On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 4:46 PM Kamil Paral <kpa...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 4:48 AM Sumantro Mukherjee <sumuk...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> Debarshi and I decided to re-write the whole thing as a changeset[0]. >> > > Great, I think this is the best approach. > > >> The revised criterion I have now stands as: >> > > Does it make sense to wait for the FESCo approval before we finalize the > exact criterion wording? I don't want to spend too much time on it in > advance, when we're not sure about the outcome :-) > > > FESCo has approved[0] this changeset and now the criterion needs to be in place. I will gather all the knowledge and the corrections that have been talked about in this thread and start a fresh one for voting? [0] https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3002 -- //sumantro Fedora QE TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED <https://redhat.com/trusted>
_______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
