On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
Again, _design_ is here orthogonal to HTML, and as web surfer providing no
citations to back up your opinion or contradict my statements, yours is pure
useless opinion. Pretty != well-designed. Pretty != usable. Pretty
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
I don't really care who's right and who's wrong, but website design is
off-topic for test@. Please take it to the websites list.
Sorry, but I didn't and don't think that insulting a design team, any
design team, like
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
On 2012/05/09 13:25 (GMT-0400) Tom H composed:
Felix Miata wrote:
4-I filed a bug (still unfixed) 19 months ago about this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638726 Like most of the web
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
kernel (hd0,6)/f17inst/vmlinuz
repo=http://mirrors.us.kernel.org/fedora/development/17/i386/os
ip=192.168.1.2 gateway=192.168.1.1 netmask=255.255.255.0 dns=192.168.1.1
rd.luks=0 rd.md=0 rd.dm=0 splash=verbose noipv6
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
On 2012/05/09 13:32 (GMT+0100) Frank Murphy composed:
Is there some reason Fedora BFO won't suit?
https://boot.fedoraproject.org/faq
Thanks (I think, separate on-topic response to follow)! I never knew it
existed.
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 08:19:46 -0400,
Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do have both enforcing=0 and selinux=0?
Because they are different. enforcing=0 will run selinux in permissive
mode, selinux=0 will disable
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 13:31:42 -0400,
Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 08:19:46 -0400,
Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
Why
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 6:55 PM, antonio montagnani
antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
how do I disable/stop the firewall in a F-17 fresh installation???
If firewalld is active, systemctl stop firewalld.service.
If iptables is active, systemctl stop iptables.service.
--
test mailing list
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 2:24 AM, antonio montagnani
antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
Ed Greshko ha scritto / said the following il giorno/on 06/05/2012 07:55:
On 05/06/2012 01:46 PM, antonio montagnani wrote:
I have 3 different F17, but only 1 fresh installation: I have installed
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, stan gr...@q.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:21:08 -0400
Tom Horsley horsley1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:26:39 +0200
Karel Volný wrote:
I hope there doesn't exist one more step before like in previous
iteration, users were bad to us, so
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Mark Zhitomirski ma...@mail.ru wrote:
I've got used to installing Fedora 15/16 via PXE by simply putting/modifying
a couple of lines in pxelinux.cfg/default like these:
LABEL Fedora16
MENU LABEL Install Fedora 16 x86-64
KERNEL fedora16x64/vmlinuz
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 20:12 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
EFI booting that DVD to update an existing Fedora 17 Beta x86_64 with
EFI boot, and requesting Do not change bootloader config, has left
my system unbootable.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
The last F17 update
Gave a grub2.cfg entry similar to:
Fedora Linux
Advanced options for Fedora Linux xxx
I have since upgrade this vm to Rawhide\F18 (7 fc18 kernels)
Thought I can click on the above entry, which is
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Rob Healey robheal...@gmail.com wrote:
Is rawhide usable once again? I am tired of getting dracut shell
Could anyone tell me if the issue causing the dracut shell has been
fixed or not yet???
I do not want to upgrade my computer if it is still worthless
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel
clydekunkel7...@verizon.net wrote:
On 04/19/2012 10:10 AM, Tom H wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Adam Williamsonawill...@redhat.com
wrote:
If grub2 isn't designed to be chainloaded in that way, it isn't. Like I
said, I believe
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Timothy Davis cpuobses...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not the recovery mode entry that bothers me, but the fact that for
all of the kernels in my boot parttion gets assigned to F17 or what
every the last distro installed. Maybe the mkconfig program isn't samrt
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
c...@omen.com wrote:
Here is the relevant /etc/exports entry in my server:
/ 192.168.1.1/255.255.255.0(rw,async)
Here is the screen capture from RC4 64 bit Xfce session:
[root@omen3 /]# mount 192.168.1.13:/ /o
mount.nfs: No such
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Timothy Davis cpuobses...@gmail.com wrote:
Once again grub2 has installed dozens (at least 20) different entries in my
boot menu. I understand that Fedora is bleeding edge and not for the feint
of heart
I accept that and have no problem tweaking anything.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Andre Robatino
robat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Andre Robatino robatino at fedoraproject.org writes:
BTW, you mentioned in another message that you thought the reason you couldn't
build the guest additions was a missing symlink in /usr/src. I never had
that
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 20:26 -0500, Tom H wrote:
[root@localhost ~]# mv /etc/ld.so.conf.d/usrmove.conf .
[root@localhost ~]# ldconfig
[root@localhost ~]# ldconfig -p | wc -l
825
[root@localhost ~]# ldconfig -p | grep
dracut-014-81.git20120202.fc17 has fixed the problem for me and for
another reporter.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 14:10 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Fedora 17 will locate the entire base operating system in /usr. The
directories
/bin, /sbin, /lib, /lib64 will only be symlinks:
/bin → /usr/bin
/sbin →
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 18:04 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 14:10 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Fedora 17 will locate the entire
[root@localhost ~]# mv /etc/ld.so.conf.d/usrmove.conf .
[root@localhost ~]# ldconfig
[root@localhost ~]# ldconfig -p | wc -l
825
[root@localhost ~]# ldconfig -p | grep usr | wc -l
11
[root@localhost ~]# mv usrmove.conf /etc/ld.so.conf.d/
[root@localhost ~]# ldconfig
[root@localhost ~]# ldconfig -p
I noticed late Sunday night that I was booting after the usrmove
procedure from a pre-usrmove kernel. When I tried to boot from a
kernel updated from the f17-usrmove repository (3.3.0-0.git4.1.fc17),
I got:
/bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open
shared object file:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed late Sunday night that I was booting after the usrmove
procedure from a pre-usrmove kernel. When I tried to boot from a
kernel updated from the f17
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed late Sunday night that I was booting after the usrmove
procedure from a pre-usrmove
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 09:26 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 10:44 -0500, Tom H wrote:
Also, the problem is in your initramfs, not the kernel itself.
Harald?
I was about to follow up. I
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/01/12 02:22, Adam Williamson wrote:
suggest we want at least:
* two or three successful tests of the yum process with an existing
Rawhide install
I have updated an Rawhide to /usr no problems.
+1
--
test
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 14:00 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 12:11 PM, John Watzke watz...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually neither image seems bootable right now (at least not through a
VM) so the matrix might
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
The following is yum distro-sync output pointing out the packages with this
issue that I have installed.
Downgrading:
ConsoleKit i686 0.4.3-5.fc17 rawhide 85
k
ConsoleKit-libs
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 12:11 PM, John Watzke watz...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually neither image seems bootable right now (at least not through a
VM) so the matrix might be overkill :-).
+1
:(
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
How do I set gfxmode=1400x900 (or 1024x768)
Looked at /etc/grub.d/00header
But am uncertain
set gfxpayload=keep in /etc/grub2.ccfg
is segfaulting out,
unless commented out.
qemu-kvm virt boxes.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:53:17 -0800
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 10:29 -0600, David Lehman wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 09:42 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:13 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:52:06 -0600, EB (Eric) wrote:
Meanwhile, feel free to file a bug report against bash-completion that
it is not doing the right smart completions on firefox. After all,
bash-completion is an
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Joachim Backes
joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote:
I opened a BZ (682785) concerning the described problems, and it was
rejected as no bug (obviously the completion works not independent
from the leading command, for example if the cmd is firefox, as in my
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Tom Horsley horsley1...@gmail.com wrote:
The comment in /boot/grub2/grub.cfg says it was generated
by grub2-mkconfig, but if you run grub2-mkconfig, you
get a file radically different than the one just created
by (for instance) installing a new kernel.
Could
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Tom Horsley horsley1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:28:45 -0400 Tom H wrote:
Anaconda seems to run grub2-mkconfig, whereas new kernels run grubby -
and they have different menu entry formats.
And does grubby pay attention to changes made in /etc
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
$ cat /etc/grub.d/41_custom
#!/bin/sh
cat EOF
if [ -f \$prefix/custom.cfg ]; then
source \$prefix/custom.cfg;
fi
EOF
If I didn't want to append stuff to that file, what might
$prefix expand to? Very likely
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
So, more symlink madness. /etc/grub2.cfg - /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
and it doesn't even work flawlessly:
This is like the grub1 /etc/grub.conf symlink; faster access to the
grub configuration and grub configuration
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 16:40 -0400, Tom H wrote:
I use vi /etc/grub2.cfg, which is perfectly reasonable and useful,
and is the same as using vi /etc/grub.conf previously.
except that there's a big header saying:
# DO
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Rob Healey robheal...@gmail.com wrote:
First of all, thank you for whatever information/ help that anyone can give
to me!
I would like to know before I crash and dump my system, I know there were
some problems with this before?
I would like to install Ubuntu
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Peter Gueckel pguec...@gmail.com wrote:
Why does the grub2 menu entry list Fedora like this:
Linux, with Linux 3.1.0-0.rc6.git0.3.fc16.x86_64?
Instead of like this:
Fedora 16, with Linux 3.1.0-0.rc6.git0.3.fc16.x86_64?
If you set GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR=Fedora in
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel
clydekunkel7...@cox.net wrote:
How do we prevent os-prober from looking for installed distros other
that the one currently booted when we do:
grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
Add GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=true to /etc/default/grub before
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel
clydekunkel7...@cox.net wrote:
On 09/08/2011 06:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 17:28 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 09/08/2011 01:57 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
Who's ready for some pre-betaTC2 installer testing fun?
I built a
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Joachim Backes
joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote:
After having updated to grub2-1.99-1.fc16.x86_64, grub2 refuses to boot
(file not found). Getting rid from this by re-installing the bootloader to
/dev/sda.
Anybody has the same issue?
Yes. Just happened to
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:07 AM, David Lehman dleh...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 07:39 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 08/26/2011 10:01 PM, David Lehman wrote:
We added code to automatically generate entries using os-prober, but
apparently os-prober is not available if you
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey, folks. I just threw together a quick draft of an 'install alongside
Windows' test case - we have this as a final criterion, but no test case
for it as of yet. Here's the draft:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 10:10 -0400, Tom H wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey, folks. I just threw together a quick draft of an 'install alongside
Windows' test case
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
On 08/30/2011 02:56 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
As we're getting ready for the F16 Beta TC1, we need some karma to get
required updates into stable.
Anyone know how to create a bootloader stage1 target device via kickstart?
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:47:15 -0400, TH (Tom) wrote:
# grub2-install --grub-setup=/bin/true '(hd0,3)'
Installation finished. No error reported.
AFAIK, this won't be bootable, unless grub-install has run
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:12:13PM -0400, Tom H wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
I now have my own, very small page, which is Fedora centric at
present...
http
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 07:50:39 -0400, TH (Tom) wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:47:15 -0400, TH (Tom) wrote:
# grub2-install --grub-setup=/bin/true '(hd0,3)'
Installation finished. No error reported.
AFAIK,
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 21:27 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 07:05:55PM -0600, Peter G. wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
did you run 'update_grub'?
no I didn't. first I heard of it. that might
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Andre Robatino
robat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Tom H tomh0665 at gmail.com writes:
That must be the result of grubby duplicating a menuentry stanza when
a new kernel's installed because the stanzas have echo ...
statements that are probably not being updated
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:47:18PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
In my defence, I don't run Ubuntu or anything evil like that. I just
cargo-cult things I vaguely remember from Google searches. That's much
better, right?
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:18:56 +0200, me wrote:
Doesn't work for me.
# grub2-install --grub-setup=/bin/true /dev/sda3
Installation finished. No error reported.
# grub2-install --grub-setup=/bin/true '(hd0,3)'
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Mike Chambers m...@miketc.net wrote:
Up until F16 (and it *might* have done it once during the early alpha
testing stages), windows has been detected and included in grub during
install. But the last few installs haven't included it and not included
on my
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 09:33:59AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:47:18PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
In my defence, I don't
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
On 08/24/2011 04:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
The fact that GRUB 2 by default won't install to a partition, and will
only do it if you use --force, is known. It's why anaconda can't install
the bootloader to a
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Petrus de Calguarium
pguec...@gmail.com wrote:
Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
As far as I know, everything is relative to /boot. No change from old
grub.
In the old grub, you had to explicitly state /boot.
In the old grub.conf it even states:
all kernel and
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
On 08/25/2011 04:11 AM, Tom H wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Orion Poplawskior...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
Is there a way to workaround this in a kickstart file (other than running
grub2-install --force (hd0,0
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Petrus de Calguarium
pguec...@gmail.com wrote:
Tom H wrote:
In the old grub, you had to explicitly state /boot.
In the old grub.conf it even states:
all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /
That means everything is relative to root (/), not /boot
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Petrus de Calguarium
pguec...@gmail.com wrote:
Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
I have installed F16α and with it grub2 to the MBR of /dev/sda. I am
experimenting happily with F16, but I am unable to add F15 to the
grub2 boot menu.
I have edited
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Andy Lawrence dr.die...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote:
On 08/23/2011 06:49 PM, Andy Lawrence wrote:
According to this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Grub2
grub2 is used by default with F16, so
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:19 PM, cornel panceac cpanc...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/8/19 cornel panceac cpanc...@gmail.com
anybody knows how to add more operating systems to grub2 , in fedora 16?
never mind, i've added the answer to:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Grub2
You have to set
The installation of grub2 fails, even Anaconda reports it as having
succeeded, and you end up at an unusable (AFAIK because only the two
disks are detected, the partitions and the array aren't detected)
grub rescue prompt when you reboot.
Bug filed:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Chris Lumens clum...@redhat.com wrote:
Are there any new grub2-related kickstart settings for the bootloader
line in kickstart?
No, there have been no changes to the bootloader command for grub2.
Should there be?
Using vga=... throws up a warning at boot
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Chris Lumens clum...@redhat.com wrote:
OT for this thread but for the record regarding kickstart
documentation: the part biosboot --fstype=biosboot --size=1
kickstart entry to create a bios_grub partition on a GPT disk isn't
yet documented on the kickstart
2011/8/17 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:
On 08/16/2011 11:25 PM, Tom H wrote:
Are there any new grub2-related kickstart settings for the bootloader
line in kickstart?
VGA= is not a kickstart setting it's an kernel command line parameter and
with grub2 you need to use set
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Michal Jaegermann mic...@harddata.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 05:48:51AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
VGA= is not a kickstart setting it's an kernel command line parameter
and with grub2 you need to use set gfxpayload=$your-desired-resolution
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
Karel Volný wrote:
- last time I checked, the website with the docs was down, and it
lasted for at least a week, then I gave up (maybe it is online
now?)
http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/
I suspect that
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
No small problem with Grub2 is that few but Grub devs know how to configure
it. Grub2 documentation is among the worst of the bad, virtually
non-existent, particularly in a form those who need it most can comprehend,
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Tom Horsley horsley1...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed to my horror in another thread today that
fedora 16 is going to switch to grub2.
I hope it is packaged and updated totally differently
from the version in ubuntu, because the ubuntu
version is a nightmare.
Are there any new grub2-related kickstart settings for the bootloader
line in kickstart?
For example, I installed F16 through kickstart yesterday with
vga=794, which adds it to the linux ... line. I get correct
resolution but I also get a boot message that using vga=... is
deprecated and that
75 matches
Mail list logo
