On Thu Mar 16 2017 18:21:26 GMT-0600 (MDT) GERHARD GOETZHABER
wrote:
> since KDE has become nothing more than a tragedy
That's an unfair statement to KDE maintainers who do put a lot of effort
and have provided the open source community with awesome software. The
least
On Sat Mar 18 2017 16:05:39 GMT-0600 (MDT) GERHARD GOETZHABER
wrote:
> Though I'd like to know what was wrong before ...
Apparently no one else has run into similar issue so that'd be hard to
troubleshoot. It's also pointless, given that the new install is working
fine.
On Thu Mar 16 2017 19:21:04 GMT-0600 (MDT) GERHARD GOETZHABER
wrote:
> However, even disabling SElinux followed by reboot didn't help ...
Sorry I missed this in my previous reply...as a general rule you don't
want to disable SELinux, rather turn on permissive mode, or if
On Thu Mar 16 2017 19:21:04 GMT-0600 (MDT) GERHARD GOETZHABER
wrote:
> I got the following SElinux alert:
>
> SELinux is preventing (ostnamed) from mounton access on the file
> /proc/mtrr.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411360
--
Viorel
On Sat Feb 25 2017 21:20:27 GMT-0700 (MST) Bowen Wang
wrote:
> Also when I try to open the network manager, I found I can't open it.
> I can see it in the application menu, but when I tried to open it, it
> is just cannot be opened.
Do 'nmcli device show' and 'ip
On Sat Feb 25 2017 10:22:17 GMT-0700 (MST) Bowen Wang
wrote:
> ping www.google.com the terminal says that the service is unknown.
The message indicates that your network is "down". Since the other
kernel works I would suspect the network driver for your wireless or
On Mon Feb 20 2017 10:16:42 GMT-0700 (MST) Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 17:46 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> The person, who added this prerequisite, should leave Fedora,
>> IMNSHO.
>
> This kind of tone is unacceptable and a clear violation
On Sun Feb 19 2017 11:23:24 GMT-0700 (MST) stan
wrote:
> I ran a dnf --best update and there are 317 errors, and dnf skips
> everything. :-)
[...]
> I suppose I'll be forced to --allowerasing if I want to do a dnf
> update. Or force install the dnf
On Sun Feb 19 2017 09:50:24 GMT-0700 (MST) stan
wrote:
> Not here. I tried all kinds of variations of the above, and I keep
> getting errors.
I prefer to keep the Koji URL as a visual clue in dnf history:
[root@omiday ~]# dnf history dnf
Last metadata
On Fri Feb 17 2017 22:43:55 GMT-0700 (MST) Russel Winder
wrote:
> [root@anglides ~]# dnf list kernel ArgumentError: argument
> --obsoletes: conflicting option string: -- obsoletes [root@anglides
> ~]#
>
> This has been happening for a while now. Given that dnf is so
On Wed Jan 18 2017 05:45:17 GMT-0700 (MST) Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> Since you're running F25, the appropriate forum is the Users list, not the
> Test list.
I'm not looking for user support, rather I want to confirm a bug [1].
> The Test list is for unreleased
Hello,
The first issue has to do with 'man' tab completion not working when 'Lmod'
package is installed. To debug I enabled expansion in the interactive shell on
two systems -- a working one shown below as 'mha' and the broken one ('pc96'),
both running F25 up to date:
set -x
followed
I hit this when connecting to a VNC session via SSH port forwarding:
Dec 03 18:25:54 omiday.can.local audit[2665]: AVC avc: denied { name_connect
} for pid=2665 comm="sshd" dest=5901
scontext=system_u:system_r:sshd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
tcontext=system_u:object_r:vnc_port_t:s0 tclass=tcp_socket
This occurred to me while I was upgrading using the CLI instructions [1] and
got prompted with:
[SKIPPED] sudo-1.8.18p1-1.fc25.i686.rpm: Already downloaded
[SKIPPED] the_silver_searcher-0.33.0-1.fc25.i686.rpm: Already downloaded
[SKIPPED] tzdata-2016i-1.fc25.noarch.rpm: Already
On Sun Oct 09 2016 03:53:51 GMT-0600 (MDT) GERHARD GOETZHABER
wrote:
> Hi, fellas!
>
> I can't do but immediately report this success:
> The boot process now not only goes without any failure note but even faster
> than ever before, and so far I can see up to the first
On Fri Sep 30 2016 23:55:37 GMT-0600 (MDT) Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Hmm, sorry? Results step 1 is:
>
> "The USB stick should be wiped before being written with the image"
>
> are you saying that didn't happen when you tried with a non-live image?
> What did happen?
On Fri Sep 30 2016 13:58:51 GMT-0600 (MDT) Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Test case: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_USB_fmw
Done with two bonus bananas [1]:
1. A cosmetic glitch [2]. To replicate, reinsert the USB key while FMW is open.
2. Expected Results #1
On Fri Sep 30 2016 10:39:07 GMT-0600 (MDT) Chris Murphy
> OK but what is the bug ID?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371661
--
Viorel
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Thu Sep 22 2016 14:50:43 GMT-0600 (MDT) Matthew Miller
wrote:
> We probably _can_ -- the data is there. Just need to find a way to
> show it that brings out that answer. Maybe instead of counting number
> of reports, count number of packages with reports each day and
On Mon Aug 15 2016 18:31:21 GMT-0600 (MDT) Adam Williamson
wrote:
> 1. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-97debec731
>sssd-1.14.0-5.fc25 | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366403
>
> This one has just landed. It should fix an issue
On Mon Aug 08 2016 18:45:48 GMT-0600 (MDT) Adam Williamson
wrote:
> * Create a [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/createaccount.cgi Bugzilla Account]
> (ideally using the same address as the one associated with your FAS account)
Hi Adam, I'd remove "ideally" as it
On Fri Aug 05 2016 16:08:49 GMT-0600 (MDT) Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Still, we could probably clarify the join process in any case.
What's the purpose of phone number in FAS? It's a piece of personal information
spammers will never reveal.
--
Viorel
--
test mailing
On Sun Jun 12 2016 00:57:08 GMT-0600 (MDT) Russel Winder
wrote:
> Setting
>
> SELINUX=permissive
>
> in /etc/selinux/config allows GDM to start on my Lenovo X1.
>
> This allows for UI-based use but clearly at the expense of SELinux.
What happens if you enable it after
On Fri May 20 2016 21:32:33 GMT-0600 (MDT) Samuel Sieb wrote:
> You don't need to enter all that. Just check the radio buttons at the bottom
> right and put a short comment about whether or not it works for you. If it
> doesn't, also put a short explanation of why not.
On Thu May 19 2016 15:48:44 GMT-0600 (MDT) Adam Williamson
wrote:
> 6. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330766 - realmd - MODIFIED
>[abrt] realmd: g_cancellable_is_cancelled(): realmd killed by SIGSEGV
>
> This is an issue in FreeIPA client enrolment
On Fri May 20 2016 15:02:17 GMT-0600 (MDT) Adam Williamson
wrote:
> I don't use virt-install, but we've done many kickstart installs of F24
> both manually and in openQA and they work fine.
"No space left on device" may hint to wrong partitioning or disk allocation.
On Mon May 02 2016 15:07:41 GMT-0600 (MDT) Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Which page?
Hi Adam, this is the page I was referring to:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA#Communicate
QA project meetings are held Mondays at 16.00 UTC in the fedora meeting
channel on
On Sat Apr 23 2016 22:48:19 GMT-0600 (MDT) John Dulaney
wrote:
> We also have weekly IRC meetings at 11 AM Eastern (both DST and not DST) in
> #fedora-meeting.
The QA wiki page reads 16:00 UTC. If it needs an update I can do that.
--
Viorel
--
test mailing list
Hello all,
I'm fairly new to Fedora as a community, having joined CommOps about three
months ago where I mostly helped with wiki gardening and scratched a bit the
Fedocal surface. Recently I decided to try my hand at a ticket that involves
Python development which is the area I'd like to
On Fri Apr 29 2016 11:05:47 GMT-0600 (MDT) Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 09:49 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> As I understand it, permissive should allow all operations but give
>> warnings while disabled means, well, disabled. However, I've seen
>>
On Tue Apr 05 2016 00:44:40 GMT-0600 (MDT) Adam Williamson
wrote:
> To be precise - since navigating Bugzilla can be tricky the first time!
> - select Fedora as the 'classification' and the 'product', then
> seamonkey as the component (if you just type 'seamonkey'
Hello,
I'm a new contributor to Fedora and this is my first time helping out with
testing so I'm not sure where to report, in what format and everything else
that is explained in the QA documentation pages that I haven't read yet.
I upgraded from F23 and as per subject line Seamonkey segfaults
32 matches
Mail list logo