Hi
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
It's a wiki ;) Please, do fix problems if you see 'em. I'll try and take a
look, but it's totally fine to just go ahead and fix up pages for errors /
out-of-dateness.
I have added a note on using yum-config-manager to enable the
On 07/02/13 11:25 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
mailto:awill...@redhat.com wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/__wiki/QA:Update_feedback___guidelines
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Update_feedback_guidelines .
Hi
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.comwrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/**wiki/QA:Update_feedback_**guidelineshttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Update_feedback_guidelines.
Ideally, bodhi should link to this
It does. It's the first link under 'Welcome
Hi
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
For those who applied to the proven tester and/or BugZappers groups and
are wondering what this thread means - we still want your contributions!
Those who are interested in the proven tester process, please just go
ahead and test
On 02/06/2013 04:02 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
For those interested in the BugZappers group - it'd be great if someone
was interested in resurrecting the triage work, and if you are but
you're not sure how to get started, please get in touch with me and we
can kick some ideas around. But
On 06/02/13 01:42 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 02/06/2013 04:02 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
For those interested in the BugZappers group - it'd be great if someone
was interested in resurrecting the triage work, and if you are but
you're not sure how to get started, please get in touch
On 06/02/13 09:43 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
For those who applied to the proven tester and/or BugZappers groups and
are wondering what this thread means - we still want your contributions!
Those who are interested in the
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 17:35 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, folks. So I drafted up the proposed 'onboarding' changes. For now I
didn't include the idea of adding people to the 'qa' FAS group: it
seemed easier to get this done first, then we can do that after if we
want to. Here are the
