Yet several times after F20 alpha live installs I've had to go manually turn
on the wired network, and the Connect Automatically option was unchecked.
I suppose it could be a transient or imaginary problem. If I get something
consistent I'll file a bug against network manager.
I haven't seen
John Morris jmorris at beau.org writes:
Screen space is valuable so removing an icon that is 'always' there and
isn't typically displaying useful information is sensible enough.
Possibly a dumb question, but doesn't space have to always be available for
the icon, whether it's displayed always
On Oct 9, 2013, at 2:37 AM, Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote:
Yet several times after F20 alpha live installs I've had to go manually turn
on the wired network, and the Connect Automatically option was unchecked.
I suppose it could be a transient or imaginary problem. If I get something
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 11:46 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
John Morris jmorris at beau.org writes:
Screen space is valuable so removing an icon that is 'always' there and
isn't typically displaying useful information is sensible enough.
Possibly a dumb question, but doesn't space have to
On Oct 9, 2013, at 5:23 PM, John Morris jmor...@beau.org wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 11:46 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
John Morris jmorris at beau.org writes:
Screen space is valuable so removing an icon that is 'always' there and
isn't typically displaying useful information is sensible
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708966 is the upstream bug
... if you have anything useful (i.e no flamebait) to add ad it there.
Provided. Thanks.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 09:04 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
A wired state icon in the menu bar is not needed if it's available upon
making a physical connection, by default, for all users. For Gnome 3.8, I
regularly encountered no network connection upon successful install, despite
a working
On Oct 7, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 09:04 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
A wired state icon in the menu bar is not needed if it's available upon
making a physical connection, by default, for all users. For Gnome 3.8, I
regularly
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 13:41 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Oct 7, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 09:04 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
A wired state icon in the menu bar is not needed if it's available upon
making a physical connection, by
On 04.10.2013 07:54, moshe nahmias wrote:
I think that it must be possible to make the icon visible as an
option. I use a cellular modem on my laptop and the easiest way to
connect with it to the net is by clicking that icon...
I guess that it's possible to connect from other places, but it
On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 07:54 +0200, moshe nahmias wrote:
I think that it must be possible to make the icon visible as an
option. I use a cellular modem on my laptop and the easiest way to
connect with it to the net is by clicking that icon...
I guess that it's possible to connect from other
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 01:54:17PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 07:54 +0200, moshe nahmias wrote:
I think that it must be possible to make the icon visible as an
option. I use a cellular modem on my laptop and the easiest way to
connect with it to the net is by
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 01:54:17PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 07:54 +0200, moshe nahmias wrote:
I think that it must be possible to make the icon visible as an
option. I use a cellular modem on my
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 03:17:03PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 01:54:17PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 07:54 +0200, moshe nahmias wrote:
I think that it must be possible to make the
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 07:54:54AM +0200, moshe nahmias wrote:
I think that it must be possible to make the icon visible as an option. I
This seems like a very useful place for a Gnome Shell Extension.
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ mat...@fedoraproject.org
--
test
On 04.10.2013 16:38, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 07:54:54AM +0200, moshe nahmias wrote:
I think that it must be possible to make the icon visible as an option. I
This seems like a very useful place for a Gnome Shell Extension.
Or rather a gsettings option accessible via
On Oct 3, 2013, at 11:48 PM, John Morris jmor...@beau.org wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 20:59 +0200, drago01 wrote:
You should get an icon indicating failure just no success one. Which
is even very unixy ;)
Well GNU is Not Unix and these days Fedora isn't even following that
star. How
Hi,
Running Gnome 3.10 in a virtual machine, I notice that the networking UI
in the system status area is missing (happens both in classic mode as
well as standard mode). This happens both with a continuously updated
rawhide installation as well as with the latest F20 nightly. Anyone else
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 14:03 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
Running Gnome 3.10 in a virtual machine, I notice that the networking UI
in the system status area is missing (happens both in classic mode as
well as standard mode). This happens both with a continuously updated
rawhide
On 03.10.2013 14:29, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 14:03 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
Running Gnome 3.10 in a virtual machine, I notice that the networking UI
in the system status area is missing (happens both in classic mode as
well as standard mode). This happens both with a
Well, a statically configured network interface might be expected to
just work.
With dynamic configuration, there must be successful contact with a DHCP
server, and the server must be willing to assign an IP address and
possibly provide other information (gateway, nameserver, host name) to
the
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 14:31 -0400, Richard Ryniker wrote:
Well, a statically configured network interface might be expected to
just work.
With dynamic configuration, there must be successful contact with a DHCP
server, and the server must be willing to assign an IP address and
possibly
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Richard Ryniker ryni...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
Well, a statically configured network interface might be expected to
just work.
With dynamic configuration, there must be successful contact with a DHCP
server, and the server must be willing to assign an IP address
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 20:59 +0200, drago01 wrote:
You should get an icon indicating failure just no success one. Which
is even very unixy ;)
Well GNU is Not Unix and these days Fedora isn't even following that
star. How does Apple do it?
Screen space is valuable so removing an icon that is
I think that it must be possible to make the icon visible as an option. I
use a cellular modem on my laptop and the easiest way to connect with it to
the net is by clicking that icon...
I guess that it's possible to connect from other places, but it won't be as
easy.
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:48
25 matches
Mail list logo
