Regarding bug in the on screen keyboard

Hi, I have tested the on screen keyboard of Fedora 28 and I a found a bug in that, I have visited to the Red Hat Bugzilla but didn't found any section for the keyboard where I can file it. Any suggestions? -- Regards, Abdul Rehman Quadri ___ test

Re: GNOME 3.30.0 megaupdate

On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 10:27:06AM +1200, Gavin Flower wrote: > On 06/09/2018 04:45, Parag Nemade wrote: > > > > > >On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:49 PM, Stephen Gallagher > >mailto:sgall...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > > > > >On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:12 AM Kalev Lember > >

Fedora Rawhide-20180904.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 31/132 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180903.n.0): ID: 274863 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/274863 ID: 274919 Test: i386

Re: GNOME 3.30.0 megaupdate

On 06/09/2018 04:45, Parag Nemade wrote: On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:49 PM, Stephen Gallagher > wrote: On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:12 AM Kalev Lember mailto:kalevlem...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi all, As many of you know, I've been gone half the

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180904.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180903.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180904.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 18 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 74 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 9.06 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

To join Fedora testing and quality assurance

Hi, I am currently testing on Screen keyboard of Fedora using OpenQA and I found a bug which I would like to discuss on the list. So request to join me in the list. -- Regards, Abdul Rehman Quadri ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: GNOME 3.30.0 megaupdate

On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 11:19 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:12 AM Kalev Lember wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > As many of you know, I've been gone half the summer. I'm back now since > > Monday though and just in time for GNOME 3.30.0 :) > > > > We are quite a bit

Re: GNOME 3.30.0 megaupdate

On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 22:15 +0530, Parag Nemade wrote: > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:49 PM, Stephen Gallagher > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:12 AM Kalev Lember > > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > As many of you know, I've been gone half the summer. I'm back now since > > >

Re: GNOME 3.30.0 megaupdate

On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:49 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:12 AM Kalev Lember > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> As many of you know, I've been gone half the summer. I'm back now since >> Monday though and just in time for GNOME 3.30.0 :) >> >> We are quite a bit behind

Re: GNOME 3.30.0 megaupdate

>> As many of you know, I've been gone half the summer. I'm back now since >> Monday though and just in time for GNOME 3.30.0 :) >> >> We are quite a bit behind with the builds, like half of GNOME is still >> at 3.28.x or at various stages of 3.29.x snapshots, so there's quite a >> bit of catching

Re: GNOME 3.30.0 megaupdate

On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 16:19, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I'd be *strongly* disinclined to give a Freeze Exception for a GNOME > mega-update. So you'd rather we ship GA with early pre-release builds of GNOME that have had little-to-no testing? From a downstream point of view I'm not going to fix

Re: GNOME 3.30.0 megaupdate

On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:12 AM Kalev Lember wrote: > Hi all, > > As many of you know, I've been gone half the summer. I'm back now since > Monday though and just in time for GNOME 3.30.0 :) > > We are quite a bit behind with the builds, like half of GNOME is still > at 3.28.x or at various