Fedora-Rawhide-20210330.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 6/189 (x86_64), 17/127 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210329.n.0): ID: 837333 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL:

Fedora-34-20210330.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 5/178 (x86_64), 40/127 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210329.n.0): ID: 837005 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/837005 ID: 837031

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210330.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210329.0): ID: 836923 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210330.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210329.0): ID: 836946 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_system_logging@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/836946 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7

Re: gdm question

On 3/29/21 10:01 AM, David wrote: In my install of Rawhide, gdm has a flat black background, but in Fedora 34 Beta, it is a blue background that is different shades of blue across the screen, sort of fading from one spot to another. Just curious if this is intentional. Most likely. There is

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210330.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210329.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210330.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 9 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:4 Upgraded packages: 131 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 3.80 MiB Size of dropped packages

Post-mortem: Preventing broken updates from being pushed out?

Dear all, Following up on a broken update that got pushed: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d42d8643e4 (I'm not naming the package here, as my goal with this discussion is not to assign blame but to figure out if we can prevent similar issues from reoccuring) Event timeline:

Fedora 34 compose report: 20210330.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-34-20210329.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210330.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 21 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 63 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 7.88 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: [Proposal] The dual head set-up criterion

Lukas Ruzicka composed on 2021-03-30 13:22 (UTC+0200): > *On computers with dual video cards (or with external video output) the > system must be able to display the video content on each connected device. Above to me is rather ambiguous. Laptops generally have one external output only.

Self introduction Alisina

Hi My Name is Alisina Bolourchi, I am an Outreachy applicant. I am a Code Your Future graduate I have Experience In JavaScript and React I am willing to contribute to the Fedora QA project. I am a bit lost I have already done the following: - Subscribe to the test

Re: [Proposal] The dual head set-up criterion

Hi Lukas, *On computers with dual video cards (or with external video output), as > well as with multiple video cards* > In regard to the above, I think what you intend to say is: "On computers with video-out capability, as well as with multiple video cards...", or something like that. As it

Self-Introduction: Linda Okorie

Hello everyone, I'm very happy to join the team! I've wanted to contribute to open source for a while and I'm glad I can now. My name is Linda Okorie. I live in Lagos, Nigeria. I have experience with JavaScript and React. I'm studying a lot more on JavaScript internals and Java as well. I'm

Re: newbie question about the Branched version

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:56 AM David wrote: > > Does anything exciting happen during that time ? > Hello, Ben has already answered the organisational stuff, but if you have asked because you wanted to know how safe it is to use the Beta version, my reply would be that it is generally safe

Re: [Proposal] The dual head set-up criterion

Thanks for your view. On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 3:45 PM Richard Ryniker wrote: > > desktops to work with multiple displays on erery architecture. It is > desirable, yes, but this sounds like a QA attempt to control development. > No, this is not a QA attempt to control development. This is a

Re: [Proposal] The dual head set-up criterion

Should multiple displays be a release-blocking criterion? I can imagine a desire to ship a new release on-schedule because of significant, content that works fine, but with multiple display support deferred for an update because upstream problems are likely to take a while to fix. I am

Re: Outreachy Applicant Contribution to Improve Fedora QA Dashboard

Hi Manisha, thanks for showing interest in our project, I already saw your pull request and contacted Frantisek regarding the API changes. L. On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:07 AM Manisha Kanyal wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I'm Manisha Kanyal, a Computer Science & Engineering student and an >

[Proposal] The dual head set-up criterion

Hello friends of Fedora, I would like to propose a new release covering criterion that was suggested on the yesterday's Blocker Review Meeting. Please let me know, what you think about it and perhaps suggest improvements. Target: *Preferably Beta* *Proposal 1 (conservative criterion)* *On

Outreachy Applicant Contribution to Improve Fedora QA Dashboard

Hi Everyone, I'm Manisha Kanyal, a Computer Science & Engineering student and an Outreachy 2021 applicant. I'm looking to contribute to the project "Improve Fedora QA Dashboard". I've forked the repo, cloned, and started making changes locally to get an understanding of how things are going