# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2023-03-20
# Time: **15:00** UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again! Let's pat ourselves on the back for Fedora 38
Beta and look forward to
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2023-03-20
# Time: **15:00** UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again! Let's pat ourselves on the back for Fedora 38
Beta and look forward to
# F37 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2023-03-20
# Time: **16:00** UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
Hi folks! We have 5 proposed Final blockers to review, so let's have a
review meeting.
Remember that clocks went forward in North America last weekend, so
the meeting time
The current target is the early target date (18 April).
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. fcoe-utils — anaconda failed to detect the fcoe target(only affects
ixgbe) — NEW
ACTION: Maintainer to diagnose issue
NEEDINFO: cleech
2. gnome-calendar — After a
On Fri, 2023-03-17 at 09:43 -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023, at 6:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 16:30 -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> > > Hi Fedora test team,
> > >
> > > Testing F38 on the X1C11 our QA team noted that the notification on a
> > >
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023, at 6:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 16:30 -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
>> Hi Fedora test team,
>>
>> Testing F38 on the X1C11 our QA team noted that the notification on a
>> screenshot is not being displayed.
>>
>> I confirmed this - and note the
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 5:48 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> The desktop environment must work correctly when displaying common
> application content - that includes regular application windows, video
> output, games and possibly other common content. Regular operations like
> windows
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 5:48 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> Related to a recently proposed blocker [1][2], I propose a new release
> criterion which would cover such cases. Here it is:
>
>
> The desktop environment must work correctly when displaying common
> application content - that
Related to a recently proposed blocker [1][2], I propose a new release
criterion which would cover such cases. Here it is:
The desktop environment must work correctly when displaying common
application content - that includes regular application windows, video
output, games and
