Re: [Proposal] The dual head set-up criterion

2021-04-06 Thread Kamil Paral
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 9:17 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 7:27 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > > > > I would like to propose a new release covering criterion that was > suggested on the yesterday's Blocker Review Meeting. Please let me know, > what you think about it and perhaps

Re: [Proposal] The dual head set-up criterion

2021-04-03 Thread Lukas Ruzicka
Well, I agree that the terminology might not be the most exact, but I was not expecting that this version will be taken as is, I rather wanted to start a discussion. Since this one has been the only proposal that appeared on the list, I think I did a good thing to start it no matter what confusion

Re: [Proposal] The dual head set-up criterion

2021-04-02 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2021-04-01 at 23:36 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 1:12 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 7:27 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > > > > > > I would like to propose a new release covering criterion that was > > > suggested on the yesterday's Blocker

Re: [Proposal] The dual head set-up criterion

2021-04-01 Thread Chris Murphy
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 1:12 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 7:27 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > > > > I would like to propose a new release covering criterion that was suggested > > on the yesterday's Blocker Review Meeting. Please let me know, what you > > think about it and

Re: [Proposal] The dual head set-up criterion

2021-04-01 Thread Ben Cotton
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 7:27 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > > I would like to propose a new release covering criterion that was suggested > on the yesterday's Blocker Review Meeting. Please let me know, what you think > about it and perhaps suggest improvements. > I like the idea of dual monitors

Re: [Proposal] The dual head set-up criterion

2021-03-31 Thread Kamil Paral
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 1:27 PM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > Hello friends of Fedora, > > I would like to propose a new release covering criterion that was > suggested on the yesterday's Blocker Review Meeting. Please let me know, > what you think about it and perhaps suggest improvements. > > Target:

Re: [Proposal] The dual head set-up criterion

2021-03-30 Thread Felix Miata
Lukas Ruzicka composed on 2021-03-30 13:22 (UTC+0200): > *On computers with dual video cards (or with external video output) the > system must be able to display the video content on each connected device. Above to me is rather ambiguous. Laptops generally have one external output only.

Re: [Proposal] The dual head set-up criterion

2021-03-30 Thread Geoffrey Marr
Hi Lukas, *On computers with dual video cards (or with external video output), as > well as with multiple video cards* > In regard to the above, I think what you intend to say is: "On computers with video-out capability, as well as with multiple video cards...", or something like that. As it

Re: [Proposal] The dual head set-up criterion

2021-03-30 Thread Lukas Ruzicka
Thanks for your view. On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 3:45 PM Richard Ryniker wrote: > > desktops to work with multiple displays on erery architecture. It is > desirable, yes, but this sounds like a QA attempt to control development. > No, this is not a QA attempt to control development. This is a

Re: [Proposal] The dual head set-up criterion

2021-03-30 Thread Richard Ryniker
Should multiple displays be a release-blocking criterion? I can imagine a desire to ship a new release on-schedule because of significant, content that works fine, but with multiple display support deferred for an update because upstream problems are likely to take a while to fix. I am

[Proposal] The dual head set-up criterion

2021-03-30 Thread Lukas Ruzicka
Hello friends of Fedora, I would like to propose a new release covering criterion that was suggested on the yesterday's Blocker Review Meeting. Please let me know, what you think about it and perhaps suggest improvements. Target: *Preferably Beta* *Proposal 1 (conservative criterion)* *On