Re: freeze exceptions for FTI bugs

2023-09-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2023-09-05 at 09:27 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 08:21:18AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > updates-testing is not enabled by default for the upgrade. > > > > The upgrade process uses whatever repos are enabled *in the current > > configuration*. So in the

Re: freeze exceptions for FTI bugs

2023-09-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2023-09-05 at 18:03 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 5:22 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > updates-testing is not enabled by default for the upgrade. > > > > The upgrade process uses whatever repos are enabled *in the current > > configuration*. So in the "typical"

Re: freeze exceptions for FTI bugs

2023-09-05 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 08:21:18AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > updates-testing is not enabled by default for the upgrade. > > The upgrade process uses whatever repos are enabled *in the current > configuration*. So in the "typical" case, you are upgrading from a > stable Fedora release

Re: freeze exceptions for FTI bugs

2023-09-05 Thread Kamil Paral
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 5:22 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > updates-testing is not enabled by default for the upgrade. > > The upgrade process uses whatever repos are enabled *in the current > configuration*. So in the "typical" case, you are upgrading from a > stable Fedora release with default

Re: freeze exceptions for FTI bugs

2023-09-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2023-09-05 at 12:30 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > Lately we've seen a surge of FTI (fails to install) bugs being proposed as > freeze exceptions [1] [2]. We generally grant them, because we want the > base repo to be in a consistent and buildable state. However, I wonder, > isn't this

Re: freeze exceptions for FTI bugs

2023-09-05 Thread Kamil Paral
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 2:05 PM Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > The added work for a FE seems pretty minimal to me (3 people write +1, I > push it to the accepted FE in about a minute), not sure if the releng > perspective is different here though? > I see it a bit differently. Even when just

Re: freeze exceptions for FTI bugs

2023-09-05 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 12:31 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > Lately we've seen a surge of FTI (fails to install) bugs being proposed as > freeze exceptions [1] [2]. We generally grant them, because we want the > base repo to be in a consistent and buildable state. However, I wonder, > isn't this

freeze exceptions for FTI bugs

2023-09-05 Thread Kamil Paral
Lately we've seen a surge of FTI (fails to install) bugs being proposed as freeze exceptions [1] [2]. We generally grant them, because we want the base repo to be in a consistent and buildable state. However, I wonder, isn't this approach mostly relevant for the Final release? Does it make sense