[ Michael Greene ]
I would also like this, although I'm not sure it's necessary for 0.1.
As long as the tarball is correct for 0.1, I would think we could
still package it for the various distributions after-the-fact.
I'm not sure if the differences between Esteve and Todd's work have
been
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Kevin Clark kevin.cl...@gmail.com wrote:
No ivy:settings found for the default reference 'ivy.instance'. A
default instance will be used
no settings file found, using default...
[ivy:retrieve] :: Ivy 2.0.0-rc2 - 20081028224207 ::
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ ::
It was checked in:
http://gitweb.thrift-rpc.org/?p=thrift.git;a=commitdiff;h=f08c0a3
Todd Lipcon wrote:
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Kevin Clark kevin.cl...@gmail.com wrote:
No ivy:settings found for the default reference 'ivy.instance'. A
default instance will be used
no settings file
Oh, but it wasn't added to EXTRA_DIST, so it isn't in the tarball.
Will fix.
David Reiss wrote:
It was checked in:
http://gitweb.thrift-rpc.org/?p=thrift.git;a=commitdiff;h=f08c0a3
Todd Lipcon wrote:
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Kevin Clark kevin.cl...@gmail.com wrote:
No ivy:settings
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:17 AM, David Reiss dre...@facebook.com wrote:
Oh, but it wasn't added to EXTRA_DIST, so it isn't in the tarball.
Will fix.
I *didn't* tag the RC since you were bundling it up. Should we tag it
before we merge in changes from trunk?
--
Kevin Clark
http://glu.ttono.us
Are we even supposed to tag RCs? Seems like a pain.
Kevin Clark wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:17 AM, David Reiss dre...@facebook.com wrote:
Oh, but it wasn't added to EXTRA_DIST, so it isn't in the tarball.
Will fix.
I *didn't* tag the RC since you were bundling it up. Should we tag it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alexander Shigin updated THRIFT-496:
Attachment: thrift-python-pure-rw.patch
Pure python reader/writer
Pure python reader/writer
-
Key: THRIFT-496
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-496
Project: Thrift
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Library (Python)
Reporter: Alexander Shigin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12708174#action_12708174
]
Alexander Shigin commented on THRIFT-335:
-
Please, check THRIFT-496.
Compact
TSocket read/peek fails on OS X
---
Key: THRIFT-497
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-497
Project: Thrift
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Library (C++)
Affects Versions: 0.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rush Manbert updated THRIFT-497:
Attachment: 497-TSocket.cpp.patch
Patch fr TSocket.cpp.
TSocket read/peek fails on OS X
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bryan Duxbury resolved THRIFT-493.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed.
Stopping TNonblockingServer when it hasn't been starting
Has there been any discussion of how versioning is going to work? In
particular, the C++ and C# libraries (at least) use versioning as a
means of indicating compatibility.
For example, given libthrift.so.0.1.0, libthrift.so.0.2.0, and
libthrift.so.0.3.0, one would assume binary compatibility,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12708245#action_12708245
]
Rush Manbert commented on THRIFT-491:
-
The changes to Monitor look good and work as
Compact and Binary native protocols, used at the same time, can cause some
issues
-
Key: THRIFT-498
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-498
Project: Thrift
I think the general convention is that if the major version number is 0, you
should assume binary incompatibility for minor version changes. Once the
major version moves to 1, then you can assume that incompatibility will be
indicated by a major version revision.
Does this match other folks'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12708297#action_12708297
]
Michael Robellard commented on THRIFT-495:
--
Looks appropriate to me
traceback now
17 matches
Mail list logo