Anyone have any fix for this? Trying to run java unit tests for first time
in a long time and seeing it as well. ulimit is 1024 here. Sun java 6_20
-Todd
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Anthony Molinaro
antho...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
Yeah, actually they pass for me as well in Mac with
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com wrote:
Anyone have any fix for this? Trying to run java unit tests for first time
in a long time and seeing it as well. ulimit is 1024 here. Sun java 6_20
Never mind - filed THRIFT-873, will commit when my coworker confirms the
Okay, so I got it to pass the tests. I started playing with the number
of threads in the async test since that was the first that failed, and
that works, but seemed odd. 100 works fine, 400 works fine, 490 causes
a test several past the async test to fail.
This makes me think somehow junit is
Yeah, actually they pass for me as well in Mac with only 256. So I'm thinking
it could somehow be vmware, or maybe I have some bad network config, do
the tests open a lot of sockets?
The java versions are almost identical
CentOS
% java -version
java version 1.6.0_20
Java(TM) SE Runtime
I'm going to -1 this tarball myself due to issues with the PHP extension
building. I'll post another RC momentarily.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Anthony Molinaro
antho...@alumni.caltech.edu wrote:
Yeah, actually they pass for me as well in Mac with only 256. So I'm
thinking
it could
br...@rapleaf.com
To: thrift-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Fri, August 13, 2010 12:40:59 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Thrift 0.4.0 RC0
Hi all,
As discussed, in all the time it took for us to finally release Thrift
0.3,
we've accumulated enough changes for Thrift 0.4!
I propose we
On my local machine, the java library tests cleanly. The errors in your
build output seem to be related to available file handles, which should
never be an issue. I'm not sure this is a real bug or not, but could you
please open a ticket for us to investigate?
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 1:37 PM,
Works fine on CentOS 5.5. On Snow Leopard, make check was returning this:
libtool: link: g++ -g -O2 -o .libs/UnitTests UnitTests-UnitTestMain.o
UnitTests-TMemoryBufferTest.o UnitTests-TBufferBaseTest.o
-Wl,-bind_at_load ./.libs/libtestgencpp.a
We used to do it at Powerset. If you're installing thrift for 4
languages it's nice to use the same technique for the 5th. Though I
don't recall if the Ruby make target was changed to just generate the
gem these days, in which case it probably doesn't matter.
Bryan - I can probably give you
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:18 AM, David Reiss dre...@facebook.com wrote:
+1
There are a few ._BLAH files in there that would be nice to remove, but
not critical.
Do you feel like opening a ticket for this cleanup? We can tackle it in the
next release.
As an aside...
Does anyone use
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Kevin Clark kevin.cl...@gmail.com wrote:
Bryan - I can probably give you appropriate credentials, though it'd
have to wait til I'm back in civilization (start of September).
Sounds good.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 09:15:50AM -0700, Bryan Duxbury wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 8:18 AM, David Reiss dre...@facebook.com wrote:
As an aside...
Does anyone use configure and make to build the ruby stuff? If not, can we
just
delete Ruby support from the configure script? It's
I cannot get this to build on Mac OS X 10.6.4. It appears the cpp library
is failing.
boost @1.43.0_0
zlib @1.2.5_0
libevent @1.4.14b_0
Here is where it fails.
Making all in cpp
/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I../.. -I/opt/local/include -I./src
+1 Checksum, signature, RAT output all look good.
Doug
On 08/12/2010 09:40 PM, Bryan Duxbury wrote:
Hi all,
As discussed, in all the time it took for us to finally release Thrift 0.3,
we've accumulated enough changes for Thrift 0.4!
I propose we accept
+1 from me. Looks sane.
-Original Message-
From: David Reiss [mailto:dre...@facebook.com]
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 8:19 AM
To: thrift-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Thrift 0.4.0 RC0
+1
There are a few ._BLAH files in there that would be nice to remove
wrote:
+1 from me. Looks sane.
-Original Message-
From: David Reiss [mailto:dre...@facebook.com]
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 8:19 AM
To: thrift-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Thrift 0.4.0 RC0
+1
There are a few ._BLAH files in there that would be nice to remove
. Looks sane.
-Original Message-
From: David Reiss [mailto:dre...@facebook.com]
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 8:19 AM
To: thrift-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Thrift 0.4.0 RC0
+1
There are a few ._BLAH files in there that would be nice to remove, but
not critical
On Aug 12, 2010, at 9:40 PM, Bryan Duxbury wrote:
Hi all,
As discussed, in all the time it took for us to finally release Thrift 0.3,
we've accumulated enough changes for Thrift 0.4!
I propose we accept
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Thrift 0.4.0 RC0
+1
There are a few ._BLAH files in there that would be nice to remove, but
not critical.
As an aside...
Does anyone use configure and make to build the ruby stuff? If not, can
we just
delete Ruby support from the configure script? It's gotten
, Mark Slee ms...@facebook.com wrote:
+1 from me. Looks sane.
-Original Message-
From: David Reiss [mailto:dre...@facebook.com]
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 8:19 AM
To: thrift-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Thrift 0.4.0 RC0
+1
There are a few ._BLAH files
Upayavira is currently travelling and probably
won't have time to vote on the release, so the
sooner you pass this vote along to gene...@incubator
asking for votes from IPMC members, the better.
: David Reiss [mailto:dre...@facebook.com]
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 8:19 AM
To: thrift-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Thrift 0.4.0 RC0
+1
There are a few ._BLAH files in there that would be nice to remove, but
not critical.
As an aside...
Does anyone use configure and make
It's complaining about Bit::Vector not being there. I'm not sure if its
required by the Thrift library itself, or just the tests, but one way to
address it would be this patch, which checks for Bit::Vector at
configure time.
--- configure.ac.orig 2010-08-13 14:31:33.0 -0700
+++
If I read it correctly, the effect of this patch is that the configure will
fail on stock OSX 10.6.4. (That's what I have - no special Perl modules
installed) Is that correct?
I don't use Perl any more, so don't know what you get in a standard Perl
installation. If Bit::Vector isn't included,
It looks like Bit::Vector is referenced in Thrift::BinaryProtocol as
well as the Makefile.PL, so it appears to be a runtime dependency, not
just a test one.
The other way to do this is to not build the Thrift perl libraries if
the module detection fails, by tweaking the WITH_PERL variable.
Well, if it's a runtime requirement, then the configure should check for it,
but only if --with-perl=yes, and fail if it's not installed. Then if I don't
want to install it I can just configure with --with-perl=no.
HOWEVER, I started fresh and configured like this:
./configure
Sure, I could submit a configure.ac patch to do the perl checks.
The make check fails because UnitTests_LDADD in the test/Makefile.am
doesn't include $(BOOST_LDFLAGS), so if boost is in a non-standard
location (for example MacPorts puts it in /opt/local), the Makefile
can't find it at link
I plan to take a look at this over the weekend, but
I'd again like to suggest that you add your apache.org
address to your pgp key and put your key in
/x1/www/www.apache.org/dist/incubator/thrift/KEYS
on people.apache.org. Both Todd's key and mine are
already there. You might want to
28 matches
Mail list logo
