Hi there,
Le mardi 8 avril 2014, 16:17:09 Steve Kemp a écrit :
I'm in the middle of building a rescue-system, and I would
like to be able to include a simple compiler within that
environment.
Ideally I'd like to see tcc compiled against uclibc, or
musl, however despite coming across
I have a patch to build a single cross-compiler by using --targetcpu but given
the potential of breakage of the build script I prefer to post it here for now
and ask you to try building tcc with it, either natively or all the cross
compilers to see if anything break.
You can also try building
Hi Steve,
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 04:17:09PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
For example this link:
http://pts-mini-gpl.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/pts-tcc/
At this point I'm taking a step back and asking if there
are any existing recipes for building a static compiler
that can be used in a
Yes I did adjust pts-tcc to the then current uclibc in September 2011.
Unfortunately my recipe is very specific for my compile environment
and also the corresponding patches are for a quite old uclibc
This should read tcc and uclibc instead of uclibc.
Rune
I didn't look much at the patch but noticed it hardcodes i686 as the target.
Is your system a 32 bit intel system? If no, that might explain what is the
problem you encounter.
No, sadly I'm on a 64-bit host.
Also you can try playing with the number of / (adding or removing one)
in line
Yes I did adjust pts-tcc to the then current uclibc in September 2011.
Unfortunately my recipe is very specific for my compile environment
and also the corresponding patches are for a quite old uclibc
version. I do not have time to clean up the data, nor is it
suitable for publishing
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 04:19:47PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
been wanting to build a very very minimal rescue-system. Currently
that consists of an initrd image, a kernel, and nothing else.
Having a compiler present isn't a deal-breaker, but given the
root filesystem is writable it would
