Hi Larry,
I share this hobby with you but only with my own projects.
If you like to chase warnings in C, I invite you to forget those 'chicken'
checks and to move to something stronger such as (from easier to stronger):
* clang and --analyze
* VC++ -analyse
* smatch that helped to find ~3000
Hi,
On Sun, 7 May 2017, Larry Doolittle wrote:
Using gcc's -Wextra, I found 17 "unused parameter", which could be
addressed by bloating the source code a bit (casting to void), and with
no consequence on the binary. If anyone else thought that would be an
improvement, I'd be happy to write
Hello grischka,
parts of your last patch:
* tcctest.c: remove outdated limitation for ll-bitfield test
It always worked, there is no reason why it should not work
in future.
That's not true. The comment I've put there tried to explain it:
-#ifndef __i386__
-/* on i386 we
Michael -
On Sun, May 07, 2017 at 08:16:08AM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> On debian, if you have libc6-dev and musl-dev installed you get a
> [mess that doesn't work with tinycc].
> So, yeah, the detection/support of musl
> is early and doesn't work with the split-mind approach that debian
> is
Ok, it works, including tests with:
jullien@sims3:~/tinycc $ git diff
diff --git a/arm-gen.c b/arm-gen.c
index a5dabd1..34e1ef2 100644
--- a/arm-gen.c
+++ b/arm-gen.c
@@ -2150,6 +2150,4 @@ ST_FUNC void gen_vla_alloc(CType *type, int align) {
#endif
Christian Jullien wrote:
alloca-arm.S: error: unrecognized file type
Ok, bottom of arm-gen.c, remove
#ifndef TCC_IS_NATIVE
thanks.
Makefile:67: recipe for target 'alloca-arm.o' failed
-Original Message-
From: Tinycc-devel
Thank grischka,
Be use I annoyed you with this warning because, to me, it exhibits a
potential issue on arm.
Your fix gives:
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/jullien/tinycc/lib'
../tcc -c libtcc1.c -o libtcc1.o -DCONFIG_TRIPLET="arm-linux-gnueabihf"
-DTCC_TARGET_ARM -DTCC_ARM_EABI
Christian Jullien wrote:
So, gentlemen, it seems that at least one ARM configuration/option requires
the offending code having test on an uninitialized value.
Commenting using #if will fail if "arm-fpa-ld" is used.
Can you please take a moment to investigate and propose the right fix.
Nope.
So, gentlemen, it seems that at least one ARM configuration/option requires
the offending code having test on an uninitialized value.
Commenting using #if will fail if "arm-fpa-ld" is used.
Can you please take a moment to investigate and propose the right fix.
C.
-Original Message-
Christian Jullien wrote:
Especially if " LDOUBLE_SIZE != 8 is not
possible in any arm config" why is there such a test in arm-gen.c code?
The "arm-fpa-ld" variant gets LDOUBLE_SIZE=12 passed from the Makefile.
-- gr
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Michael,
Thank you for patience with this thread.
Your previous reply was very clear about my mistake. I just wanted to point
out the inconsistency of arm code. Especially if " LDOUBLE_SIZE != 8 is not
possible in any arm config" why is there such a test in arm-gen.c code?
I also would prefer a
Hi,
On Sun, 7 May 2017, Christian Jullien wrote:
Forget one moment what has been said so far and concentrate on my
concern with narrowed info.
Facts:
Yes, all known and agreed upon.
* Finally, arm-gen.c uses TOK___fixxfdi with yet another #if condition =>
LDOUBLE_SIZE != 8
#if
Hi,
On Sat, 6 May 2017, Larry Doolittle wrote:
Micheal, Marc, and tinycc lurkers -
On Sun, May 07, 2017 at 04:54:38AM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, Marc Vertes wrote:
I just committed the patch to support musl-libc in the tcc
compiler development branch:
13 matches
Mail list logo
