Hi, On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, uso ewin wrote:
> > Are there any plans for C11's _Generic or at least __builtin_choose_expr? > > > > > > Best regards, > > Petr Skocik > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tinycc-devel mailing list > > Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel > > Hello, > > I was working on _Generic implementation on tcc(as an hobby) > Your mail made me want to continue my job, and yesterday I've succeed > to make something usable: > https://github.com/cosmo-ray/tcc/commits/generic Thanks for working on this. > The code as it is actually is pretty crappy, doesn't respect C > standard(main difference is I can't make difference between a char*, > an int * or any kind of pointer), but should be enough for most use > case, and pretty easy to merge on mob > > should I try to merge it to mob once I've clean my commits ? > maybe by adding some option like: "--with-fake-generic" ? > So _Generic are not enable by default Hmm. I'd dislike an implementation of _Generic that isn't standard conforming (at least in most cases and as far as we know). So try a bit harder to implement it fully :) (I.e. you might need to extend compare_types) A separate option wouldn't be needed then. I've very briefly looked at your implementation: Don't use your current way of parsing the controlling expression/type, you should be able to reuse expr_type/parse_expr_type/parse_type (or parts of it). Ciao, Michael. _______________________________________________ Tinycc-devel mailing list Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
