Without the patch, it also coredumps on Risc-V:
jullien@gcc401:~$ tcc -v
tcc version 0.9.27 - 0378168 (riscv64 Linux)
jullien@gcc401:~$ tcc -o foo foo.c && ./foo
Illegal instruction (core dumped)
-Original Message-
From: Tinycc-devel
Hi, I only tested the latest patch supplied by Pursuer,
When A == 0, it gives the expected result:
tcc foo.c -o foo && ./foo
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0
(no core dump)
-Original Message-
From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org] On
Behalf Of grischka
Elijah Stone wrote:
Actually, the problem is with the CEXPR_EH macro; it always returns 1.
If I replace the definition with '#define CEXPR_EH
__builtin_constant_p', all of your tests pass.
I guess the problem is that the behaviour of this clause (from 6.5.15p6)
is not correctly implemented:
Christian Jullien wrote:
All parameters go to the right arguments. So patch looks good
What happens if the first condition is false (A = 0) ?
-- gr
void main() {
int A = 1;
int B = 2;
map_add(10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, A && B);
}
$ tcc foo.c -o foo && ./foo;echo
I included "tcc\include\winapi\omp.h" and used the -fopenmp flag but got
undefined references, is there anyway to link OpenMP with tcc?
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Actually, the problem is with the CEXPR_EH macro; it always returns 1.
If I replace the definition with '#define CEXPR_EH __builtin_constant_p',
all of your tests pass.
I guess the problem is that the behaviour of this clause (from 6.5.15p6)
is not correctly implemented:
if one operand is
Thank you. (I just used another email account and forgot to add nickname in
previous email.)
After inspecting the code more deeply, I found another way to fix this bug.
Most functions in tccgen.c ,which modify the vstack , callvcheck_cmp() at
the beginning (like "vsetc" ,"vswap", "vrotb"
All parameters go to the right arguments. So patch looks good
#include
void map_add(int x0, int x1, int x2, int x3, int x4, int x5, int x6, int x7,
in\
t x8) {
printf("%d ", x0);
printf("%d ", x1);
printf("%d ", x2);
printf("%d ", x3);
Hi just quickly tested on my RPi arm64.
I don't know if it works, i.e. all arguments go to the right parameter with
the right value but, at least it no longer segfault.
I'll make more tests today.
C.
From: Tinycc-devel [mailto:tinycc-devel-bounces+eligis=orange...@nongnu.org]
On
This bug may caused by "vpushv" SValue with VT_CMP flag. There should be only
one VT_CMP SValue on vstack.
I make below patch to fix it, then thecompilationexit normally. But
I have no arm64 device with GNU/Linux to verify the test.
diff --git a/arm64-gen.c b/arm64-gen.c
index 6389409..a9cbfa2
10 matches
Mail list logo
