Hi,
On Mon, 3 Jul 2017, Barath Aron wrote:
I vote for __COUNTER__ as well. Some macro-libraries of mine also use
it. :)
Implemented in mob 824dceb. Wasn't totally trivial because our way of
expanding macro arguments wasn't like the standard requires but only in a
way noticable with macros
Hi!
I vote for __COUNTER__ as well. Some macro-libraries of mine also use it. :)
Áron
On 07/03/2017 07:51 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Gabriele Fulgaro wrote:
Can tinycc implementing in future __COUNTER__ macro?
Would be easy to do. Why do you need it specifically?
Hi,
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Gabriele Fulgaro wrote:
> Can tinycc implementing in future __COUNTER__ macro?
Would be easy to do. Why do you need it specifically? It's
non-standard. Even though a couple compilers provide it, it would be good
to have some rationale for adding it.
Ciao,
Can tinycc implementing in future __COUNTER__ macro?
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
