Hi all,
Here is the second batch of changesets from Rob's repo
that I plan to commit next.
Additionally (not in Rob's repo) the long long constant
propagation by Ben Hinkle and a newer version of tccpe.c.
If someone knows about specific concerns with one of these,
please tell.
After that we
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:39:18AM +0100, grischka wrote:
Could a C guru out there please tell me why the following works?
Extra points if you can explain why it makes sense.
#include stdio.h
int main(){
int arr[10];
printf(%d\n,sizeof arr[0]); // ok
printf(%d\n,sizeof(arr)[0]); // ok, but why?
Why should that be valid syntax? Is C99 really weird or what?
(its a immediate value being used in place of a pointer.)
-Mike
Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:39:18AM +0100, grischka wrote:
Could a C guru out there please tell
On Nov 14, 2007, at 5:18 PM, Mike wrote:
printf(%d\n,sizeof(arr)[0]); // ok, but why?
Why should that be valid syntax? Is C99 really weird or what?
(its a immediate value being used in place of a pointer.)
The C99 grammar says that sizeof is:
unary-expression:
sizeof unary-expression
On Nov 14, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Mike wrote:
(arr)[0] would be valid yes. But 40[0] should be invalid, right?
Yes, and it is. 40[arr] is valid of course.
-Chris
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
Hi all,
Does anyone have a patch to make tcc configure and compile on
Cygwin? I can't seem to compile tcc cleanly on Cygwin. It would be
a nice thing for those poor us stuck in between *nix and win32. I
was thinking of tweaking the msys/mingw configuration to do that.
--
Cheers,
Kein-Hong Man
grischka wrote:
CVSROOT: /sources/tinycc
Module name: tinycc
Changes by: grischka grischka 07/11/14 17:34:31
Modified files:
. : Changelog bcheck.c il-gen.c libtcc1.c tcc.c
Log message:
Import some changesets from Rob Landley's fork (part 1)
[snip]
