Re: [Tinycc-devel] Newcomer to TCC (and C) with a couple ofquestions..

2009-04-04 Thread lostgallifreyan
fsw.fb fsw...@comcast.net wrote: (04/04/2009 03:06) Hi, if you want to stay with Win32 then you could look for theForger's Win32 API tutorial here: http://www.winprog.org/tutorial/ That one's really good. I like the humour too. And I just read the appendix on API vs MFC. Very useful, this

Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] invalid memory access in free_section()

2009-04-04 Thread grischka
David Raulo wrote: Hi, I am a user of the libtcc API; the code I'm working with comes from the tip of git://repo.or.cz/tinycc.git Here is a test case which causes a crash under MSVC; it seems to pass under Linux, except if you take a closer look with valgrind (see attached file

Re: [Tinycc-devel] (no subject) - array[restrict] problem

2009-04-04 Thread grischka
Pedro A ARANDA wrote: Hi the current git version of TinyCC chokes at one of my scripts: p...@paag:~.../Devel$ syncp tinycc_1.0.0-pre2_i386.deb /media/Philips\ External\ Hard\ Disk/ In file included from /home/paag/bin/syncp:16: /usr/include/regex.h:543: identifier expected

Re: [Tinycc-devel] bugs

2009-04-04 Thread grischka
patch pushed at http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git?a=commit;h=162e3a937c95cf1912a78d05ffef09b63ca02bd5 --- grischka Sandor Zsolt wrote: 1. The tcc compiler can`t work with absolute defined include paths. Solution: in tcc.c in function preprocess from the line 3063 /* now search in all the

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re: TCC:cannot find -lxyz.dll

2009-04-04 Thread grischka
lostgallifreyan wrote: Still, maybe -rdynamic needs more explanation with TCC. So please feel free to suggest some addition to the docs, say, one short sentence, placed to your choice ;) I can try... Perhaps somewhere in Quick start section, under the Here are some examples to understand the

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re: TCC:cannot find -lxyz.dll

2009-04-04 Thread lostgallifreyan
grischka gris...@gmx.de wrote: (04/04/2009 16:40) As people seem consequently to ignore what's called readme.txt, meybe we should just get rid of it and have some Windows section in tcc-doc.html, respectively extend what's already there: (5.3 PE-i386 file generation) I think that might partly