Re: [Tinycc-devel] Source vandalism

2015-07-29 Thread grischka
Next time you want to do whole-sale code changes please discuss on the mailing list before doing so, there might be reasons for the status quo that you're unaware of, like in this case. Noted. See also the mob regression ... thread from 1.7.2015 and thanks in advance for reverting

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Source vandalism

2015-07-29 Thread gus knight
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Michael Matz matz@frakked.de wrote: Hello gus or Augustin, while I appreciate more people working on tinycc, why do you think the best thing to do as the very first commits would be source code reformattings and reorganizations? Look at what damage you've

Re: [Tinycc-devel] RE : [RFC] Moving source code to src

2015-07-29 Thread Michael Matz
Hi, On Mon, 27 Jul 2015, gus knight wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Christian JULLIEN eli...@orange.fr wrote: Hi Gus, This is a good idea. If you do so, I also suggest an arch directory that contains subdirectories for all supported archives I wound up going with one dir per

Re: [Tinycc-devel] RE : [RFC] Moving source code to src

2015-07-29 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2015-07-29 09:00:18 -0400, gus knight wrote: Ah, oops. Looks like make didn't fail on the docs command as I expected it to. Also, don't forget to test out-of-tree builds with a read-only source directory. -- Vincent Lefèvre vinc...@vinc17.net - Web: https://www.vinc17.net/ 100% accessible

[Tinycc-devel] Source vandalism

2015-07-29 Thread Michael Matz
Hello gus or Augustin, while I appreciate more people working on tinycc, why do you think the best thing to do as the very first commits would be source code reformattings and reorganizations? Look at what damage you've done: @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ void C67_g(int c) #endif ind1 = ind + 4;

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Source vandalism

2015-07-29 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2015-07-29 08:56:47 -0400, gus knight wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Michael Matz matz@frakked.de wrote: P.S: some of the reindendation changes look like as if you've replaced leading tabs with four spaces. That would have been wrong, tabs are eight spaces. If this is the

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Source vandalism

2015-07-29 Thread gus knight
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Daniel Glöckner daniel...@gmx.net wrote: If you use clang-format again, please don't change char *x to char* x. No, I don't intend to. And I wasn't sure which was the correct thing to use, so I looked at some files and guessed. Sorry. -gus

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Source vandalism

2015-07-29 Thread Daniel Glöckner
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 08:56:47AM -0400, gus knight wrote: The reformattings were to attempt to make everything conform to the CodingGuidelines document that was already in the tree (4 spaces not tabs, etc.) which a few files didn't conform to. The CodingStyle document is from April. Most

Re: [Tinycc-devel] RE : [RFC] Moving source code to src

2015-07-29 Thread gus knight
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Michael Matz matz@frakked.de wrote: make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. Sigh. Also make -C src is broken, the documentation in particular: $ make -C src ... ./texi2pod.pl ../docs/tcc-doc.texi tcc.pod make: ./texi2pod.pl: