Hi,
I think you mean this post:
Thanks for forwarding this! But unfortunately, it seems that this is
the fix of another bug. The bug I looked into was the following:
#include stdio.h
int A = 1;
#define A 1+A
#define B(x) x
int main() {
printf(%d\n, B(A));
}
This code should output 2, but
- Original Message -
From: shinichiro.h shinichiro.ham...@gmail.com
To: i...@euronet.nl; tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] Is the CVS repository dead yet?
Thanks for forwarding this! But unfortunately, it seems
Well git operates in much the same way as mercurial does, only instead of
referring to commits (changesets) directly, you have branches pointing to
them. This one-many branch-commit relationship is one of the reasons I really
prefer git over mercurial, because you can use human-readable names
...@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 6:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] Is the CVS repository dead yet?
On Friday 20 March 2009 13:32:29 grischka wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Rob Landley r...@landley.net
To: Joshua Phillips jp.sittingd...@gmail.com
Cc: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
Sent
Hi,
I have almost no idea on the main discussion since I've recently
started to modify tcc (I think it would be great if tinycc.org has the
link to git repository though), but I have a question about Rob's list.
That's not counting numerous mentions on my blog and my website. (My fork
also
On Saturday 21 March 2009 20:11, shinichiro.h wrote:
I'm sorry to know the archive was gone. I've found bugs around macro
and the bug was already reported.
http://www.mail-archive.com/tinycc-devel@nongnu.org/msg01798.html
Feng said that there was a fix for this bug in Rob's list. I
checked
Grischka as well takes care of mirroring cvs on
http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git
Ah, a mirror. So CVS is the official repository and git is just a mirror.
Actually no. I'm using GIT for TinyCC ever since pre 0.9.24.
It is just that I run a script from time to time that updates the CVS
On Thursday 19 March 2009 10:30:53 Joshua Phillips wrote:
Rob,
I feel your pain :(
I have had a look at the tcc git repository and it has many duplicated
commits (rebased?) and is a complete and utter mess.
Unfortunately, in my opinion, CVS (and SVN, too, because it is CVS done
right) are
On Friday 20 March 2009 10:46:47 grischka wrote:
Grischka as well takes care of mirroring cvs on
http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git
Ah, a mirror. So CVS is the official repository and git is just a
mirror.
Actually no. I'm using GIT for TinyCC ever since pre 0.9.24.
There's no mention
On Friday 20 March 2009 11:48:02 Rob Landley wrote:
On Friday 20 March 2009 10:46:47 grischka wrote:
Grischka as well takes care of mirroring cvs on
http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git
Ah, a mirror. So CVS is the official repository and git is just a
mirror.
Actually no. I'm
Rob Landley schrieb:
On Friday 20 March 2009 10:46:47 grischka wrote:
Grischka as well takes care of mirroring cvs on
http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git
Ah, a mirror. So CVS is the official repository and git is just a
mirror.
Actually no. I'm using GIT for TinyCC ever since pre 0.9.24.
- Original Message -
From: Rob Landley r...@landley.net
To: Joshua Phillips jp.sittingd...@gmail.com
Cc: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] Is the CVS repository dead yet?
On Thursday 19 March 2009 10:30:53 Joshua Phillips wrote
Rob Landley wrote:
I don't want to fight another project. I _want_ to participate in a multi-
developer project. But CVS remains a deal breaker. This project has proven
it would rather die than switch off of CVS. I just check back every 6 months
to see if it's changed its mind.
I concur.
On Friday 20 March 2009 13:32:29 grischka wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Rob Landley r...@landley.net
To: Joshua Phillips jp.sittingd...@gmail.com
Cc: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] Is the CVS repository dead yet
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 15:10:32 Daniel Glöckner wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 05:05:09PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
On Thursday 12 March 2009 16:20:28 Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
grischka and Daniel you are the ones who actually committed code during
the last few months, what do you
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:20:28PM +0100, Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 06:07:51PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
It's been 6 months, I thought I'd ask.
People still occasionally email me links to a tcc git mirror (not sure
why),
and I reply that mirrors are
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 05:05:09PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
On Thursday 12 March 2009 16:20:28 Marc Andre Tanner wrote:
grischka and Daniel you are the ones who actually committed code during the
last few months, what do you think?
I'm fine with whatever RCS is used.
It's not like I touch
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 06:07:51PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
It's been 6 months, I thought I'd ask.
People still occasionally email me links to a tcc git mirror (not sure why),
and I reply that mirrors are nice, I even used to run one, but that any
project that still cuts its releases
18 matches
Mail list logo
