tinycc.git (was: Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re: global 64-bit variables initialization)

2008-12-02 Thread Detlef Riekenberg
On Mi, 2008-11-26 at 16:08 +, Joshua Phillips wrote: Whatever happened to mercurialtcc on sharesource? I never used hg before. A while ago, I joined that tree and tried to sync patches from CVS, but due to real life, i'm unable to sync it to a usable sate. I suggest: rm -f We are since

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re: global 64-bit variables initialization

2008-11-27 Thread Jerry
I have clone a local copy of tcc from repo. But how to switch to mob branch? Here is what I have tried. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/Source Code/tcc $ git-branch mob fatal: Not a valid object name: 'master'. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/Source Code/tcc $ git-checkout mob error: pathspec 'mob' did not match any

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re: global 64-bit variables initialization

2008-11-27 Thread grischka
Jerry wrote: I have clone a local copy of tcc from repo. But how to switch to mob branch? Here is what I have tried. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/Source Code/tcc $ git-branch mob fatal: Not a valid object name: 'master'. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/Source Code/tcc $ git-checkout mob error: pathspec 'mob'

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re: global 64-bit variables initialization

2008-11-26 Thread Joshua Phillips
Whatever happened to mercurialtcc on sharesource? On Monday 24 November 2008 21:38:27 grischka wrote: Jerry wrote: I would like to start from test TCC. I have experience with ClearCase,SVN and SourceSafe, but I am not sure which SCCM currently is used here. Could you point me where I

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re: global 64-bit variables initialization

2008-11-26 Thread grischka
Joshua Phillips wrote: Whatever happened to mercurialtcc on sharesource? Well it is still there: https://sharesource.org/hg/mercurialtcc/ As well as Rob Landley's fork here: http://landley.net/hg/tinycc Most substantial material from both should have made it into the TCC-0.9.24 release,

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re: global 64-bit variables initialization

2008-11-24 Thread Jerry
I would like to start from test TCC. I have experience with ClearCase,SVN and SourceSafe, but I am not sure which SCCM currently is used here. Could you point me where I could get start? Thanks. -jl 2008/11/24 grischka [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jerry wrote: Great! Do you think we should do some

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re: global 64-bit variables initialization

2008-11-24 Thread grischka
Jerry wrote: I would like to start from test TCC. I have experience with ClearCase,SVN and SourceSafe, but I am not sure which SCCM currently is used here. Could you point me where I could get start? We are since recently working with GIT at http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git Daniel has

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re: global 64-bit variables initialization

2008-11-23 Thread grischka
Jerry wrote: Great! Do you think we should do some research on current status of TCC, and generate a roadmap for it so that we will not lost direction. The map is not one big road but many little paths between possible places to go, with more than a few possible directions. For example if

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re: global 64-bit variables initialization

2008-11-22 Thread Jerry
So far, I am not very familiar with the development process usedhere. Could you please assign me a ramp-up task? So that I could warm myself quickly. Also, how could I set up my own development environment? I am now a software developer in Sybase. In my job, I work on develop, bug fixing for

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re: global 64-bit variables initialization

2008-11-22 Thread Masha Rabinovich
Hello I am not familiar as well. I am just trying to compile my code, then report the bugs if TCC reports compile error where it should not be, or if a TCC-compiled program crashes where GCC and VS compiled works fine. To compile tinycc you may install mingw anf run build-tcc.bat, or change

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re: global 64-bit variables initialization

2008-11-22 Thread Jerry
Great! Do you think we should do some research on current status of TCC, and generate a roadmap for it so that we will not lost direction. For C++ support, I think it probably better to generate a new project because we want to make TCC reasonable simple with strong support to C language only.

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re: global 64-bit variables initialization

2008-11-21 Thread Jerry
Do you have enough regression test cases available? If not, I would like to add some. jl 2008/11/21 Masha Rabinovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] The was not 10 in the program I am trying to compile with tcc, but there was pointer + some small value in constant expression. the only reason I put

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re: global 64-bit variables initialization

2008-11-20 Thread Daniel Glöckner
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 08:50:22AM +0100, Masha Rabinovich wrote: int a = 2.0 ? 0 : 1; int b = (_Bool)2.0; int c = !2.0; int d = 2.0; int e = (char)500; int main() { printf(%d %d %d %d %d\n, a, b, c, d, e); } GCC output: 0 1 0 2 -12 TCC output: 1 0 1 0 500 Nice example. It

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Re: global 64-bit variables initialization

2008-11-20 Thread Masha Rabinovich
The was not 10 in the program I am trying to compile with tcc, but there was pointer + some small value in constant expression. the only reason I put 10 in test case was to see in output a value different from regular pointer to be sure the additional is performed. Something like

[Tinycc-devel] Re: global 64-bit variables initialization

2008-11-19 Thread Masha Rabinovich
Hello Seems the problem is not only with 'long long' but with any casting performed outside of code blocks int a = 2.0 ? 0 : 1; int b = (_Bool)2.0; int c = !2.0; int d = 2.0; int e = (char)500; int main() { printf(%d %d %d %d %d\n, a, b, c, d, e); } GCC output: 0 1 0 2 -12 TCC output: 1 0 1