On 11/2/07, KHMan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
grischka wrote:
Do you think it is possible and/or makes sense to extract all
changesets from Rob's repo into single patches first, with an
automatic script or something?
In case you're not aware of it, check out Mercurial Queues
From: KHMan:
However I think some of David Dodge's patches have already been
applied, and bits of documentation has been updated in CVS, so I
guess that some hg patches will not apply cleanly.
Yes, might happen, but we can deal with technical questions later.
I am doing this
on cygwin and
grischka wrote:
From: KHMan:
I will push patches to grischka, and check every few patches with
Ubuntu make all, and the two trees should come together.
Do you think it is possible and/or makes sense to extract all
changesets from Rob's repo into single patches first, with an
automatic
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 09:31:23AM -0600, Gregg Reynolds wrote:
On 11/2/07, KHMan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
grischka wrote:
Do you think it is possible and/or makes sense to extract all
changesets from Rob's repo into single patches first, with an
automatic script or something?
In
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 02:59:15AM +0800, KHMan wrote:
Attached is a sample patch based on the Mercurial repository. I
assume revisions up to 395 is already in the official CVS,
Just a quick note about mercurial: revision numbers such as 395 are
just a convenience and are locally assigned to
Dave Dodge wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 02:59:15AM +0800, KHMan wrote:
Attached is a sample patch based on the Mercurial repository. I
assume revisions up to 395 is already in the official CVS,
Just a quick note about mercurial: revision numbers such as 395 are
just a convenience and are
Hi all,
Attached is a sample patch based on the Mercurial repository. I
assume revisions up to 395 is already in the official CVS, so
perhaps I shall try and see how many trivial patches I can make
from revision 396 onwards, versus current Savannah CVS. No quality
assurance beyond trying a make
