ong here?
>>
>> You're mixing two node expressions into the same top level sh:values
>> blank node. Either use sh:filterShape or sh:path but not both. I don't know
>> what the chaining is supposed to look like, but if you want the values of
>> the upper path to go throu
.com
*On Behalf Of *Holger Knublauch
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 25, 2022 2:55 PM
*To:* topbrai...@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [topbraid-users] SHACL inferred data question
*** External email: use caution ***
On 2022-01-26 3:13 am, cbur...@healthwise.org wrote:
Holger
spec - sh:filterShape can only have exactly one sh:nodes as input.
>
> The outer sh:class is unrelated to the sh:values rule and is only used for
> validation purposes, not inferencing.
>
> Holger
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* topbrai...@googlegroups.com *On
> Behalf Of *Hol
ers@googlegroups.com
*On Behalf Of *Holger Knublauch
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 25, 2022 2:55 PM
*To:* topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [topbraid-users] SHACL inferred data question
*** External email: use caution ***
On 2022-01-26 3:13 am, cbur...@healthwise.org wrote:
Ho
anuary 25, 2022 2:55 PM
To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] SHACL inferred data question
*** External email: use caution ***
On 2022-01-26 3:13 am, cbur...@healthwise.org<mailto:cbur...@healthwise.org>
wrote:
Holger,
I am able to create a second property s
On 2022-01-26 3:13 am, cbur...@healthwise.org wrote:
Holger,
I am able to create a second property shape, ex:shape2, that uses the
values from my ex:shape1 in a very simple, non-transformative way and
successfully returns the values of ex:shape1 for ex:shape2:
ex:Class-shape2
a
Holger,
I am able to create a second property shape, ex:shape2, that uses the
values from my ex:shape1 in a very simple, non-transformative way and
successfully returns the values of ex:shape1 for ex:shape2:
ex:Class-shape2
a sh:PropertyShape ;
sh:path ex:shape2 ;
sh:class ex:Class
On 2022-01-21 10:54 am, cbur...@healthwise.org wrote:
Thanks, Holger. My need in this case isn't to query inferred data
using SPARQL or GraphQL, but rather to reuse the inferred data as an
input for another EDG property shape with another sh:values rule in
it. I think I'm hearing that that's
Thanks, Holger. My need in this case isn't to query inferred data using
SPARQL or GraphQL, but rather to reuse the inferred data as an input for
another EDG property shape with another sh:values rule in it. I think I'm
hearing that that's not possible.
Can you point me to where I can read more
On 2022-01-19 9:44 am, cbur...@healthwise.org wrote:
I have defined a property shape and am successfully inferring its
objects using a sh:values rule.
Can you remind me whether it is possible to use this property and its
inferred data in the sh:values rule for a different property shape? If
I have defined a property shape and am successfully inferring its objects
using a sh:values rule.
Can you remind me whether it is possible to use this property and its
inferred data in the sh:values rule for a different property shape? If so,
is there a special way that it needs to be done --
11 matches
Mail list logo
