Well so the bridge now jumped to being online for 18 days. But despite the
torrc it is now saying it's still no distribution mechanism??
Thanks.
--Keifer
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 10:23 AM Keifer Bly wrote:
> Ok, so when this happens, what would be the best command to use for
> reading the
Ok, so when this happens, what would be the best command to use for reading
the newest tor log?
I am also needing this for another relay, my middle relay at
https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#search/udeserveprivacy also keeps
going offline with no warning and nothing written to the log file.
On Sonntag, 12. März 2023 04:45:21 CET Keifer Bly wrote:
> I do not use any scripts to start tor, I just type tor to start the process
> on debian.
That's where your problems begin. You start a 2nd tor process as root that
doesn't take the default configs from:
I do not use any scripts to start tor, I just type tor to start the process
on debian. And yes the datacenter I run in has an external firewall which
requires setting up port forwarding.
The result of running ls -A /var/log/tor
root@instance-1:/home/keifer_bly# ls -A /var/log/tor
notices.log
On Mittwoch, 8. März 2023 18:13:01 CET Keifer Bly wrote:
> Strangely, nothing whatsoever is being written to the notices.log file,
> upon checking it it is completely empty, nothing there.
That can't be, please post:
~# ls -A /var/log/tor
In general, everything is always written to
On Wednesday, March 8, 2023, 11:13:08 AM MST, Keifer Bly
wrote:
Well so here is the current torrc file:
Nickname gbridge
ORPort 8080
SocksPort 0
BridgeRelay 1
PublishServerDescriptor bridge
BridgeDistribution email
ServerTransportPlugin obfs4 exec /usr/bin/obfs4proxy
Well so here is the current torrc file:
Nickname gbridge
ORPort 8080
SocksPort 0
BridgeRelay 1
PublishServerDescriptor bridge
BridgeDistribution email
ServerTransportPlugin obfs4 exec /usr/bin/obfs4proxy
ServerTransportListenAddr obfs4 0.0.0.0:8081
ExtOrPort auto
Log notice file
On Samstag, 4. März 2023 02:09:19 CET Keifer Bly wrote:
> Wheres the pastebin page? Thanks.
$websearch pastebin
https://paste.debian.net/
https://paste.systemli.org/
https://pastebin.mozilla.org/
...
--
╰_╯ Ciao Marco!
Debian GNU/Linux
It's free software and it gives you freedom!
Wheres the pastebin page? Thanks.
--Keifer
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 7:47 AM wrote:
> On Dienstag, 28. Februar 2023 19:02:38 CET Keifer Bly wrote:
> > Yep, and after that the same still happens, it is still going offline
> In the syslog is why tor aborts.
>
> To help you, you should post your
On Dienstag, 28. Februar 2023 19:02:38 CET Keifer Bly wrote:
> Yep, and after that the same still happens, it is still going offline
In the syslog is why tor aborts.
To help you, you should post your logs to a pastbin page. From the start of
the tor daemon until it goes offline.
--
╰_╯ Ciao
Yep, and after that the same still happens, it is still going offline
despite the also different ports and having followed the listed steps.
--Keifer
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 9:45 PM Keifer Bly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I had changed the listener port for obfs4, it's now 8181.
>
> Upon running your
Hi,
So I had changed the listener port for obfs4, it's now 8181.
Upon running your steps, and systemctl status tor, it returns the following:
● tor.service - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (multi-instance-master)
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/tor.service; enabled; vendor preset:
On Freitag, 24. Februar 2023 04:11:27 CET Keifer Bly wrote:
> Yes, the limit is 50GB per month, but for some reason the distribution
> mechanism is not updating and the bridge keeps going offline despite the
> new torrc.
What comes to my mind without logs (& your 'killall -HUP' of a systemd
Yes, the limit is 50GB per month, but for some reason the distribution
mechanism is not updating and the bridge keeps going offline despite the
new torrc.
--Keifer
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 1:43 PM wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2023 13:43:29 CET gus wrote:
>
> > AccountingStart day 12:00
Hi,
So yes I had obfs4 installed. I accidentally set it to the same port as tor
without relazing, silly me. Here is my new torrc:
Nickname gbridge
ORPort 8080
SocksPort 0
BridgeRelay 1
PublishServerDescriptor bridge
BridgeDistribution email
ServerTransportPlugin obfs4 exec /usr/bin/obfs4proxy
On Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2023 13:43:29 CET gus wrote:
> AccountingStart day 12:00
> AccountingMax 50 GB
>
>
> Example: Let's say you want to allow 50 GB of traffic every day in each
> direction and the accounting should reset at noon each day:
Hi Gus, I think Keifer meant the 5GB limit or
Hi Keifer,
You can't use the same port.
Here is a simple example:
BridgeRelay 1
ORPort 56331
ServerTransportPlugin obfs4 exec /usr/bin/obfs4proxy
ServerTransportListenAddr obfs4 0.0.0.0:5
ExtORPort auto
ContactInfo keiferdodderblyyatgmaildoddercom
Log notice file
Ok, changed to port 8080 and upped my allowed traffic a bit:
GNU nano 3.2
/etc/tor/torrc
Nickname gbridge
ORPort 8080
SocksPort 0
BridgeRelay 1
PublishServerDescriptor bridge
BridgeDistribution email
ServerTransportPlugin obfs4 exec /usr/bin/obfs4proxy
ServerTransportListenAddr
> And the reason why it's on port 443 is so as to be on a port that's not
> likely blocked by network administrators.
That might be useful for the ORPort of a relay, and for the obfs4 port
of a bridge, but not for the ORPort of a bridge. Clients are not
supposed to connect to it.
The only reason
Well,
So I just changed my torrc to this:
Nickname gbridge
ORPort 443
SocksPort 0
BridgeRelay 1
PublishServerDescriptor bridge
BridgeDistribution email
ServerTransportPlugin obfs4 exec /usr/bin/obfs4proxy
ServerTransportListenAddr obfs4 0.0.0.0:8080
ExtOrPort auto
Log notice file
Hi,
Your torrc is correct wrt to distribution mechanism (your bridge is
indicating "bridge-distribution-request any" in the descriptor it
sends), but for the record, the line would have been
"BridgeDistribution any".
A bridge uses less bandwidth than a relay, but it's still a proxy. At
5GB per
Where in the torrc file would I set it to any? I am looking for a way to
run a bridge without being charged a huge amount of money for it, and I was
curious how it would have been detected by Russia if noone had used the
bridge there? Thanks.
--Keifer
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 8:45 AM wrote:
>
On Samstag, 18. Februar 2023 18:56:00 CET Keifer Bly wrote:
> Ok. Here is the torrc file:
>
> GNU nano 3.2 /etc/tor/torrc
>
>
> Nickname gbridge
> ORPort 443
> SocksPort 0
> BridgeRelay 1
> PublishServerDescriptor bridge
> ServerTransportPlugin obfs4 exec
Ok. Here is the torrc file:
GNU nano 3.2 /etc/tor/torrc
Nickname gbridge
ORPort 443
SocksPort 0
BridgeRelay 1
PublishServerDescriptor bridge
ServerTransportPlugin obfs4 exec /usr/bin/obfs4proxy
ServerTransportListenAddr obfs4 0.0.0.0:8080
ExtOrPort auto
Log
On Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2023 06:15:02 CET Keifer Bly wrote:
> So my bridge at
> https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/4D6E3CA2110FC36D3106C86940A1D
> 4C8C91923AB says it has “none “,
Well, then you have configured BridgeDistribution (Default: any) to none.
> though the torrc file has
Hi,
So my bridge at
https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/4D6E3CA2110FC36D3106C86940A1D4C8C91923AB
says it has “none “, though the torrc file has it set to be distributed
publicly. I'm wondering why the bridge would say that, when it obviously is
being used as it's apparently blocked
26 matches
Mail list logo
