> Am 08.05.2024 um 15:54 schrieb Kallidis, Georg :
>
> Hi Torque community,
>
> a release candidate for Torque version 6.0 has been prepared (closed in
> nexus.apache.org) and is open for voting!
>
> [X] +1 release it
> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
> [ ] -1 no, do not release it because
Hi Georg,
> Am 05.04.2024 um 14:41 schrieb Kallidis, Georg :
>
> I think we should release as version 6.0 as this might be enough clear that
> we break support for Java 8?
If you don't mind I'd try to eliminate all deprecated code.
Bye, Thomas
Hi Georg
> Am 05.04.2024 um 14:41 schrieb Kallidis, Georg :
>
> Hi all Torque Devs,
>
> I am in the process to prepare a Torque release, currently as version 5.2.
>
> Except changes in the code like fixes and features, this release will support
> only Java 11.
>
> I think we should release
Am 04.04.2022 um 15:58 schrieb Georg Kallidis
:
>
> yes, seems to me that the entire DB website is migrated to
> repos/infra/sites/db/content/torque.
>
> The release happended to be at the end of the last quarter and no code
> change occurred since then.
>
> Best regards, Georg
Is there any
Hi Georg,
> Am 05.01.2022 um 16:48 schrieb Georg Kallidis
> :
>
> this is a new release candidate for Torque version 5.1 has been prepared
> and is open for voting!
>
One hint as it hit me as well with commons-jcs:
The newer Apache Parent POMs have project.build.outputTimestamp set which
> Am 05.01.2022 um 16:48 schrieb Georg Kallidis
> :
>
> Please verify this release candidate carefully, give feedback or/and vote
>
Signature of source distribution checked ok.
Build environment:
Apache Maven 3.8.1 (05c21c65bdfed0f71a2f2ada8b84da59348c4c5d)
Java version: 11.0.13, vendor:
Hi Georg,
now, that it's out: would you possibly consider updating to log4j 2.17 before
this release?
We don't release Torque that often, you know.
Bye, Thomas
> Am 21.12.2021 um 12:00 schrieb Georg Kallidis
> :
>
> Hi Torque community,
>
> a release candidate for Torque version 5.1 has
Hi Thomas,
On 01.09.20 16:45, Thomas Fox wrote:
> I have enjoyed the years here, and I still like the approach of code
> generation for database code. Sadly,I've not been able to use Torque anymore
> at work for more than 5 years now. I thank everybody here (especially Thomas
> V) to be able
Hi Georg,
Signature, build and unit tests are ok with
Apache Maven 3.5.2 (138edd61fd100ec658bfa2d307c43b76940a5d7d;
2017-10-18T09:58:13+02:00)
Java version: 1.8.0_241, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home:
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_241.jdk/Contents/Home/jre
Default locale:
On 14.08.20 19:48, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> I had no idea that this was required.
> I took the liberty to request a folder for Torque (INFRA-20686)
> We need to move the CI jobs by *tomorrow*
All jobs have been moved:
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/DB/job/Torque/
By
I had no idea that this was required.
I took the liberty to request a folder for Torque (INFRA-20686)
We need to move the CI jobs by *tomorrow*
Bye, Thomas
Forwarded Message
Subject: Fwd: Who has not migrated yet?
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 08:54:41 -0400
From: Gary Gregory
Hi Georg,
Sorry for the long delay. I needed to go on vacation to find time to do
this.
Signature, build and unit tests are ok with
Apache Maven 3.5.2 (138edd61fd100ec658bfa2d307c43b76940a5d7d;
2017-10-18T09:58:13+02:00)
Java version: 1.8.0_241, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home:
Hi Georg
> Am 03.03.2020 um 11:02 schrieb Georg Kallidis
> :
>
> Hi devs,
>
> preparing the release for torque 4.1/5.0 this stopped me in
> torque-templates: if providing an interface or peerInterface attribute in
> table element in schema.xml the generated results are not in the base
>
On 18.12.19 16:59, Georg Kallidis wrote:
> today I worked on a couple of TORQUE issues, which blocked the release of
> Torque 4.1, but could be resolved (someone checks this?).
The question is whether torque-test runs ok or not.
I got access to a fairly recent Oracle server and found that the
On 10.10.19 09:34, g...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: gk
> Date: Thu Oct 10 07:34:08 2019
> New Revision: 1868226
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1868226=rev
> Log:
> - added and updated changes.xml
The convention with Torque has been to track changes in JIRA tickets.
Bye, Thomas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Vandahl resolved TORQUE-359.
---
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Assignee: Thomas Vandahl
Fix Version/s: 4.1
Hi Georg,
On 12.03.19 14:34, Georg Kallidis wrote:
> Postgresql has timestamp with precision and zone, but this has yet to be
> added to Torque templates platform.
Just for the record: HSQLDB added zone awareness somewhere between 2.3
and 2.4.1 which causes the Torque tests to fail.
Bye,
Hi folks,
TORQUE-355 and TORQUE-356 are still open. Anyone care to jump in?
Bye, Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscr...@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-h...@db.apache.org
Shall we? We are on Java8 anyway.
Bye, Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscr...@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-h...@db.apache.org
Hi Jeff,
On 08.03.19 16:24, Jeffery Painter wrote:
> Nice! I was afraid to mess with the templates too much when I tried
> fixing all the JavaDoc issues. Looking forward to a release soon so we
> can figure out what we need to integrate with Turbine :-)
>
> Let me know if I can help with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Vandahl resolved TORQUE-357.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.1
Added feature to read support from JDBC driver
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Vandahl reassigned TORQUE-357:
-
Assignee: Thomas Vandahl
> Implement IDGenerator us
Thomas Vandahl created TORQUE-357:
-
Summary: Implement IDGenerator using
java.sql.Statement.getGeneratedKeys
Key: TORQUE-357
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-357
Project: Torque
Thomas Vandahl created TORQUE-356:
-
Summary: Improve support for HSQLDB 2.x
Key: TORQUE-356
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-356
Project: Torque
Issue Type: Improvement
Thomas Vandahl created TORQUE-355:
-
Summary: Implement millisecond support for MySQL timestamps
Key: TORQUE-355
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-355
Project: Torque
Issue
Thomas Vandahl created TORQUE-354:
-
Summary: Add doSelectAsStream() to BasePeerImpl
Key: TORQUE-354
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-354
Project: Torque
Issue Type: New
Hi Jeff,
On 08.10.18 14:42, Jeffery Painter wrote:
> I am not sure why those changes failed in Jenkins... everything looked
> fine on my end. There were some complaints about some of the Java8
> updates after making the dependency updates in the jenkins log file, but
> nothing that looked fatal
On 19.09.18 17:24, Thomas Fox wrote:
> Very cool.
Java 8 and Maven 3. That simple.
Bye, Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscr...@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-h...@db.apache.org
Hi Thomas,
On 17.09.18 22:52, t...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: tv
> Date: Mon Sep 17 20:52:16 2018
> New Revision: 1841146
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1841146=rev
> Log:
> Skip tests with Jenkins errors for now
Could you please try to find out why these tests fail on Jenkins while
On 9/11/18 5:41 AM, Thomas Fox wrote:
> Another idea: Not TorqueConnectionImpl.rollback() and
> TorqueConnectionImpl.commit() set the flag to not rollback on close(), but
> TransactionImpl.rollback() and TransactionImpl.commit(). So in this case the
> user can commit() and rollback() on the
Eclipse complains about unnecessary @SuppressWarnings({"unused",
"unchecked"}) in generated Java files. I was not able to find the place
where this annotation is inserted. I need a hint.
Bye, Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Shall we?
Bye, Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscr...@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: torque-dev-h...@db.apache.org
On 9/6/18 7:03 AM, Thomas Fox wrote:
> Ok, but should we not reset the committed and rolledBack Flag when the user
> could have issued further statements after a commit/rollback, e.g. when
> connection.createStatement() ist called?
Yes, I agree - at least in the general case. I our case,
On 05.09.18 19:19, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> On 03.09.18 05:32, Thomas Fox wrote:
>> As I understand it, TorqueConnectionImpl.committed and
>> TorqueConnectionImpl.rolledBack keep track of whether there could be
>> outstanding operations in a transaction. So
On 03.09.18 05:32, Thomas Fox wrote:
> As I understand it, TorqueConnectionImpl.committed and
> TorqueConnectionImpl.rolledBack keep track of whether there could be
> outstanding operations in a transaction. So when one calls close() on a
> connection with uncommitted changes these get rolled
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Vandahl resolved TORQUE-350.
---
Resolution: Implemented
Assignee: Thomas Vandahl
I chose a wrapper instead of a proxy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Vandahl resolved TORQUE-348.
---
Resolution: Not A Problem
Assignee: Thomas Vandahl
Fix Version/s: 4.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Vandahl updated TORQUE-351:
--
Comment: was deleted
(was: The Mac file system only has second resolution, so this fix doesn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Vandahl resolved TORQUE-351.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Thomas Vandahl
Fix Version/s: 4.1
Fixed in SVN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16592907#comment-16592907
]
Thomas Vandahl commented on TORQUE-351:
---
The test relies on the *identical* timestamps of two sets
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Vandahl updated TORQUE-353:
--
Description:
MySQL 5.7.16 on Mac OS X 10.11.6
DataTest.testLikeClauseEscaping tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Vandahl updated TORQUE-353:
--
Description:
MySQL 5.7.16 on Mac OS X 10.11.6
DataTest.testLikeClauseEscaping tests if '%\\c
Thomas Vandahl created TORQUE-353:
-
Summary: DataTest.testLikeClauseEscaping fails on MySQL 5.7.16
Key: TORQUE-353
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-353
Project: Torque
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Vandahl resolved TORQUE-349.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
Assignee: Thomas Vandahl
Please try again with Torque 4.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16582362#comment-16582362
]
Thomas Vandahl commented on TORQUE-351:
---
The Mac file system only has second resolution, so
Hi Graig
> Am 09.05.2018 um 18:12 schrieb Craig Russell :
>
> So I'd like Thomas to acknowledge that we are using the same process that
> most other PMCs use.
I have to admit that I didn't take too much time to research processes. I tried
to derive what to do using a
Hi Craig,
On 08.05.18 19:49, Craig Russell wrote:
> I think I am missing something. I am a member of the DB PMC and didn't know
> about the vote that was going on.
>
> DB-Torque is not a PMC. The DB PMC did not hold a vote. Where is the process
> that you went through documented?
The voters
Hi PMC,
the DB-Torque folks have held a vote about two new committers like this:
On 27.04.18 11:31, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> two people from the Turbine project have shown interest to help with a
> new release of Torque. Georg and Jeffery are experienced long-term
> contributors and PM
On 27.04.18 11:31, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> two people from the Turbine project have shown interest to help with a
> new release of Torque. Georg and Jeffery are experienced long-term
> contributors and PMC members of the Turbine project which historically
> alwa
Hi folks,
two people from the Turbine project have shown interest to help with a
new release of Torque. Georg and Jeffery are experienced long-term
contributors and PMC members of the Turbine project which historically
always had strong ties to Torque.
So shall we welcome them in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Vandahl resolved TORQUE-343.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Implement a central registry for peerImpls like the registry for manag
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Vandahl resolved TORQUE-347.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed most cases
> Reduce the amount of synchronization in collecti
Hi Thomas,
On 19.09.16 22:02, Thomas Fox wrote:
> Thomas, you have removed some version number from the maven plugins poms.
> I'm aware that the version number of the plugins were not the most current
> ones:-)
> However, I have found that specifying version numbers of plugins makes a
> maven
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15479624#comment-15479624
]
Thomas Vandahl commented on TORQUE-347:
---
[~tfischer]: Why are ColumnMap.inheritanceMaps
Thomas Vandahl created TORQUE-350:
-
Summary: Make use of try-with-resources possible with Torque
transactions
Key: TORQUE-350
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-350
Project: Torque
On 05.09.16 03:53, Thomas Fox wrote:
> Thomas, is it ok if I remove the empty templates
> doSelect.vm
> doInsert.vm
> log.vm
>
> and the commented lines in imports.vm?
Absolutely. I have to admit that I do not fully understand how the
generator is configured so I decided for the smallest impact
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15409600#comment-15409600
]
Thomas Vandahl commented on TORQUE-343:
---
Never mind. I made a simple initial approach to test
Thomas Vandahl created TORQUE-348:
-
Summary: Why is the databases-map not cleared during shutdown?
Key: TORQUE-348
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-348
Project: Torque
Issue
Hi folks,
isn't it time to upgrade to a more recent JDK for the Torque runtime?
I could imagine some nice use cases for Java8 streams.
WDYT?
Bye, Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscr...@db.apache.org
For
Thomas Vandahl created TORQUE-347:
-
Summary: Reduce the amount of synchronization in collections used
by Torque
Key: TORQUE-347
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-347
Project: Torque
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Vandahl resolved TORQUE-346.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in SVN
> Introduce abstract layer for peer impl to reduce the amo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15395587#comment-15395587
]
Thomas Vandahl commented on TORQUE-346:
---
[~tfischer]: Another question: Is obj.getPrimaryKey
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15395360#comment-15395360
]
Thomas Vandahl commented on TORQUE-343:
---
About the complex query case:
Say, I have an application
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15395340#comment-15395340
]
Thomas Vandahl commented on TORQUE-343:
---
Yes, the use case is exactly as you describe. In general
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15394360#comment-15394360
]
Thomas Vandahl commented on TORQUE-346:
---
[~tfischer]: Question: What is the actual meaning
Thomas Vandahl created TORQUE-346:
-
Summary: Introduce abstract layer for peer impl to reduce the
amount of generated code
Key: TORQUE-346
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-346
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Vandahl resolved TORQUE-345.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in SVN
> Remove commons-collections depende
Thomas Vandahl created TORQUE-345:
-
Summary: Remove commons-collections dependency
Key: TORQUE-345
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-345
Project: Torque
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Vandahl resolved TORQUE-344.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.1
Added PerUserPool2DataSourceFactory.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15394032#comment-15394032
]
Thomas Vandahl commented on TORQUE-344:
---
I'd rather make both dependencies optional and document
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Vandahl reassigned TORQUE-344:
-
Assignee: Thomas Vandahl
> Update to Commons Pool/DBCP Versio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15334234#comment-15334234
]
Thomas Vandahl edited comment on TORQUE-343 at 6/16/16 6:16 PM:
Yes I know
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15334234#comment-15334234
]
Thomas Vandahl commented on TORQUE-343:
---
Yes I know about the extensibility. The use case I have
Thomas Vandahl created TORQUE-343:
-
Summary: Implement a central registry for peerImpls like the
registry for managers
Key: TORQUE-343
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-343
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Vandahl resolved TORQUE-342.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Thomas Vandahl
Fixed in SVN
> XXXPeer.addSelectColu
Thomas Vandahl created TORQUE-342:
-
Summary: XXXPeer.addSelectColumns() is declared to throw
TorqueException for no apparent reason
Key: TORQUE-342
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-342
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15125487#comment-15125487
]
Thomas Vandahl commented on TORQUE-304:
---
I'm not sure about the general use case here but in my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15103751#comment-15103751
]
Thomas Vandahl commented on TORQUE-152:
---
Village is not used anymore in Torque 4.0.
> Torque is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15103750#comment-15103750
]
Thomas Vandahl commented on TORQUE-36:
--
Please note that Village is no longer used by Torque 4.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15103749#comment-15103749
]
Thomas Vandahl commented on TORQUE-36:
--
Yes it was. Yes the problem may also apply to other databases
On 19.09.15 03:09, Thomas Fox wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in order to solve
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-290
> I'd like to make org.apache.torque.criteria.PreparedStatementPart an interface
> with the current PreparedStatementPart being renamed to
> PreparedStatementPartImpl
> and an
On 19.09.15 23:02, Thomas Fox wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-334
> I'd like to change the name of the existing retriebeByPks methods to
> retrieveByObjectKeys.
>
> Any objections or better ideas ?
>
> Example:
> BaseBookPeer now has 2 methods:
>
> public
On 08.09.15 16:09, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> I already managed to update the code when I discovered that the whole manager
> package has zero test coverage. I want to fix this before committing the
> changes.
Done.
By
Thanks, Thomas, for the offer. I'lllook at it in the next few weeks, and
> perhaps come back for help if I'm stuck.
>
>Thomas
>
> - Ursprüngliche Mail -
> Von: "Thomas Vandahl" <t...@apache.org>
> An: "Apache Torque Developers List" <torque-d
On 05.09.15 03:41, Thomas Fox wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for fixing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-226, a version of
> jgit must be included which requires JDK 1.7 for the generator.
> I suggest to raise the required JDK version for the Torque 4.1 generator to
> JDK 1.7
>
> Also, it has
On 05.09.15 07:51, Thomas Fox wrote:
> We have an open ticket
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-327
> which suggests to upgrade to JCS 2.0. Now JCS-2.0-beta1 is available. Does
> anyone have an idea how stable this version ist and whether we should try to
> use it ?
I guess it is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Vandahl reassigned TORQUE-335:
-
Assignee: Thomas Vandahl
Syntax error in DOAP file release section
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Vandahl resolved TORQUE-335.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in SVN
Syntax error in DOAP file release section
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14100054#comment-14100054
]
Thomas Vandahl commented on TORQUE-320:
---
My point just was that I remember
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14065416#comment-14065416
]
Thomas Vandahl commented on TORQUE-320:
---
There are database systems that require
On 24.07.13 10:44, Thomas Fox wrote:
Personally I'd be fine to switch to java 6 as minimum requirement.
+1
Bye, Thomas.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: torque-dev-unsubscr...@db.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 04.07.2013 15:52, Thomas Fox wrote:
Thomas Vandahl wrote:
- What is the equivalence of
runOnlyOnSchemaChangetrue/runOnlyOnSchemaChange ? I have Maven
integration active in Eclipse so the current situation means that the OM
classes are being generated on every build which in turn means
Thomas Vandahl created TORQUE-292:
-
Summary: The feature of runOnlyOnSchemaChange is missing from the
maven plugin
Key: TORQUE-292
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-292
Project
Thomas Vandahl created TORQUE-293:
-
Summary: The generated OM classes of object A contain a method
getAtoBJoinA() where they should contain a method getAtoBJoinB()
Key: TORQUE-293
URL: https://issues.apache.org
Thomas Vandahl created TORQUE-294:
-
Summary: An example for the generation of the Init-ID-Table-SQL is
missing from the docs.
Key: TORQUE-294
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TORQUE-294
On 08.07.2013 10:12, Thomas Fox wrote:
Probably the best idea is to reimplement the feature. Personally I do not
use it (I use maven on the command line) so I did not miss it.
Please create an issue.
TORQUE-292
This feature is very helpful when dealing with m:n relations. It allows
to access
On 08.07.2013 10:47, Thomas Fox wrote:
Plus there is the wrong description, which says required for generation
of java classes, which definitely is a bug. I have already fixed it, can
you please look if it is ok now ?
Thanks for looking into this. I'd write ...this option is required for
SQL
Hi folks,
I just started to migrate a project (fulcrum-security-torque) to Torque
4 and stumbled across some problems. Before creating issues, I'd like to
make sure that my understanding is correct:
- What is the equivalence of
runOnlyOnSchemaChangetrue/runOnlyOnSchemaChange ? I have Maven
On 07.06.2013 09:12, Thomas Fox wrote:
If we need a wiki, there seem to be the possibility to add moderation (i.e.
nothing gets changed until one of the moderators approves the change)
It is much simpler than that. See
Hi Thomas,
On 20.03.2013 01:59, Thomas Fox wrote:
Personally, I'd like to remove the deprecated APIs, especially the old
Criteria implementation, from the runtime.
+1
So these are the things I'd like to tackle.
Does anyone else have any other plans ?
I'd like to suggest two additional
1 - 100 of 487 matches
Mail list logo