** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
I believe this is a regression from
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3.10/+bug/1990586 which
I know sounds hilarious because it was fixing another issue like this
but here is what I believe happened:
- mutter and gnome-shell were released on the same day
- gnome-shell was eligible
To debug the solver we'd also need an EDSP dump from that operation but
I think we're out of luck.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2025462
Title:
Apt deletes
Please attach /var/log/apt/history.log files showing at least the
upgrade and the previous one.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
Newer releases of Ubuntu can always start making use of new file system
feature flags. Looking at all currently supported releases (whether
standard or ESM), we have never SRUed e2fsprogs before, it only ever
received security updates, so I'd be inclined to not do a backport here
either and
It's all the same people on both sides and I didn't close the Debian bug
so it's on my mind, but that's hard to have a general process for.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
This is not correct, apt-key is deprecated *because it requires gpg*,
not in favor of gpg, and gpg is not installed anymore, since we
specifically reworked the packaging to get a small minimal gpgv for
verification.
There is no way to fix apt-key as it requires gpg and is fundamentally
misaligned
Please actually read the warning message. Also read the warning message
apt-key gives you:
Warning: apt-key is deprecated. Manage keyring files in trusted.gpg.d
instead (see apt-key(8)).
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because
** Tags removed: rls-jj-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023545
Title:
[UBUNTU 22.04] openssl with ibmca engine
** Tags removed: rls-mm-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to powermgmt-base in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980991
Title:
/usr/sbin/on_ac_power incorrectly
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => grub2 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2023973
Title:
Low priority. Documentation. Suggestion : improve error
As you can see in the output grub-common failed to install because the
service failed to restart which edits the /boot/grub/grubenv file. This
indicates the file is corrupted either due to a bug in grub we don't
know about, a hard reset during grub running which corrupted the disk
cache or
While I cherry-picked the fix, as this only affects Debian, I'm going to
mark the bug as Won't Fix.
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
Ubuntu 18.04 has reached it's end of standard support, hence marking
won't fix.
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
The reasoning for rejection on the Debian side seems valid, and since
that's a universe package maintained by the community it's best left
that way.
** Changed in: qtchooser (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Reassigning and marking incomplete as we can't act on that if we don't
have a reproducer or know why it happened to not chown() when it moved
the file out of partial/
** Package changed: update-manager (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You
Public bug reported:
As part of my sandboxed APT I noticed that the package failed to install
as it was trying to write to /root.
/root is a user directory, not a system one, which may not even exist
because the administrator changed it to like /home/root, for example,
and we definitely should
I think you need to url encode the sequence, but not sure. I don't think
there's anything we can do here about handling backslashes, the problem
is backspaces do happen in actual config items and we can't introduce a
behavior change for them as that would cause regressions.
You should be free to
That's a hashicorp problem if they serve repositories without by-hash or
atomically updated dists/ directory, this bug here is solved.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
Generally for reproducing issues I set Phased-Update-Percentage to 0 on
the packages the user had phased so it's independent of machine-id, it's
not been a problem in my experience to reproduce issues.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
** Package changed: update-manager (Ubuntu) => openldap (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2017927
Title:
Failed to start SLAPD and B operation
I did not make any changes to the design when moving it from Update-
Manager in apt, it's been this way for 10 years now, it's a proven
concept.
The initial implementation used and md5 but the math gets complex when
dealing with 128 bit integers.
You can easily override the machine-id for apt by
If those are your only two kernels both should be kept. If you have a
higher versioned kernel, it's correct that 1100 is removed. That's a
feature, not a bug.
Also don't do that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed
Deleting InRelease files from the repository is not supported. The
release file is mandatory for phased update support to correctly ignore
phasing for security updates, as it identifies security repositories
based on the Archive: field in the InRelease file.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
There's more complexity of course because I only talk about the first
of the two solvers apt runs. The first solver marks the changes based on
following the graph from the user-initiated actions downward to
dependencies, marking Depends for install, Conflicts for remove, and so
on.
If that
This is the expected behavior of apt, and a deeply integral part of the
solver algorithm, that it does not try to remove packages that have an
upgrade available. So that's not something I'd want to touch because the
regression potential is huge.
You can always use pass systemd-timesyncd- to apt
** Also affects: binutils (Ubuntu Lunar)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Lunar)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (enr0n)
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Lunar)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because
As #1 says, the file permissions for the keyring are wrong. They should
be world-readable, or at the very least readable by _apt
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which
There has always been a difference between which packages are upgradable
and which packages will be upgraded, this is not exactly new and phasing
dependent.
If A is phasing and B depends on that new A, both will be kept back.
While apt list --upgradable could hide A, it can't hide B - it doesn't
bionic: apt 1.6.17, Started with linux-image-4.15.0-208-generic
Log:
1. (in 208) installed 206
2. (in 208) no kernels to autoremove
3. (in 208) installed 204
4. (in 208) SUCCESS: autoremove would remove 204
5. (in 204) SUCCESS: After reboot into 204, 206 is autoremovable and 204, 208
are kept
6.
FWIW, the mmdebstrap issue is resolved in lunar, I'm not sure it makes a
whole lot of sense to fix kinetic to release apt 2-3 months before EOL
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
I'm going to set this to Won't Fix because that seems to be an important
part of the solver logic, and the workarounds - running upgrade first,
or using ubuntu-drivers - are easy to do and the potential for
regression significantly outweighs them.
This will get solved eventually by a nicer solver
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992513
Title:
apt will not install nvidia-driver-470-server if
I think we debugged this recently but I'm not sure where the end result
of this is that we do not mark packages for removal that have an upgrade
available, hence we end up without a removal request after the first
stage solver, and the Conflicts solver that runs after can't solve that.
--
You
Reproduced issue and dumped test case into https://salsa.debian.org/apt-
team/apt-tests/-/blob/main/edsp/fail-ubuntu-1992513.edsp.log for future
analysis when doing solver work.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
** Tags removed: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992513
Title:
apt will not install nvidia-driver-470-server if nvidia-
driver-450-server
Well you gotta quote it in single quotes, that's shell syntax and has
nothing to do with apt.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
My understanding is that this has not been addressed yet. We need to
actually make use of that data even if UEFI gives us that.
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
You received this bug
APT automatically removes unnecessary kernels. If something depends on a
specific kernel version or you marked that kernel as manually installed
it will be kept of course. Also it will always keep 2 kernels around as
a minimum, and of course the currently booted kernel.
** Changed in: apt
Is desktop working on this / going to?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ibus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2008279
Title:
glib2.0 2.75.3-3 breaks text input for Firefox & Chromium snaps
Status
You can only query '?section(^universe/)'
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in
** Package changed: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) => grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2007743
Title:
intramfs Failed:
Also you see other errors from e.g. your tracker database indicating
that filesystem is corrupt. Maybe your hard disk is failing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
Ah I do see ZSTD-compressed data is corrupt in the log, what do you see
when you run update-initramfs -u? Any errors? Does it work after running
that?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
I cannot find any "Not Enough Memory" on codesearch.debian.net. I know
grub says "out of memory" and AFAIK doesn't ask you to press a key so
it's still not clear where you see an error, sorry. Are you sure the
message is absolutely identical character by character?
None of the syslog should be
Please include the exact error messages and when they occur, as well as
the grub version.
Are you on the latest grub update already (ends in ubuntu14.1)? This
includes a lot of fixes for out of memory issues. If not try to upgrade
using apt install grub-efi-amd64-signed (apt upgrade might not yet
** Summary changed:
- When apt keeps back packages due to phased updates, it should say nothing
+ When apt keeps back packages due to phased updates, it should list them
separately
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => needrestart (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980881
Title:
In Ubuntu 22.04 apt-get may stall
Status in
There can be many reasons why files remain. Did you purge the packages
for those Linux versions? Did you do any dkms modules.
This is not a bug in apt, apt is not responsible for those files.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => linux
I noticed that too yesterday but it's hard to make this right I think.
Maybe the default permissions should give read access to the auth.conf
snippet for users in the admin group or whatever it's called.
Because the problem to guard against are shared systems where
credentials for Pro shouldn't
And it also will for 23.04
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2004505
Title:
apt-key is still packaged
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
The manual page is a bit overexcited:D
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2004505
Title:
apt-key is still packaged
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug
This fix will be included in grub2-unsigned/2.06-2ubuntu14.1 for
kinetic, jammy, focal, bionic. Binaries have been built in
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-uefi-team/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages
for kinetic.
Signing request: https://answers.launchpad.net/canonical-signing-
jobs/+question/704589
Marking as verified per test instructions, as the autopkgtests have all
passed (and the reported regression also has been fixed in a retry
apparently, hooray).
** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-kinetic
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy verification-done-kinetic
I think it's better to ship slightly wrong documentation in the wrong
place than to ship the right documentation in a language users don't
understand, so that's why they don#t get updated in stable releases.
I do not think the apt.conf manual page is a good idea in the first
place. These options
As David wrote, the behavior here is correct. linux-lowlatency is a
binary package provided by linux-meta-lowlatency, for which you are
requesting the source code.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Opinion
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Patches are welcome but unfortunately there isn't much we can do
otherwise, this highly depends on network specifics like latency and
mtus and is never reliably reproducible.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
The entire upload will be uploaded to all older releases but we do have
a security upload already in the unapproved queues that should go out
first, but that needs approving those first, them passing the SRU
verification, a resigning against the new signing key the new shim
needs, and finally
** Changed in: findutils (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to findutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973788
Title:
Merge findutils 4.9.0-3 from
The term you're looking for is workaround, not triage or fixes. Triage
is the process of understanding the bug and marking it the correct
things.
Not using the same language as everyone else and writing very long
comments makes it hard to understand.
First I thought you reported an out of memory
Hi ybdjkfd I don't really understand what you are doing and how it's
relevant. This issue should be fixed in lunar-proposed 2.06-2ubuntu16,
please only add comments if you have meaningful insights regarding the
verification of that update.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Changed in: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
** Changed in: grub2-signed (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
It's actually the exact same backtrace in that bug as here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
This is pretty straightforward because ubuntu-drivers-common got ported
from apt.Cache to apt_pkg.Cache to be fast enough, but software-
properties still passed it in apt.Cache.
It's the same bug as bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964880 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964880
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1965094
"Additional Drivers" application crashes on startup
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964880
software-properties-gtk crashed with
I have now picked all the rhboot patches in 2.06-2ubuntu16~ppa1 in
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-uefi-team/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages
and will boot that before uploading to the archive.
This *should* allow initrds over 4GB but obviously bugs could be there.
The important bit is that we are now
Tests have passed on the infra with both old apt and the new apt (I
retriggered it with u-u as additional trigger), so this is good to go.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic
--
You received this bug
It's quite clear that this *cannot* fail, so the problem must be
something else like yet another seccomp borkage.
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => docker.io (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Julian Andres Klode (juliank) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sysvinit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998325
Title:
Please me
Uploaded.
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notificatio
I'm setting Lunar to fix released as the fix is in 2.5.0. Despite it not
being released yet, we'd otherwise just forget about it.
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu Kinetic)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
Type checking fails in CI
[Test plan]
Have CI type check successfully
[Where problems could occur]
It's only a comment *inside* the function, so not really anywhere.
** Affects: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Fix Released
**
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+ Large files can't be downloaded as we use a 32-bit integer in AcquireFile
constructor, this breaks e.g. command-not-found generator:
+
I'm trying to update the command-not-found indexes (bin/cnf-extract.py
$MIRROR $suite $component $arch) on the
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => In Progress
** Also affects: python-apt (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: python-apt (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: python-apt (Ubuntu Kinetic)
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1997036
Title:
python-apt: FTBFS with Python 3.11
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pyth
>>> acq=apt.apt_pkg.Acquire()
>>> apt.apt_pkg.AcquireFile(acq,"http://foo;, "foo", size=2875204834)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
OverflowError: signed integer is greater than maximum
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
Public bug reported:
Despite support being in fcc-unlock.d
Bus 001 Device 003: ID 2c7c:030a Quectel Wireless Solutions Co., Ltd.
Quectel EM05-G
the modem remains locked and enabling it fails:
jak@jak-t14-g3:~:master$ mmcli -m any -e
error: couldn't enable the modem:
@Craig The limit in Debian is actually much lower than in Ubuntu even,
but fixing it there is even harder as that misses a lot more patches.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
I encourage flavours using Qt to fix this if they care about it.
** Tags removed: foundations-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
Seeing the comment now, I want to point out that /usr takes precedence
over /, so if the command is available there is no overhead - only in
the error case.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
APT currently launches dpkg in the same environment as it is launched in
leaking all sorts of environment variables to it, only overriding PATH
with a sensible default.
This is suboptimal, apt should clean the environment more thoroughly or
populate a clean environment from
Removing the foundations-todo tag for now because I can control both the
removal and the bug fix.
** Tags removed: foundations-todo
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973830
Title:
Error upgrading f
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (enr0n)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1977630
Title:
machinectl
** Changed in: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Changed in: grub2-signed (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pa
201 - 300 of 2457 matches
Mail list logo
