** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Description changed:
- On an Ubuntu 22.04 desktop system created using the current installation
- image without enabling package updates over the network, installing the
- package libudev1 results in a large number of
In your libmysqlclient21 example everything seems to be working
correctly so I don't understand why you post that.
- you are eligible for 8.0.29-0ubuntu0.22.04.3
- you force downgrade to 8.0.29-0ubuntu0.22.04.2
- you upgrade once again to 8.0.29-0ubuntu0.22.04.3
- no higher version available in
For concrete details:
1) Which command would install these updates
2) Please attached `apt policy ...names of affected packages...` output
3) Attach your sources.list and sources.list.d files
4) Attach your preferences and preferences.d files
Maybe just throw all the files into a tarball.
--
The apt update is from kinetic, the development release. What are you
doing?
The question is what installs them. Certainly it's not apt itself doing
that unless you have very weird pinning in place.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
I do not believe there is a bug in apt here. APT literally is too strict
now, it fails to install packages. It will get more relaxed in the
coming weeks.
Anyway, if you find out where those get upgraded, please reopen the bug
and reassign to the correct package.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
** Tags added: rls-jj-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970449
Title:
GPG keys are not shown in Software and Updates
Status in
For impish, please remove the update, it is not necessary to release an
SRU 3 days before EOL that improves the situation for further SRUs.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
Verified. I hacked around the Packages files locally to simulate the
situation:
0. Pinned snapd to -1 and removed it
1. Modified packages file to add Depends: snapd to an update in proposed
(netplan.io), and set
Phased-Update-Percentage: 0 on snapd
Before:
root@jammy:~# apt policy snapd
This is being fixed in https://salsa.debian.org/apt-
team/apt/-/merge_requests/248
** Package changed: systemd (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode
You also do not have the latest docker installed. Be aware that if the
host system is older than the guest, various things can fail due to
seccomp issues, the latest docker should always be used.
So please check with all updates installed in the host, the official
ubuntu:jammy image, and using a
Please actually follow the error message and check that the keyring
permissions are correct.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Akbarkhon Variskhanov (kbar) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1978871
Title:
apt package missing apt-auto-removal
Status in
Well you figured out the versions we stopped shipping it, so you could
have just read the changelog to find out why that happened.
But anyway, we no longer protect the last installed kernel.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because
Set the verification done tags based on my the confirmation in #11 and
#12 of what I see in my pre-upload testing, and also double checked as
described - with mmdebstrap with proposed enabled, it installed apt
2.0.9 successfully
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974456
What happens here is that that version of snapd is not phased for you,
and it hence pins it down to 1. But you already had it pinned to -1 and
that got overridden, sorry. It should only downgrade pin priority to 1
if it's phased as not for you.
--
You received this bug notification because you
Thanks. I think this is a corner case I did not handle correctly in the
phased updates support.
https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/phased-updates-in-apt-in-21-04/20345
I think if you set
APT::Get::Never-Include-Phased-Updates
In the meantime, this should workaround the issue.
** Changed in: apt
There is no specific handling in apt for this, so where are you seeing
this? Is it possible you see this in a graphical update tool like
update-manager?
Your apt-get log looks correct.
What does apt-cache policy snapd say?
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You
My goal would be to switch to deb822 sources for this with the key
embedded in the .sources file.
We're still missing the ability to edit those files graphically however,
that needs to be implemented first.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
Hi Gary,
how do you invoke debootstrap so it uses packages from the the updates
pocket? I wasn't able to with --extra-suites=focal-updates, but I might
have missed something.
But then I guess we should actually release that fix too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
It might, I just might miss the right setting, I don't really know.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974456
Title:
regression: apt.postint fails if never
@David I was able to reproduce this with mmdebstrap as it uses -updates
pocket, but not with debootstrap as it only uses the release pockets.
Which tool were you using to bootstrap your system?
It's possible we might just want keep the fix in -proposed and not
release it to updates if it does not
Yup I'm going to push updated bionic and focal SRUs for this next week
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974456
Title:
regression: apt.postint fails if never
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
Please create a new bug for that regression, thanks for noticing!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968154
Title:
Only keep 2 kernels
Status in apt package in
I ran the tests in lxd, I'm not sure that's sufficient, but:
on bionic:
upgrade-all-security FAIL non-zero exit status 1
focal failed to build for me in autopkgtest:
2022-05-20 10:04:12,150 ERROR Exception happened during upgrade.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
looking
** Also affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
Also you probably don't want to run devel proposed, that's a recipe for
disaster.
** Tags added: rls-kk-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973149
I thought we patched that warning out. Do not read it :D
Notably this is the only supported layout.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix => Triaged
--
Verified impish 2.3.9ubuntu0.1
Log:
1. (in 1016) started with 5.13.0-1016-kvm; installed 5.13.0-1022-kvm
2. (in 1016) no kernels to autoremove
3. (in 1016) installed linux-image-5.13.0-1011-kvm
linux-modules-5.13.0-1011-kvm, and marked auto
4. (in 1016) SUCCESS: autoremove would remove 1011
5.
** No longer affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Impish)
** No longer affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Focal)
** No longer affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Bionic)
** No longer affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
** Description changed:
[Impact]
APT currently keeps 3 kernels or
The gimp-help-* packages have a dependency on only virtual packages rather than
firefox-esr | firefox | chromium | x-www-browser
or something which is a bug. as it will pick a random one. Also I'm not sure
why it would depend on the non-graphical browser virtual package (www-browser)
instead
The mirror list is shipped in python-apt and updated with each python-
apt update, and with each Ubuntu point release based on the launchpad
mirror feed https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archivemirrors-rss.
Additional updates to just the mirror list are not made.
The mirror method is supported using
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814072
Title:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1814072 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814072
charite did not support https at the time the mirror list in python-apt
was created. The mirror list is updated with each python-apt update, and
with each Ubuntu point release.
With the next update, only
@sil2100 Added that to regression potential. It was used to keep the
third kernel. There was some misunderstanding how that affects the set
calculated.
I noticed that 2.0.7 and 2.3.9ubuntu0.1 had the wrong version in
maintainer scripts, so I will have to upload a fixed 2.0.8 for the
former (it
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Impish)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: unattended-upgrades
Not an apt bug in either case if it crashes your system
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => ubuntu
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
unattended-upgrades in jammy did not need a change, we'll see if SRUs
will need changes, hence keeping the task so we can add them later on
without having to reset to launchpad API shenanigans.
** Description changed:
[Impact]
APT currently keeps 3 kernels or even 4 in some releases. Our
(Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Assignee: Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
Status: In Progress
** Affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: fr-2155
** Description changed:
[Impact]
APT currently keeps 3 kernels or even 4 in some
The ro flag is correct, the / filesystem is remounted rw after a
filesystem check, I don't know where precisely, I'm gonna reassign this
to systemd
** Package changed: grub2 (Ubuntu) => systemd (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
** Tags added: fr-2162
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dbus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962036
Title:
dbus was stopped during today's jammy update, breaking desktop
Status in dbus package
** Changed in: dbus (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-22.04
** Changed in: dbus (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Also affects: dbus (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Critical
Status: Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965960
Title:
apt installs snap packages
Status in apt package in
Thanks for your bug report.
I am reassigning this to the installer, but it seems more likely that
this is a result of user error, given that there have not been any
relevant changes in focal's installer. For user support, please use
askubuntu, discourse, the ubuntu-user mailing lists, or the
I have uploaded the agreed changes (attached) to jammy.
** Patch added: "initramfs-tools_0.140ubuntu13.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1958148/+attachment/5569316/+files/initramfs-tools_0.140ubuntu13.diff
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
I wonder if you need to install gnome-software Deb maybe.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962346
Title:
Ubuntu reboots instead of powering off if a
Though on the other hand I don't really want flavours to do offline
upgrades, but I don't think we have a clear-cut policy on that. Either
way, removing the feature inside PackageKit might break some flavours,
so seeing as we are past feature freeze, fixing that in the frontend
would be less
This is *not* a packagekit issue. There are flavours upgrading using
packagekit, not everyone uses update-manager. It's either gnome-shell or
gnome-session or something that should not be reacting to this.
** Package changed: packagekit (Ubuntu) => gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug
Removing the duplicate, because while the other bugs focus on the
crashes, this one focuses on dbus stopping. I don't think the crashes
matter, fwiw, dbus should not be stopping in the first place, there's no
way to gracefully recover from that.
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1961910
I did not find interesting journalctl, maybe someone else is luckier.
** Attachment added: "journal.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus/+bug/1962036/+attachment/5563112/+files/journal.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
The attached /var/log/apt/term.log does not show anything suspicious
** Attachment added: "apt-term.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus/+bug/1962036/+attachment/5563111/+files/apt-term.log
** Description changed:
+ Impact: logind stopped, so desktop stopped, ssh stopped, got
dpkg.log from that run
** Attachment added: "dpkg.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus/+bug/1962036/+attachment/5563110/+files/dpkg.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dbus in Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Impact: logind stopped, so desktop stopped, ssh stopped, got no getty.
Had to hard reset.
Today's jammy upgrade stopped dbus at 19:46:27
Feb 23 19:46:27 jak-t480s systemd[1]: Stopping D-Bus System Message
Bus...
This should not happen. I don't know which package caused
We generally expect programs to print a depreciation notice to stderr
and not just hide them in release notes, that we, as downstream users
don't read :)
If it doesn't warn during use, it's not properly deprecated.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
Matthias, could this be a result of allowing PK to switch versions?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961837
Title:
PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform
Question we have to ask: Is breaking support for old servers without a
deprecation notice in the LTS release the best cause of action?
** Summary changed:
- openssh 8.8 breaks login to canonical servers
+ openssh 8.8 breaks login to Canonical servers
--
You received this bug notification
It says
Incompatibility is more likely when connecting to older SSH
implementations that have not been upgraded or have not closely tracked
improvements in the SSH protocol. For these cases, it may be necessary
to selectively re-enable RSA/SHA1 to allow connection and/or user
authentication via
Public bug reported:
With 8.7p1-4 connecting to wendigo
debug1: Next authentication method: publickey
debug1: Offering public key: /home/jak/.ssh/id_rsa RSA
SHA256:Dj1/l9g5RH00/wO7puC1WVxgpvmhmaQg3wEETwmOFPk agent
debug1: Server accepts key: /home/jak/.ssh/id_rsa RSA
We'll continue/start working on the SRUs mid May, if no regressions are
reported until then. That gives it a month or so in stable jammy which
seems reasonable for the scope of changes and very little testing being
done so far.
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors as the default compression level is still
an ongoing discussion.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958148
Title:
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914278
Title:
Kernel updates marked as
1.2.5 is out now, I'll go grab that directly rather than try to
reconstruct the correct ugit tarball for the git snapshot :)
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
** Changed in: python-debian (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-debian in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960404
Title:
merge python-debian 0.1.43
Superseded by a no-change rebuild -4.1build1; it turns out the delta was
not needed anymore.
** Changed in: make-dfsg (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
I rebuilt make-dfsg 4.1 without changes and cross-toolchain-base mostly
finished building against it in the same bileto ppa, so this issue seems
resolved, probably some toolchain bug?
https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-
service/+archive/ubuntu/4783/+packages
** Changed in: make-dfsg (Ubuntu)
Note that gmake is shipped in make-guile, not the normal make package,
but currently broken, which this will address
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to make-dfsg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989961
** Changed in: make-dfsg (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Changed in: make-dfsg (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed t
I don't know if anyone looks at apt-cacher-ng bug reports, but reassigning it
there for further analysis.
The log says that this is apt-cacher-ng failing to talk to launchpad.
I generally recommend avoiding apt-cacher-ng due to bugs in the
interaction with apt (which then go in endless circles
I tried to reproduce the issue in a podman container, but was unable to
do so. This makes sense: After do-release-upgrade -d, obviously apt
upgrade will not have any pending upgrades.
Marking this as incomplete, as we'd need to see a clean reproducer to
get anywhere.
Looking at the postinst, it
It seems you use apt-cacher-ng, please try if the issue reproduces
without it, and if so, if it happens with a known good proxy like squid
(e.g. using deb-squid-proxy).
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Marking as Opinion as David explained why that is not a thing we can
reasonably determine.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Opinion
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1960582 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960582
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1960582
[critical] dpkg error while processing - can't install nor upgrade
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
You have already left grub at this point and the kernel also started.
Reassigning to systemd in the meantime to debug this further as a
userspace boot issue. This might need further reassing.
You'll have to boot this verbosely, it's no use with a splash screen
enabled.
** Package changed: grub2
Please sudo chmod 644
/var/lib/apt/lists/de.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_focal-
backports_InRelease to fix this.
If you can reproduce this reliably, please let me know. Otherwise,
there's nothing we can do to fix the underlying bug, as we can't analyse
it further, so I'm going to be closing
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1004272
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004272
** Also affects: binutils (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004272
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification
Arguably people could hack in an override for Installed-Size when
building the deb somehow to give a rough estimate, but might not be
worth the effort.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix => Invalid
--
You received
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958810
Title:
Apt installing snap package if got some error why
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958812
Title:
If apt installs snap package, then warn, because
Further data points:
- The first build with new binutils was
s390x build of soci 4.0.1-5ubuntu1 in ubuntu jammy PROPOSED
- Investigation on Debian shows that it was not affected, and that the
bug is caused by LTO - if you enable LTO on Debian, it starts building
the broken library as well.
Technically this was critical while it was in proposed, I set it to high
as we removed it; but it's a blocker to fix this for a future binutils
upload.
** Tags added: rls-jj-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
Public bug reported:
Building libxcrypt with the new binutils upload
2.37.50.20220119-0ubuntu1 in proposed produces binaries with one RWE
LOAD header instead of two LOAD headers (one RE, one RW); causing it to
fail to load in services that use MemoryDenyWriteExecute=yes, thus
breaking a ton of
You can of course use ACLs to grant permissions to _apt to individual
files.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668944
Title:
The _apt user ignores group
Subscribing ubuntu-security as I'd like to hear some insight from the
security team how switching groups would work when sandboxing, and
whether that makes sense.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
This probably should be reassigned to the kde settings package. The way
we approach upgrades in *Ubuntu is that they are done online and
attended, except for security updates, which are installed automatically
by unattended-upgrades.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
> cloud-init shouldn't care cause the ufw service doesn't do anything
unless ufw is enabled (and even when it is enabled, it just loads
firewall rules).
It doesn't care about ufw at all, systemd has noticed a cycle between
the units and deleted network-pre.target start job (or cloud-init in
#1),
Though arguably I'd expect this to be fixed by removing
DefaultDependencies again, if I looked at this correctly.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ufw in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950039
Title:
I have added a cloud-init task, to draw cloud-init people in to help get
this resolved.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ufw in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950039
Title:
ufw 0.36.1-3 introduces
I don't believe your reproducer is valid - cloud-init is not installed
anymore, as autopkgtest-buildvm-ubuntu-cloud removes it when building
the VM, whereas it remains on the cloud images, as it's needed there to
actually get the IP address during boot.
Removing the DefaultDependencies=no means
Hi,
thanks for your bug report. I'm not quite sure what you are experiencing
here, you likely have manually removed a package that depended on the
drivers and then caused them to become autoremovable. Though usually I'd
have expected the drivers to be installed manually.
We are going to need to
I think we can rebuild images on the staging autopkgtest instance with
the packages from proposed and run a couple hundred tests there and see
if it still breaks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ufw in Ubuntu.
This broke the autopkgtest cloud. Networking did not came up and hence
no tests passed anymore. We absolutely must not let this pass until we
are sure the problem is resolved, as rebuilding images without it is
hard. (so setting it to incomplete is fairly dangerous).
Debian does not use
I believe this is actually a bug in the QA website which misses the step
to setup /dev in the test scenario
https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/testcases/1318/info - so reassigning
there and marking the apt task as Invalid, but keeping it around rather
than deleting it, as it's related.
**
Thanks for your bug report. I believe you meant ubuntu-base, not ubuntu-
core (the snap based one)
How did you test this? This seems to me like you forgot to populate
/dev, either statically or by bind mounting the /dev from the host.
The tarball only contains an empty /dev, and the permissions
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1929082 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929082
Thanks for the bug report.
Please ignore Chris.
This is not a bug in apt. Launchpad currently does not preserve an old
version when a new one is phasing, so non-installability can happen
occasionally.
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951943
Title:
Engine crashes when loading
Since 20.04, apt can wait for a lock.
The apt(8) command automatically waits for a lock for 120 seconds (non-
interactive) or infinitely.
The apt-get(8) command can be configured to wait as well by passing the
-o DPkg::Lock::Timeout=, where
may also be -1 for infinite.
This avoids any races
This is a local configuration issue and not a bug in apt. APT does not
know how your proxy configuration will interact with your sources.list.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
Thanks for testing! It also built successfully on all releases, so it
did not crash during tests, so marking this as verified.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic
verification-needed-focal verification-needed-hirsute verification-needed-impish
** Tags added:
401 - 500 of 2457 matches
Mail list logo
