Check that you have less files in /var/lib/apt/lists than ulimit -n has
a value. You probably have too many repositories or too low a ulimit.
Otherwise, open a new bug with ubuntu-bug/apport.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
It asks apt if the package is trusted, and from apt's POV it is. which
might or might not be good, UX wise, for apt (maybe it should also tell
you that local debs are not verified), but not much of an issue there.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
I found out the cause for this, but other backends are affected too probably
- basically the packagekit daemon assumes that packages can be trusted
themselves,
so backends that do not have trust information in packages need to explicitly
reject local packages as untrusted, so that PackageKit
Yup, install-local does indeed trigger package-install not package-
install-untrusted
Aug 28 11:28:53 jak-t480s polkitd(authority=local)[1744]: Operator of
unix-session:2 FAILED to authenticate to gain authorization for action
org.freedesktop.packagekit.package-install for system-bus-name::1.535
Trusty is EOL. The system in question seems to be in an unsupported
state. The apt version is old, and the upgrade seems to have been
attempted with apt instead of do-release-upgrade (as do-release-upgrade
would tell you to upgrade first).
apt in trusty does not contain the bash completion, and
Life is hard. Please read messages carefully, and keep
backups/snapshots.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Opinion
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => libgcrypt20 (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890006
Title:
Hash mismatch on "apt update"
Status in libgcrypt20
This may be fixed now even.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1801338
Title:
apt fails to properly handle server-side connection closure
Status in apt package
Certainly not an apt bug. Feature request for like debconf, UCF, and
dpkg? Or packagekit? Don't know
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
Bug is probably invalid, as this is a problem on the non-Ubuntu host?
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => libseccomp (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libseccomp in Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1627564 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627564
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1627564
Debconf crash due to assertion failure in ensure_surface_for_gicon
[gtkiconhelper.c:493] (when png loader is missing/during upgrades)
--
You
** Package changed: ubuntu => debconf (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to debconf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627564
Title:
Debconf crash due to assertion failure in
Is one significantly larger than the other?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892290
Title:
PXE load Focal initrd.img-5.4.0-42-generic always
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1627564 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1627564
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1627564
Crash due to assertion failure in ensure_surface_for_gicon
[gtkiconhelper.c:493] (when png loader is missing/during upgrades)
--
You received
Reassigning to gtk+3.0 though I don't really know what to do here, we
need gtk operational during upgrades to show prompts.
(frontend:10148): Gtk-[1;33mWARNING[0m **: [34m16:28:16.133[0m: Could not
load a pixbuf fro icon theme.
This may indicate that pixbuf loaders or the mime database could
** Package changed: debconf (Ubuntu) => os-prober (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to debconf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876506
Title:
eoan to focal upgrade hangs when lvm snapshot is
I can't reproduce this anymore, so closing it.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Incomplete
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status:
Don't see any reason for any apport collecting here.
This needs a clean reproducer or someone with the issue to do the work
to analyse what's wrong.
Looking at the bug report, the output from the reproducer matches that
of the commandline tools?
--
You received this bug notification because
Should probably be
add-apt-repository deb-src
?
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => software-properties (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
Enabling by default does not make much sense and people usually use
pull-lp-source instead which does not need sources.list entries and
pulls directly from launchpad.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
@Colin: I agree with all of that.
Our kernel-side default is not powersave, but performance, across
generic and oem, at the very least:
$ grep CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_.*=y /boot/config-5.*
/boot/config-5.4.0-26-generic:CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_PERFORMANCE=y
We'll eventually get a retry support in apt, if updating failed, but
there are no plans to react to connection state changes.
The retry will be linear every 10 minutes or so I suppose, but can't be
sure, we'll have to see - I'd do exponential, but systemd does not give
us an option for that.
Any
This is not going to happen in apt. It's a question for desktop how to
do that, probably disabling the downloading in apt, and using gnome's
package kit refresh stuff instead.
** Also affects: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug
passing intel_pstate=disable_hwp on the kernel commandline causes the
kernel to scale the Core i5-8250U down to 1.6 GHz in performance mode,
but that's still a bit off from the 900 MHz it scales down to in
powersave mode.
I believe Windows also does not run the CPUs in performance mode by
default
The performance governor is the right choice for servers, but it's not
the right choice on non-server platforms, it's also not the default
kernel setting, it was set because we have the ondemand.service in
userspace that can change it back to ondemand (or well we have the
service because of that
Andreas, I've not gotten it more isolated, the minimum I had was running
debian/tests/gnome-desktop-testing in a flatpak-builder source tree (apt
source/pull-lp-source flatpak-builder).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
The maintainer script becomes a zombie, because perl -w ...
debconf/frontend ... memtest86+.postinst is stuck in a read() from fd 9,
which is a pipe.
** Package changed: memtest86+ (Ubuntu) => ubuntu
** Package changed: ubuntu => debconf (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Groovy)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876035
Title:
Automatically retry downloads on failures
I have code to fix that just need to merge it and like update tests
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
You not liking apt's solution and only realizing that after you
confirmed and applied it is not a bug in apt.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887277
Title:
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887277
Title:
apt-get install REMOVES packages without replacing
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => command-not-found (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886618
Title:
command-not-found gets stuck on locales with
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
@rbalint As said before the kernel messages and bugs are irrelevant and
wrong. They pretend like intel_pstate is different, when in fact it's
this script that is configuring it here. And yes, it needs OS config.
Nor do other distros not do this, but we do it differently. We set the
Someone probably needs to look at non-pstate systems as I have no idea
about them.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1885730
Title:
Bring back
Public bug reported:
In a recent merge from Debian we lost ondemand.service, meaning all CPUs
now run in Turbo all the time when idle, which is clearly suboptimal.
The discussion in bug 1806012 seems misleading, focusing on p-state vs
other drivers, when in fact, the script actually set the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1872200 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872200
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1872200
apt does not accept globs and regexes in some cases
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
We will not be changing the behavior here. apt-key del working if they
key was not present in the keyring is important to maintain, so that we
do not break the maintainer scripts using it (which should be tested,
and should be the only users of this).
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status:
You have enabled storing indexes in compressed form, which is a non-
default setting that does not work very well. In early days, this used
to store files in the form the server offered them, but this was changed
to recompress to lz4 in order to improve the run time performance of
apt.
You can install python-apt from apt, we do not provide python-apt on
pip. I recently got control over the pypi entry and need to do something
with it. I'm not keen on providing python-apt outside of the distro,
though (python-apt and apt versions x.y need to match), so I'd rather
just get rid of
MMap is an internal implementation detail that people have been using
accidentally when they wanted to open the cache, where they should use
pkgCacheFile for.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Yes, that's by design.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883079
Title:
The "MMap::MMap(FileFd&,
Summary is that I don't believe the option as is is sufficient, and
needs to be reworked, so I'm changing the title accordingly.
** Summary changed:
- Consider making '-o Acquire::Retries=3' the default for 'apt-get
update/install/dist-upgrade'
+ Automatically retry downloads on failures
--
The easiest way out would be to just remove tasksel once the d-i images
are gone, and it's no longer needed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574287
Title:
I'm not going to add a second independent reader to apt just so that
apt-mark runs a bit faster.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713219
Title:
'apt-mark
The problem is that the code that reads the state reads it into the
depcache.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713219
Title:
'apt-mark showauto' and 'apt show'
There are two things:
- On servers, ubuntu-server depends on mdadm, so removing mdadm also
removes ubuntu-server package, which means it's not really supported
- In general, the installers don't offer installing like that.
I don't know why we did not have a task for xenial.
** Description
That's certainly incorrect, lvm2 was fixed in focal (and hence groovy).
That only leaves xenial, but updating xenial close to its EOL for
something as unusual as this seems unneccessary. The supported
configuration for raid1 is mdadm after all, not removing mdadm and the
meta packages that depend
I was about ready to get back to reviewing this (or just saying meh, I
don't see anything obviously wrong, so just upload it) 3 months ago when
you declared that you gave up on the MR.
I don't see how creating a new tool is easier than just uploading your
changes. Both have the same effect of
A few points to think about:
1. I am not aware of anyone using that option, we don't know if it works
and how it behaves
2. Given 1, what kind of testing can we do? This needs to be thoroughly
tested, given that it's not been tested at all.
3. Switching IPs might be useful, but it's not clear
Fixed in 2.1.3, will look into adding a test case and backporting this
to 2.0 shortly.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
The regressions in bionic seem unrelated to me adding the raid1 module
to the list of modules installed to the initramfs.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509717
eoan verified.
So, eoan is tougher. I installed it with subiquity and tried to follow
the steps, but failed to convert to raid1, apparently, subiquity created
the LV 1 PE larger than before or something, so it needed 1 free PE in
the original PV to be able to add the raid1 metadata, which it did
verified in bionic
Did all the steps (install vm, create pv, extend pv, remove dmadm,
upgrade).
It booted after the upgrade to 2.02.176-4.1ubuntu3.18.04.3, and it
failed again following a downgrade to the 2.02.176-4.1ubuntu3.18.04.2
from updates pocket.
** Tags removed:
** Description changed:
[Impact]
system does not boot after converting lvm volume to raid1 w/o having mdadm
installed.
[Test case]
1. Install server with subiquity to LVM
2. Add second disk to it
3. Run pvcreate /dev/vdb
4. Run vgextend ubuntu-vg /dev/vdb
5. Run lvconvert
** Description changed:
[Impact]
system does not boot after converting lvm volume to raid1 w/o having mdadm
installed.
[Test case]
1. Install server with subiquity to LVM
- 2. Add second disk to it
- 3. Run pvcreate /dev/vdb
- 4. Run vgextend ubuntu-vg /dev/vdb
- 5. Run lvconvert
** Description changed:
[Impact]
system does not boot after converting lvm volume to raid1 w/o having mdadm
installed.
[Test case]
- 1. Install server with subiquity to VM
+ 1. Install server with subiquity to LVM
2. Add second disk to it
3. Run pvcreate /dev/vdb
4. Run
sorry, working on verifying it, got distracted by other stuff.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509717
Title:
Wily LVM-RAID1 – md: personality for level 1 is
FWIW, The upload has been superceded by a security update, and will need
revalidation when 2.0.4 is uploaded.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872200
Title:
I believe that https://salsa.debian.org/apt-
team/apt/-/merge_requests/120 fixes this.
** Information type changed from Private Security to Private
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
(I also believe this is the same issue as
https://errors.ubuntu.com/bucket/?id=/usr/bin/apt%3A11%3Aoperator%3ApkgCache%3A%3ADescFileIterator%3A%3AFile%3ApkgRecords%3A%3ALookup%3AFullTextSearch%3ADoSearch)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
On the (python-apt) client side, this involves adding an apt.conf
snippet to configure a new index target and then change the code to read
from there.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu.
Mirror lists change on a daily basis, python-apt on less than a point
release basis (it should update mirror lists before point release, but
this does not always happen afaict).
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you
I think Launchpad should start shipping mirror lists in -updates pocket
(only; probably), so that we can update the mirror lists of installed
systems as part of apt update and don't have to rebuild python-apt and
upgrade everywhere.
** Also affects: launchpad
Importance: Undecided
My goal for future releases is to shift that info out of the python-apt
package and into the -updates pocket of the archive, so that the mirror
list is updated as part of apt update.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
I don't think it's worth tracking this. There are a ton of mirror
changes on a daily basis, and we can't update the python-apt package
that often.
Releases that will get a point release should get a python-apt update
for that.
Other releases will get the mirror update together with a regular
We do not update mirror lists on their own, except for point releases,
and as part of other updates (the python-apt release process
automatically triggers mirror list updates, so this bug won't be
updated).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu Eoan)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Oh wow, there are multiple bugs, and I thought this bug was about the
actual crash:
pk-client-error-quark: could not do untrusted question as no klass
support (8)
but it is about the handling of the crash:
TypeError: could not convert value for property `transient_for' from
DialogCacheOutdated
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+ Users can't use * wildcards anymore in focal, except by accident in apt list.
+
+ For apt list, we now start restricting wildcard syntax to the same
+ syntax install now accepts, and at the same time we remove the
+ restrictions on which patterns are accepted
Yes, wildcard matching went away, I just re-added wildcard matching for
"*" wildcards, as promised; and also changed apt list to reject
unsupported wildcards (any other special character, we do not support ?
or [] stuff).
@Jakub The "no pattern matching at all" I had to LOL a bit about. Because
Though maybe it only needs work in apt, we'll see.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876495
Title:
bash-completion incorrectly shows source package names for
source is certainly a bad example, as it does take source names. But
yes, this is a minor inconvenience sometimes.
This needs quite a bit of work to fix, in a coordinated fashion, across
the two packages, and I'm not sure it's worth it. Probably needs some
investigation whether we already return
No, that's the apt help output.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875190
Title:
Apt update takes around a full minute to read state information when I
run it
Marking this as fix released in PackageKit then, seeing that we ship
1.1.13.
Given that we never used that updating stuff, I don't think it is worth
fixing that in old releases.
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because
I'm not aware of any performance issues in those parts of apt, and spent
a considerable time optimizing it.
You probably want to strace or gdb apt when it's hanging and figure out
where the issue is, because there's nothing that can be done here by
anyone else so far.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Hang on, the new base-files is not even in the release pocket yet. Are
you running the development series (groovy) with proposed enabled?
That's not wise.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu.
Well yes, that's normal. We are still opening the release.
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => python-apt (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874880
That release file is sort of invalid, as we also need the uncompressed
Packages file hashed, because we check hashes after decompression too.
So usually you generate Packages, compress it (having both around), then
create Release file, and then delete the uncompressed Packages file if
you don't
I guess that's good to know that it does not really work without a
release file now anyway, it is a good argument for removing support for
such repos completely. I made a plan a year or two ago, but have not
acted on it yet :/
Please add a Release file. It gives you download progress, hash
I think the answer is simple: We should stop sending If-Modified-Since.
There's no advantage to sending that compared to getting back the same
release file, and it's a bad design.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed
Marking the apt task as invalid as per xnox's analysis
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872902
Title:
** Package changed: update-manager (Ubuntu) => language-pack-fr (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to language-pack-fr in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873274
Title:
"Updating snaps" is not
** No longer affects: apt (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872557
Title:
apt-get error: cnf-update-db - KeyError: 'suite' (focal)
Status in
glob actually needs to come back to some extend (* only), but otherwise
yes, read the NEWS.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872200
Title:
apt does not accept
Hmm seems I missed disabling that in apt list, good catch.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872200
Title:
apt does not accept globs and regexes in some cases
It also prefers configured key files over smart cards, causing similar
issues. Luckily there is a work around for that by adding /dev/null as
an identify file in the config, but that's super ugly.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825000
Title:
Add ability for mirrors to distinguish
Then either supply the medium you installed from or remove the entry.
What did you install from?
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
Needs a reproducer
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871149
Title:
False
If clear() fails, you're a bit lost, but I'm not sure what you'd want to
do here, the system is completely broken at that point.
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Opinion
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
Status: Opinion => New
--
You received this bug
Neither of those is available when the message is logged, the message is
logged _before_ the item is being fetched, and multiple items may be in
progress at the same time, you can't go back and edit the previous line.
So you could display double the amount of entries, but that seems very
There is a memory corruption somewhere, but it's not evident from the
data where, so this needs someone to reproduce the issue in valgrind.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
FWIW, these are all status messages. They are not persistently logged,
but are in the [...] per item things in the last line of an interactive
session.
I guess we could display the "Connected to %s" messages somehow, but I
don't want to display the "Connecting to ..." messages, as there might
be
Oh I guess error messages post-connect do not include the IP address, as
we don't know it anymore.
Given the structure of the non-interactive log, I slightly fail to see
how we could include connection messages. UX-wise, it does not make much
sense to give you details you're not going to need
All error messages and progress messages (e.g. connecting to ...)
include ip addresses. Hence if connecting failed, you get all addresses
it tried, for example.
Now. You will likely not see those messages. If it connects fast enough,
you'll never see the IP. In non-interactive mode, I don't think
Well, nothing, absence of service is interactive?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825000
Title:
Add ability for mirrors to distinguish interactive and
Note that there were some I think somewhat valid privacy concerns to
exposing the service name.
Maybe it's enough to know if apt ran as part of a systemd service, but
not which service, or we build a whitelist of services (or check if they
are inside /lib/systemd/system - so we do not send local
It seems systemd actually supports restarting oneshot services now, so
any options for timestamps will be removed (anything other than 0 will
behave as always), and systemd timers will have to be configured via
drop-ins instead. Finally.
That said, it seems a bit late for focal now.
Hmm, yeah, I
But if I live in UTC+11, I don't want it to run when the day has changed
in UTC+0?
As for date +%s being time zone dependent, hmm, I thought iso-8601
included a timezone, but it does not.
A workaround for DST that might work for non-1-day intervals could be to
change the length of a day to 22
801 - 900 of 2457 matches
Mail list logo
