[Touch-packages] [Bug 1900124] [NEW] Please merge klibc 2.0.8-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-10-16 Thread Lukas Märdian
Public bug reported: Please merge klibc 2.0.8-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Most of the Ubuntu patches have been accepted upstream. ** Affects: klibc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Lukas Märdian (slyon) Status: In Progress ** Tags: ftbfs ** Changed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1900124] Re: Please merge klibc 2.0.8-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-10-16 Thread Lukas Märdian
Adding a (preliminary) patch, which needs to be adopted to my latest changes in klibc 2.0.7-1ubuntu6 (i.e. the gcc10-fcommon patch must be dropped as well), once HH is open. ** Patch added: "klibc_2.0.8-1ubuntu1.debdiff"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891196] Re: FTBFS because of porefs=noline, wrap is unrecognized

2020-08-25 Thread Lukas Märdian
sensible-utils 0.0.13 migrated from -proposed ** Changed in: sensible-utils (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sensible-utils in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1803203] Re: Support preferred_lft for IPv6 addresses

2020-09-23 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: netplan Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1803203 Title: Support preferred_lft for IPv6 addresses Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871538] Re: dbus timeout-ed during an upgrade, taking services down including gdm

2020-09-25 Thread Lukas Märdian
By chance (while developing some netplan code), I seem to have found a reproducer for this bug... I don't know what is going on, but calling the 'Trigger' method from the attached 'dbus.c' file will kill the GDM session in a reproducible way. The invalid `kill(-1, SIGINT);` of line 21, seems to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871538] Re: dbus timeout-ed during an upgrade, taking services down including gdm

2020-09-28 Thread Lukas Märdian
Oh.. I wasn't really aware of that (-1 = all) and it looked so similar. Right, so we still somehow need to find a proper reproducer... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to accountsservice in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1900124] Re: Please merge klibc 2.0.8-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-10-23 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Patch removed: "klibc_2.0.8-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/+bug/1900124/+attachment/5422924/+files/klibc_2.0.8-1ubuntu1.debdiff ** Patch added: "2-klibc_2.0.8-1ubuntu1.debdiff"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1900124] Re: Please merge klibc 2.0.8-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-10-23 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Patch added: "3-klibc_2.0.8-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/+bug/1900124/+attachment/5425988/+files/3-klibc_2.0.8-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to klibc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1900124] Re: Please merge klibc 2.0.8-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-10-26 Thread Lukas Märdian
Test builds: https://launchpad.net/~slyon/+archive/ubuntu/klibc/+packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to klibc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900124 Title: Please merge klibc 2.0.8-1 (main)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1900124] Re: Please merge klibc 2.0.8-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-10-26 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~slyon/ubuntu/+source/klibc/+git/klibc/+merge/392775 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to klibc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900124 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1803203] Re: Support preferred_lft for IPv6 addresses

2020-08-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
Thanks to Heitor's work, the pull request to support preferred_lft has been merged upstream: https://github.com/CanonicalLtd/netplan/pull/89 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891196] Re: FTBFS because of porefs=noline, wrap is unrecognized

2020-08-12 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: sensible-utils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sensible-utils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891196 Title: FTBFS because of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891196] [NEW] FTBFS because of porefs=noline, wrap is unrecognized

2020-08-11 Thread Lukas Märdian
Public bug reported: THe porefs value needs to be changed from 'noline,wrap' to 'noline'. This will be solved with 'sensible-utils 0.0.13', currently in Debian experimental. ** Affects: sensible-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: sensible-utils (Debian)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861082] Re: [SRU] ubuntu-bug doesn't know how to file bugs against snaps

2020-07-03 Thread Lukas Märdian
@brian-murray subiquity is somehow special cased via `data/package- hooks/subiquity.py` and it was that way even before we added the snap handling. @seth-arnold Yes. Apport can only report bugs automatically if there is a launchpad project provided via the snap's contact field. Snap developers

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861082] Re: [SRU] ubuntu-bug doesn't know how to file bugs against snaps

2020-07-03 Thread Lukas Märdian
Verification done on focal: === Snap only: $ LANGUAGE=en_US apport-cli snap-store *** Collecting problem information The collected information can be sent to the developers to improve the application. This might take a few minutes. ...dpkg-query: no packages found matching snap-store *** Send

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861082] Re: [SRU] ubuntu-bug doesn't know how to file bugs against snaps

2020-07-01 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: Lukas Märdian (slyon) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861082 Title: [SRU] ubuntu-

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861082] Re: ubuntu-bug doesn't know how to file bugs against snaps

2020-06-23 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861082 Title: ubuntu-bug does

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861082] Re: ubuntu-bug doesn't know how to file bugs against snaps

2020-06-23 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Description changed: - Hello, I had problems with subiquity in the focal live server install - image. I tried to use 'ubuntu-bug subiquity' to report the bug, but - ubuntu-bug apparently cannot file bug reports against snaps. + [Impact] + Users of Ubuntu 20.04 are not able to easily report

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861082] Re: [SRU] ubuntu-bug doesn't know how to file bugs against snaps

2020-06-23 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Description changed: [Impact] Users of Ubuntu 20.04 are not able to easily report bugs against applications provided as a snap. [Test Case] Install subiquity snap: # sudo snap install subiquity --classic subiquity 20.06.1 aus Canonical✓ installiert # snap list | grep

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861082] Re: [SRU] ubuntu-bug doesn't know how to file bugs against snaps

2020-06-26 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861082 Title: [SRU] ubuntu-bug doesn't know how

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861082] Re: ubuntu-bug doesn't know how to file bugs against snaps

2020-06-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Branch linked: lp:~slyon/apport/apport -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861082 Title: ubuntu-bug doesn't know how to file bugs against snaps Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861082] Re: ubuntu-bug doesn't know how to file bugs against snaps

2020-06-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
My Merge Proposal can be found here: https://code.launchpad.net/~slyon/apport/apport/+merge/385120 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861082 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861082] Re: ubuntu-bug doesn't know how to file bugs against snaps

2020-06-08 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Branch linked: lp:~slyon/apport/apport-snap-handling -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861082 Title: ubuntu-bug doesn't know how to file bugs against

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1664844] Re: No distinction between link-up and link-down interfaces

2020-06-08 Thread Lukas Märdian
We are actively working on it for the current 20.10 cycle. But it needs some changes in systemd-networkd, which are currently blocked due to a discussion upstream: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/15060 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861082] Re: ubuntu-bug doesn't know how to file bugs against snaps

2020-06-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861082 Title: ubuntu-bug doesn't k

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907789] Re: 2.35.50 breaks ld -no-pie

2021-01-07 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: s390-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon) ** Changed in: s390-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907789] Re: 2.35.50 breaks ld -no-pie

2021-01-07 Thread Lukas Märdian
Proposed to drop the -no-pie flag at upstream s390-tools: https://github.com/ibm-s390-tools/s390-tools/pull/106 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907789

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1907789] Re: 2.35.50 breaks ld -no-pie

2021-01-07 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Also affects: s390-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907789 Title: 2.35.50 breaks ld -no-pie

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1904549] Re: MTU is not set on vlan interface

2020-11-26 Thread Lukas Märdian
This looks kind of similar to LP: #1888726 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904549 Title: MTU is not set on vlan interface Status in netplan: New Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1900124] Re: Please merge klibc 2.0.8-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2020-11-02 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: klibc (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to klibc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900124 Title: Please merge klibc 2.0.8-1 (main)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888726] Re: systemd-udevd regression: some renamed network interfaces stuck in "pending" state

2020-10-22 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888726 Title: systemd-udevd regression: some

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888726] Re: systemd-udevd regression: some renamed network interfaces stuck in "pending" state

2020-10-22 Thread Lukas Märdian
I am able to reproduce the problem on Groovy (netplan.io 0.100-0ubuntu5). Using the "Type=!vlan" filter, which netplan already applies for some bridge/bond scenarios, I was able to get the vlan20 interface from 'degraded / pending' into 'degraded / configured', state and systemd-

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1889742] Re: [UBUNTU 20.04] Accept vector alignment hints on z13 (binutils)

2021-02-02 Thread Lukas Märdian
All builds in ppa:ci-train-ppa-service/4412 finished and look good. Requesting bin-sync: ubuntu-archive-tools$ ./copy-package -b --from ~ci-train-ppa-service/ubuntu/4412 -s focal -e 2.34-6ubuntu1.1 --to ubuntu --to-suite focal-proposed --sponsor jawn-smith binutils Copy candidates:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871538] Re: dbus timeout-ed during an upgrade, taking services down including gdm

2021-06-16 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Also affects: dbus (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: accountsservice (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags added:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929657] Re: [Ubuntu 20.4.2] vLan not getting static IP assigned (on s390x)

2021-06-23 Thread Lukas Märdian
After crushing the logs a bit more, I found a few interesting things and also have a few open questions. Thank you very much for your `date` timestamps in between the different steps, those are very helpful in linking the order of events! Open questions: 1) The "udevadm-monitor.txt" log shows

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1931088] Re: boot-and-services tests fails in impish on armhf (248.3)

2021-06-23 Thread Lukas Märdian
Looks like I can at least reproduce the issue on an arm64 Canonistack machine, utilizing an armhf container: ubuntu@focal-arm64:~$ time autopkgtest systemd --test-name=boot-and-services -U -- lxd autopkgtest/ubuntu/impish/armhf [...] autopkgtest [15:59:21]: test boot-and-services:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929657] Re: [Ubuntu 20.4.2] vLan not getting static IP assigned (on s390x)

2021-06-24 Thread Lukas Märdian
> Gave some time between netplan apply and check without success, I can leave > it for > hours and the IP never gets assigned Indeed, I cannot see it being assigned an IPv4 address in your latest "_delay" run. (Well, there is some assignment of an IP to enP53p0s0.171 at 15:05:29 in the journal

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929657] Re: [Ubuntu 20.4.2] vLan not getting static IP assigned (on s390x)

2021-06-25 Thread Lukas Märdian
Thank you! The core problem still is that systemd-networkd does not find any .link and .network file for the enP53p0s0.171 interface, that's why it cannot apply any configuration (IP address): > ? 9: enP53p0s0.171 > Link File: n/a > Network File: n/a This might very well be related to the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1932368] Re: boot-smoke systemd/237-3ubuntu10.48 ADT test failure with bionic

2021-06-25 Thread Lukas Märdian
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1931088 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931088 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1931088 boot-and-services tests fails in impish on armhf (248.3) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1931088] Re: boot-and-services tests fails in impish on armhf (248.3)

2021-06-25 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Impish) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: lxd (Ubuntu Impish) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: lxd (Ubuntu Impish) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon) ** Changed in: auto-package-testing Status: I

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1931088] Re: boot-and-services tests fails in impish on armhf (248.3)

2021-06-25 Thread Lukas Märdian
So I can reproduce the problem even locally, using a simple: `autopkgtest systemd --test-name=boot-and-services -- lxd autopkgtest/ubuntu/impish/amd64` When logging into the (stalled) system, while it is waiting for its timeout I can see that eth0 gets configured, but then put in DOWN state.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1931088] Re: boot-and-services tests fails in impish on armhf (248.3)

2021-06-25 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Also affects: lxd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931088 Title: boot-and-services tests fails in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1931088] Re: boot-and-services tests fails in impish on armhf (248.3)

2021-06-25 Thread Lukas Märdian
This should fix the problem: https://github.com/lxc/distrobuilder/pull/476 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931088 Title: boot-and-services tests fails in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927978] Re: Please merge db5.3 5.3.28+dfsg1-0.8 from Debian unstable

2021-05-14 Thread Lukas Märdian
Thank you, LGTM! $ dput ubuntu ../db5.3_5.3.28+dfsg1-0.8ubuntu1_source.changes D: Setting host argument. Checking signature on .changes gpg: ../db5.3_5.3.28+dfsg1-0.8ubuntu1_source.changes: Valid signature from 5889C17AB1C8D890 Checking signature on .dsc gpg:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927978] Re: Please merge db5.3 5.3.28+dfsg1-0.8 from Debian unstable

2021-05-14 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: db5.3 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to db5.3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927978 Title: Please merge db5.3 5.3.28+dfsg1-0.8 from

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871538] Re: dbus timeout-ed during an upgrade, taking services down including gdm

2021-07-01 Thread Lukas Märdian
An interesting observation I made is that all journal logs (in this LP bug and the upstream systemd bug) show the "polkit.service: Unexpected error response from GetNameOwner(): Connection terminated" message, in addition to a bunch of other "Connection terminated" errors from changing services

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1931088] Re: boot-and-services tests fails in impish on armhf (248.3)

2021-07-01 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: lxd (Ubuntu Impish) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931088 Title: boot-and-services tests

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927078] Re: Don't allow useradd to use fully numeric names

2021-07-12 Thread Lukas Märdian
Thank you! This one is looking pretty solid overall. But I think the "hex detection" has some flaws, as it only checks for capital letters and there is a discrepancy between accepting float hex numbers (which is unexpected IMO) but rejecting float octal numbers. Could you please test for some

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1915211] Re: Please merge logrotate 3.18.0-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Edit

2021-02-10 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: logrotate (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to logrotate in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915211 Title: Please merge logrotate 3.18.0-1

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1915347] Re: Sync pyxdg 0.27-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2021-02-11 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: pyxdg (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pyxdg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915347 Title: Sync pyxdg 0.27-2 (main) from Debian unstable

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891486] Re: vim ftbfs in focal (armhf, ppc64el)

2021-03-30 Thread Lukas Märdian
I'm marking this WONTFIX as both builds have passed on retry. ** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1915579] Re: lvm2 version 2.03.11-2ubuntu1 breaks initramfs

2021-03-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon) ** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1915579] Re: lvm2 version 2.03.11-2ubuntu1 breaks initramfs

2021-03-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
That file mode must have been lost during the last merge... I've prepared a fix for the 664 -> 755 mode change of /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/lvm2 available in this PPA (currently building): https://launchpad.net/~slyon/+archive/ubuntu/lp1915579 Could you please check and confirm if this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1915579] Re: lvm2 version 2.03.11-2ubuntu1 breaks initramfs

2021-03-04 Thread Lukas Märdian
Thank a lot for the confirmation @Mario! I've uploaded the fixed package to hirsute-proposed and @xnox implemented a check in "pkgbinarymangler" to avoid such failures in the future: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pkgbinarymangler/147 ** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1903814] Re: [binutils] Prevent GOT access rewrite for certain symbols

2021-02-23 Thread Lukas Märdian
Both autopkgtest regressions have turned out to be intermittent failures and have been resolved by retriggering the corresponding tests. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1915005] Re: Please merge findutils 4.8.0 from Debian unstable

2021-02-16 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: findutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to findutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915005 Title: Please merge findutils 4.8.0 from

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1903814] Re: [binutils] Prevent GOT access rewrite for certain symbols

2021-02-16 Thread Lukas Märdian
Yes, the regressions seem to be unrelated to this change. Some can be resolved by retriggering. Others might need an updated kernel package (e.g. the 404 errors seem to be fixed in linux 4.15.0-136.140) I've updated the patch headers a bit and re-uploaded the package using a proper version

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1903814] Re: [binutils] Prevent GOT access rewrite for certain symbols

2021-02-17 Thread Lukas Märdian
So the regression tests are looking good so far. I'm currently still verifying that the regression with the linux kernel on Intel (404s) is fixed with 4.15.0-136.140 (from -proposed). If that works out, I'll copy the packages to the archive for verification by the SRU team. I've SRU'ifyed the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1903814] Re: [binutils] Prevent GOT access rewrite for certain symbols

2021-02-18 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Description changed: [Impact] - * In s390 kernel context, this bug manifests itself as random errors +  * In s390 kernel context, this bug manifests itself as random errors and infinite loops. [Test Case] - * Needs to be confirmed by IBM - * Build-time tests-suite (applied

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1903814] Re: [binutils] Prevent GOT access rewrite for certain symbols

2021-02-18 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Description changed: [Impact]  * In s390 kernel context, this bug manifests itself as random errors and infinite loops. [Test Case]  * Needs to be confirmed by IBM  * Build-time tests-suite (applied upstream) backported to Bionic in    + ld/testsuite/ld-s390/gotreloc-1.s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1903814] Re: [binutils] Prevent GOT access rewrite for certain symbols

2021-02-18 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903814 Title: [binutils] Prevent GOT access

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1915347] Re: Sync pyxdg 0.27-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2021-02-18 Thread Lukas Märdian
Landed in hirsute. ** Changed in: pyxdg (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pyxdg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915347 Title: Sync pyxdg 0.27-2

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1915005] Re: Please merge findutils 4.8.0 from Debian unstable

2021-02-18 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: findutils (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to findutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915005 Title: Please merge findutils 4.8.0

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1903814] Re: [binutils] Prevent GOT access rewrite for certain symbols

2021-02-15 Thread Lukas Märdian
I can confirm that the patch applies and the build seems to pass OK in a -security enabled PPA (https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa- service/+archive/ubuntu/4439). But it produces some test failures/regressions, which we need to work on before we can get this moving:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940635] Re: systemd-networkd failing to acquire a DCHP6 lease from dnsmasq on armhf

2021-08-20 Thread Lukas Märdian
The systemd-networkd debug log (inside armhf container) reveals an interesting error message: "NDISC: Unexpected error while reading from ICMPv6, ignoring: Exchange full" Aug 20 09:40:22 autopkgtest-lxd-ytcddy systemd-networkd[5450]: NDISC: Started IPv6 Router Solicitation client Aug 20

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940635] Re: systemd-networkd failing to acquire a DCHP6 lease from dnsmasq on armhf

2021-08-20 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Attachment added: "lxd-armhf-debug.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/1940635/+attachment/5519352/+files/lxd-armhf-debug.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940635] Re: Failing to acquire a DCHP6 lease on armhf

2021-08-20 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Attachment added: "lxd-amd64.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1940635/+attachment/5519348/+files/lxd-amd64.log ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940635] Re: systemd-networkd failing to acquire a DHCP6 lease from dnsmasq on armhf

2021-08-20 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Summary changed: - systemd-networkd failing to acquire a DCHP6 lease from dnsmasq on armhf + systemd-networkd failing to acquire a DHCP6 lease from dnsmasq on armhf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929184] Re: [21.10 FEAT] RoCE: Predictable Interface Names - systemd part

2021-08-17 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Information type changed from Private to Public ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929184

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1850667] Re: Switch to "unified" cgroup hierarchy (cgroupv2)

2021-08-18 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Tags added: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850667 Title: Switch to "unified" cgroup hierarchy (cgroupv2) Status in lxc: Fix Released

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939409] Re: merge e2fsprogs 1.46.3-1 from Debian: s390x fails in test f_baddotdir

2021-08-16 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to e2fsprogs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939409 Title: merge e2fsprogs 1.46.3-1 from Debian:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939409] Re: merge e2fsprogs 1.46.3-1 from Debian: s390x fails in test f_baddotdir

2021-08-16 Thread Lukas Märdian
Thank you for providing & integrating the patches. LGTM! $ dput ubuntu ../e2fsprogs_1.46.3-1ubuntu2_source.changes Checking signature on .changes gpg: ../e2fsprogs_1.46.3-1ubuntu2_source.changes: Valid signature from 5889C17AB1C8D890 Checking signature on .dsc gpg:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940505] [NEW] monero FTBFS on riscv64

2021-08-19 Thread Lukas Märdian
Public bug reported: monero FTBFS on riscv64 due to toolchain issues: [ 64%] Linking CXX executable signature_fuzz_tests cd "/<>/obj-riscv64-linux-gnu/tests/fuzz" && /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_link_script CMakeFiles/signature_fuzz_tests.dir/link.txt --verbose=1 /usr/bin/c++ -g -O2

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940505] Re: monero FTBFS on riscv64

2021-08-19 Thread Lukas Märdian
Some context: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-gnu-toolchain/issues/738 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25181 According to the latter, this should already be fixed in upstream binutils since several years... why does it still happen? -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934221] Re: systemd-resolve segfault

2021-09-06 Thread Lukas Märdian
Hi Denys, could you please help with testing this new systemd release in focal- proposed (and hirsute-proposed) and confirm that it is working in your context without crashes? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed IIRC you're running a Focal machine, which should make testing the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940635] Re: systemd-networkd failing to acquire a DHCP6 lease from dnsmasq on armhf

2021-09-06 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940635 Title: systemd-networkd failing to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940635] Re: systemd-networkd failing to acquire a DHCP6 lease from dnsmasq on armhf

2021-09-09 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940635 Title: systemd-networkd failing to acquire a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1936948] Re: Dependency loop via sockets.target

2021-09-09 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Description changed: basic.target waits for dbus.socket (via sockets.target) AND dbus.socket waits for basic.target, too, delaying dbus-daemon startup. At some point a timeout happens, dbus is started and all queued services try to start registering to the bus at the same time.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1942113] Re: systemd unit test regression in autopkgtest (oomd-utils)

2021-09-10 Thread Lukas Märdian
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to be the same bug, but might be similar. I can still reporduce the issue with the upstream daily-build. I can reproduce it on an Ubuntu Impish host (kernel 5.11.0-31-generic, systemd 248.3-1ubuntu3), running an Ubuntu Impish container (kernel 5.11.0-31-generic,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1942113] Re: systemd unit test regression in autopkgtest (oomd-utils)

2021-09-10 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Also affects: glibc via https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/20593 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Project changed: glibc => systemd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1942113] Re: systemd unit test regression in autopkgtest (oomd-utils)

2021-09-10 Thread Lukas Märdian
We do now have an upstream patch/PR: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20705 It's not much different from what was already landed in the systemd package (skipping the test in this scenario). So we should probably only stage it for the next systemd upload, after it was merged upstream. --

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934221] Re: systemd-resolve segfault

2021-09-13 Thread Lukas Märdian
I've tested systemd 247.3-3ubuntu3.6 from hirsute-proposed in a VM and can verify it is working as expected. I used the configuration provided and kept the VM running for several days without any crash: ``` root@hh-vm:~# cat /etc/systemd/resolved.conf [Resolve]

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1942113] Re: systemd unit test regression in autopkgtest (oomd-utils)

2021-09-13 Thread Lukas Märdian
Merged upstream and staged in: https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core- dev/ubuntu/+source/systemd/log/?h=ubuntu-impish ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1943704] [NEW] lxc fails autopkgtests on (pure) cgroups v2 enabled system

2021-09-15 Thread Lukas Märdian
Public bug reported: lxc fails 4 autopkgtests if ran on a cgroups v2 enabled systemd (248.3-1ubuntu7) using a pure unified hierarchy (in favor of the hybrid hierarchy used before). https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/lxc FAIL: lxc-tests: lxc-test-apparmor-mount (0s) FAIL: lxc-tests:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1850667] Re: Switch to "unified" cgroup hierarchy (cgroupv2)

2021-09-15 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Changed in: snapd Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850667 Title: Switch to "unified" cgroup hierarchy

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1943704] Re: lxc fails autopkgtests on (pure) cgroups v2 enabled system

2021-09-15 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Attachment added: "lxc-vs-old-systemd.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/1943704/+attachment/5525407/+files/lxc-vs-old-systemd.log ** Description changed: lxc fails 4 autopkgtests if ran on a cgroups v2 enabled systemd (248.3-1ubuntu7) using a pure unified

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934221] Re: systemd-resolve segfault

2021-09-14 Thread Lukas Märdian
I've tested systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3.13 from focal-proposed in a VM and can verify it is working as expected. I used the configuration provided and kept the VM running for several days without any crash: ``` root@ff-vm:~# cat /etc/systemd/resolved.conf [Resolve]

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871538] Re: dbus timeout-ed during an upgrade, taking services down including gdm

2021-09-16 Thread Lukas Märdian
Addressed in FR-1460 ** Tags removed: rls-ii-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to accountsservice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871538 Title: dbus timeout-ed during an upgrade, taking

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1943704] Re: lxc fails autopkgtests on (pure) cgroups v2 enabled system

2021-09-17 Thread Lukas Märdian
From a side-channel discussion: all the fully unprivileged tests need to be disabled on cgroup v2. You can't run fully unprivileged containers on pure cgroup2 layouts. The delegation model doesn't allow it. Not without systemd making a fully empty delegated cgroup hierarchy available. I think

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1943704] Re: lxc fails autopkgtests on (pure) cgroups v2 enabled system

2021-09-17 Thread Lukas Märdian
Some more findings after testing with systemd-run: FAIL: lxc-tests: lxc-test-autostart (360s) FAIL: lxc-tests: lxc-test-no-new-privs (361s) This two tests fail during the (local) autopkgtest run. But after logging into the local autopkgtest VM via its debug shell (--shell-fail|-s parameter) and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1943982] [NEW] Revert resolved-disable-event-sources-before-unreffing-them.patch

2021-09-17 Thread Lukas Märdian
Public bug reported: [impact] The initial patch for LP: #1934221 was not sufficient to fix the root cause of the segfault, but rather moved it to a slightly different location in the code (still inside the on_query_timeout handler). [test case] this bug is only to revert the previous patch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934221] Re: systemd-resolve segfault

2021-09-17 Thread Lukas Märdian
Unfortunately, this patch does not seem to be sufficient. It produces very similar segfaults in on_query_timeout (https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/c4e5be3f1c7af9483993c7e6007b9325ab5b78cd) that the segfault we could observe before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1943982] Re: Revert resolved-disable-event-sources-before-unreffing-them.patch

2021-09-17 Thread Lukas Märdian
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~slyon/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+git/systemd/+merge/408816 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943982

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1850667] Re: Switch to "unified" cgroup hierarchy (cgroupv2)

2021-09-15 Thread Lukas Märdian
snapd landed the support in upstream git as of yesterday (https://github.com/snapcore/snapd) and it is expected to be shipped with snapd v2.53 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927078] Re: Don't allow useradd to use fully numeric names

2021-07-13 Thread Lukas Märdian
Thanks William, this LGTM now! I've modified your debian/changelog and the XML/man pages a bit, to account for the removed handling of floating point numbers. And uploaded the package. $ dput ubuntu ../shadow_4.8.1-1ubuntu9_source.changes D: Setting host argument. Checking signature on .changes

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927078] Re: Don't allow useradd to use fully numeric names

2021-07-15 Thread Lukas Märdian
Thanks, I've sponsored the HH & FF uploads. ** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Fix Committed => In Progress ** Changed in: shadow (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: Fix Committed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1936312] [NEW] nm-online times out, failing autopkgtests

2021-07-15 Thread Lukas Märdian
Public bug reported: The nm-online util does not return successfully as of 1.32.2-0ubuntu1 (currently in impish-proposed). systemd VS network-manager autopkgtests (in LXD) fail, because the autopkgtest-virt-lxd runner tries to wait for "network ready" before it is reconnecting after a reboot.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1936312] Re: nm-online times out, failing autopkgtests

2021-07-15 Thread Lukas Märdian
Related to: LP: #1914062 Two patches exist, both were dropped from their corresponding packages: https://git.launchpad.net/network-manager/commit/?id=4c4f7172 https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core- dev/ubuntu/+source/systemd/commit/?h=ubuntu- impish=efebddfe37efff6a259ef7fd59212d65ad1b848b --

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934221] Re: systemd-resolve segfault

2021-07-29 Thread Lukas Märdian
Denys, what kind of MDNS traffic is flowing in your network? I'm not really able to reproduce the problem locally. Maybe I'm missing this special network packets? Have you already been able to find out what triggers the issue for you? -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934221] Re: systemd-resolve segfault

2021-09-20 Thread Lukas Märdian
Thanks for confirming Denys, that's unfortunate... Would you mind giving the version from this PPA a try https://launchpad.net/~slyon/+archive/ubuntu/lp1934221 (for Hirsute)? And maybe also for Focal once the build is ready? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >