[Touch-packages] [Bug 1725840] Re: resolvconf not correctly configured after update from 17.04 to 17.10

This breaks chroot environments of 17.10 and up in a host of 17.04 and below. ** Also affects: cubic Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to resolvconf in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1494897] Re: various apps abort on assertion - g_file_monitor_source_handle_event: code should not be reached

Downstream bug: https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12556 ** Bug watch added: Xfce Bugzilla #12556 https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12556 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1494897] Re: various apps abort on assertion - g_file_monitor_source_handle_event: code should not be reached

Upstream bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776147 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #776147 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776147 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1651923] Re: apt https method decodes redirect locations and sends them to the destination undecoded.

I'm still having this issue. Has the fix been pushed out yet? I'm using Xubuntu 16.04 LTS 64-bit. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1651923 Title: apt https

[Touch-packages] [Bug 139227] Re: Make gdebi harder to use (was: Disable support for adding repositories)

I believe that the user should be able to add repositories with Apturl. It's better behavior because it makes the system easier to use. It does make sense to provide a warning (something like "Warning: This enables obtaining software from a 3rd party, it may be unsafe! Do you want to continue?"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1595769] Re: Gedit should be a recommended package instead of a required one

** Description changed: + "ubuntu-desktop" package. + Some prefer other text editors. While it's nice to have it included, it should be marked as a "recommended" package and not a "required" one. - This package, nor any of its dependencies, require gedit to function. + This package

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1595769] Re: Gedit should be a recommended package instead of a required one

Package -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1595769 Title: Gedit should be a recommended package instead of a required one Status in ubuntu-meta package

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1595769] [NEW] Gedit should be a recommended package instead of a required one

Public bug reported: Some prefer other text editors. While it's nice to have it included, it should be marked as a "recommended" package and not a "required" one. This package, nor any of its dependencies, require gedit to function. This also applies for the "ubuntukylin-desktop" and