This bug was fixed in the package apparmor - 2.13.3-7ubuntu5.2
---
apparmor (2.13.3-7ubuntu5.2) focal; urgency=medium
* Add capability upstream patches to fix LP: #1964636
- u/cap1-Generate-CAPABILITIES-in-a-script-due-to-make-4.3.patch: move
code that generates a list of
Is this issue blocked by something?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728130
Title:
Policy needs improved feature versioning to ensure it is correctly
Great! Thank you Georgia.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728130
Title:
Policy needs improved feature versioning to ensure it is correctly
being
Thank you for validating the test, Heather.
In addition to the ABI validation, I also ran the AppArmor tests using
the QA Regression Test suite (https://git.launchpad.net/qa-regression-
testing/tree/scripts/test-apparmor.py). It includes tests for
LibAppArmor, the parser, and all regression
### VERIFICATION DONE FOCAL ###
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:apparmor-dev/mqueue-dev
sudo apt update
# exchange keypair ssh
scp linux-* ubuntu@x.x.x.x:~
sudo dpkg -i linux*
sudo apt --fix-broken install
# edit /etc/default/grub
GRUB_DEFAULT='Advanced options for Ubuntu>Ubuntu, with Linux
*Note I have not done any extra testing outside of the testing steps
listed, which it would probably be a good idea to do so.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
Verification done. The autopkgtest failure for libreoffice was a
temporary issue with the test infrastructure that passed when it was
retriggered.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal
--
You received this bug
Hello John, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apparmor into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/2.13.3-7ubuntu5.2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~georgiag/qa-regression-testing/+git/qa-regression-testing/+merge/433546
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
Chris, I updated the description with the SRU template information.
The test plan shows this does what we need:
1. feature is in kernel, abi set in policy is kernel, and policy does not have
permission: execution fails with permission denied.
2. abi set in policy does not contain feature, and
** Description changed:
+ [ Impact ]
+
Currently allows pinning a single feature abi or running in a developer
mode where the full abi available of the current kernel is enforced.
However this can result in breaking applications in undesirable ways.
If an application is shipped
This is missing the SRU template information.
Particularly: what is the test plan to verify (a) that this does what we
need, and (b) doesn't accidentally break existing apparmor profiles?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
This feature is required by Bug 1993353.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728130
Title:
Policy needs improved feature versioning to ensure it is correctly
14 matches
Mail list logo
