[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964636] Re: Incorrect handling of apparmor `bpf` capability

2023-03-28 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package apparmor - 2.13.3-7ubuntu5.2 --- apparmor (2.13.3-7ubuntu5.2) focal; urgency=medium * Add capability upstream patches to fix LP: #1964636 - u/cap1-Generate-CAPABILITIES-in-a-script-due-to-make-4.3.patch: move code that generates a list of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964636] Re: Incorrect handling of apparmor `bpf` capability

2023-03-15 Thread Heather Lemon
ack thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964636 Title: Incorrect handling of apparmor `bpf` capability Status in apparmor package in Ubuntu: In

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964636] Re: Incorrect handling of apparmor `bpf` capability

2023-03-14 Thread John Johansen
Focal is in soft freeze atm, once the soft freeze is lifted this should land -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964636 Title: Incorrect handling of apparmor

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964636] Re: Incorrect handling of apparmor `bpf` capability

2023-03-14 Thread Heather Lemon
Is there something blocking the release for focal? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964636 Title: Incorrect handling of apparmor `bpf` capability Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964636] Re: Incorrect handling of apparmor `bpf` capability

2023-01-10 Thread Christian Boltz
> # new python script to create vim profiles with > > python create-apparmor.vim.py For the records: create-apparmor.vim.py exists since years, and ... > # generates a new file called apparmor.vim.in ... it uses apparmor.vim.in as _input_ and generates the apparmor.vim file (syntax highlighting

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964636] Re: Incorrect handling of apparmor `bpf` capability

2023-01-10 Thread Heather Lemon
Lukasz is correct, we should be diligent in backporting the upstream patches. In regards to testing it's important to ensure apparmor and its new features work as intended with no errors in logs. As well as apparmor not quitting after a restart. All three effected LP's should be thoroughly

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964636] Re: Incorrect handling of apparmor `bpf` capability

2023-01-09 Thread Heather Lemon
In regards to @sil2100 questions, I can review the patches(~24) and double check any use cases. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964636 Title: Incorrect

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964636] Re: Incorrect handling of apparmor `bpf` capability

2023-01-09 Thread Heather Lemon
I did a quick test with apparmor focal-yoga and -proposed this morning to verify it fixes https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1988270 # testing with focal-yoga Apparmor version tested - 2.13.3-7ubuntu5.2 generate focal-yoga instance juju ssh nova-compute/0 sudo apt-cache policy

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964636] Re: Incorrect handling of apparmor `bpf` capability

2022-12-12 Thread Georgia Garcia
Verification done. The autopkgtest failure for libreoffice was a temporary issue with the test infrastructure that passed when it was retriggered. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964636] Re: Incorrect handling of apparmor `bpf` capability

2022-12-06 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
I didn't want to block this from getting into focal-proposed because I think it would be good to get some initial testing already, especially that the package has been sponsored by someone from the security team. But I'm not entirely happy with the test/regression-potential stories for this bug,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964636] Re: Incorrect handling of apparmor `bpf` capability

2022-12-06 Thread Łukasz Zemczak
Hello Stéphane, or anyone else affected, Accepted apparmor into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/2.13.3-7ubuntu5.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964636] Re: Incorrect handling of apparmor `bpf` capability

2022-11-23 Thread Georgia Garcia
Description updated with the SRU template information. ** Description changed: - We've recently noticed a lot of the LXD CI jobs failing because of - apparmor related snapd issues. + [ Impact ] - The way this usually manifests is: - - lxc launch images:ubuntu/20.04 c1 - - lxc exec c1 -- apt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964636] Re: Incorrect handling of apparmor `bpf` capability

2022-11-22 Thread Chris Halse Rogers
This is missing the SRU template information - there seems to be a test case there, but the rest is missing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964636 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964636] Re: Incorrect handling of apparmor `bpf` capability

2022-10-05 Thread John Johansen
** Also affects: apparmor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch