n.b. If Ubuntu hasn't taken the 32-bit time_t change (which is in
Debian unstable) I have a commit which backs out this change for
building e2fsprogs on older systems, e.g., for backports.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
Attached is a V2 patch for Noble for e2fsprogs.
** Patch added: "Debdiff for e2fsprogs on noble V2"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/2036467/+attachment/5772258/+files/lp2036467_noble_V2.debdiff
** Patch removed: "Debdiff for e2fsprogs on noble"
Hi Krister,
Thanks for the heads up about 1.47.1 upstream, it does indeed look like
a release is coming soon.
It seems Debian unstable already has 1.7.1-rc1:
https://packages.debian.org/sid/e2fsprogs
When the Ubuntu archive opens for OO, we will merge 1.47.1~rc1-1 from
debian unstable, and then
@Matthew I took a look at your debdiffs (I hope they are updated) and
they look good in general, I checked the debdiffs for Focal, Jammy,
Mantic and Noble. The Noble debdiff requires a rebase, now in Noble we
have version 1.47.0-2.4~exp1ubuntu4, so we want version
1.47.0-2.4~exp1ubuntu4.1 with
Hi Matthew,
It's been a couple months. We'd really love to get the fix for Focal, Jammy,
and Noble. Any chance this could get sponsored and approved soon?
I also checked up on upstream and it appears that they're preparing a
1.47.1 release of e2fsprogs that should include this fix. It hasn't
** Also affects: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Critical
Assignee: Matthew Ruffell (mruffell)
Status: In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to e2fsprogs in Ubuntu.
Thanks for the update, Matthew. We're looking forward to getting this
fix from Ubuntu. My team patched our version the e2fsprogs package from
Focal about a year ago, before we submitted the fix upstream. Since
that patch, we haven't had any re-occurrences of the problem. It used
to show up
I have been running the test packages on AWS with the reproducer running
for 20 days now, and they are still running great. The change to direct
IO really does fix this issue, and my testing has removed any and all
concerns of causing a regression.
Previously focal wouldn't last more than 20
Hi Krister,
Fascinating. I'm in New Zealand, so I use ap-southeast-2 in Sydney,
Australia for all my instances, and I never gave it any thought that
this could depend on how busy EBS is on the availability zone.
I'll move my instances to us-west-2.
Thanks,
Matthew
--
You received this bug
Hi Matthew,
Thanks for the update. I'm glad this finally reproduced in your environment. I
don't have a great explanation for why it took so much longer there. I did
observe that it seemed more likely to occur in us-west-2 during the 9a-5p
window in the local timezone. The timing may be
Hi Krister,
I have finally seen this occur in real life with my own two eyes!
You are absolutely correct, the 4-retry doesn't seem to be sufficient
sometimes.
The reproducer works on Focal and previous in about 20 minutes, so its
easy to see the issue trigger on Focal. But Focal and previous
Ubuntu 23.04 (Lunar Lobster) has reached end of life, so this bug will
not be fixed for that specific release.
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu Lunar)
Status: In Progress => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
Hi Matthew,
Thanks for the update. I went ahead and tested your updated packages on a
Focal, Jammy, and Noble image in EC2 this evening. With the latest packages
installed, I was unable to reproduce the problem on any of the three installs.
I'm uncertain which builds were inconsistent about
Hi Krister,
I apologise for the delay. The main issue I have been having with
testing is that it reproduces significantly faster on some releases than
others, and I still haven't managed to reproduce once on some releases.
I'll set up some fresh reproducers now, and leave them running.
If you
Attached is a patch for noble that solves this issue.
** Patch added: "Debdiff for e2fsprogs on noble"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/2036467/+attachment/5738302/+files/lp2036467_noble.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Attached is a V2 patch for mantic with a different version number, due
to it no longer being the devel release.
** Patch removed: "Debdiff for e2fsprogs on mantic"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/2036467/+attachment/5707893/+files/lp2036467_mantic.debdiff
** Patch
@mruffel just wanted to check back to see if the instructions in the
report worked to reproduce the problem for you. If so, do you have any
estimate when packages with the patch will be made available? Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
Hi,
Just wanted to check back to see if the reproducer and fix worked in your
testing environments. I was also curious if it were possible to share any
plans around when an update that contains this fix might be released. Thanks
again.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Description changed:
[Impact]
This is a long running bug plaguing cloud-images, where on a rare
occasion resize2fs would fail and the image would not resize to fit the
entire disk.
Online resizes would fail due to a superblock checksum mismatch, where
the superblock in memory
@juliank I'm just doing a little bit more testing for the moment, as I
really want to make sure this isn't going to cause any issues in the
cloud images. It would be nice to have this bug fixed though, I have
seen a few cases related to it over the years.
I'll ask my SEG colleagues for help with
trusty and xenial receive bug updates via Pro and not via the main
archive anymore, you'll have to get SEG to add bug tasks for Pro and
prepare +esm updates with them.
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: In Progress => Won't Fix
** Changed in: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu Xenial)
@mruffel did you mean to get sponsoring for the patches? you might then
want to subscribe ~ubuntu-sponsors so this can be merged by the patch
pilots.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to e2fsprogs in Ubuntu.
** Summary changed:
- superblock checksum mismatch in resize2fs
+ Resizing cloud-images occasionally fails due to superblock checksum mismatch
in resize2fs
** Description changed:
- Hi,
- We run ext4 on EBS volumes on EC2. During provisioning, cloud-init will
occasionally report that
23 matches
Mail list logo
