: 08 July 2013 13:37
To: Spencer Dawkins; ietfdbh
Cc: tsv-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Draft agenda for the IETF-87 TSV Area meeting uploaded
On 07/07/13 23:39, Spencer Dawkins spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com
allegedly wrote:
The notes I've read in this thread have been very helpful to me. Thank
you
...@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Wesley Eddy
Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2013 10:11 PM
To: l.w...@surrey.ac.uk
Cc: tsv-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Draft agenda for the IETF-87 TSV Area meeting uploaded
On 7/6/2013 5:52 PM, l.w...@surrey.ac.uk wrote:
IETF transport focuses on maintaining its existing
...@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Wesley Eddy
Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2013 10:11 PM
To: l.w...@surrey.ac.uk
Cc: tsv-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Draft agenda for the IETF-87 TSV Area meeting uploaded
On 7/6/2013 5:52 PM, l.w...@surrey.ac.uk wrote:
IETF transport focuses on maintaining its existing standards
Hi,
On Jul 5, 2013, at 2:37, Joe Touch to...@isi.edu wrote:
A slot should not be granted if there isn't a draft.
when Magnus and me started TSVAREA, the intent was that it be an information
dissemination session, and that IDs were not going to be published through
TSVAREA. (We have TSVWG for
Thanks - the area vs wg distinction makes sense.
Joe
On Jul 6, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Eggert, Lars l...@netapp.com wrote:
Hi,
On Jul 5, 2013, at 2:37, Joe Touch to...@isi.edu wrote:
A slot should not be granted if there isn't a draft.
when Magnus and me started TSVAREA, the intent was that
s/drone/someone/
set autocorrect=false
:-)
On Jul 6, 2013, at 4:03 PM, Joe Touch to...@isi.edu wrote:
On Jul 6, 2013, at 12:15 PM, l.w...@surrey.ac.uk wrote:
First deploy, then tell the IETF about it, and let the IETF put the
documentation into
the preferred 1970s ASCII format.
reminded of King Canute.
Lloyd Wood
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/
From: Joe Touch [to...@isi.edu]
Sent: 06 July 2013 08:03
To: Wood L Dr (Electronic Eng)
Cc: swm...@swm.pp.se; tsv-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Draft agenda for the IETF-87 TSV Area meeting uploaded
On 7/6/2013 5:52 PM, l.w...@surrey.ac.uk wrote:
IETF transport focuses on maintaining its existing standards; that's
my point. It's not really set up for experimental work not directly
related to those standards.
I'm not really sure how TSV could be setup any better to do this type
of
original-
De: tsv-area-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:tsv-area-boun...@ietf.org] En
nombre de Martin Stiemerling
Enviado el: jueves, 04 de julio de 2013 8:48
Para: tsv-area@ietf.org
Asunto: Draft agenda for the IETF-87 TSV Area meeting uploaded
Hi,
Here is the draft agenda for the IETF-87 TSV Area
Hi Joe,
On 07/05/2013 02:37 AM, Joe Touch wrote:
A link to a draft would be useful.
There is no draft but this is of interest to the transport community at
large. And it is tentative right now as we do not know if there will be
this presentation, i.e., waiting for the confirmation.
A
agenda for the IETF-87 TSV Area meeting uploaded
A link to a draft would be useful.
A slot should not be granted if there isn't a draft.
Joe
On 7/4/2013 8:10 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013, ietfdbh wrote:
Hi,
What is QUIC? Is there a draft?
https://docs.google.com
agenda for the IETF-87 TSV Area meeting uploaded
Hi,
Here is the draft agenda for the IETF-87 TSV Area meeting:
Transport Area Open Meeting (tsvarea) -- IETF-87 THURSDAY, August 1, 2013
09:00-11:30
Draft Agenda:
09:00 Note Well and agenda bashing (5 minutes)
09:05 TSV/NOMCOM (15
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013, ietfdbh wrote:
Hi,
What is QUIC? Is there a draft?
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RNHkx_VvKWyWg6Lr8SZ-saqsQx7rFV-ev2jRFUoVD34/preview?sle=true
http://blog.chromium.org/2013/06/experimenting-with-quic.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QUIC
--
Mikael Abrahamsson
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013, Joe Touch wrote:
A slot should not be granted if there isn't a draft.
Why? Is there some really important principle I'm missing here?
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RNHkx_VvKWyWg6Lr8SZ-saqsQx7rFV-ev2jRFUoVD34/preview?sle=true
Yes, I'm sure this document could be
14 matches
Mail list logo
