[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Borley closed TUSCANY-943.
-
Resolution: Fixed
tuscany/cpp/build.txt file no longer exists - replaced with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Borley updated TUSCANY-1042:
---
Summary: Update Tuscany C++ to use Axis2/C 0.96 (was: Update Tuscany C++
to use Axis2/C
There's a lot of JIRA emails flooding the list right now for so just an fyi:
If you use the bulk change function then on the last screen there's a tick
box to say whether or not to send a notification email to the mailing list.
For a lot of the tidying up thats going on its probably fine to not
I'd like to nominate Simon Laws to become a Tuscany committer. Simon has has
done lots of different things for Tuscany - patches, interop work, the
website, release testing, participating in discussions etc, and he's been
contributing to Tuscany since April last year!
Here's my +1.
...ant
+1
ant elder wrote:
I'd like to nominate Simon Laws to become a Tuscany committer. Simon has
has
done lots of different things for Tuscany - patches, interop work, the
website, release testing, participating in discussions etc, and he's been
contributing to Tuscany since April last year!
+1
On 17/01/07, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
ant elder wrote:
I'd like to nominate Simon Laws to become a Tuscany committer. Simon has
has
done lots of different things for Tuscany - patches, interop work, the
website, release testing, participating in discussions etc, and he's
been
+1
On 1/17/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 17/01/07, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
ant elder wrote:
I'd like to nominate Simon Laws to become a Tuscany committer. Simon has
has
done lots of different things for Tuscany - patches, interop work, the
website,
+1
- Venkat
On 1/17/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to nominate Simon Laws to become a Tuscany committer. Simon has
has
done lots of different things for Tuscany - patches, interop work, the
website, release testing, participating in discussions etc, and he's been
contributing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Venkatakrishnan reassigned TUSCANY-1043:
Assignee: Venkatakrishnan
NPE with Pass By Value Interceptor during multiple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Venkatakrishnan resolved TUSCANY-1043.
--
Resolution: Fixed
This has been fixed as a result of resolving TUSCANY-1004. I have
+1
-Original Message-
From: Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 10:59 AM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Simon Laws for Tuscany committer
+1
ant elder wrote:
I'd like to nominate Simon Laws to become a Tuscany committer. Simon
has has
+1
On 17/01/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to nominate Simon Laws to become a Tuscany committer. Simon has
has
done lots of different things for Tuscany - patches, interop work, the
website, release testing, participating in discussions etc, and he's been
contributing to
+1
Actually, since he's also applied fixes to SDO for C++, am I allowed a +2?
On 17/01/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 17/01/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to nominate Simon Laws to become a Tuscany committer. Simon has
has
done lots of different things
For the Web service bindings since there is in essence a copy that has
already been made in the serialization and deserialization and the
bindings themselves shouldn't modify the parms/result can these
connections be automatically marked with AllowsPassByReference ?
+1
On 1/17/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to nominate Simon Laws to become a Tuscany committer. Simon has
has
done lots of different things for Tuscany - patches, interop work, the
website, release testing, participating in discussions etc, and he's been
contributing to
+1
On 1/17/07, Rick Rineholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the Web service bindings since there is in essence a copy that has
already been made in the serialization and deserialization and the
bindings themselves shouldn't modify the parms/result can these
connections be automatically marked
Hi All,
When I try to run the helloworldRMIService demo from
tuscany-sca-1.0-incubator-M2 release using JDK6,
I got the following error:
Exception in thread main javax.xml.stream.FactoryConfigurationError:
Provider javax.xml.stream.XMLInputFactory could not be instantiated:
On 1/17/07, Johnson Ma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
When I try to run the helloworldRMIService demo from
tuscany-sca-1.0-incubator-M2 release using JDK6,
I got the following error:
Exception in thread main javax.xml.stream.FactoryConfigurationError:
Provider
+1
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
On 1/17/07, Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 1/17/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to nominate Simon Laws to become a Tuscany committer. Simon has
has
done lots of different things for Tuscany -
+1
Luciano Resende wrote:
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1. Welcome!
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 2:43 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Simon Laws for Tuscany committer
I'd like to nominate Simon Laws to become a Tuscany committer. Simon has
has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12465436
]
Lou Amodeo commented on TUSCANY-1045:
-
I am seeing that -967 is fixed. The fix for that is to copy the
Hi Luciano,
Comments inline.
Jim
On Jan 15, 2007, at 5:23 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
I have started investigating TUSCANY-1045. Based on what the spec
is saying,
we should start by calculating the component type information from
introspection and then looking into sidefile and merge the
Dan Murphy wrote:
Thanks for the pointer Ray,
It looks like a great start... Do you (all) think we should assume SCA is
being used/ the desired solution ?
The scenarios would, I hope, show how SCA helps solve a problem,
though they
could be useful to see if/where SCA has gaps and where Tuscany
SDO Serialzation Failing in BigBank.
Key: TUSCANY-1060
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1060
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SDO Implementation
Affects
Please see my comments inline.
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: Tuscany-1045 - Merging component type information from two
sources
Hi Luciano,
Comments inline.
Hello,
Currently BigBank is failing cause it's now using the
PassByValueInterceptor which detects
com.bigbank.account.impl.CustomerProfileDataImpl a SDO generated class
is Java Serializable; however during serialization it receives a
ClassCastException.
See
ant elder wrote:
I'd like to nominate Simon Laws to become a Tuscany committer. Simon
has has
done lots of different things for Tuscany - patches, interop work, the
website, release testing, participating in discussions etc, and he's been
contributing to Tuscany since April last year!
Here's
On Jan 17, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Jim Marino wrote:
Based on some of the deployment work that will be done, we actually
need to separate out the load phase into two, one which loads the
assembly model and another phase which resolves the dependencies
necessary to construct the component type
Hi,
We had discussions before on how we can optimize the pass-by-value support:
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg11487.html
As a summary, here are some points:
1) Pass-by-value interceptor could be skipped for the wires to a bound
reference or from a bound service
On Jan 17, 2007, at 9:09 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jan 17, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Jim Marino wrote:
Based on some of the deployment work that will be done, we
actually need to separate out the load phase into two, one which
loads the assembly model and another phase which resolves the
2) Pass-by-value interceptor could be skipped if the databinding
interceptor is also effective in chain (data transformation will
convert the data by value).
Quick question: how would we do this without assuming the wire post
processors are called in a certain order?
Jim
ReadMe on how to write SCA Integration Test Cases
-
Key: TUSCANY-1061
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1061
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12465453
]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-1060:
---
Are you seeing a dynamic DataObject instance created from the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hasan Muhammad updated TUSCANY-1061:
Attachment: IntegrationTestHelp.html
ReadMe on how to write SCA Integration Test Cases
I'm not very sure ATM. Would it probably add a requirement to add a
optimization phase which will be triggered after all the interceptors are
in place for the invocation chain :-) ?
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12465460
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1060:
-
It looks to me like line 149 of DataBindingExtension should be
On Jan 17, 2007, at 9:22 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
I'm not very sure ATM. Would it probably add a requirement to add a
optimization phase which will be triggered after all the
interceptors are in place for the invocation chain :-) ?
That was the point of the wire post processors in the
Hi,
Can I pull up profile name from StandaloneTuntimeInfo to RuntimeInfo?
Iwas thinking about using profile name as the peer name for runtime for
the distributed assembly I am working on. I would assume, regardless of
the host type, an SCA runtime should be able to participate in a
federated SCA
DataGraph.createRootObject implementation does not match 2.1 spec and also is
not helpful when given bad parameters
---
Key: TUSCANY-1062
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Golick updated TUSCANY-1062:
-
Attachment: DataGraphTestCase.jar
DataGraphImpl_patch.txt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12465472
]
Venkatakrishnan commented on TUSCANY-1060:
--
Hi,
I guess this could be because the SDO DataBinding uses
To generate some discussion of how we would like this done (in other words,
I'm not too happy with what I did) I wrote down some scenarios based on a
possible example. Since I hope these sit above java and so I had a clean
sheet I created :
http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/Scenarios
First
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12465474
]
Lou Amodeo commented on TUSCANY-1043:
-
This is working in r497034 please close.
NPE with Pass By Value
On Jan 17, 2007, at 9:42 AM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Hi,
Can I pull up profile name from StandaloneTuntimeInfo to RuntimeInfo?
Iwas thinking about using profile name as the peer name for runtime
for
the distributed assembly I am working on. I would assume,
regardless of
the host type,
Hi, Venkat.
CopyHelper is the way to go to copy DataObjects in the same context. Do we
have the case that the source and target of a wire is between two
composites? If so, we might want to use
SDOUtil.createCrossScopeCopyHelper(TypeHelper targetScope) to get a
CopyHelper that's
I'm still seeing this - what do I need to do to fix it?
--
Jeremy
On Jan 13, 2007, at 11:11 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I'm getting a download failure in tools:
Reason: Error getting POM for 'org.apache.axis2:axis2-codegen' from
the repository: Error transferring file
Just want to make sure its clear or that I understand, this may be another means
to copy SDO object, but I still think the SDO generated object that is
Serializable should be able to serialize / deserialize. (i.e. the code as it
there today SHOULD work)
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi, Venkat.
I did a bit investigation on this issue. It turned out that two factors
probably contribute to the failure.
1) The POM file is missing for axis2 1.1.1 artifacts (probably they are not
deployed using mvn deploy?)
2) I observed that the maven2 repo for eclipse
My $0.2 Once we define the scenario and go trough the actually go
through design, develop, build, install, run and debug it and manage the
steps, could we create a blog about it ? Something like those guys that go
on a journey and blog each steps ? I think this might be interesting to
people
Hi, Tom.
Thanks for bringing it to our attention.
Here are a few more items:
1) Core and SPI:
Add the support for multiple bindings of the composite service or reference.
Add interfaces for discovery service
2) Host-API: Add interfaces for deployment and management
BTW, what's the best way
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12465547
]
Ignacio Silva-Lepe commented on TUSCANY-1003:
-
I am not sure exactly how run.bat is put together, but
Hi Jim,
I am not sure I follow the modification to ConnectorImpl. You remove
the check for operationHasCallback altogether in the forward direction
and add a check for isOneWayOperation in the callback direction.
As far I understand, Operation.isNonBlocking (which determines the
value of
Ignacio,
I think the updated code implements the behavior described in the
assembly spec. There was another thread related to callbacks where Dave
Booz helped to clarify some of the use cases.
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg12874.html
I think this update may also
On Jan 13, 2007, at 2:12 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I have committed the changes under revision r495979.
I have republished corresponding snapshot jars of the spec SCA API
and the Tuscany Kernel core module:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/osoa/sca-
On Jan 17, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Hi Jim,
I am not sure I follow the modification to ConnectorImpl. You remove
the check for operationHasCallback altogether in the forward direction
and add a check for isOneWayOperation in the callback direction.
As far I understand,
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jan 13, 2007, at 2:12 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I have committed the changes under revision r495979.
I have republished corresponding snapshot jars of the spec SCA API
and the Tuscany Kernel core module:
On Jan 17, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Jan 13, 2007, at 2:12 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I have committed the changes under revision r495979.
I have republished corresponding snapshot jars of the spec SCA
API and the Tuscany Kernel core
Hi,
A few of us are participating in the SCA Assembly offsite this week.
The outcome of the offsite is that there will be a number of changes
introduced into the specification which will impact the kernel and
extensions. We can summarize and discuss the changes in separate
threads but I
Hi Jim,
I don't understand what you mean when you talk about the do-not-use
kernel version.
Here is how I am understanding your proposal. . Is this correct?
Step #1 in your list: is a release of the kernel with content as of today .
This will live in a branch - Extensions will need to be
60 matches
Mail list logo
