It works for me! Sebastien?
On 21/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have checked in a fix which I believe works for the PHP wsdl generation
scenario and for our SCA samples.
--
Caroline
I have checked in a fix which I believe works for the PHP wsdl generation
scenario and for our SCA samples.
Cheers,
On 20/12/06, Caroline Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, we're OK to stick with the old level for now. I understood this
thread to say that the latest version would work
Pete et al,
The latest code from HEAD is still broken - it fails the
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-962 scenario. This is the #1
use case for SCA - we cannot use this latest code with PHP.
--
Caroline
On 20/12/06, Caroline Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete et al,
The latest code from HEAD is still broken - it fails the
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-962 scenario. This is the #1
use case for SCA - we cannot use this latest code with PHP.
--
Caroline
Yes I know and it
Thanks, we're OK to stick with the old level for now. I understood this
thread to say that the latest version would work both for Sebastien's
scenario and for the WSDL generation, but it seems I was confused. I'll keep
waiting for the ultimate fix ...
On 20/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 15/12/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
On 14/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. .and I suppose attributes too although we don't currently ever
write a
prefix on an attribute (we should!)
OK so I have been trying to fix the
Pete Robbins wrote:
On 15/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15/12/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
On 14/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. .and I suppose attributes too although we don't currently ever
write a
Pete Robbins wrote:
On 15/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15/12/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
On 14/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. .and I suppose attributes too although we don't currently ever
write a
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
On 15/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15/12/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
On 14/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. .and I suppose attributes too although we
On 15/12/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
On 15/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15/12/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
On 14/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL
Pete Robbins wrote:
On 15/12/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
On 15/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15/12/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
On 14/12/06, Pete
.. .and I suppose attributes too although we don't currently ever write a
prefix on an attribute (we should!)
OK so I have been trying to fix the SDOXMLWriter code to do the right
thing and I think it is OK now for writing xsi:type information. The
problem we have is writing namespace prefix for
On 14/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. .and I suppose attributes too although we don't currently ever write a
prefix on an attribute (we should!)
OK so I have been trying to fix the SDOXMLWriter code to do the right
thing and I think it is OK now for writing xsi:type
Pete Robbins wrote:
On 14/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. .and I suppose attributes too although we don't currently ever
write a
prefix on an attribute (we should!)
OK so I have been trying to fix the SDOXMLWriter code to do the right
thing and I think it is OK now for
On 15/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15/12/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote:
On 14/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. .and I suppose attributes too although we don't currently ever
write a
prefix on an attribute
15 matches
Mail list logo
