Re: [TV orNotTV] Super Bowl Ratings

To steal from Spinal Tap: "We laid off our national security and Justice correspondents." "What?" "Yeah. I wouldn't worry about it though, DC's not a big news town." On Tue, Feb 13, 2024, 18:14 Diner wrote: > And the layoffs include 20 at CBS News, notably reporters Catherine > Herridge

Re: [TV orNotTV] Super Bowl Ratings

And the layoffs include 20 at CBS News, notably reporters Catherine Herridge (national security) and Jeff Pegues (justice). https://deadline.com/2024/02/cbs-news-layoffs-catherine-herridge-1235824772/ On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 5:44:11 PM UTC-5 Kevin M. wrote: > Apparently ratings

Re: [TV orNotTV] Super Bowl Ratings

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 3:34 AM Kevin M. wrote: > What verifiable data is being supplied to or by Nielsen to support these > numbers? I feel like the networks and streamers distrust ratings unless the > numbers serve them. And I’ve not seen evidence that streaming services are > sharing user

Re: [TV orNotTV] Super Bowl Ratings

I watched on Nickelodeon, as I can't take football seriously.  I'm probably covered somewhere in the fine print. I'm out of the SpongeBob demo, but I must admit that having SpongeBob and Patrick Star join CBS's fifth-string made for an entertaining watch. Best,David On Monday, February

Re: [TV orNotTV] Super Bowl Ratings

I was at a friends’ apartment watching on good old-fashioned Spectrum cable. Some other people in the complex were loudly cheering for things about 45 seconds after we’d seen them, so I assume they were watching on Paramount+ or some other streaming option. > On Feb 12, 2024, at 7:56 PM, Stan

Re: [TV orNotTV] Super Bowl Ratings

I got annoyed by the delay on Spectrum so I switched to plain old antenna. I remain unmeasurable. -Stan On Monday, February 12, 2024 at 10:34:47 PM UTC-5 Kevin M. wrote: > What verifiable data is being supplied to or by Nielsen to support these > numbers? I feel like the networks and

Re: [TV orNotTV] Super Bowl ratings

Last January 81% of US men identified as avid or casual NFL fans, vs 59% of US women. I don’t know the corresponding breakdown for Taylor Swift fans, but assuming it is at least as skewed the other way towards women, there is some potential for Swift bringing in new fans to NFL games. But again,

Re: [TV orNotTV] Super Bowl ratings

In my house, the following has happened since the Tayvis partnering: 1) wife learned the rules of football. 2) watched a number of KC games with me. 3) Asked at the beginning of the DET-SF game "are there any players in this game that are going out with a megastar? If no, I'm going to watch

Re: [TV orNotTV] Super Bowl ratings

I saw in Matt Belloni's latest email that last week's divisional game got a record 50.4m viewers. So I assume that yesterday's will top that. Belloni predicts record breaking Super Bowl ratings - although I wonder if that is Swift fans, and not just the fact that, in the US, NFL is the monoculture

Re: [TV orNotTV] Super Bowl ratings

I think we are still some years off from the Super Bowl being exclusively on Peacock or some other streamer (this year you will have the option of watching on P+). And while it is difficult to make predictions about absolute broadcast ratings these days, it is a lock that for as long as linear

Re: [TV orNotTV] Super Bowl ratings

As we are at the twilight of broadcast television, it is difficult to predict how the SuperBowl will fare when viewers must stream it. Sports has maintained ratings compared to other produced series, but sponsors are starting to realize that doesn’t automatically lead to audiences buying

[TV orNotTV] Super Bowl ratings

So Super Bowl ratings will spike this year since Taylor Swift will likely be there. She is scheduled to play Feb. 10 at the Tokyo Dome. That gives her enough time to take her private jet to Las Vegas for the Super Bowl. My question is, will this spike have a lasting effect? Will more people watch

Re: [TV orNotTV] Super Bowl ratings lowest since 2009

I'd still take Al Michaels over Joe Buck any day of the week. On Tuesday, February 6, 2018 at 11:11:35 PM UTC-5, Greg Diener wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, February 6, 2018 at 12:03:27 AM UTC-5, PGage wrote: >> >> Collingworth, who I generally like, had a really, really bad game. I am >> not sure if

Re: [TV orNotTV] Super Bowl ratings lowest since 2009

On Tuesday, February 6, 2018 at 12:03:27 AM UTC-5, PGage wrote: > > Collingworth, who I generally like, had a really, really bad game. I am > not sure if he really is just in the tank for Brady > As a New Yorker who has mostly grown up a Jets fan, I've listened to Michaels and Collinsworth

Re: [TV orNotTV] Super Bowl ratings lowest since 2009

PGage, to Steve Timko, today (2/06): > > Collingworth, who I generally like, had a really, really bad game. I am > not sure if he really is just in the tank for Brady - my thought was that > he has been thrown by all the attention given Romo and was trying to be > more enthusiastic. But he was

Re: [TV orNotTV] Super Bowl ratings lowest since 2009

Collingworth, who I generally like, had a really, really bad game. I am not sure if he really is just in the tank for Brady - my thought was that he has been thrown by all the attention given Romo and was trying to be more enthusiastic. But he was way off on a couple of things (though he did a

Re: [TV orNotTV] Super Bowl ratings lowest since 2009

On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 11:07 PM, Steve Timko wrote: > > TV by the Numbers is brutal on the NBC broadcast. He doesn’t like the > announcers or the half time show. I appreciate that Timberlake didn’t lip > synch. It was a great game. I think many who didn’t tune in didn’t

[TV orNotTV] Super Bowl ratings lowest since 2009

TV by the Numbers is brutal on the NBC broadcast. He doesn’t like the announcers or the half time show. I appreciate that Timberlake didn’t lip synch. It was a great game. I think many who didn’t tune in didn’t care to see Brady win another ring.