I'm not your bitch, and I would not do any feedback for somebody who
decided that do not want feedback from me. Why you are contacting me
then? Just to provoke me?
Either you want a feedback and will not ignore it. Or you do not want a
feedback and then you would not contact me.
I see that Simon
Simon has filtered your emails, which I believe he even told you, after
how much you were berating him in a previous thread. That's why he's
not responding and I'm answering your only relevant to this thread
question so far. He cc'd you because a file you're listed as maintainer
on was changed.
Simon, could you react here? Because Tom is complaining again that I'm
not responding to this email. But this is again total nonsense from Tom
as I have asked you to react 2 times, which provides that I'm not the
one who does not response here.
On Sunday 03 September 2023 22:39:39 Pali Rohár
On Monday 04 September 2023 15:55:18 Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 10:36:15PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > You are not saying truth here, you are lying and you know it. mvebu
> > changes? ignored, no answer. ppc changes? ignored no answer in 10
> > months. mmc changes, no answer at
On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 10:36:15PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> You are not saying truth here, you are lying and you know it. mvebu
> changes? ignored, no answer. ppc changes? ignored no answer in 10
> months. mmc changes, no answer at all. rx-51 bug reports and regression
> which you and your
I still have not received any reply from you.
On Wednesday 30 August 2023 20:14:59 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Simon, why you are contacting me? You have wrote to me that you would
> ignore my reviews here, so what you want now? Could you please explain
> what you are trying to achieve? I'm not going to
You are not saying truth here, you are lying and you know it. mvebu
changes? ignored, no answer. ppc changes? ignored no answer in 10
months. mmc changes, no answer at all. rx-51 bug reports and regression
which you and your people broke? you wrote me: fuck you and fix it
yourself. So what does
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 11:29:34PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> There were no answers.
>
> On Wednesday 30 August 2023 17:26:20 Tom Rini wrote:
> > I'm trimming the CC list. All of those points you list were addressed
> > and answered in your last long running argument. You need to decide what
> >
There were no answers.
On Wednesday 30 August 2023 17:26:20 Tom Rini wrote:
> I'm trimming the CC list. All of those points you list were addressed
> and answered in your last long running argument. You need to decide what
> is best for you moving forward and I would ask that it not involve
>
I'm trimming the CC list. All of those points you list were addressed
and answered in your last long running argument. You need to decide what
is best for you moving forward and I would ask that it not involve
complaining that you're being asked to review code that you're a listed
maintainer of.
Seems that you completely miss the point of the argument, then the only
option for such people is to repeat them. Or have I repeat you again
that you have not answered the first question, why you are asking for
review from somebody who you are ignoring and not taking into account?
You do not want
I don't think it's worth re-hashing the same arguments over and over.
There is no "my persons", there is the public community. If you no
longer wish to participate, I can remove you from the maintainers
entries you're listed in. But please stop with the long arguments
unrelated to the patches at
So lets recap what you and your persons have done in last 6 months:
* Ignored my changes
* Ignored my reviews
* Ignored my regression reports
* Ignored my reminders
And now you complaining that I'm not going to do another review? Then
you should be the first who step down there as incompetent
And you too. That was at the time when you and your people were
interested in reviews from others.
On Wednesday 30 August 2023 15:41:57 Tom Rini wrote:
> Then you should probably remove yourself from the places you've listed
> yourself as an interested maintainer, thanks.
>
> On Wed, Aug 30,
Then you should probably remove yourself from the places you've listed
yourself as an interested maintainer, thanks.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 09:10:36PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> You have already decided, what is the point? You are not taking any my
> objections into account, so stop writing to
You have already decided, what is the point? You are not taking any my
objections into account, so stop writing to me and to others these your
stupids bullshits. I'm not an idiot who is interesting for them.
On Wednesday 30 August 2023 15:04:22 Tom Rini wrote:
> You're a listed maintainer for a
You're a listed maintainer for a file being changed. If you objected to
the changes, your objection would matter. If you don't object, you can
just ignore it, or review it, whatever you like. You need to decide
what you want to do about code you're volunteering to maintain.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023
And what? How it is related to the statements that my reviews would also
ignored? And what you want from me now?
On Wednesday 30 August 2023 14:17:50 Tom Rini wrote:
> Pali,
>
> You are specifically listed as a maintainer for drivers/pci/pci_mvebu.c
> and that is changed by this patch.
>
> On
Pali,
You are specifically listed as a maintainer for drivers/pci/pci_mvebu.c
and that is changed by this patch.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 08:14:59PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Simon, why you are contacting me? You have wrote to me that you would
> ignore my reviews here, so what you want now?
Simon, why you are contacting me? You have wrote to me that you would
ignore my reviews here, so what you want now? Could you please explain
what you are trying to achieve? I'm not going to review this or any
other your changes.
On Wednesday 30 August 2023 12:05:03 Simon Glass wrote:
> The PCI
The PCI helpers read only the base address for a PCI region. In some cases
the size is needed as well, e.g. to pass along to a driver which needs to
know the size of its register area.
Update the functions to allow the size to be returned. For serial, record
the information and provided it with
21 matches
Mail list logo
