[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] edminiv2.h: fix GPIO output value settings

Wrong output value was harmless as long as orion5x did not use it. Upcoming patch fixes orion5x, thus must fix edminiv2 config as well. Also update comments to clarify edminiv2 GPIO directions and values. Signed-off-by: Albert Aribaud albert.arib...@free.fr --- include/configs/edminiv2.h | 20

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] orion5x: set GPIO output value before enabling

GPIO output values from config file were ignored. Set them, before enabling to avoid glitches. Signed-off-by: Albert Aribaud albert.arib...@free.fr --- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/orion5x/cpu.c |7 +-- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

[U-Boot] [PATCH] edminiv2: move U-boot at top of RAM

This makes the first 63 megabytes of RAM free to use for loading images and booting kernels however big they are. Signed-off-by: Albert Aribaud albert.arib...@free.fr --- board/LaCie/edminiv2/config.mk |4 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git

[U-Boot] [PATCH] at91_emac.h: fix typo in register definition

Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann andreas.de...@googlemail.com --- resent this patch cause of http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/83565/focus=83856 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_emac.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] IDE: Don't assume there are always two devices per bus

Le 26/08/2010 15:16, Rogan Dawes a écrit : Anything wrong with this patch? I think I finally found what was bugging me with it. Granted, there are cases where we don't want two devices per bus, but this is a requirement unrelated to the maximum number of busses and devices: this is simply

[U-Boot] Hello

Hello I have a business offer for you, If interested write me back. Thank You. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mvsata_ide: adjust port init sequence

mvsata_ide_initialize_port(): adjust init sequence (SStatus should be checked only after all writes to SControl) and return success/failure to ide_preinit(). Also, as some tests showed init durations in the hundreds of us, raise the time-out to 01 ms to be on the safe side. ---

[U-Boot] Votre Annonce

Bonjour, Dépôt Annonces Gratuit, Votre annonce sur cette adresse http://www.mobilebleu.com/annonce.php?annonce=185902 une chose pas normale , ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] Gunstiges Angebot fur Sie.

Guten Tag, entschuldigen Sie bitte, dass ich mich bei Ihnen lange nicht gemeldet habe. Ich verlor blob Ihre E-Mail-Adresse und ich hatte im Kopf grubeln mussen, bevor ich mich daran erinnern konnte. Ich habe fur Sie ein passendes Stellenangebot gefunden. Bezahlung: ab 3000,- Euro. Nicht

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 08/11] mtd: nand: supress 'unknown NAND' warning if no nand is found

This printk was added recently and results in ugly output on systems with no NAND: NAND: nand_get_flash_type: unknown NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x00, Chip ID: 0x00 0 MiB instead of: NAND: 0 MiB Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman st...@sakoman.com Steve, A proper patch would be

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 08/11] mtd: nand: supress 'unknown NAND' warning if no nand is found

On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 12:38 -0500, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: This printk was added recently and results in ugly output on systems with no NAND: NAND: nand_get_flash_type: unknown NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x00, Chip ID: 0x00 0 MiB instead of: NAND: 0 MiB