[Bug 2069129] Re: [UBUNTU 24.04] Cannot find or install the 'crypto-policies' package

2024-06-12 Thread Adrien Nader
Hi, crypto-policies is not supported on Ubuntu: it requires deep integration with the packages and their configurations. This integration doesn't exist and is unlikely to ever exist outside of redhat-based distributions because of how tight it has to be. Past uses of crypto- policies on Ubuntu

[Bug 2068713] Re: shoogle: please remove (unmaintained, low usage)

2024-06-07 Thread Adrien Nader
** Description changed: Shoogle is not compatible with new python-googleapi releases. It is also low-popcon ( https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=shoogle ). There has been one upstream version uploaded to debian in 2017 and then only fixes by the packager. The package seems

[Bug 2068716] Re: pydrive: please remove (replaced by pydrive2)

2024-06-07 Thread Adrien Nader
** Description changed: Pydrive has been replaced by pydrive2 and it depends on python- oauth2client which we'd like to remove as it is deprecated, unmaintained, and is preventing some migrations. Please remove pydrive so that we can continue with the removal. Note that pydrive2

[Bug 2068716] [NEW] pydrive: please remove (replaced by pydrive2)

2024-06-07 Thread Adrien Nader
Public bug reported: Pydrive has been replaced by pydrive2 and it depends on python- oauth2client which we'd like to remove as it is deprecated, unmaintained, and is preventing some migrations. Please remove pydrive so that we can continue with the removal. Note that pydrive2 also uses

[Bug 2068713] [NEW] shoogle: please remove (unmaintained, low usage)

2024-06-07 Thread Adrien Nader
Public bug reported: Shoogle is not compatible with new python-googleapi releases. It is also low-popcon ( https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=shoogle ). There has been one upstream version uploaded to debian in 2017 and then only fixes by the packager. The package seems moderately active

[Bug 2062999] Re: Errors during install

2024-06-07 Thread Adrien Nader
Shoogle hasn't been updated in several years and I wouldn't be surprised there are compatibility issues with new python versions. I was actually coming here to ask for its removal as it's not compatible with new python-googleapi (which had not been updated in several years either). The

[Bug 2062999] Re: Errors during install

2024-06-07 Thread Adrien Nader
Also, removal would only apply for Oracular (the development version), not Noble. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062999 Title: Errors during install To manage notifications about

[Bug 2067672] Re: [SRU] Openssl copyright/changelog.Debian.gz file points at non-existent location

2024-06-04 Thread Adrien Nader
Noble will not use 3.2.1. Only oracular will. Unfortunately, I don't have a very good answer about how to get this fix in Noble as quickly as possible. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2067672] Re: [SRU] Openssl copyright/changelog.Debian.gz file points at non-existent location

2024-05-31 Thread Adrien Nader
Hi and thanks for the patch. Process-wise, the changes should land in oracular first and I don't think I changed anything regarding that, even in my merge proposal for 3.2.1. I think we can integrate your patch in oracular in the version that follows the 3.2.1 merge (I'd prefer not to respin my

[Bug 1297025] Re: Either the changelog.gz is missing or there is an erroneous link in the libssl1.0.0 package

2024-05-31 Thread Adrien Nader
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297025 Title: Either the changelog.gz is missing or there is an erroneous link

[Bug 2063094] Re: unattended-upgrades is running forever

2024-05-30 Thread Adrien Nader
Attaching 20 seconds of strace output for my case. This actually lead me to look at /var/log/unattended- upgrades/unattended-upgrades-shutdown.log and I Noticed the following: 2024-01-18 15:01:16,996 WARNING - SIGTERM or SIGHUP received, stopping unattended-upgrades only if it is running

[Bug 2063094] Re: unattended-upgrades is running forever

2024-05-30 Thread Adrien Nader
Also, note that out of my three stuck processes, it seems got unstuck. Can't tell why however. I also talked about running out of space but I don't think that was the issue: it was the reason I looked at the machine but it wasn't related to unattended-upgrades. -- You received this bug

[Bug 2063094] Re: unattended-upgrades is running forever

2024-05-30 Thread Adrien Nader
I have 10 backtraces with python3-dbg installed and therefore more complete backtraces (but I wouldn't call them very readable). I'm going to attach them here (.tar.xz archive which extracts in the current directory). ** Attachment added: "unattended-upgrades-bt.tar.xz"

[Bug 2063094] Re: unattended-upgrades is running forever

2024-05-30 Thread Adrien Nader
I'm seeing very different traces. Sorry. :) I have processes which appear stuck and which have been using more than 11 weeks of CPU time over the past 132 days. No idea if it was in only one run (I think I looked at CPU time less than 132 days ago, and even less than 11 weeks ago, so it probably

[Bug 244250] Re: Spurious reboot notifications caused by libssl upgrades.

2024-05-30 Thread Adrien Nader
The reason I want to remove the code is that it wasn't meant for Desktop. It works on Desktop when using wayland but this is was definitely not the intent back then. As I say in https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+git/openssl/+merge/466581 , I don't think the postinst can

[Bug 2067384] Re: openssl: merge 3.2.1-3 from unstable

2024-05-30 Thread Adrien Nader
** Description changed: Unstable has openssl 3.2.1 which is need to fix some tests for nodejs and some features for cryptsetup and is a good step to 3.3 for 24.10. + + Merge request: + https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+git/openssl/+merge/466581 -- You received

[Bug 2058017] Re: openssl is not LTO-safe

2024-05-29 Thread Adrien Nader
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058017 Title: openssl is not LTO-safe To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 2067384] [NEW] openssl: merge 3.2.1-3 from unstable

2024-05-28 Thread Adrien Nader
Public bug reported: Unstable has openssl 3.2.1 which is need to fix some tests for nodejs and some features for cryptsetup and is a good step to 3.3 for 24.10. ** Affects: openssl (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Adrien Nader (adrien) Status: In Progress -- You received

[Bug 244250] Re: Spurious reboot notifications caused by libssl upgrades.

2024-05-28 Thread Adrien Nader
I did some archeology because I'm trying to get rid of the Ubuntu delta compared to Debian. I think the code change in 1.0.0e-2ubuntu3 is problematic. No blame: the shell script was already hairy and difficult to understand and in order to spot that, I had to identify a chunk of dead code, remove

[Bug 2066024] [NEW] eso-midas: please remove due to FTBFS

2024-05-17 Thread Adrien Nader
Public bug reported: Please remove eso-midas. eso-midas FTBFS on all architectures due to a crash when running its testuite (which it does during package building), this is the issue described in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eso- midas/+bug/2058971 . It was first noticed with time_t

[Bug 2058971] Re: proposed-migration for eso-midas 23.02pl1.0-1build1

2024-05-15 Thread Adrien Nader
For reference, backtrace of the issue (I've inserted a call to gdb for "prepa.exe" in the "inmidas" shell script. There are tons of fortify warnings during build. Also, note that the Debian maintainer disabled implicit function declarations, citing that the code is very old, and indeed, it started

[Bug 2059287] Re: Test failures in noble-proposed (all-proposed)

2024-05-15 Thread Adrien Nader
Removed the request to badtest this (it was denied anyway). ** Description changed: Autopkgtests for request-tracker4 (and 5 it seems) fail on all arches and due to the recent changes around test environments and the use of all-proposed, it's difficult to identify which package change is

[Bug 2058971] Re: proposed-migration for eso-midas 23.02pl1.0-1build1

2024-05-15 Thread Adrien Nader
Build now fails on all arches with # of pixels used = 843920 from 1,1 to 880,959 (in pixels) FITS file newVIMOS.fits will have 4 extensions *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated This is the same issue as back in March when this bug was created (I had seen the issue and found

[Bug 2063271] Re: Illegal opcode in libssl

2024-04-30 Thread Adrien Nader
AFAIU there is no issue in the package at the moment so I'll close the report. Thanks for investigating and trying the package reinstallation. (Also, Alex, impressive intuition!) ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1297025] Re: Either the changelog.gz is missing or there is an erroneous link in the libssl1.0.0 package

2024-04-30 Thread Adrien Nader
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297025 Title: Either the changelog.gz is missing or there is an erroneous link in

[Bug 1297025] Re: Either the changelog.gz is missing or there is an erroneous link in the libssl1.0.0 package

2024-04-29 Thread Adrien Nader
I plan to work on this during the OO cycle. It's an issue inherited from Debian AFAIU. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297025 Title: Either the changelog.gz is missing or there is an

[Bug 2063898] Re: broken doc symlinks after t64 transition in noble

2024-04-29 Thread Adrien Nader
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1297025 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297025 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1297025 Either the changelog.gz is missing or there is an erroneous link in the libssl1.0.0 package -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 2062118] Re: autopkgtests fail on s390x (segfault)

2024-04-18 Thread Adrien Nader
** Tags added: rls-oo-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062118 Title: autopkgtests fail on s390x (segfault) To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 2062119] Re: autopkgtests fail on ppc64el

2024-04-18 Thread Adrien Nader
** Tags added: rls-oo-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062119 Title: autopkgtests fail on ppc64el To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 2062018] Re: [FFe] gnutls28: merge 3.8.5-2 and backport RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 fix

2024-04-18 Thread Adrien Nader
** Changed in: gnutls28 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062018 Title: [FFe] gnutls28: merge 3.8.5-2 and backport RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 fix To

[Bug 2062167] Re: [FFe] openssl: post-3.0.13 changes from git

2024-04-18 Thread Adrien Nader
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062167 Title: [FFe] openssl: post-3.0.13 changes from git To manage notifications about

[Bug 2062167] Re: [FFe] openssl: post-3.0.13 changes from git

2024-04-18 Thread Adrien Nader
Note that there is a CVE fix in there too. It's low-severity because it's only unbounded memory growth but it's quite easy to trigger and I think that anyone who has a webserver with TLS 1.3 will want it patched. Therefore there should be an upload of this at least. -- You received this bug

[Bug 2062167] [NEW] [FFe] openssl: post-3.0.13 changes from git

2024-04-18 Thread Adrien Nader
Public bug reported: I would like to have the most recent openssl version possible in Noble. For that I am requesting to upload all the commits in the openssl-3.0 branch that follow 3.0.13 which is already in the archive. I would like to include 3.0.14 afterwards if feasible. Having the most

[Bug 2062018] [NEW] [FFe] gnutls28: merge 3.8.5-2 and backport RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 fix

2024-04-17 Thread Adrien Nader
Public bug reported: Please allow the merge and upload of https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien-n/ubuntu/+source/gnutls28/+git/gnutls28/+merge/464535 . I made the commit message there quite complete so I'm basically copying that here. In a few words, this is meant to include as many fixes

[Bug 2051925] Re: [MIR] promote libtracefs as a trace-cmd dependency

2024-04-17 Thread Adrien Nader
Matching MR is up: https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien-n/ubuntu/+source/libtracefs/+git/libtracefs/+merge/464434 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051925 Title: [MIR] promote libtracefs

[Bug 2055309] Re: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest

2024-04-16 Thread Adrien Nader
** Changed in: libtracefs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055309 Title: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest To manage

[Bug 2051925] Re: [MIR] promote libtracefs as a trace-cmd dependency

2024-04-16 Thread Adrien Nader
I just got test results on amd64 and arm64. https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-noble-adrien-n-noble- libtracefs-mir/noble/amd64/libt/libtracefs/20240416_142558_e8175@/log.gz https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-noble-adrien-n-noble- libtracefs-mir/noble/arm64/libt

[Bug 2051925] Re: [MIR] promote libtracefs as a trace-cmd dependency

2024-04-16 Thread Adrien Nader
Still working on it. I'm only cleaning up the changes but I've been having issues with the autopkgtest infrastructure since the beginning of the week (if I trigger tests within "too" quickly, the testbed setup fails). Status is: - amd64 and arm64 pass, - ppc64el fails with 2, 3, or 4 failures, -

[Bug 2051925] Re: [MIR] promote libtracefs as a trace-cmd dependency

2024-04-09 Thread Adrien Nader
I'm working on this and mostly finishing the changes. I think all comments in Christian's messages are addressed. Tests work. Valgrind tests are used and not too slow. Tests and build must run in VMs and not containers. I have published the changes in a PPA ( https://launchpad.net/~adrien-n

[Bug 2055309] Re: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest

2024-04-09 Thread Adrien Nader
** Changed in: libtracefs (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Adrien Nader (adrien-n) ** Changed in: libtracefs (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: libtracefs (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 2055309] Re: No test suite run at built time nor as autopkgtest

2024-04-08 Thread Adrien Nader
I carried this forward. In a Noble LXD container, the test setup doesn't work. In a Noble LXD VM, three tests fail: tracefs_iterate_snapshot_events, , and uprobes. The first and second tests fail because they try to sched_setaffinity() across 8 cores which the VM host has but the VM itself has

[Bug 2009544] Re: OpenSSL 3 performance regression

2024-04-04 Thread Adrien Nader
I'm going to target this to 24.10 as it's the first time it will be possible to "solve" it. As far as I understand, there will probably be performance loss with 3.3 compared to 1.1 but it's going to be a long tail rather than a few big changes which have been included in 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3. Btw,

[Bug 2009544] Re: OpenSSL 3 performance regression

2024-04-04 Thread Adrien Nader
** Also affects: openssl (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Also affects: openssl (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: openssl (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu

[Bug 2009544] Re: OpenSSL 3 performance regression

2024-04-03 Thread Adrien Nader
Due to openssl's release schedule, 24.04 Noble Numbat will still use 3.0. It will be 3.0.13 unless a 3.0.14 is released very soon. After Noble Numbat is released, I will work on openssl 3.3 for the subsequent Ubuntu release. It is not yet released but will be soon so I might start with beta/RC.

[Bug 2059417] Re: Sync xz-utils 5.6.1-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-03-31 Thread Adrien Nader
** Description changed: + NOTE: THIS IS AN ATTEMPT AT INCLUDING A BACKDOOR. THIS IS LEFT FOR + HISTORICAL PURPOSES ONLY AND MUST NOT BE DONE. + + Please sync xz-utils 5.6.1-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Hello! I am one of the upstream maintainers for XZ Utils. Version 5.6.1 was

[Bug 2055422] Re: Please sync xz-utils 5.6.0-0.2 from Debian experimental

2024-03-30 Thread Adrien Nader
I had forgotten about this bug. Thanks for bringing this up and let me close this. ** Changed in: xz-utils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Description changed: + NOTE: THE VERSION MENTIONED HERE HAS BEEN BACKDOORED. + I am keeping the text below unchanged due to its possible

[Bug 2059417] Re: Sync xz-utils 5.6.1-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-03-29 Thread Adrien Nader
I'll dive deeper into this. The timing collides with the t64 transition so that makes me curious. Moreover, Debian reverted to 5.4.5 so the situation where we're on 5.6.0 doesn't match Debian either. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 2059287] [NEW] Test failures in noble-proposed (all-proposed)

2024-03-27 Thread Adrien Nader
Public bug reported: Autopkgtests for request-tracker4 (and 5 it seems) fail on all arches and due to the recent changes around test environments and the use of all-proposed, it's difficult to identify which package change is responsible. I actually see some passes on amd64 and arm64 but due to

[Bug 2058940] Re: pyxplot: Please RM due to FTBFS

2024-03-25 Thread Adrien Nader
This is currently blocking texlive-bin, fftw3, python3-defaults, readline, ghostscript; all on armhf only. I think the previous build (before a no-change rebuild against cfitsio) was passing on other arches. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 2058947] [NEW] eso-midas: Please RM due to FTBFS

2024-03-25 Thread Adrien Nader
Public bug reported: eso-midas fails to build from source on all architectures at the moment, and the issue is reproducible locally. The failure looks like: # of pixels used = 843920 from 1,1 to 880,959 (in pixels) FITS file newVIMOS.fits will have 4 extensions *** buffer overflow

[Bug 2058940] [NEW] pyxplot: Please RM due to FTBFS

2024-03-25 Thread Adrien Nader
Public bug reported: pyxplot fails to build from source on all architectures at the moment, and the issue is reproducible locally. The failure looks like: python3 makeFigureEps.py ../bin/pyxplot # Best fit parameters were: # - a1 = -1.2602846 a3 =

[Bug 2056593] Re: [FFE] FIPS compatibility patches

2024-03-18 Thread Adrien Nader
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056593 Title: [FFE] FIPS compatibility patches To manage notifications about

[Bug 2058017] Re: openssl is not LTO-safe

2024-03-18 Thread Adrien Nader
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058017 Title: openssl is not LTO-safe To manage notifications about this

[Bug 2058017] Re: openssl is not LTO-safe

2024-03-17 Thread Adrien Nader
** Description changed: tl;dr: since it's too much work to make openssl LTO-safe, upstream doesn't see it as a goal and doesn't test it, and there are probably no performance gains to LTO for this package. Openssl is an old project and the codebase wasn't written with aliasing rules

[Bug 2058017] Re: openssl is not LTO-safe

2024-03-17 Thread Adrien Nader
** Description changed: tl;dr: since it's too much work to make openssl LTO-safe, upstream doesn't see it as a goal and doesn't test it, and there are probably no performance gains to LTO for this package. Openssl is an old project and the codebase wasn't written with aliasing rules

[Bug 2056593] Re: [FFE] FIPS compatibility patches

2024-03-15 Thread Adrien Nader
to create +   the keys. This means that encoding tests run with the wrong library context, +   which always uses the default provider. - The link for the MR is at + These changes are now included in a larger MR with other changes in the + same package version: + https://code.launchpad.net

[Bug 2058017] Re: openssl is not LTO-safe

2024-03-15 Thread Adrien Nader
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04 ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Adrien Nader (adrien-n) ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 2056593] Re: [FFE] FIPS compatibility patches

2024-03-15 Thread Adrien Nader
I did some additional tests too in a noble container. With/without the env var to set the file location, including with the file missing, with/without the env var to force FIPS mode, and using values 0, 1, 42, -42, a. By the way, note that access to these environment variables uses

[Bug 2058017] Re: openssl is not LTO-safe

2024-03-15 Thread Adrien Nader
** Summary changed: - [FFe] openssl is not LTO-safe + openssl is not LTO-safe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058017 Title: openssl is not LTO-safe To manage notifications about

[Bug 2058017] Re: [FFe] openssl is not LTO-safe

2024-03-15 Thread Adrien Nader
** Description changed: tl;dr: since it's too much work to make openssl LTO-safe, upstream doesn't see it as a goal and doesn't test it, and there are probably no performance gains to LTO for this package. Openssl is an old project and the codebase wasn't written with aliasing rules

[Bug 2058017] Re: [FFe] openssl is not LTO-safe

2024-03-15 Thread Adrien Nader
** Summary changed: - openssl is not LTO-safe + [FFe] openssl is not LTO-safe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058017 Title: [FFe] openssl is not LTO-safe To manage notifications

[Bug 2058017] [NEW] openssl is not LTO-safe

2024-03-15 Thread Adrien Nader
Public bug reported: tl;dr: since it's too much work to make openssl LTO-safe, upstream doesn't see it as a goal and doesn't test it, and there are probably no performance gains to LTO for this package. Openssl is an old project and the codebase wasn't written with aliasing rules in mind. There

[Bug 2030784] Re: Backport Intel's AVX512 patches on openssl 3.0

2024-03-14 Thread Adrien Nader
Thanks a lot for looking at this. The issue seems fixed on my machine. There are currently several changes being prepared for openssl and I think I'd rather batch them considering the state of the CI queue but this will definitely go into Noble. Thanks again. -- You received this bug

[Bug 2056739] Re: apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" class="file" profile="virt-aa-helper" name="/etc/gnutls/config"

2024-03-11 Thread Adrien Nader
Hey, I think everything in the gnutls/ directory should be allowed: there can be profiles with arbitrary names (or at least alnum I guess) which define priority/configuration strings that can be used by gnutls applications. I'm not aware of anything else that typically goes there but I haven't

[Bug 2055304] Re: openssl 3.0.2 backport IgnoreUnexpectedEOF ssl config option from 3.2

2024-03-04 Thread Adrien Nader
There are several reasons a program can skip loading the openssl configuration unfortunately: env vars pointing to another file, apparmor preventing loading, library initilization skipping it, ... Is the program that ignores the openssl configuration file in the Ubuntu archive? Or public? --

[Bug 2055304] Re: openssl 3.0.2 backport IgnoreUnexpectedEOF ssl config option from 3.2

2024-02-29 Thread Adrien Nader
Thanks for continued investigation. A reproducer would be valuable as it would allow me to verify independently the patch is effective, within the limits of the understanding of the situation of course and that can be especially time-consuming when not having access to the remote server. :/ A

[Bug 2055422] Re: Please sync xz-utils 5.6.0-0.2 from Debian experimental

2024-02-29 Thread Adrien Nader
Graham pointed out that the upload was actually to unstable and therefore autosync'ed already! I'm going to keep the bug open until it migrates due to the possibility of some testsuite failures. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 2055422] [NEW] Please sync xz-utils 5.6.0-0.2 from Debian experimental

2024-02-29 Thread Adrien Nader
Public bug reported: Xz-utils 5.6.0 was released last Friday. It features a much faster decompression code on all platforms but on x86_64 in particular, it is 60% faster in my testing. It also aligns better current practices of enabling multi-threading by default (always with a default memory

[Bug 2055304] Re: openssl 3.0.2 backport IgnoreUnexpectedEOF ssl config option from 3.2

2024-02-28 Thread Adrien Nader
Thanks for the report. I am reluctant to backport this as I'm not sure it makes a lot of sense system-wide. Curl upstream didn't seem happy with enabling this work-around even in 2021. It seems the reason to integrate this would be to be able to ignore this despite curl not ignoring it nor

[Bug 795355] Re: Intermittent SSL connection faults when using TLSv1

2023-08-29 Thread Adrien Nader
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix ** Changed in: apache (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to a duplicate bug report (857636).

[Bug 400766] Re: ubuntu 9.04 installation problem

2023-07-18 Thread Adrien Nader
Old bug... I think the error comes from base-passwd függőségek: libc6 (>= 2.8); ám: libc6 rendszeren lévő verziója 2.8~20080505-0ubuntu9 which translates to base-passwd függőségek: libc6 (>= 2.8); ám: libc6 rendszeren lévő verziója 2.8~20080505-0ubuntu9 And then bash pre-depends on libc6 >=

[Bug 396818] Re: openssl s_client behaves strangely without CAPath

2023-05-11 Thread Adrien Nader
I'm not seeing that behaviour on a 23.04 system and I expect it to be the same since 22.04 at least. As such I'm going to mark this as Fix Released. ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 795355] Re: Intermittent SSL connection faults when using TLSv1

2023-05-11 Thread Adrien Nader
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to a duplicate bug report (857636). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795355 Title: Intermittent SSL connection faults when

[Bug 106737]

2021-11-11 Thread Adrien-rybarczyk
Perhaps the title should be changed, as it also affects imap folders. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106737 Title: Renaming folder to same name but different case not allowed To

[Bug 1826290] Re: geoclue mozilla location api key rate limited

2021-01-27 Thread Adrien
@osomon any news on the key request for Ubuntu ? I'm hitting usage limits randomly with the generic "geoclue" key which makes redshift not work sometimes. It's the same error as @heap -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1884583] Re: vim is dependent on libcanberra0 in Ubuntu 20.04, had no such dependency in Ubuntu 18.04

2020-11-07 Thread Adrien Beau
Also filed (and fixed!) in Arch Linux: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/63073 A build switch was introduced in Vim 8.1.1529, so vim can be built with --disable-canberra. Commit https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/21606676d9ebc6f159c56ee90733e5d5720ab3d7 Even though it is technically "no X", I

[Bug 1844012] Re: grub2 doesn't recognize ext4 with metadata_csum_seed enabled

2020-11-05 Thread Adrien Beau
Note that this is not limited to metadata_csum_seed, other "recently" added ext4 features cannot be used on the system partition (and maybe the whole system disk, if you have other ext4 partitions there with such features). At least confirmed to not work with GRUB: - metadata_csum_seed -

[Bug 1844012] Re: grub2 doesn't recognize ext4 with metadata_csum_seed enabled

2020-11-05 Thread Adrien Beau
The bug is still present in version 2.04-1ubuntu26.6 in focal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844012 Title: grub2 doesn't recognize ext4 with metadata_csum_seed enabled To manage

[Bug 1844012] Re: grub2 doesn't recognize ext4 with metadata_csum_seed enabled

2020-11-05 Thread Adrien Beau
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #866603 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866603 ** Also affects: grub2 (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866603 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1876219] Re: iris driver for old cpu

2020-10-09 Thread Adrien Béraud
** Bug watch added: git.jami.net/savoirfairelinux/ring-daemon/issues #264 https://git.jami.net/savoirfairelinux/ring-daemon/issues/264 ** Also affects: mesa via https://git.jami.net/savoirfairelinux/ring-daemon/issues/264 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Also affects: ring

[Bug 1887107] Re: Missing entry for timezone database when setting timezone via the text search

2020-07-10 Thread Adrien L.
I will. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887107 Title: Missing entry for timezone database when setting timezone via the text search To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1887107] Re: Missing entry for timezone database when setting timezone via the text search

2020-07-10 Thread Adrien L.
After some quick investigation, I found that gnome-control-center pulls its data directly from the zone.tab file, just like Paul Eggert warned against doing in the comment I quoted above. in tz.h (https://github.com/GNOME/gnome-control-

[Bug 1887107] Re: Missing entry for timezone database when setting timezone via the text search

2020-07-10 Thread Adrien L.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1884307 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1884307 I don't think this is correct to mark this as a duplicate of bug #1884307. #1884307 is a bug at the installation of Ubuntu Mate, and for all we know, this might pull from a different database than the bug I

[Bug 1887107] Re: Missing entry for timezone database when setting timezone via the text search

2020-07-09 Thread Adrien L.
I did a little bit more digging. Perhaps this comment would help explain why there is a problem: https://github.com/eggert/tz/commit/45dcf69b45087cff50282d4da64b86a7d705ddf3#commitcomment-4602830 In release v2013e "America/Montreal" was removed from the zone.tab file, and incorrect programs may

[Bug 1260972] Re: Montreal not available in Ubiquity time zome selector

2020-07-09 Thread Adrien L.
I want to point out that the tzdata discussion (which I continued, but should not have) seems to be irrelevant in the case of ubiquity, which has the proper city of Montreal, but under a misspelled name. My main point here is that the database contains a lot of misspellings. -- You received

[Bug 1260972] Re: Montreal not available in Ubiquity time zome selector

2020-07-09 Thread Adrien L.
Upping this again. There is a Mont-real entry, which is not an official name for the city. This should be corrected to either Montréal or Montreal (preferably the first). > However, this turned out to not be true and Montreal timezone was removed > from tzdata database. This is not quite

[Bug 1887107] [NEW] Missing entry for timezone database when setting timezone via the text search

2020-07-09 Thread Adrien L.
Public bug reported: I can't find Montreal in the timezone search box, even though it is present in the /usr/share/zoneinfo database. What I did: Settings > Time & Date > Time Zone > Click in the search box and start typing Mont... What I expected: Autocompletion. What happened: No completion

[Bug 1767652] Re: kicad on ubuntu mate 18.04 cursor ghosting (eeshcema), pcb design shrinked (pcbnew)

2020-06-01 Thread Adrien
Hello, I just solved it by using the info in this link : https://kicad- pcb.org/download/ubuntu/ In the end it means upgrading to Kicad 5.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767652

[Bug 1767652] Re: kicad on ubuntu mate 18.04 cursor ghosting (eeshcema), pcb design shrinked (pcbnew)

2020-06-01 Thread Adrien
Hello every one. I hqve the same issue with the following configuration : Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS Release:18.04 Codename: bionic Package: 4.0.7+dfsg1-1ubuntu2 It is on a jetson nano from NVIDIA. How can we know if there are any update ? I tried

[Bug 1864901] Re: [snap] suggestion: alert users when the snap has been refreshed while running

2020-04-24 Thread Adrien Jarthon
For the record I recently noticed the 30 leaked processes started taking all my CPU (all at the same time, maybe when an update was downloaded). They were all running in infinite loop and I couldn't see the "sleep 60" in their children any more in htop. I didn't investigate more as I had to

[Bug 1864901] Re: [snap] suggestion: alert users when the snap has been refreshed while running

2020-04-18 Thread Adrien Jarthon
I just noticed hundreds of chromium.launcher processes running on my machine with `sleep 60` and found that it's because of this fix. Looks like this background process is started but nerver stopped? nor does it checks if it's already running. This is especially visible in my case because I'm

[Bug 1872915] [NEW] 11-nvidia-prime.conf ModulePath seems incorrect

2020-04-15 Thread Adrien RICCIARDI
ure -qDEB_HOST_MULTIARCH", which returns only "x86_64-linux-gnu". However, does 'ModulePath "xxx"' line really mater here ? Best regards, Adrien ** Affects: ubuntu-drivers-common (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug not

[Bug 158483] Re: evince mishandles duplex printing of multiple copies of PDFs with an odd number of pages.

2020-01-06 Thread Adrien
I would like to point that this issue has not been solved as of 2020 (Version 3.30). Thanks for reading! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158483 Title: evince mishandles duplex

[Bug 1849455] Re: [SRU] Externally-opened files no longer open in existing window

2019-11-18 Thread Adrien RICCIARDI
Hello, 4:19.04.3-0ubuntu2.1 fixed the bug for me too. Thank you ! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849455 Title: [SRU] Externally-opened files no longer open in existing window To

[Bug 1825049] Re: dnsimple adapter produces invalid URL in create_record

2019-04-29 Thread Adrien Ferrand
** Patch added: "cosmic.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lexicon/+bug/1825049/+attachment/525/+files/cosmic.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825049

[Bug 1825049] Re: dnsimple adapter produces invalid URL in create_record

2019-04-29 Thread Adrien Ferrand
I fixed the issue observed in Cosmic as observed with http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/VfDDrbR9qF/ The update debdiff for Cosmic is attached after my post. The one for Bionic can stay at it is, since the package is building properly in this case. About your question for the tests. I assume you are

[Bug 1825049] Re: dnsimple adapter produces invalid URL in create_record

2019-04-26 Thread Adrien Ferrand
** Attachment added: "Fix for Cosmic" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lexicon/+bug/1825049/+attachment/5259385/+files/fix-dnsimple-cosmic-debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1825049] Re: dnsimple adapter produces invalid URL in create_record

2019-04-26 Thread Adrien Ferrand
I am a maintainer of the Lexicon project, and want to propose a SRU for Lexicon 2.2.1 on Bionic and Lexicon 2.7.0 on Cosmic to fix that issue. [Impact] * Due to an undisclosed bug in Lexicon on the DNSimple provider, the creation of new DNS records on DNSimple is not possible anymore since

[Bug 1825049] Re: dnsimple adapter produces invalid URL in create_record

2019-04-26 Thread Adrien Ferrand
** Attachment added: "Fix for Bionic" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lexicon/+bug/1825049/+attachment/5259384/+files/fix-dnsimple-bionic-debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1616368] Re: Unable to upgrade ubuntu server from 14.04.4 to 16.04.1

2019-02-26 Thread Adrien
Hello, I've the same issue like Benjamin Curtiss.. As Ubuntu 14.04 will be soon EOL, it's complicated that we can't upgrade the OS from 14.04 to 16.04 right now.. I don't have postfix installed neither old init.d scripts on my server. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >