[Bug 1694149] Re: ssl error using urllib2

2018-11-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Over a year later and no triage, no nothing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1694149 Title: ssl error using urllib2 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1694149] Re: ssl error using urllib2

2017-06-18 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Hrm. What is the point of LTS even if bugs like this can go completely ignored? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1694149 Title: ssl error using urllib2 To manage notifications about

[Bug 1694149] Re: ssl error using urllib2

2017-06-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I wonder why this ticket has not even been triaged. It was filed against an LTS release of Ubuntu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1694149 Title: ssl error using urllib2 To manage

[Bug 1694149] [NEW] ssl error using urllib2

2017-05-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: On Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS with python 2.7.5-5ubuntu3 and libpython2.7-stdlib 2.7.6-8ubuntu0.3, using this little example program: #!/usr/bin/python import urllib2 USER_AGENT = 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.101

[Bug 578620] Re: Failed to open device `brother3:bus1; dev1': Invalid argument

2016-09-04 Thread Brian J. Murrell
And yet another Ubuntu bug that has zero activity for 3 years only be closed EOL. No wonder I don't use Ubuntu any more. Seems there is zero interested in fixing any bug that doesn't affect a phone. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1607024] [NEW] needs to wait for remote-filesystems to start

2016-07-27 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Currently the dbus upstart script has this: start on local-filesystems But this makes the dbus startup fail if /usr is an NFS filesystem. After changing the above line to: start on remote-filesystems dbus started working correctly. This actually highlights the problem

[Bug 1182225] Re: KVM ubuntu 12.04.2 guest installation with kickstart config fails

2016-07-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
So "Confirmed" but nothing done about it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182225 Title: KVM ubuntu 12.04.2 guest installation with kickstart config fails To manage notifications

[Bug 1568830] Re: make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 512k 2554601336 124

2016-05-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
> 3.4: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.4-quantal/ This one works. I've got to say that it's really annoying that every time I reboot my system comes back with a degraded array: # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [linear] [multipath] [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]

[Bug 1568830] Re: make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 512k 2554601336 124

2016-05-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
> 4.0: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.0-vivid/ This kernel works -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568830 Title: make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks

[Bug 1568830] Re: make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 512k 2554601336 124

2016-05-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Nope. # uname -r 3.2.80-030280-generic [18455.876945] md/raid0:md1: make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 512k 1102518240 124 [18455.876959] md/raid1:md0: md1: rescheduling sector 1102518240 [18455.935138] md/raid1:md0: redirecting sector 1102518240 to other mirror:

[Bug 1568830] Re: make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 512k 2554601336 124

2016-04-30 Thread Brian J. Murrell
So now that I have determined that this problem is fixed in the newer/upstream kernel, what next? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568830 Title: make_request bug: can't convert block

[Bug 1568830] Re: make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 512k 2554601336 124

2016-04-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Tags added: kernel-fixed-upstream -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568830 Title: make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 512k 2554601336 124 To manage

[Bug 1568830] Re: make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 512k 2554601336 124

2016-04-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I got past it with --ignore-depends=kmod. Array is rebuilding right now. We'll know in a couple of hours when the backups start whether the kernel complains again or not. I will update then. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1568830] Re: make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 512k 2554601336 124

2016-04-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
# dpkg -i linux-image-4.6.0-040600rc4-generic_4.6.0-040600rc4.201604172330_amd64.deb (Reading database ... 84773 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking linux-image-4.6.0-040600rc4-generic (from .../linux-image-4.6.0-040600rc4-generic_4.6.0-040600rc4.201604172330_amd64.deb) ...

[Bug 1568830] UdevLog.txt

2016-04-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
apport information ** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568830/+attachment/4632630/+files/UdevLog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568830 Title:

[Bug 1568830] Re: make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 512k 2554601336 124

2016-04-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
FWIW, I did use "ubuntu-bug linux" to create this ticket and the report that was generated did contain all of the same things as the requested "apport-collect 1568830" but they didn't all get attached to this ticket. Seems like ubuntu-bug is a bit broken. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1568830] ProcInterrupts.txt

2016-04-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568830/+attachment/4632627/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1568830] WifiSyslog.txt

2016-04-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
apport information ** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568830/+attachment/4632631/+files/WifiSyslog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568830

[Bug 1568830] ProcCpuinfo.txt

2016-04-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568830/+attachment/4632626/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568830

[Bug 1568830] UdevDb.txt

2016-04-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
apport information ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568830/+attachment/4632629/+files/UdevDb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568830 Title:

[Bug 1568830] ProcModules.txt

2016-04-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568830/+attachment/4632628/+files/ProcModules.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568830

[Bug 1568830] AlsaDevices.txt

2016-04-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
apport information ** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568830/+attachment/4632621/+files/AlsaDevices.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568830

[Bug 1568830] Lsusb.txt

2016-04-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568830/+attachment/4632625/+files/Lsusb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568830 Title:

[Bug 1568830] Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt

2016-04-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
apport information ** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568830/+attachment/4632622/+files/Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1568830] Dependencies.txt

2016-04-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
apport information ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568830/+attachment/4632624/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1568830] CurrentDmesg.txt

2016-04-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
apport information ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1568830/+attachment/4632623/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1568830] Re: make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 512k 2554601336 124

2016-04-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: I have a couple of RAID arrays with the following configuration: /dev/md1: Version : 1.2 Creation Time : Sat Dec 26 19:49:41 2015 Raid Level : raid0 Array Size : 1953524736 (1863.03 GiB

[Bug 1568830] [NEW] make_request bug: can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 512k 2554601336 124

2016-04-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: I have a couple of RAID arrays with the following configuration: /dev/md1: Version : 1.2 Creation Time : Sat Dec 26 19:49:41 2015 Raid Level : raid0 Array Size : 1953524736 (1863.03 GiB 2000.41 GB) Raid Devices : 2 Total Devices : 2 Persistence :

[Bug 545006] Re: permission denied for files i own on nfs4 with kerberos

2016-01-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
There was support when this ticket was opened, 6 years ago and then not a single thing happened with it (the ticket). It didn't even get triaged. No wonder I don't install Ubuntu any more and am converting what few Ubuntu systems I have left to RedHat/CentOS. -- You received this bug

[Bug 640289] Re: bluetooth-applet crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_is_a() after pairing with a bluetooth device

2016-01-26 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Indeed! This bug was reported over 5 years ago and never got any more attention than "is it working now?". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/640289 Title: bluetooth-applet crashed with

[Bug 554172] Re: system services using "console output" not starting at boot

2016-01-20 Thread Brian J. Murrell
@Christopher: I wasn't suggesting it should stay open. I was just making a comment on how letting tickets stagnate until everyone gives up and stops commenting is one sure way to close tickets. I don't actually use Ubuntu any more because my experience when I last did (and the reason I switched)

[Bug 554172] Re: system services using "console output" not starting at boot

2016-01-19 Thread Brian J. Murrell
> That version is now outdated and no more supported Waiting for the Ubuntu versions that bugs are filed against to just become unsupported is one way to close tickets I suppose. Even tickets that affect 243 people. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1478364] [NEW] invalid session being saved

2015-07-26 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: When I log out of my desktop I get some files in ~/.config/gnome-session /saved-session/, pressumably the saving of my session so that it can be restored on next login. But on next login I get an error from gnome-session: env: unrecognized option '--sm-client-id' Try 'env

[Bug 1478364] Re: invalid session being saved

2015-07-26 Thread Brian J. Murrell
As you will notice, upstream closed this bug OBSOLETE with the explanation: Version 3.9 is an ancient unstable development version and not supported anymore by GNOME developers. GNOME developers are no longer working on that older version, so there will not be any bug fixes by GNOME developers

[Bug 152668] Re: image data has block inversions

2014-12-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I no longer have that particular scanner nor do I use Ubuntu any more[1]. I'm afraid the general bug stagnation has chased me away from Ubuntu. This bug is a good example in fact. 6.5 years old now. I guess you might as well just close this. [1] desktops here are all Fedora now and servers

[Bug 1297800] Re: During upgrades, new certificates will be added. Please choose those you trust.

2014-03-26 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297800 Title: During upgrades, new certificates will be added. Please choose

[Bug 1297800] Re: During upgrades, new certificates will be added. Please choose those you trust.

2014-03-26 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Interesting. I don't recall ever [re-]setting that option. In any case: # debconf-show ca-certificates ca-certificates/title: * ca-certificates/enable_crts: ... * ca-certificates/trust_new_crts: ask -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

Re: [Bug 523484] Re: ureadahead requires /var on root filesystem

2014-02-23 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Sun, 2014-02-23 at 14:00 +, Pavel Malyshev wrote: Four years passed... What is the point to use LTS releases if such pure-Ubuntu bugs are not fixed fore years? I asked myself that same question a while ago. This was my conclusion/solution: $ cat /etc/issue Fedora release 20

[Bug 1268597] [NEW] doesn't see printers from 1.6 servers

2014-01-13 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: On current LTS (Precise) CUPS does not see printers advertised from CUPS 1.6 systems. Yes, I understand that the whole CUPS browse feature went away in CUPS 1.6, but that means that current LTS has a functionality hole/regression where CUPS 1.6 servers are concerned. Fedora

[Bug 1268312] [NEW] vdpau missing

2014-01-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: It seems that while the libvdpau_nvidia library is available for nvidia- current: /usr/lib/nvidia-current/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.295.40 So such driver is available for nvidia-173-updates. ** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-173-updates (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 813183] Re: dante-server 1.1 no longer supported

2013-11-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Wow. 2.5 year old bug report reporting that the currently packaged version is no longer supported and still, no update to a newer version. The version currently being packaged is over 7 years old!! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1044039] Re: badly needs an update

2013-07-28 Thread Brian J. Murrell
So, will this be backported to LTS (precise) given that it fixes a known security issue: CVE 2011-1755. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044039 Title: badly needs an update To manage

[Bug 905686] Re: nautilus assert failure: nautilus: ../../src/xcb_io.c:528: _XAllocID: Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed.

2013-05-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
This bug was opened 2011-12-17 and it's now 1/3 way into 2013 and it still exists on LTS/precise. Is this bug actually going to get fixed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905686 Title:

Re: [Bug 1095270] Re: segfault in rb_track_transfer_batch_check_profiles()

2013-04-15 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-04-14 02:36 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: This was apparently fixed in rhythmbox 2.98 which is available in Ubuntu 13.04. Which doesn't really do LTS users much good. Can we have a fix backported? Or even just the patch I supplied to this bug applied and released? TBH, getting a fix released

Re: [Bug 1095270] Re: segfault in rb_track_transfer_batch_check_profiles()

2013-04-15 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-04-15 09:37 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: Brian, if you want this fix for 12.04 LTS, you should look at the SRU procedures: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates Like I said, *I* don't need a release of this in LTS. I have my local patched copy and it's working just fine. But other

Re: [Bug 1095270] Re: segfault in rb_track_transfer_batch_check_profiles()

2013-04-15 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-04-15 11:04 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: If you think this patch needs to be in Ubuntu 12.04, then please add more specific information to the description than a pretty reproducible segfault. I have no idea how common the crash is or how to reproduce it myself. Thanks. A segfault is a bug,

Re: [Bug 1095270] Re: segfault in rb_track_transfer_batch_check_profiles()

2013-04-15 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-04-15 11:37 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: What specific steps should we take to recreate this bug? TBH, after all of this time, I don't recall. I'm not at all saying that this bug shouldn't be fixed but honestly there isn't enough information here for me to know what the bug is, so it's

Re: [Bug 736743] Re: environment block not implemented on btrfs

2013-04-06 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-04-06 06:05 AM, Harald Glatt wrote: Also the fact that this bug is two years old means the time span for patience has long been left standing in the dust... Patience for this bug to be fixed or patience with Ubuntu in general? I know which one it is for me. -- You received this bug

Re: [Bug 1094496] Re: gnome-keyring-daemon leaks memory

2013-03-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-03-08 08:08 AM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: The patch is applied in gnome-keyring = 3.6.1, Will that release go into the current LTS, 12.04? LTS is Long Term Support so I would expect it to see bug fixes without requiring individuals to file specific requests to have a bug fixed in it. --

[Bug 1094496] Re: gnome-keyring-daemon leaks memory

2013-03-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
But I do have a 12.04 machine and I already submitted a patch (which just came from upstream, not my patch) which fixes the problem on the gnome-keyring shipped in 12.04 LTS. So really, I don't know why you are proposing all of this rigmarole with backporting patches from g-k-r 3.6.1 and

[Bug 1149527] [NEW] upstart kills ipv6 networking

2013-03-06 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: I have a machine here that network boots (i.e. no resident hard disk, pxeboot and nfsroot) and during it's boot it gets an ipv6 address on our network but after it's booted, even though it still has an ipv6 network configured (address and routing) any ipv6 packets sent to it

Re: [Bug 736743] Re: environment block not implemented on btrfs

2013-02-21 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-02-21 03:10 AM, ill wrote: It's been a bug for two years now. It has a known, easy to implement fix. If the ubuntu devs wanted to fix it they would have done it a long time ago. Indeed. It's this apathy for the real problems real users have that is driving me away from Ubuntu. All new

[Bug 848183]

2013-02-20 Thread Brian J. Murrell
(In reply to Dominik from comment #30) Workaround: Save attached message to folder (outside Thunderbird) and import it with the addon ImportExportTools. Well, yes. I think we all understand what the workaround is. But I think we all agree that it's cumbersome at best. That's why we are

[Bug 1007924] Re: pm-utils uses wrong interface for NetworkManager hook (should be org.freedesktop.NetworkManager.Sleep)

2013-02-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
This problem exists in LTS 12.04. It causes machines coming back from resume to use illegal IP addresses since it uses the address that it had when it suspended and does not renew it on resume. This means if the lease expired while suspended, it is against network and security policies (of

[Bug 1007924]

2013-02-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Can we get a comment from the maintainer whether this patch is or will (not) be applied and explanation as to why not if not? This bug is percolating to many downstream consumers of this package. It's not really reasonable to ignore it here and expect them all to fix it themselves. -- You

[Bug 695247] Re: dhcp3-client doesn't renew leases after suspend

2013-02-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
This is not wishlist. This is a bug. It is absolutely invalid and wrong to just get onto a network and use an address that was not either given to you manually by the network administrator or obtained through some autoconfiguration tool such as DHCP. Therefore, using an IP address after it's

[Bug 1005504] Re: [Upstream] Writer: Avery 5167 label bottom vertically truncated

2013-01-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
So when will this bug be fixed in 12.04, the LTS release that is supposed to be being supported currently? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005504 Title: [Upstream] Writer: Avery 5167

Re: [Bug 1005504] Re: [Upstream] Writer: Avery 5167 label bottom vertically truncated

2013-01-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-01-25 11:33 AM, Björn Michaelsen wrote: fix is in 3.6 released with quantal This doesn't, answer my question about 12.04 which is the current LTS release and should be currently (and for quite a while still) supported. When will this fix go into the current LTS? -- You received this bug

Re: [Bug 1005504] Re: [Upstream] Writer: Avery 5167 label bottom vertically truncated

2013-01-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-01-25 12:20 PM, Björn Michaelsen wrote: doesnt qualify: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates Oh, so LTS == Long Term Support, except where it's not? What's the point of LTS if users have to put up with a whole slew of issues which doesnt qualify to be fixed for (at minimum) the 2

[Bug 1005504] Re: [Upstream] Writer: Avery 5167 label bottom vertically truncated

2013-01-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
OK. So debate about LTS aside, back to the issue at hand: how am I as a user of an LTS system supposed to be able to print labels given this bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005504

[Bug 1098981] Re: fails to resume from suspend

2013-01-13 Thread Brian J. Murrell
It seems that http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel- ppa/mainline/v3.2.34-precise/, which 3.2.0-35-generic is apparently based on has a number of issues with suspend/resume also. Suspend/resume worked great in 2.6.38-13 (natty). Why has it gone all to hell since then? -- You received this bug

[Bug 1099202] [NEW] null pointer dereference unloading then loading mceusb

2013-01-13 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Simply doing an rmmod mceusb; modprobe mceusb triggers the crash in the crash.txt attachment. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: linux-image-generic 3.2.0.35.40 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-35.55-generic 3.2.34 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-35-generic i686

[Bug 1098981] Re: fails to resume from suspend

2013-01-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Worth adding, all tests, on both kernels were done without any binary/proprietary nvidia module loaded in the kernel. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098981 Title: fails to resume

[Bug 1098981] [NEW] fails to resume from suspend

2013-01-12 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Latest precise kernel (and most previous ones) seem to fail to resume from suspend on the hardware in this bug report. The mainline kernel at http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.2.31-precise/ doesn't have this problem. To suspend I am simply doing: # echo mem

Re: [Bug 1094496] Re: gnome-keyring-daemon leaks memory

2013-01-07 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-01-07 01:06 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote: Thanks Brian, do you have details on how to trigger the leak? Nothing more specific than just sit back and wait. :-) Seriously, I don't to anything special here. I keep SSH and PGP keys in my keyring and ssh a lot and sign every outgoing e-mail.

[Bug 1094496] Re: gnome-keyring-daemon leaks memory

2013-01-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
This patch from upstream bug #684351 seems to fix the problem here for me. ** Patch added: patch to fix memory leak https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-keyring/+bug/1094496/+attachment/3474829/+files/10_bz_684351_memory_leak.patch ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #684351

[Bug 1095270] [NEW] segfault in rb_track_transfer_batch_check_profiles()

2013-01-02 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: I have what appears to be a pretty reproducible segfault here in 2.96. If you need any more info, please don't hesitate to ask. FWIW, I do have a full apport crash report but since apport sends whole core files, which these days typically contain account credentials, I

[Bug 1095270] Re: segfault in rb_track_transfer_batch_check_profiles()

2013-01-02 Thread Brian J. Murrell
This patch appears to fix the segfault in my local testing. ** Patch added: patch to fix segfault https://bugs.launchpad.net/rhythmbox/+bug/1095270/+attachment/3472612/+files/git_bz690993.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

Re: [Bug 1094739] Re: no way to disable database backup

2013-01-02 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 13-01-02 11:18 AM, Mario Limonciello wrote: I think the easiest solution for you would be to just comment out the line in the cron job in /etc. Yeah. I've done that in the meanwhile. If we ever add something else to that cron job it will do a conffile prompt on upgrade. Right. Yet

[Bug 1094739] [NEW] no way to disable database backup

2012-12-30 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: In /etc/cron.weekly/mythtv-database there is: /usr/share/mythtv/mythconverg_backup.pl Which ends up producing an error: ERROR: DBBackupDirectory not specified, stopped at /usr/share/mythtv/mythconverg_backup.pl line 856. run-parts: /etc/cron.weekly/mythtv-database exited

[Bug 1094496] [NEW] gnome-keyring-daemon leaks memory

2012-12-29 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: gnome-keyring-daemon gets killed here every few days due to it's memory size exceeding the site imposed limit of 2GB per process. The ulimit of course is not the problem as even with an unlimited setting, it would just grow until it was killed by the OOM killer. The real

[Bug 1005928] Re: segfault in gconf_engine_get_fuller()

2012-12-18 Thread Brian J. Murrell
No worries. I'm using linphone now. Have been for a long time now and it's meeting all of my needs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005928 Title: segfault in

[Bug 1005928] Re: segfault in gconf_engine_get_fuller()

2012-12-18 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I should add though, I've never had any large address books. I doubt I've ever had more than a dozen entries in one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005928 Title: segfault in

Re: [Bug 714560] Re: ekiga hangs frequently

2012-12-18 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 12-12-18 06:20 AM, Eugen Dedu wrote: Please use ekiga 4.0.0, it fixes such issues. That's not available (yet) and I guess won't be for a few years for LTS users. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 1005928] Re: segfault in gconf_engine_get_fuller()

2012-12-18 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 12-12-18 08:04 AM, Eugen Dedu wrote: It is not about address book, but about the call history. Ahhh. My mistake. I do suppose I could have had a long call history given that this was a client on my home PBX. Thanks much for the clarification. -- You received this bug notification because

Re: [Bug 736135] Re: way old version in supported lucid (LTS)

2012-11-08 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 12-11-08 09:03 AM, zapman wrote: That said, compiling gtkg from source is extremely easy. Just download the source tarball from http://gtk-gnutella.sourceforge.net/, extract it say in your home directory. Then open a terminal and type (or copypaste) the following commands: sudo

Re: [Bug 1073580] Re: mythtv-backend needs to run in writable directory

2012-11-05 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 12-11-05 07:07 PM, Mario Limonciello wrote: Well and actually that conflicts with what this commit says: http://code.mythtv.org/trac/changeset/4a515ba3904bde90f7d9b64c5a7dc10e49a77dd8/mythtv In theory 0.25 should be able to dump. I'm using 0.25-fixes and not getting core dumps. I've

[Bug 1073580] [NEW] mythtv-backend needs to run in writable directory

2012-10-31 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: The mythtv-backend process needs to be run in a directory that it can write into, ~mythtv for example. This is required so that a core file can be collected if/when it segfaults -- like it has been doing here. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package:

[Bug 1073580] Re: mythtv-backend needs to run in writable directory

2012-10-31 Thread Brian J. Murrell
I should add, look at the modified.conffile..etc.init.mythtv.backend.conf.txt attachment for an example of how to do this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1073580 Title:

Re: [Bug 1073580] Re: mythtv-backend needs to run in writable directory

2012-10-31 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 12-10-31 10:40 AM, Thomas Mashos wrote: Shouldn't the crash file already be written to /var/crash/ ? Interesting point. It doesn't seem to be the case however. Given this segfault: Oct 30 22:00:03 pvr kernel: [1937721.428406] mythbackend[13502]: segfault at 28 ip 0620ef91 sp b2ffe140

[Bug 1064986] [NEW] need patch to reduce debug verbosity

2012-10-10 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Per the RedHat bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754940 the same patch needs to be applied to the Ubuntu package. As you will see from that RH bug report, the patch has been accepted upstream, presumably for 2.4.13:

[Bug 1064636] [NEW] shouldn't use /path/to/...

2012-10-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: In the rsnapshot.conf that is included with rsnapshot-1.3.1-3, there are paths as such: #linux_lvm_cmd_lvcreate /path/to/lvcreate #linux_lvm_cmd_lvremove /path/to/lvremove Yes, I see they are commented out by default so somebody uncommenting them ought to fix the /path/to/

[Bug 1064636] Re: shouldn't use /path/to/...

2012-10-09 Thread Brian J. Murrell
** Package changed: ubuntu = rsnapshot (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1064636 Title: shouldn't use /path/to/... To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1059567] [NEW] update-rc.d: warning: saslauthd stop runlevel arguments (0 1 6) do not match LSB Default-Stop values (1)

2012-10-01 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: While installing sasl2-bin I got the following message: Setting up sasl2-bin (2.1.25.dfsg1-3ubuntu0.1) ... update-rc.d: warning: saslauthd stop runlevel arguments (0 1 6) do not match LSB Default-Stop values (1) * Starting SASL Authentication Daemon saslauthd ...done.

[Bug 1059567] Re: update-rc.d: warning: saslauthd stop runlevel arguments (0 1 6) do not match LSB Default-Stop values (1)

2012-10-01 Thread Brian J. Murrell
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059567 Title: update-rc.d: warning: saslauthd stop runlevel arguments (0 1 6) do not match LSB Default-Stop values (1) To

[Bug 1059567] Re: update-rc.d: warning: saslauthd stop runlevel arguments (0 1 6) do not match LSB Default-Stop values (1)

2012-10-01 Thread Brian J. Murrell
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059567 Title: update-rc.d: warning: saslauthd stop runlevel arguments (0 1 6) do not match LSB Default-Stop values (1) To manage notifications about

[Bug 1059567] [NEW] update-rc.d: warning: saslauthd stop runlevel arguments (0 1 6) do not match LSB Default-Stop values (1)

2012-10-01 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: While installing sasl2-bin I got the following message: Setting up sasl2-bin (2.1.25.dfsg1-3ubuntu0.1) ... update-rc.d: warning: saslauthd stop runlevel arguments (0 1 6) do not match LSB Default-Stop values (1) * Starting SASL Authentication Daemon saslauthd ...done.

[Bug 496886] Re: Squid crashes with assertion failed authenticateUserAuthenticated

2012-09-26 Thread Brian J. Murrell
OK. So when will this be fixed? This bug has been open for a year and 3 months already. It was reported in the previous LTS and is still present in the current LTS. That makes this bug over 2 years old. Is having a crashing proxy server in two LTS releases acceptable? Is it acceptable

[Bug 496886] Re: Squid crashes with assertion failed authenticateUserAuthenticated

2012-09-26 Thread Brian J. Murrell
OK. So when will this be fixed? This bug has been open for a year and 3 months already. It was reported in the previous LTS and is still present in the current LTS. That makes this bug over 2 years old. Is having a crashing proxy server in two LTS releases acceptable? Is it acceptable

Re: [Bug 699802] Re: error:: no video mode activated

2012-09-26 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 12-09-26 11:35 AM, Colin Watson wrote: Could affected people retest with GRUB 2.00 in an up-to-date build of Ubuntu 12.10, please? Just a suggestion... In general, I'd guess that most people are unable to do such things. I don't know about anyone else, but I stick to stable releases for my

[Bug 1056248] [NEW] assertion failed: AclProxyAuth.cc:229: authenticateUserAuthenticated(Filled(checklist)-auth_user_request)

2012-09-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Squid 3.1.19 is failing with: assertion failed: AclProxyAuth.cc:229: authenticateUserAuthenticated(Filled(checklist)-auth_user_request) This is reported and fixed upstream however the fix only went into 3.2 because it's too invasive for 3.1. Thus, squid3 on Qunatal AND

[Bug 1056118] [NEW] need update to 15.0.1 on Precise

2012-09-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: There is a nasty performance issue with TB 15 which is fixed in 15.0.1 according to reports in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787348. I have confirmed this by installing 15.0.1 from https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/thunderbird-stable. This needs to

Re: [Bug 1056118] Re: need update to 15.0.1 on Precise

2012-09-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On 12-09-25 08:45 AM, Chris Coulson wrote: Huh, I thought we'd already updated this???!! (at least, I uploaded it to the security PPA 2 weeks ago). Security PPA? And I'm not sure why it's in the thunderbird-stable PPA. I would imagine because it's the latest stable release? Using those

[Bug 1049428] Re: Thunderbird 15.0.1 stable update tracking bug

2012-09-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Just a guess, but failed build on ia64 and sparc? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1049428 Title: Thunderbird 15.0.1 stable update tracking bug To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1056248] [NEW] assertion failed: AclProxyAuth.cc:229: authenticateUserAuthenticated(Filled(checklist)-auth_user_request)

2012-09-25 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Squid 3.1.19 is failing with: assertion failed: AclProxyAuth.cc:229: authenticateUserAuthenticated(Filled(checklist)-auth_user_request) This is reported and fixed upstream however the fix only went into 3.2 because it's too invasive for 3.1. Thus, squid3 on Qunatal AND

[Bug 995645] Re: udevd: timeout: killing 'watershed sh -c '/sbin/lvm vgscan; /sbin/lvm vgchange -a y''

2012-09-02 Thread Brian J. Murrell
And still, a month and a half later, not even a triage of this bug. I guess it might be time to move on to a new distro. Ubuntu seem like they have better things to do than fix bugs that seem to continue on from one release to another. In any case, if I remove all of my LVM snapshots this

[Bug 1043637] Re: ignores sm.d directory for realms

2012-08-30 Thread Brian J. Murrell
And here's a patch that restores the behaviour. ** Patch added: fix sm.d/ dir usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jabberd2/+bug/1043637/+attachment/3283702/+files/30sm.patch ** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1044039] [NEW] badly needs an update

2012-08-30 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: Jabberd2 has fixed a number of bugs in 2.2.15: https://bugs.launchpad.net/jabberd2/+bug/899284 https://bugs.launchpad.net/jabberd2/+bug/374687 It would be very nice to see an update in Ubuntu Linux that reflects this progress. If I am reading

[Bug 1043637] [NEW] ignores sm.d directory for realms

2012-08-29 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: The jabberd2 package includes an sm.d subdirectory of /etc/jabberd2/ where one is suppose to be able to configure additional realms/domains to be serviced by the jabberd2 instance. This directory is completely ignored by the current startup scripts. Pity. ** Affects:

[Bug 1042199] [NEW] doesn't actually download flash plugin

2012-08-27 Thread Brian J. Murrell
Public bug reported: I have installed: flashplugin-installer: Installed: 11.2.202.238ubuntu0.12.04.1 Candidate: 11.2.202.238ubuntu0.12.04.1 But when I run: $ sudo dpkg-reconfigure flashplugin-installer And hit return at the Location to the local file: prompt, leaving the input empty so

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >