[Bug 1852183]

2020-06-02 Thread Carlos Sevcik
I certainly ignore many things. Thank you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852183 Title: [X11] copy/paste (clipboard) with LibreOffice is broken in Ubuntu 19.10 & 20.04 (see

[Bug 1852183]

2020-06-02 Thread Carlos Sevcik
(In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #29) > (In reply to larrybradley from comment #25) > > Interesting attitude. If you buy a Toyota and the engine goes bad, do you > > expect Toyota to say, "Sorry, not our problem, they sold us bad engines." > Interesting approach. I hate car allegories, but

[Bug 1852183]

2020-05-19 Thread Carlos Sevcik
"Workaround: login to a Wayland session instead of X11 (or maybe X-Wayland?) session." Wayland is not suppoeted by Ubuntu 20.04 LTS. Probably neither in eny Debian based Linux. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1852183]

2020-05-18 Thread Carlos Sevcik
Occurs in LO 7.0.0-Alpha too Linux+GNOME -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852183 Title: [X11] copy/paste (clipboard) with LibreOffice is broken in Ubuntu 19.10 & 20.04 (see comment

[Bug 1852183]

2020-05-18 Thread Carlos Sevcik
All reports suggest that the bug occurs under Linux+GNOME, yet all other Linux+GNOME applications do mouse copy/pastes OK. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852183 Title: [X11]

[Bug 42178] Re: synaptic: ‘Lock Version’ is broken; use dpkg hold

2019-02-28 Thread Carlos Sevcik
I am not sure its the same bug, but using Ubuntu 8.10 suddenly synaptic stopped working. If you click on the icon it requires sudoers password, and then nothing happens. If you try to run it from terminal it starts if you run it without administrative privileges. but sudo synaptic pails with this

Re: [Bug 1767523] Re: Upgrade from Mate 17.10 failed due to Xwindows problem now dosn't install from 18.04 pendrive

2018-05-11 Thread Carlos Sevcik
Yes, somebody must do something. It is a horrible mess that made my waste 3 or 4 days to find a way. Carlos Sevcik, MD PhD Professor CEO, Scientific & Medical Data Analysis (SciMeDAn). Barcelona, Spain Web: www.scimedan.com carlos.sevci...@gmail.com Phone: +34 930 15 16 34 Mobile: +34 697 6

[Bug 1767523] Re: Upgrade from Mate 17.10 failed due to Xwindows problem now dosn't install from 18.04 pendrive

2018-05-08 Thread Carlos Sevcik
Even my previous tips produced a buggy result I finally got UM 18.04 working as follows. 1-Clean install 17.10 with a wipe everything option (Phony enough this did erase my previous / and /home ext4 partitions). Let it install the / partition in 14 GB /dev/nvme0n1p1 ext4. Let the installation

[Bug 1767523] Re: Upgrade from Mate 17.10 failed due to Xwindows problem now dosn't install from 18.04 pendrive

2018-05-02 Thread Carlos Sevcik
I finally managed to install Ubuntu MATE 18.04 on my Lenovo All In One 520-277KL. But it was very bumpy (I am using Ubuntu since 2006), here is my full story. 1-UM 17.10 installed after disabling UEFI in the bios and asked to wipe out the disk and install letting UM 17.10 do its default

[Bug 1767523] [NEW] Upgrade from Mate 17.10 failed due to Xwindows problem now dosn't install from 18.04 pendrive

2018-04-27 Thread Carlos Sevcik
Public bug reported: LENOVO with uefi installation fails due to inability to write boot loader. Ubuntu MATE 17.10 worked OK but update to 18.04 failed due to Xwinows configurtion. It was possible to login using Control-Alt-F1 but xinit or startx gave errors and failed. ProblemType: Bug

[Bug 1640171] Re: Molecules are not rendered, black screen

2017-04-24 Thread Carlos Sevcik
Same problem with Ubuntu 17.04, it renders Avogadro useless -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640171 Title: Molecules are not rendered, black screen To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1646275] [NEW] package cinnamon 3.0.7-1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/cinnamon/js/misc/config.js', which is also in package cinnamon-common 3.0.7-1~xenial0

2016-11-30 Thread Carlos Sevcik
Public bug reported: Error upgrading Ubuntu 16.10 when upgrading cinnamon ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10 Package: cinnamon 3.0.7-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-27.29-generic 4.8.1 Uname: Linux 4.8.0-27-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.3-0ubuntu8 Architecture: amd64

[Bug 1532226] Re: No menu bar in gtk apps on fresh boot

2016-05-16 Thread Carlos Sevcik
"Same problem in Ubuntu 16.04, the weird thing is than in my Workstation this bug is present but not in my laptop." I fully confirm this, only in my workstation, not in any of my 2 ultrabooks or my laptop. It happened after upgrading from 15.10 to 16.04. The applications I notice without menus

[Bug 1309645] [NEW] blcr-dkms 0.8.5-2.1: blcr kernel module failed to build

2014-04-18 Thread Carlos Sevcik
Public bug reported: After updating to 14,04 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: blcr-dkms 0.8.5-2.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-24.46-generic 3.13.9 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 DKMSKernelVersion:

[Bug 1006667] [NEW] Ubuntu 12.4 instalation crashed

2012-05-30 Thread Carlos Sevcik
Public bug reported: Instalation crashed ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: ubiquity 2.10.16 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu5 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.315 Date: Wed May 30

[Bug 1006667] Re: Ubuntu 12.4 instalation crashed

2012-05-30 Thread Carlos Sevcik
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006667 Title: Ubuntu 12.4 instalation crashed To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 993674] [NEW] Javascript falsely reported as blocked in Firefox

2012-05-02 Thread Carlos Sevcik
Public bug reported: An extremely important site for my work, the NCBI Protein Data Bank stores crystal structure of proteins which used to be easily downloadable. Not now, the site reports Firefox 12 as not compatible indicating that javascripts are blocked. The site is:

[Bug 993674] Re: Javascript falsely reported as blocked in Firefox

2012-05-02 Thread Carlos Sevcik
** Description changed: - An extremely important site for my work, the NCBI Protein Data Bank it - stores crystal structure of proteins which use to be easily + An extremely important site for my work, the NCBI Protein Data Bank + stores crystal structure of proteins which used to be easily

[Bug 804943] Re: blcr kernel module failed to build with kernel 3.0 : configure: error: --with-linux argument '3.0-x' is neither a kernel version string nor a full path

2012-04-26 Thread Carlos Sevcik
I hate the message saying this bug has already been reported. I wonder when will it be fixed. I can't use ghemical on U 12.04 either because of this bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 804943] Re: blcr kernel module failed to build with kernel 3.0 : configure: error: --with-linux argument '3.0-x' is neither a kernel version string nor a full path

2012-04-06 Thread Carlos Sevcik
I need the blcr package to run ghemical a critical aplication for me. This error appaently happened because the package is not propperly installed and the system tried to upgrade it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 971601] Re: soffice.bin crashed with SIGSEGV

2012-04-02 Thread Carlos Sevcik
bit machines do not crash LO in my Asus Eee Atom + netbook The xls files either are imported OK (with some files) or crash + LO in the 3 machines. The crashes ocurr with Ubuntu 12.04 beta, Linux + Mint 11 and Linux Mint 12. Carlos Sevcik carlos.sevci...@gmail.com ProblemType: Crash

[Bug 885740] Re: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 (undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE)

2012-02-16 Thread Carlos Sevcik
This forum is frustrating, 3 month after the bug was solved I still cannot break through the maze of broken dependecies one finds when trying to install the solution. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 885740] Re: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 (undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE)

2011-11-29 Thread Carlos Sevcik
Hi Jordan, Compiling and installing [0] http://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/mpqc [1] http://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/liboglappth was easy. I also compiled and installed mopac7. But the configuration of [2] http://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/libghemical fails with the

[Bug 885740] Re: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 (undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE)

2011-11-27 Thread Carlos Sevcik
I quit, ghemical is crucial to me. But fixing all dependencies and getting it to work under Ubuntu 11.10 is beyond my time and patience. I'll quit Ubuntu 11/10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 885740] Re: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 (undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE)

2011-11-27 Thread Carlos Sevcik
Thanks Jordan, I'll try once again following your suggestion and path. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885740 Title: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 (undefined symbol:

[Bug 885740] Re: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 (undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE)

2011-11-19 Thread Carlos Sevcik
This is a bug in libsc-dev, its sc-config tool does not list the SC libraries in the sc-config --libs output, which libghemical uses for linking My attempts to compile ghemical 3 under Mint 12 fail when including mpqc in the libgemical library, I have not been able to satisfy the sc dependency,

[Bug 885740] Re: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 (undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE)

2011-11-15 Thread Carlos Sevcik
I tried to compile Ghemical 3.0 from the tar files in the Ghemical sites, with cfortran installed (sudo apt-get install cfortran) I succeeded in building all the modules except ghemical 3 it self which fails due to some gtk dependencies that are missing. Thus far I have been unable to figure out

[Bug 885740] Re: Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10 (undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE)

2011-11-06 Thread Carlos Sevcik
I tried installing libghemical v 3 from the ghemical site in /usr/lib and changing the libghemical.so.5 link to point to it and the errors stays the same. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 885740] [NEW] Ghemical Doesn't run under Ubuntu 11.10

2011-11-03 Thread Carlos Sevcik
Public bug reported: trying to run ghemical under Ubuntu 11.10 fails with the following message: ghemical: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libghemical.so.5: undefined symbol: _ZTIN2sc7RefBaseE ** Affects: ghemical (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug

[Bug 752135] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build

2011-04-05 Thread Carlos Sevcik
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752135 Title: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 752135] [NEW] package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build

2011-04-05 Thread Carlos Sevcik
Public bug reported: updating the system with update manager ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia wl Architecture: amd64 Date:

[Bug 747955] [NEW] package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build

2011-04-01 Thread Carlos Sevcik
Public bug reported: package dind't install when upgrading ro 11.04 beta1 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia wl Architecture:

[Bug 747955] Re: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build

2011-04-01 Thread Carlos Sevcik
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/747955 Title: package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr kernel module failed to build -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 397277] [NEW] package automake 1:1.10.2-0ubuntu3.09.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-07-08 Thread Carlos Sevcik
Public bug reported: automake update crashes. Automake cannot be erased with dpkg, apt-get or Synaptic Package Manager. Autoremove or autoclean with apt-get do not solve the problem either. ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess

[Bug 397277] Re: package automake 1:1.10.2-0ubuntu3.09.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-07-08 Thread Carlos Sevcik
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28839130/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28839131/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- package automake 1:1.10.2-0ubuntu3.09.04 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess

[Bug 369207] [NEW] Web links are sluggish

2009-04-29 Thread Carlos Sevcik
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Opening links on several pages is sluggish. You can see the link but dragging the cursor to the link does not result in the little hand that indicates an activable link, clicking on the link has no effect. But if you do nothing and wait a

[Bug 369207] Re: Web links are sluggish

2009-04-29 Thread Carlos Sevcik
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26131906/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26131907/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: pluginreg.dat.txt

[Bug 281234] Re: [amd64] bad numbers after creating pdf

2009-04-20 Thread Carlos Sevcik
In my case the bug happens only using Ubuntu OO not the original files downloaded from www.openoffice.org, I posted this elsewere: [QUOTE]I am running Jaunty with OpenOffice.org 3.01 in 3 different machines, a Dell Workstation with dual Xeon processors, an HP laptop with a dual Centrino

[Bug 281234] Re: [ooo-build] [amd64] bad numbers after creating pdf

2009-04-20 Thread Carlos Sevcik
I stick to my word, after exporting more than 10 documents in my AMD64 machine, which were buggy with the Ubuntu OO files, the bug showed in none of them using the original OOo built files. -- [ooo-build] [amd64] bad numbers after creating pdf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281234 You received

[Bug 281234] Re: [ooo-build] [amd64] bad numbers after creating pdf

2009-04-20 Thread Carlos Sevcik
I am not sure, but my guess is AMD64 Ubuntu's OO is compiled from source, and something is done differently than in OOo site. Different compiler? Different compiler version? It's hard to say, I don't know the innards of the process. -- [ooo-build] [amd64] bad numbers after creating pdf

[Bug 340780] [NEW] Firefox keep asking to be restartarted because it has been updated, and does so one and again forever

2009-03-10 Thread Carlos Sevcik
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 Firefox keep asking to be restarted because it has been updated. If you delete the message it pops back, and no mater how many times you restart Firefox it keeps asking to be restarted. Login out and into my account or rebooting thr machine

[Bug 340780] Re: Firefox keep asking to be restartarted because it has been updated, and does so one and again forever

2009-03-10 Thread Carlos Sevcik
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23735741/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23735742/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: pluginreg.dat.txt