[Bug 2066700] Re: systemd-networkd is inactive by default since ubuntu 23.10?

2024-05-30 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
If no renderer is set anywhere in your YAMLs it will default to networkd. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066700 Title: systemd-networkd is inactive by default since ubuntu 23.10?

[Bug 2063094] Re: unattended-upgrades is running forever

2024-05-23 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Calling "strace" and "perf record" against the process would also help debugging it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063094 Title: unattended-upgrades is running forever To manage

[Bug 2059292] Re: autopkgtest failure with libvmod-redis/15.1-1build2 on arm64

2024-05-15 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Changed in: libvmod-redis (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059292 Title: autopkgtest failure with libvmod-redis/15.1-1build2 on arm64

[Bug 2051672] Re: Backport iproute2 6.8.0 to noble

2024-05-08 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Hi folks, do you think we are good to sync iproute2 from Debian to Oracular at this point? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051672 Title: Backport iproute2 6.8.0 to noble To manage

[Bug 1862481] Re: Cannot set accept-ra to 2, it keeps reseting it to 0

2024-05-02 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
I was looking at this bug while working on another accept-ra related thing and found this: As far as I can tell, networkd will always set the per-interface accept_ra parameter to 0: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/v255/src/network/networkd- sysctl.c#L146 The explanation for that is

[Bug 2063973] Re: network-online.target is reached before netplan-configured interfaces are online

2024-04-29 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Hi Lucas, In your scenario the best approach would probably be relying on Netplan to rename the interface for you instead of creating an external udev rule. I'd suggest you use "set-name: eno1" and continue to use "match" in your configuration. Something like this: ``` network: version: 2

[Bug 2055012] Re: When I upgraded from 22.04 to 24.04, DNS resolution went wrong.

2024-04-23 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
I can confirm this is an issue, although it's not caused by Network Manager so I'll go ahead and set it as invalid. After trying to do a "do-release-upgrade -d" from a brand new installation of Jammy 22.04.4, gnome-shell crashed and interrupted the upgrade. After that, this is what "dpkg --list

[Bug 2058179] Re: Kernel 6.8 + zfs-2.2.2: copy_file_range Operation Not Supported

2024-04-22 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Kernel -31 fixed the problem for me. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058179 Title: Kernel 6.8 + zfs-2.2.2: copy_file_range Operation Not Supported To manage notifications

[Bug 2058179] Re: Kernel 6.8 + zfs-2.2.2: copy_file_range Operation Not Supported

2024-04-20 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Oh the new kernel wasn't built with the new zfs-dkms =/ II: dkms-build downloading zfs (zfs-dkms_2.2.2-0ubuntu7_all.deb) II: fetching https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/zfs-dkms_2.2.2-0ubuntu7_all.deb II: fixing

[Bug 2058179] Re: Kernel 6.8 + zfs-2.2.2: copy_file_range Operation Not Supported

2024-04-20 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
I just updated and rebooted but I'm also still seeing the same problem: Failed to backup /etc/group: Operation not supported. It's reproducible with "apt install tomcat10". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2060818] Re: FTBFS on Noble

2024-04-16 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
stack trace after installing llvm-symbolizer ** Attachment added: "swift_crash_arm64.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/swiftlang/+bug/2060818/+attachment/5766081/+files/swift_crash_arm64.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 2060818] Re: FTBFS on Noble

2024-04-15 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
With a few patches I got it working on amd64. The build fails on arm64 though, the swift compiler itself crashes during the build and the problem appears to be in the vendored LLVM 13 code. I put it in a PPA here https://launchpad.net/~danilogondolfo/+archive/ubuntu/swiftlang -- You received

[Bug 2055333] Re: netplan.io 0.106.1-7ubuntu0.22.04.2 fails to manage additional loopback addresses on Ubuntu 2204 Jammy

2024-04-15 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
To get you configuration working you need to remove the match and set- name stanzas (which were never required really). Using the definition ID as the interface name (the "lo" inside "ethernets") is enough to configure an interface using its name. And by removing that it will work on Jammy. As

[Bug 2060818] Re: FTBFS on Noble

2024-04-10 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Tags added: ftbfs update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060818 Title: FTBFS on Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 2060818] [NEW] FTBFS on Noble

2024-04-10 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Public bug reported: Source package is failing to build for different reasons: 1) - -- Check for working C compiler: /<>/build/buildbot_linux/llvm-linux-x86_64/./bin/clang -- Check for working C compiler: /<>/build/buildbot_linux/llvm-linux-x86_64/./bin/clang - broken CMake Error at

[Bug 2060241] Re: prosposed migration audit 1:3.1.2-2.1build1 vs network-manager 1.46.0-1ubuntu1

2024-04-06 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Probably fixed in the last network-manager upload: debian/tests/control: add Depends: python3-gi for nm_netplan.py (LP: #2060221) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060241 Title:

[Bug 2059651] Re: network-manager gets uninstalled on apt full-upgrade

2024-03-28 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Please refer to https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu- devel/2024-March/042954.html for more information about the current state of upgrades. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059651

[Bug 2059415] Re: netplan crash when using command netplan

2024-03-28 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Thanks for the information. The crash you mentioned you were getting on Jammy, is that the same crash you reported? Did you manually upgrade netplan to 0.107 on Jammy for any chance? So, after upgrading to 0.107.1, the directory /usr/share/netplan/netplan should have been removed (or at least

[Bug 2059415] Re: netplan crash when using command netplan

2024-03-28 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Hello, can you explain how you got to this situation? Have you upgraded your system from Jammy to Noble? Can you paste the output of "dpkg --list | grep netplan", please? Can you also paste the output of "find /usr/share/netplan/netplan/"? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 2059299] [NEW] Autopkgtest failing on amd64 with "_FORTIFY_SOURCE redefined"

2024-03-27 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Public bug reported: autopkgtest [13:54:07]: test hello: [--- 833s info: compiling 833s : warning: "_FORTIFY_SOURCE" redefined 833s : note: this is the location of the previous definition 833s info: running 833s HELLO, WORLD 833s success: Able to run hello world program 834s

[Bug 2059131] Re: slurmdbd segfaults on armhf

2024-03-27 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
I've got the (non-flaky) tests passing autopkgtest [10:47:08]: summary srun PASS sbatch FLAKY non-zero exit status 1 sacctPASS mpi PASS but the patch is getting ridiculous... I had to patch %ld -> %lld in 42

[Bug 2059131] Re: slurmdbd segfaults on armhf

2024-03-26 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Attachment added: "build log on armhf" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/slurm-wlm/+bug/2059131/+attachment/5759741/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-armhf.slurm-wlm_23.11.4-1.2ubuntu6~ppa1_BUILDING.txt.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 2059131] Re: slurmdbd segfaults on armhf

2024-03-26 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
There are lots of instances of this issue. After fixing the one above it breaks in a different place root@autopkgtest-lxd-bqwqyd:~# slurmdbd -D slurmdbd: accounting_storage/as_mysql: _check_mysql_concat_is_sane: MySQL server version is: 5.5.5-10.11.7-MariaDB-2ubuntu1 slurmdbd: error: Database

[Bug 2059131] Re: slurmdbd segfaults on armhf

2024-03-26 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
The problem is the format string using %ld with the new time_t in armhf, now it's long long int (%lld)... query2 = xstrdup_printf("insert into %s (creation_time, " "mod_time, table_name, definition) " "values (%ld, %ld, '%s', '%s') " "on duplicate key update "

[Bug 2059131] Re: slurmdbd segfaults on armhf

2024-03-26 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
The variable "now" used in xstrdup_printf is defined as "time_t now = time(NULL);" h -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059131 Title: slurmdbd segfaults on armhf To manage

[Bug 2059131] [NEW] slurmdbd segfaults on armhf

2024-03-26 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Public bug reported: The slurmdbd segfaults on armhf. This is from the autopkgtest logs: 613s × slurmdbd.service - Slurm DBD accounting daemon 613s Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/slurmdbd.service; enabled; preset: enabled) 613s Active: failed (Result: core-dump) since Tue

[Bug 2058031] Re: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 22.04

2024-03-22 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Autopkgtests from Jammy. See the description above for an explanation about why there are test failures. ** Attachment added: "jammy-autopkgtest-logs.tar" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2058031/+attachment/5758414/+files/jammy-autopkgtest-logs.tar -- You received

[Bug 2058051] Re: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 23.10

2024-03-22 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058051 Title: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 23.10 To manage

[Bug 2058031] Re: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 22.04

2024-03-22 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058031 Title: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 22.04 To manage

[Bug 2058051] Re: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 23.10

2024-03-22 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Description changed: + Stable Release Update for netplan.io 0.107.1-3 to Mantic. This version + has many bug fixes and new features we want to make available to users + of Ubuntu 23.10. netplan.io has an SRU exception for backporting new + versions with new features

[Bug 2058051] Re: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 23.10

2024-03-22 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Description changed: Another SRU, for Jammy, was prepared in a separate LP bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2058031. As the package is slightly different (due to backwards compatibility patches) and on Mantic we have the integration with Network Manager

[Bug 2058051] Re: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 23.10

2024-03-22 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Attaching autopkgtest logs from netplan.io and network-manager tests. ** Attachment added: "mantic-autopkgtest-logs.tar" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2058051/+attachment/5758327/+files/mantic-autopkgtest-logs.tar ** Description changed: Another SRU, for Jammy,

[Bug 2058051] Re: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 23.10

2024-03-22 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Description changed: Another SRU, for Jammy, was prepared in a separate LP bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/netplan.io/+bug/2058031. As the package is slightly different (due to backwards compatibility patches) and on Mantic we have the integration with Network Manager

[Bug 2058031] Re: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 22.04

2024-03-22 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Description changed: Stable Release Update for netplan.io 0.107.1-3 to Jammy. This version has many bug fixes and new features we want to make available to users of Ubuntu 22.04. netplan.io has an SRU exception for backporting new versions with new features

[Bug 2058051] Re: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 23.10

2024-03-21 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Description changed: - Stable Release Update for netplan.io 0.107.1-3 to Mantic. This version - has many bug fixes and new features we want to make available to users - of Ubuntu 23.10. + Another SRU, for Jammy, was prepared in a separate LP bug: +

[Bug 2058031] Re: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 22.04

2024-03-20 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~danilogondolfo/netplan/+git/ubuntu/+merge/462714 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058031 Title: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to

[Bug 2058051] Re: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 23.10

2024-03-20 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~danilogondolfo/netplan/+git/ubuntu/+merge/462773 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058051 Title: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to

[Bug 2058031] Re: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 22.04

2024-03-20 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Description changed: Stable Release Update for netplan.io 0.107.1-3 to Jammy. This version has many bug fixes and new features we want to make available to users of Ubuntu 22.04. netplan.io has an SRU exception for backporting new versions with new features

[Bug 2058031] Re: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 22.04

2024-03-20 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Description changed: Stable Release Update for netplan.io 0.107.1-3 to Jammy. This version has many bug fixes and new features we want to make available to users of Ubuntu 22.04. netplan.io has an SRU exception for backporting new versions with new features

[Bug 2058031] Re: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 22.04

2024-03-20 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Description changed: Stable Release Update for netplan.io 0.107.1-3 to Jammy. This version has many bug fixes and new features we want to make available to users of Ubuntu 22.04. netplan.io has an SRU exception for backporting new versions with new features

[Bug 2058031] Re: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 22.04

2024-03-20 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Description changed: Stable Release Update for netplan.io 0.107.1-3 to Jammy. This version has many bug fixes and new features we want to make available to users of Ubuntu 22.04. netplan.io has an SRU exception for backporting new versions with new features

[Bug 2058031] Re: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 22.04

2024-03-20 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Description changed: Stable Release Update for netplan.io 0.107.1-3 to Jammy. This version has many bug fixes and new features we want to make available to users of Ubuntu 22.04. netplan.io has an SRU exception for backporting new versions with new features

[Bug 2058031] Re: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 22.04

2024-03-20 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Description changed: Stable Release Update for netplan.io 0.107.1-3 to Jammy. This version has many bug fixes and new features we want to make available to users - of Ubuntu 22.04. + of Ubuntu 22.04. netplan.io has an SRU exception for backporting new + versions with new features

[Bug 2058179] Re: Kernel 6.8 + zfs-2.2.2: copy_file_range Operation Not Supported

2024-03-18 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
I ran into the same issue here. It's the same symptom. I'm running Noble with ZFS on root and kernel 6.8. Setting up tomcat10-common (10.1.16-1) ... Setting up tomcat10 (10.1.16-1) ... Creating group 'tomcat' with GID 994. Creating user 'tomcat' (Apache Tomcat) with UID 994 and GID 994. Failed

[Bug 2058031] Re: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 22.04

2024-03-15 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Description changed: - [tbd] + Stable Release Update for netplan.io 0.107.1-3 to Jammy. This version + has many bug fixes and new features we want to make available to users + of Ubuntu 22.04. + + One big change with this updated is the split of netplan.io in different + packages. netplan.io

[Bug 2058051] Re: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 23.10

2024-03-15 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Description changed: - [tbd] + Stable Release Update for netplan.io 0.107.1-3 to Mantic. This version + has many bug fixes and new features we want to make available to users + of Ubuntu 23.10. + + * Backport netplan.io 0.107.1-3 to 23.10 (LP: #2058051): + - wifi: add support for

[Bug 2058051] [NEW] [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 23.10

2024-03-15 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Public bug reported: [tbd] ** Affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058051 Title: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to

[Bug 2058031] [NEW] [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to Ubuntu 22.04

2024-03-15 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Public bug reported: [tbd] ** Affects: netplan.io (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058031 Title: [SRU] Backport 0.107.1-3 to

[Bug 2055148] Re: NetworkManager connections with an explicit DoT (DNS over TLS) are not supported with Netplan

2024-03-15 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
So, I believe the best solution here would be to add options to DNS addresses, similar to what we do with IP addresses. Something like this nameservers: addresses: - 1.2.3.4: sni: domain port: 1234 interface: eth123 - 1.1.1.1 with this we'd fully support both

[Bug 2055148] Re: NetworkManager connections with an explicit DoT (DNS over TLS) are not supported with Netplan

2024-03-15 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
I can confirm the problem. Here is a reproducer: # nmcli con add ifname dummy0 type dummy ipv4.dns 1.1.1.1#lxd Error: Failed to add 'dummy-dummy0' connection: Message recipient disconnected from message bus without replying This is the crash related to this issue: Mar 15 09:46:40 noble-vm

[Bug 2055693] Re: FTBFS on Noble

2024-03-01 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~danilogondolfo/ubuntu/+source/libdumbnet/+git/libdumbnet/+merge/461632 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055693 Title: FTBFS

[Bug 2055713] Re: Please merge 2.18-1 into noble

2024-03-01 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~danilogondolfo/ubuntu/+source/libwww-mechanize-perl/+git/libwww-mechanize-perl/+merge/461653 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2055713] [NEW] Please merge 2.18-1 into noble

2024-03-01 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Public bug reported: tracking bug ** Affects: libwww-mechanize-perl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055713 Title: Please

[Bug 2055689] Re: FTBFS on Noble

2024-03-01 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~danilogondolfo/ubuntu/+source/beep/+git/beep/+merge/461630 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055689 Title: FTBFS on Noble To

[Bug 2055693] [NEW] FTBFS on Noble

2024-03-01 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Public bug reported: +++ dpkg-gensymbolsZpo_vY 2024-02-29 10:00:05.746752747 + @@ -93,8 +93,8 @@ route_get@Base 1.8 route_loop@Base 1.8 route_open@Base 1.8 - strlcat@Base 1.8 - strlcpy@Base 1.8 +#MISSING: 1.17.0-1# strlcat@Base 1.8 +#MISSING: 1.17.0-1# strlcpy@Base 1.8

[Bug 2055689] [NEW] FTBFS on Noble

2024-03-01 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Public bug reported: It's failing with : error: "_FORTIFY_SOURCE" redefined [-Werror] : note: this is the location of the previous definition cc1: all warnings being treated as errors ** Affects: beep (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug

[Bug 2055399] Re: FTBFS due new glibc and strlcpy

2024-02-29 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~danilogondolfo/ubuntu/+source/android-platform-art/+git/android-platform-art/+merge/461525 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2055399] Re: FTBFS due new glibc and strlcpy

2024-02-29 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Description changed: This package had it's own implementation of strlcpy. glibc added it in 2.38 and now it's failing to build. In file included from runtime/debugger.cc:37: libartbase/base/strlcpy.h:31:22: error: static declaration of 'strlcpy' follows non-static declaration

[Bug 2055399] [NEW] FTBFS due new glibc and strlcpy

2024-02-29 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Public bug reported: This package had it's own implementation of strlcpy. glibc added it in 2.38 and now it's failing to build. In file included from runtime/debugger.cc:37: libartbase/base/strlcpy.h:31:22: error: static declaration of 'strlcpy' follows non-static declaration static inline

[Bug 2055063] [NEW] No change rebuild needed due to new libboost1.83

2024-02-26 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Public bug reported: libbtas-dev installs a cmake file with the full path of the file BoostConfig.cmake, like this /usr/lib/cmake/BTAS/btas-config.cmake:set(Boost_CONFIG /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/Boost-1.74.0/BoostConfig.cmake) It's causing tiledarray to FTBFS with the following

[Bug 2055051] Re: FTBFS on Noble

2024-02-26 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~danilogondolfo/ubuntu/+source/libhtp/+git/libhtp/+merge/461263 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055051 Title: FTBFS on Noble

[Bug 2055051] [NEW] FTBFS on Noble

2024-02-26 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
Public bug reported: It's blocking Suricata. dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some new symbols appeared in the symbols file: see diff output below dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols file: see diff output below dpkg-gensymbols: warning:

[Bug 2052964] Re: Migration prevented due to "missing dep libssl-dev (>= 3.1.4)"

2024-02-26 Thread Danilo Egea Gondolfo
As we are not going to update OpenSSL on Noble (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/2044795) I created a merge request dropping the requirements to OpenSSL 3.0. According to the README.SSL file, fetchmail will work just fine. ** Merge proposal linked: