[Bug 1955483] Re: dhcp4 (wlp1s0): could not get netmask from lease

2021-12-21 Thread Guilherme Salgado
** Description changed: + I get this on n-m 1.30.0-1ubuntu3 (hirsuite) and 1.32.12-0ubuntu1 + (impish). It's been reported and fixed upstream. Any chance of getting + an update to the impish package with the fix? + Dec 21 06:23:54 t495 NetworkManager[989]: [1640089434.9548] device (wlp1s0):

[Bug 1955483] [NEW] dhcp4 (wlp1s0): could not get netmask from lease

2021-12-21 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Public bug reported: I get this on n-m 1.30.0-1ubuntu3 (hirsuite) and 1.32.12-0ubuntu1 (impish). It's been reported and fixed upstream. Any chance of getting an update to the impish package with the fix? Dec 21 06:23:54 t495 NetworkManager[989]: [1640089434.9548] device (wlp1s0): supplicant

[Bug 1507837] Re: Battery indicator not showing up in system tray at startup

2015-11-01 Thread Guilherme Salgado
I see the same behaviour, and also have no ~/.cache/upstart/indicator- power.log -- the last one (.1.gz) is from before I upgraded to 15.10. Also noticed that killing the indicator-power-service process causes it to get started again, and then the icon shows up -- You received this bug

[Bug 1204588] Re: Empathy shows numbers instead of names for some Facebook contacts

2013-08-03 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Hmm, 0.17.5 didn't fix it for me. I installed the package from debian unstable, btw -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1204588 Title: Empathy shows numbers instead of names for some

[Bug 1048618] Re: Selecting multiple messages in a folder with a lot of messages causes CPU to spike, application to become unresponsive

2013-03-21 Thread Guilherme Salgado
No, it seems to be fixed in TB17 ** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048618 Title: Selecting multiple

[Bug 1011344] Re: [snb mesa] GPU hang enabling MapsGL on gmaps leading to screen corruption (two thirds black, one third striped)

2013-02-28 Thread Guilherme Salgado
I no longer experience this on 12.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011344 Title: [snb mesa] GPU hang enabling MapsGL on gmaps leading to screen corruption (two thirds black, one

[Bug 1048618] [NEW] Selecting multiple messages in a folder with a lot of messages causes CPU to spike, application to become unresponsive

2012-09-10 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Public bug reported: After upgrading to Thunderbird 15, whenever I select a dozen or so messages in a folder with a lot of messages, the CPU usage spikes and TB becomes unresponsive for a few seconds, after which it comes back to life and CPU usage goes back to normal. I can reproduce it

[Bug 1048618] Re: Selecting multiple messages in a folder with a lot of messages causes CPU to spike, application to become unresponsive

2012-09-10 Thread Guilherme Salgado
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #787121 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787121 ** Also affects: thunderbird via https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787121 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1048618] Re: Selecting multiple messages in a folder with a lot of messages causes CPU to spike, application to become unresponsive

2012-09-10 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Originally linked it to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787121 but that's in turn marked as a dupe of https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=782899. The former describes the issue I'm seeing but I'm linking to the other as upstream says they're dupes ** Bug watch added: Mozilla

[Bug 27112] Re: import gtk changes sys.getdefaultencoding()

2012-07-04 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Indeed, if you import gi.repository.Gtk it won't, but it still does if you import pango. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27112 Title: import gtk changes

[Bug 1011344] [NEW] Screen corruption (two thirds black, one third striped) when enabling MapsGL on gmaps

2012-06-10 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Public bug reported: A few seconds after I enabled MapsGL on google maps, using chrome, 2/3 of my screen went black and 1/3 was striped. After leaving the machine idle for a few minutes the display went into sleep mode and then when I pressed something on the keyboard to wake it up it was back to

[Bug 1011344] Re: Screen corruption (two thirds black, one third striped) when enabling MapsGL on gmaps

2012-06-10 Thread Guilherme Salgado
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011344 Title: Screen corruption (two thirds black, one third striped) when enabling MapsGL on gmaps To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1011344] Re: Screen corruption (two thirds black, one third striped) when enabling MapsGL on gmaps

2012-06-10 Thread Guilherme Salgado
xserver-xorg-video-intel crash file from the time the problem happened. there are a dozen others, all between 19:15:58 and 19:16:58 ** Attachment added: xserver-xorg-video-intel.2012-06-10_19:15:58.557691.crash

[Bug 1011344] Re: Screen corruption (two thirds black, one third striped) when enabling MapsGL on gmaps

2012-06-10 Thread Guilherme Salgado
photo of the screen ** Attachment added: DSC_6192.JPG https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1011344/+attachment/3184190/+files/DSC_6192.JPG -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1011344] Re: Screen corruption (two thirds black, one third striped) when enabling MapsGL on gmaps

2012-06-10 Thread Guilherme Salgado
This looks very similar to bug 812638 (https://launchpadlibrarian.net/75481075/IMG_20110718_182145.jpg is what the screen looked like there) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1011344

[Bug 812638] Re: video problems with Thinkpad T420s integrated intel graphics

2012-06-10 Thread Guilherme Salgado
I just saw the same symptom when enabling mapsgl on google maps. Filed bug 1011344 (against xorg since it seemed to generate a bunch of xorg crash files on /var/crash) for it -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 958291] Re: Bad path autocomplete on some commands

2012-05-02 Thread Guilherme Salgado
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 769866 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/769866 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 769866 tab completion no longer escapes filenames and completes dirnames incorrectly (space instead of slash) -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 955382] Re: gnucash not syncing with UbuntuOne

2012-04-29 Thread Guilherme Salgado
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 809370 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809370 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 953621 Gnucash accounts file gets removed when you tell Gnucash to save your changes ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 809370 hardlinks dont make

[Bug 958291] Re: Bad path autocomplete on some commands

2012-04-23 Thread Guilherme Salgado
In my case this seems to have been caused by having acroread installed (bug 769866). I applied https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acroread/+bug/769866/comments/54 to /opt/Adobe/Reader9/Resource/Shell/acroread_tab and things started working as they did before. If that works for you as well

[Bug 924337] Re: lxc on precise is not working with lucid containers (container does not reach runlevel 2)

2012-04-12 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Just confirmed; this did fix a newly created Natty container for me. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924337 Title: lxc on precise is not working with lucid

[Bug 924337] Re: lxc on precise is not working with lucid containers (container does not reach runlevel 2)

2012-04-12 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Just confirmed; this did fix a newly created Natty container for me. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924337 Title: lxc on precise is not working with lucid containers

[Bug 924337] Re: lxc on precise is not working with lucid containers (container does not reach runlevel 2)

2012-03-28 Thread Guilherme Salgado
This happens to me on a Natty container: salgado@delgadito:~$ cat /var/lib/lxc/patchmetrics/rootfs/etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=11.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=natty DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 11.04 salgado@delgadito:~$ sudo lxc-start -n patchmetrics init: procps main process (26)

[Bug 924337] Re: lxc on precise is not working with lucid containers (container does not reach runlevel 2)

2012-03-28 Thread Guilherme Salgado
This happens to me on a Natty container: salgado@delgadito:~$ cat /var/lib/lxc/patchmetrics/rootfs/etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=11.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=natty DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 11.04 salgado@delgadito:~$ sudo lxc-start -n patchmetrics init: procps main process (26)

[Bug 956432] Re: gnome-terminal crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()

2012-03-19 Thread Guilherme Salgado
This has just happened again ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 729458 gnome-terminal crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast() -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 956432] Re: gnome-terminal crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()

2012-03-15 Thread Guilherme Salgado
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 729458 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729458 ** Visibility changed to: Public ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 729458 gnome-terminal crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast() -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 729458] Re: gnome-terminal crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()

2012-03-15 Thread Guilherme Salgado
In my case it seems to have crashed while running an 'apt-get upgrade'. That was the only terminal window I had but it was not in focus so it's possible the upgrade had finished when it crashed. (bug 956432 has the trace) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 955168] Re: lxc-start seems to reset properties of input devices

2012-03-14 Thread Guilherme Salgado
** Description changed: - I change some properties of my trackpoint (via xinput) upon login, but - when I lxc-start a container those properties are reset to their - original values: + I change some properties of my trackpoint (via xinput) upon logging into + unity, but when I lxc-start a

[Bug 955168] [NEW] lxc-start seems to reset properties of input devices

2012-03-14 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Public bug reported: I change some properties of my trackpoint (via xinput) upon logging into unity, but when I lxc-start a container those properties are reset to their original values: salgado@delgadito:~$ xinput --list-props pointer:Lite-On Technology Corp. ThinkPad USB Keyboard with

[Bug 955168] [NEW] lxc-start seems to reset properties of input devices

2012-03-14 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Public bug reported: I change some properties of my trackpoint (via xinput) upon logging into unity, but when I lxc-start a container those properties are reset to their original values: salgado@delgadito:~$ xinput --list-props pointer:Lite-On Technology Corp. ThinkPad USB Keyboard with

[Bug 955168] Re: lxc-start seems to reset properties of input devices

2012-03-14 Thread Guilherme Salgado
** Description changed: - I change some properties of my trackpoint (via xinput) upon login, but - when I lxc-start a container those properties are reset to their - original values: + I change some properties of my trackpoint (via xinput) upon logging into + unity, but when I lxc-start a

[Bug 917660] Re: Installing qemu-user-static in an i386 lxc container applies the binfmt changes to the host, breaking execution in that host

2012-03-07 Thread Guilherme Salgado
The fix to bug 947617 seems to have caused a regression here; reopening. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Bug 917660] Re: Installing qemu-user-static in an i386 lxc container applies the binfmt changes to the host, breaking execution in that host

2012-03-07 Thread Guilherme Salgado
The fix to bug 947617 seems to have caused a regression here; reopening. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917660

[Bug 942662] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in intel_miptree_release()

2012-02-28 Thread Guilherme Salgado
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 926379 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926379 ** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942662 Title: compiz

[Bug 926379] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in intel_miptree_release() (Needs mesa-8.0.1)

2012-02-28 Thread Guilherme Salgado
This seems to have hit me again: bug 942662 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926379 Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in intel_miptree_release() (Needs mesa-8.0.1) To manage

[Bug 926379] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in intel_miptree_release() (Needs mesa-8.0.1)

2012-02-28 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Bryce, do you still need me to attach dmesg/Xorg.0.log/xsession-errors? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926379 Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in intel_miptree_release() (Needs

[Bug 926379] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in intel_miptree_release() (Needs mesa-8.0.1)

2012-02-28 Thread Guilherme Salgado
I won't be able to get a backtrace today, but will do so tomorrow if nobody beats me to it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926379 Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in

[Bug 933630] Re: Launcher doesn't auto-hide after using Super+1..9 shortcuts

2012-02-24 Thread Guilherme Salgado
I can't reproduce that here. Is Super+Shift+arrow a custom shortcut you created? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933630 Title: Launcher doesn't auto-hide after using Super+1..9

Re: [Bug 933630] Re: Launcher doesn't auto-hide after using Super+1..9 shortcuts

2012-02-24 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Oh, ok, I still seem to have the old shortcuts (Ctrl+Alt+arrow). Maybe I changed them at some point and now my user-defined ones override the system ones? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 938720] [NEW] When switching application tabs (with Alt+1..9 shortcuts) the HUD sometimes shows up

2012-02-22 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Public bug reported: I use the Alt+1...9 shortcuts to switch application tabs (gnome- terminal, chromium, firefox, etc) all the time, and quite often the HUD shows up after the tab is switched. This doesn't happen if I press the Alt key, followed by the number and then release Alt, but I

[Bug 923410] Re: HUD - closing a window with Alt+F4 opens the hud

2012-02-22 Thread Guilherme Salgado
I see a similar issue when using Alt+1..9 to switch application tabs, but in my case it looks more like a race condition so I filed bug 938720 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923410

[Bug 938720] Re: When switching application tabs (with Alt+1..9 shortcuts) the HUD sometimes shows up

2012-02-22 Thread Guilherme Salgado
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938720 Title: When switching application tabs (with Alt+1..9 shortcuts) the HUD sometimes shows up To manage notifications about this bug go to:

Re: [Bug 933630] Re: Launcher doesn't auto-hide after using Super+1..9 shortcuts

2012-02-20 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Indeed, neither am I -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933630 Title: Launcher doesn't auto-hide after using Super+1..9 shortcuts To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 934084] Re: super+number keys now cause launch to wedge with the key hints shown and retains focus instead of selecting the requested window

2012-02-17 Thread Guilherme Salgado
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 933630 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933630 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 933630 Launcher doesn't auto-hide after using Super+1..9 shortcuts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 933760] Re: Pressing Super+number stops the desktop from responding to most input

2012-02-17 Thread Guilherme Salgado
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 933630 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933630 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 933630 Launcher doesn't auto-hide after using Super+1..9 shortcuts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 933618] [NEW] Launcher doesn't auto-hide after using Super+1..9 shortcuts

2012-02-16 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Public bug reported: After the last unity update my Launcher gets stuck after I hit any Super+1..9 combination. I have it configured to auto-hide so whenever I hit Super+1..9 it used to appear for a fraction of a second and then hide but now it gets stuck as if I was holding down the Super key.

[Bug 933630] [NEW] Launcher doesn't auto-hide after using Super+1..9 shortcuts

2012-02-16 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Public bug reported: After the last unity update my Launcher gets stuck after I hit any Super+1..9 combination. I have it configured to auto-hide so whenever I hit Super+1..9 it used to appear for a fraction of a second and then hide but now it gets stuck as if I was holding down the Super key.

[Bug 933630] Re: Launcher doesn't auto-hide after using Super+1..9 shortcuts

2012-02-16 Thread Guilherme Salgado
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933630 Title: Launcher doesn't auto-hide after using Super+1..9 shortcuts To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 933618] Re: Launcher doesn't auto-hide after using Super+1..9 shortcuts

2012-02-16 Thread Guilherme Salgado
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 933630 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933630 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 933630 Launcher doesn't auto-hide after using Super+1..9 shortcuts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 917660] Re: Installing qemu-user-static in an i386 lxc container applies the binfmt changes to the host, breaking execution in that host

2012-02-02 Thread Guilherme Salgado
It's indeed fixed, thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917660 Title: Installing qemu-user-static in an i386 lxc container applies the binfmt changes to the host,

[Bug 917660] Re: Installing qemu-user-static in an i386 lxc container applies the binfmt changes to the host, breaking execution in that host

2012-02-02 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Although I now get an error when uninstalling qemu-user-static. I don't worry about that because I know what's going on, but I thought I'd mention anyway -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Bug 877560] Re: Audio codec draining power when not in use

2012-02-02 Thread Guilherme Salgado
I think it might be that powertop is on crack here. I see that at the top of powertop's overview all the time (with only a few terminals open), but on powertop-1 it never shows up. Here's a snapshot of both, taken at the same time (on precise): powertop: Usage Events/s Category

[Bug 917660] Re: Installing qemu-user-static in an i386 lxc container applies the binfmt changes to the host, breaking execution in that host

2012-02-02 Thread Guilherme Salgado
It's indeed fixed, thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917660 Title: Installing qemu-user-static in an i386 lxc container applies the binfmt changes to the host, breaking

[Bug 917660] Re: Installing qemu-user-static in an i386 lxc container applies the binfmt changes to the host, breaking execution in that host

2012-02-02 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Although I now get an error when uninstalling qemu-user-static. I don't worry about that because I know what's going on, but I thought I'd mention anyway -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 917660] Re: Installing qemu-user-static in an i386 lxc container applies the binfmt changes to the host, breaking execution in that host

2012-01-23 Thread Guilherme Salgado
I reproduce it yesterday by creating a fresh precise-i386 container on my precise-amd64 host and installing qemu-user-static in it. This is how I created it: lxc-create -n $CONTAINER_NAME -t ubuntu -f /tmp/network.conf -- -r precise -a i386 -- You received this bug notification because you

Re: [Bug 917660] Re: Installing qemu-user-static in an i386 lxc container applies the binfmt changes to the host, breaking execution in that host

2012-01-23 Thread Guilherme Salgado
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Problem still exists on latest kernel status confirmed -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8dUNMACgkQ8F5AvJx1xKYptACglD1Mt1bVgKD7al5UlpdVgvlF

Re: [Bug 917660] Re: Installing qemu-user-static in an i386 lxc container applies the binfmt changes to the host, breaking execution in that host

2012-01-23 Thread Guilherme Salgado
I reproduce it yesterday by creating a fresh precise-i386 container on my precise-amd64 host and installing qemu-user-static in it. This is how I created it: lxc-create -n $CONTAINER_NAME -t ubuntu -f /tmp/network.conf -- -r precise -a i386 -- You received this bug notification because you

Re: [Bug 917660] Re: Installing qemu-user-static in an i386 lxc container applies the binfmt changes to the host, breaking execution in that host

2012-01-23 Thread Guilherme Salgado
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Problem still exists on latest kernel status confirmed -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8dUNMACgkQ8F5AvJx1xKYptACglD1Mt1bVgKD7al5UlpdVgvlF

[Bug 902557] Re: Wireless not working in 12.04 for rtl8192ce (RTL8188CE)

2012-01-23 Thread Guilherme Salgado
** Summary changed: - Wireless not working in 12.04 for rtl8192ce + Wireless not working in 12.04 for rtl8192ce (RTL8188CE) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/902557 Title: Wireless not

Re: [Bug 917660] Re: Installing qemu-user-static in an i386 lxc container applies the binfmt changes to the host, breaking execution in that host

2012-01-20 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Is the new kernel still on -proposed or has it been accepted already? I just ran apt-get update/upgrade and didn't get that. Also, is it really worth testing this on the new kernel? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc

Re: [Bug 917660] Re: Installing qemu-user-static in an i386 lxc container applies the binfmt changes to the host, breaking execution in that host

2012-01-20 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Is the new kernel still on -proposed or has it been accepted already? I just ran apt-get update/upgrade and didn't get that. Also, is it really worth testing this on the new kernel? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 917660] [NEW] Installing qemu-user-static on an i386 lxc container will hose your amd64 host

2012-01-17 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Public bug reported: If you create an i386 container on an amd64 host and install qemu-user- static on the container, it will run update-binfmts --import qemu- x86_64 and since binfmt doesn't seem to be containerized, it will affect the host causing all binary executions to go through /usr/bin

[Bug 917660] Re: Installing qemu-user-static on an i386 lxc container will hose your amd64 host

2012-01-17 Thread Guilherme Salgado
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917660 Title: Installing qemu-user-static on an i386 lxc container will hose your amd64 host To manage notifications about this bug go to:

Re: [Bug 885895] Re: linaro-image-tools (hwpack-create) broken on oneiric 64-bits

2011-12-12 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Thanks a lot for fixing this, Michael! I've just confirmed that on Precise we no longer need our hack in linaro-image-tools to workaround this. Now, should we expect this fix to be backported to Oneiric as well? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

Re: [Bug 891560] [NEW] make linaro-fetch-image more usable

2011-11-17 Thread Guilherme Salgado
I think you can get the list of supported boards from linaro-media-create --help, but this is indeed something we should fix -- it should also show up when you run l-f-i --help. status triaged importance medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 891560] Re: make linaro-fetch-image more usable

2011-11-17 Thread Guilherme Salgado
** Also affects: linaro-image-tools Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linaro-image-tools Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: linaro-image-tools Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 891194] [NEW] start_charge_thresh and force_discharge don't work on T420s

2011-11-16 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Public bug reported: salgado@delgadito:~$ cat /sys/devices/platform/smapi/BAT0/start_charge_thresh cat: /sys/devices/platform/smapi/BAT0/start_charge_thresh: No such device or address (from dmesg) [15228.081117] smapi smapi: smapi_request: SMAPI error: SMAPI function is not available

[Bug 891194] Re: start_charge_thresh and force_discharge don't work on T420s

2011-11-16 Thread Guilherme Salgado
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #646683 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646683 ** Also affects: tp-smapi (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646683 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 877598] Re: [Thinkpad T420s] MMC Reader has issues with SDHC (SD and MMC are OK)

2011-11-16 Thread Guilherme Salgado
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 773524 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773524 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 773524 [Toshiba Tecra R850] SD card reader doesn't work -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 885895] Re: linaro-image-tools (hwpack-create) broken on oneiric 64-bits

2011-11-15 Thread Guilherme Salgado
** Changed in: linaro-image-tools Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885895 Title: linaro-image-tools (hwpack-create) broken on oneiric 64-bits

[Bug 877598] Re: [Thinkpad T420s] MMC Reader has issues with SDHC (SD and MMC are OK)

2011-11-15 Thread Guilherme Salgado
This seems to be a dupe of bug 773524; the hardware is the same (Ricoh e823). Also note that there's a workaround on that bug, but it's marked as fix released when it doesn't seem to be. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 885895] Re: linaro-image-tools (hwpack-create) broken on oneiric 64-bits

2011-11-14 Thread Guilherme Salgado
** Branch linked: lp:~salgado/linaro-image-tools/bug-885895 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885895 Title: linaro-image-tools (hwpack-create) broken on oneiric 64-bits To manage

[Bug 865612] Re: Unity slow at logout/shutting down

2011-11-03 Thread Guilherme Salgado
It turns out the delay when logging out, in my case, was because of bug 880299. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865612 Title: Unity slow at logout/shutting down To manage

[Bug 880299] Re: Tomboy causing delay on logout or shutdown

2011-11-03 Thread Guilherme Salgado
I can reproduce this even with a freshly created user. After starting tomboy, logging out takes almost 30 seconds -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880299 Title: Tomboy causing delay on

[Bug 885225] [NEW] The indicator uses a lot more CPU as soon as I unplug my laptop from AC

2011-11-02 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Public bug reported: I have the indicator with the CPU monitoring enabled and noticed that whenever I unplug my laptop (T420s) from AC, the CPU usage increases. After watching top while I unplugged, I noticed the inidicator-multiload process was partly to blame (compiz was also using more CPU

[Bug 885225] Re: The indicator uses a lot more CPU as soon as I unplug my laptop from AC

2011-11-02 Thread Guilherme Salgado
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885225 Title: The indicator uses a lot more CPU as soon as I unplug my laptop from AC To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 865612] Re: Unity slow at logout/shutting down

2011-11-01 Thread Guilherme Salgado
In my case this seems to be related to my local user. When using other users the logout is pretty fast, even with network-manager running and connected to a wifi-network. Has anybody tried logging out with a different user to see if it's slow as well? -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 865612] Re: Unity slow at logout/shutting down

2011-10-26 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Please let me know if there's anything I can do to help debug this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865612 Title: Unity slow at logout/shutting down To manage notifications about

[Bug 865612] Re: Unity slow at shutting down

2011-10-25 Thread Guilherme Salgado
I experience this as well on a relatively fast laptop, but the problem is not really when shutting down; it's when logging out. That's why gtk-logout-helper --logout is slow as well. ** Summary changed: - Unity slow at shutting down + Unity slow at logout/shutting down -- You received this

[Bug 865612] Re: Unity slow at logout/shutting down

2011-10-25 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Also, in my case stopping NetworkManager (via 'service network-manager stop') didn't help; logging out was equally slow. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865612 Title: Unity slow at

[Bug 878560] Re: evolution mail view stops updating

2011-10-24 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Looks like what I'm seeing here... Can you confirm what you see is the same as shown on the screenshot? In this case I switched from the calendar view to the mail view but the selected message didn't get displayed where it should, so instead you see what was there before (part of the calendar) **

[Bug 878560] Re: evolution mail view stops updating

2011-10-24 Thread Guilherme Salgado
I'm using Unity, and had the HTML mode config set to Show HTML if present. After changing it to Show plaintext if present I've not seen this issue anymore. It's only been a few hours since I've changed it, so we'll see if that actually fixes the issue. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 874571] [NEW] Most of my mail disappeared from evolution

2011-10-14 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Public bug reported: After upgrading to 11.10, the first time I ran evolution I was presented with a dialog telling me it was necessary to convert the local storage from mbox to maildir (I don't remember what it said exactly, but it was something like that). Upon hitting Ok, evolution started and

[Bug 874571] Re: Most of my mail disappeared from evolution

2011-10-14 Thread Guilherme Salgado
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874571 Title: Most of my mail disappeared from evolution To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 874571] Re: Evolution unsubscribed from a bunch of IMAP folders

2011-10-14 Thread Guilherme Salgado
** Summary changed: - Most of my mail disappeared from evolution + Evolution unsubscribed from a bunch of IMAP folders ** Description changed: After upgrading to 11.10, the first time I ran evolution I was presented with a dialog telling me it was necessary to convert the local storage

[Bug 796586] [NEW] e-addressbook-factory crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2011-06-13 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution-data-server I hit Ctrl-r to reply to a message and got this, which ultimately led to evolution crashing as well. ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: evolution-data-server 2.32.2-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu

[Bug 796586] Re: e-addressbook-factory crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2011-06-13 Thread Guilherme Salgado
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/796586 Title: e-addressbook-factory crashed with SIGABRT in raise() To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 790760] Re: linaro-hwpack-create fails with GPG errors from APT

2011-06-02 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Marcin, are you using lp:~linaro-maintainers/linaro-images/hwpack.natty .linaro-panda or a modified version of it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790760 Title: linaro-hwpack-create

[Bug 790760] Re: linaro-hwpack-create fails with GPG errors from APT

2011-06-02 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Running on my Maverick install (with the same l-i-t version), I also don't get a etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/ created in the temp dir used by linaro-hwpack-create, but still runs to completion and doesn't complain about that. Maybe this is because of some apt config or something specific to Oneiric's

[Bug 790760] Re: linaro-hwpack-create fails with GPG errors from APT

2011-06-02 Thread Guilherme Salgado
http://paste.ubuntu.com/616721/ seems to confirm my hypothesis. something that used to work on Maverick no longer works on Oneiric. Now we need to figure out whether it's a regression in python-apt or just a new requirement that trusted.gpg.d is in place before you run cache.update() -- You

[Bug 790760] Re: linaro-hwpack-create fails with GPG errors from APT

2011-06-02 Thread Guilherme Salgado
** Also affects: python-apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790760 Title: linaro-hwpack-create fails with GPG errors from APT --

Re: [Bug 789135] Re: Add image/hwpack information into image

2011-05-27 Thread Guilherme Salgado
I'm pretty sure we don't have lmc logs anywhere in the image. I guess the important thing would be the logs of the hwpack installation? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789135 Title:

[Bug 771537] Re: mpurate=1000 fails on beagleXM

2011-05-26 Thread Guilherme Salgado
** Also affects: linux-linaro Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/771537 Title: mpurate=1000 fails on beagleXM -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 784290] [NEW] ec2-bundle-instance should it make clear that it only works for Windows instances

2011-05-17 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ec2-api-tools Both the manpage and the help for ec2-api-tools imply that it works for Linux instances, but it doesn't seem to: http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/AWSEC2/latest/CommandLineReference/index.html ?ApiReference-cmd-BundleInstance.html

[Bug 784290] Re: ec2-bundle-instance should it make clear that it only works for Windows instances

2011-05-17 Thread Guilherme Salgado
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ec2-api-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784290 Title: ec2-bundle-instance should it make clear that it only works for Windows instances -- Ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 784253] [NEW] gnome-volume-control crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2011-05-17 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-media Was trying to change the input/output devices to the usb headset I'd just plugged. ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: gnome-media 2.32.0-0ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux

[Bug 784253] Re: gnome-volume-control crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

2011-05-17 Thread Guilherme Salgado
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784253 Title: gnome-volume-control crashed with SIGABRT in raise() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 784290] [NEW] ec2-bundle-instance should it make clear that it only works for Windows instances

2011-05-17 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ec2-api-tools Both the manpage and the help for ec2-api-tools imply that it works for Linux instances, but it doesn't seem to: http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/AWSEC2/latest/CommandLineReference/index.html ?ApiReference-cmd-BundleInstance.html

[Bug 784290] Re: ec2-bundle-instance should it make clear that it only works for Windows instances

2011-05-17 Thread Guilherme Salgado
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784290 Title: ec2-bundle-instance should it make clear that it only works for Windows instances -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 777977] [NEW] evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in emf_multipart_signed()

2011-05-05 Thread Guilherme Salgado
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution This happens consistently when I switch to one of my folders. Started today and seems to be caused when displaying a new message. ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: evolution 2.32.2-0ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu

[Bug 777977] Re: evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in emf_multipart_signed()

2011-05-05 Thread Guilherme Salgado
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/777977 Title: evolution crashed with SIGSEGV in emf_multipart_signed() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

  1   2   3   >