Additional confirmation; the patch works for me as well - thanks all!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574270
Title:
applications segfault systematically with tsocks
To manage
Thanks for the reminder! I think I'll give it a try since this is
something that would improve Squid performance for us.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1235681
Title:
Thanks for the reminder! I think I'll give it a try since this is
something that would improve Squid performance for us.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1235681
Title:
squid3 always
I have also encountered the two issues Michael mentions and two others
in the upstart script /etc/init/squid3 that are - from my perspective -
essential to get SMP Squid3 working. They are:
* an expect daemon line needs to be included
* a statement that checks for the presence of /var/run/squid3
I have also encountered the two issues Michael mentions and two others
in the upstart script /etc/init/squid3 that are - from my perspective -
essential to get SMP Squid3 working. They are:
* an expect daemon line needs to be included
* a statement that checks for the presence of /var/run/squid3
My apologies; in the rush of things to do, I'd forgotten about this.
Yes, my account is actually currently in the expiration cycle. I will
test in a few hours time and report back.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba
Ran into dependancy issues. There was a conflict between the existing
samba-common (2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.6) package and the samba-common-bin
(2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.7) package that has blocked me from further work - I
can't login anymore. WIll try to do further tests tomorrow when I'm back
in the office
My apologies; in the rush of things to do, I'd forgotten about this.
Yes, my account is actually currently in the expiration cycle. I will
test in a few hours time and report back.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Ran into dependancy issues. There was a conflict between the existing
samba-common (2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.6) package and the samba-common-bin
(2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.7) package that has blocked me from further work - I
can't login anymore. WIll try to do further tests tomorrow when I'm back
in the office
I'm not either on an account that is close to expiration, will talk to
colleagues next week and see if someones account is close to expiring
(I'm on vacation right now).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
I'm not either on an account that is close to expiration, will talk to
colleagues next week and see if someones account is close to expiring
(I'm on vacation right now).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On 26 June 2013 20:30, Bryan Quigley gqu...@gmail.com wrote:
Has this been confirmed to be fixed via this patch with other user
accounts at this point? If so, we should start the SRU process..
Yes, it works for all user accounts.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
On 26 June 2013 20:30, Bryan Quigley gqu...@gmail.com wrote:
Has this been confirmed to be fixed via this patch with other user
accounts at this point? If so, we should start the SRU process..
Yes, it works for all user accounts.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Sorry, Luca, yes - we have tested your patch and it worked fine for one
user! We are just waiting for other user accounts to expire...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
Sorry, Luca, yes - we have tested your patch and it worked fine for one
user! We are just waiting for other user accounts to expire...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003296
Title:
De enda paketen av ovan lista jag skulle rekommendera att behålla är
diff och unzip.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1064771
Title:
Frigöra diskutrymme på adder
To manage
Happens to me as well:
lshw -c display
*-display
description: VGA compatible controller
product: GF108 [Quadro 1000M]
vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
physical id: 0
bus info: pci@:01:00.0
version: a1
width: 64 bits
clock:
Excellent work, Luca! Will test your patch as soon as I can.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003296
Title:
lightdm crashed with SIGSEGV in _pam_winbind_change_pwd()
Excellent work, Luca! Will test your patch as soon as I can.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003296
Title:
lightdm crashed with SIGSEGV in _pam_winbind_change_pwd() when
password
Sorry about the delayed response, took a while to get hold of the info:
our domain controllers are Win 2008 R2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003296
Title:
lightdm
Actually, this is not the first time we see a similar issue. We ran into
it with 10.04 / Lucid + samba + gdm and this was before our domain
controllers were 2008 R2. I can't quite remeber what fixed it then (I'm
still digging through old emails) but I have a vague memory of it being
fixed by a
Sorry about the delayed response, took a while to get hold of the info:
our domain controllers are Win 2008 R2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003296
Title:
lightdm crashed with
Actually, this is not the first time we see a similar issue. We ran into
it with 10.04 / Lucid + samba + gdm and this was before our domain
controllers were 2008 R2. I can't quite remeber what fixed it then (I'm
still digging through old emails) but I have a vague memory of it being
fixed by a
I can confimr that this bug also affects me. Is there any information I
can provide to help unearth the cause?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003296
Title:
lightdm
I can confimr that this bug also affects me. Is there any information I
can provide to help unearth the cause?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003296
Title:
lightdm crashed with
At my company we simply chose to give up on likewise. We've migrated to
Samba / winbind instead.
--
AssumeDefaultDomain does not work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534629
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Since this bug is a showstopper for us (we are in the process of setting
up an Ubuntu 10.04 NFS v4 server with ~1500 Ubuntu 10.04 client
machines) I would very much like to know if the mentioned patch will be
making it into the kernel for lucid (1) at all and (2) if there has been
a decision to
Mathias, do you mind explaining why you keep rejecting this request?
From my - and several others - perspective it seems quite natural for
utf8 to be the default. Particularly in view of the fact that complete
internationalization has been a longstanding goal for the Ubuntu
distribution.
--
Mathias, do you mind explaining why you keep rejecting this request?
From my - and several others - perspective it seems quite natural for
utf8 to be the default. Particularly in view of the fact that complete
internationalization has been a longstanding goal for the Ubuntu
distribution.
--
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 34181 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34181
I would also like to see this bug addressed. I have had similar problems
as those Alan Tam has reported. On a hunch I checked the corresponding
Debian packages and the same behaviour is exhibited there, so I
30 matches
Mail list logo
