[Bug 1521618] Re: wrong subnet in DHCP answer when multiple networks are present

2015-12-08 Thread LaMont Jones
I'm having trouble reproducing this... What version of isc-dhcp-server is running here? Does it change anything if you (manually) reorder the 2 subnets in dhcpd.conf and restart the dhcp server? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1523699] [NEW] install delivers non-executable usr/share/node-gyp/bin/node-gyp.js

2015-12-07 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: Seen in 3.0.3-2, but likely to have been there for a while. ** Affects: node-gyp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Committed ** Patch added: "debian/rules patch to fix the issue."

[Bug 1523699] Re: install delivers non-executable usr/share/node-gyp/bin/node-gyp.js

2015-12-07 Thread LaMont Jones
3.0.3-2ubuntu1 uploaded with the fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1523699 Title: install delivers non-executable usr/share/node-gyp/bin/node-gyp.js To manage notifications about

[Bug 1521618] Re: wrong subnet in DHCP answer when multiple networks are present

2015-12-01 Thread LaMont Jones
Can we also get the output of the following on the cluster controller: ip addr list; ip route list thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1521618 Title: wrong subnet in DHCP answer

[Bug 1449099] Re: [SRU] bcache-tools to trusty and precise

2015-11-28 Thread LaMont Jones
Version 1.0.7-1~12.04.1 works on precise, with the needed (hwe-t) kernel. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1449099

[Bug 1449099] Re: [SRU] bcache-tools to trusty and precise

2015-11-28 Thread LaMont Jones
Version 1.0.7-1~12.04.1 works on precise, with the needed (hwe-t) kernel. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bcache-tools in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1356012] Re: maas incorrectly overmanages DNS reverse zones

2015-11-28 Thread LaMont Jones
** Changed in: maas/1.9 Assignee: (unassigned) => LaMont Jones (lamont) ** Changed in: maas/trunk Assignee: (unassigned) => LaMont Jones (lamont) ** Changed in: maas/trunk Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: maas/trunk Assignee: LaMont Jone

[Bug 1356012] Re: maas incorrectly overmanages DNS reverse zones

2015-11-28 Thread LaMont Jones
** Changed in: maas/1.9 Assignee: (unassigned) => LaMont Jones (lamont) ** Changed in: maas/trunk Assignee: (unassigned) => LaMont Jones (lamont) ** Changed in: maas/trunk Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: maas/trunk Assignee: LaMont Jone

[Bug 1519518] Re: gsettings-schema-convert has syntax errors

2015-11-26 Thread LaMont Jones
I forget exactly what the error message was, but I think it was the difference between whatever output is, and that write wanted a bytestring. -- it's possibl;e that should be fout.write(unicode(output))... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1519518] [NEW] gsettings-schema-convert has syntax errors

2015-11-24 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: gconf2 3.2.6-3ubuntu5 (xenial) has gsettings-schema-convert requiring python3, but without correct syntax: gsettings-schema-convert --force --gconf --xml --schema-id "org.freedesktop.ibus" --output lamont.in ../../data/ibus.schemas.in File

[Bug 1515661] Re: [SRU] sync 14.04 cloud-initramfs-tools to 12.04

2015-11-18 Thread LaMont Jones
I have verified this fix. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1515661 Title: [SRU]

[Bug 1515661] Re: [SRU] sync 14.04 cloud-initramfs-tools to 12.04

2015-11-18 Thread LaMont Jones
I have verified this fix. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1515661 Title: [SRU] sync 14.04 cloud-initramfs-tools

[Bug 1449099] Re: [SRU] bcache-tools to trusty and precise

2015-11-16 Thread LaMont Jones
bcache-tools_1.0.7-1~12.04.1 (in my ppa) has been tested and is known to work. I'll be uploading that to precise-proposed shortly. lamont -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bcache-tools in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1449099] Re: [SRU] bcache-tools to trusty and precise

2015-11-16 Thread LaMont Jones
bcache-tools_1.0.7-1~12.04.1 (in my ppa) has been tested and is known to work. I'll be uploading that to precise-proposed shortly. lamont -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1449099

[Bug 1509147] Re: [SRU] MAAS 1.8.3

2015-10-28 Thread LaMont Jones
Of course, once the package is in the various -proposed, we'll do a final round of testing, including upgrade testing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509147 Title: [SRU] MAAS 1.8.3

[Bug 1509147] Re: [SRU] MAAS 1.8.3

2015-10-28 Thread LaMont Jones
Of course, once the package is in the various -proposed, we'll do a final round of testing, including upgrade testing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509147 Title:

[Bug 1510711] [NEW] if-pre-up.d/vlan should support brN.X interfaces

2015-10-27 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: A common name for bridge interfaces is 'br0'. Currently, the pre-up and post-down scripts do not support those, so the interaface fails to autocreate. Seen on trusty (1.9-3ubuntu10) and confirmed as not fixed on xenial (1.9-3.2ubuntu1) ** Affects: vlan (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1510711] [NEW] if-pre-up.d/vlan should support brN.X interfaces

2015-10-27 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: A common name for bridge interfaces is 'br0'. Currently, the pre-up and post-down scripts do not support those, so the interaface fails to autocreate. Seen on trusty (1.9-3ubuntu10) and confirmed as not fixed on xenial (1.9-3.2ubuntu1) ** Affects: vlan (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1502238] Re: bridge does not forward neighbor solicitation packets

2015-10-26 Thread LaMont Jones
the "2001::" IP would be the 2601:... IP address used throughout. Once it is specifically routed to the fe80: IP for the host, then ipv6 connectivity works just fine to the 2601 IP (since no neighbor discovery is involved -- it's a link address for nexthop. I'll make some time to disable the

[Bug 1505748] Re: twisted.web.client._URI.fromBytes does not handle ipv6 addresses

2015-10-14 Thread LaMont Jones
This is the actual and verified patch for 15.2.1-1ubutnu1 ** Patch added: "lp1505748.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/twisted/+bug/1505748/+attachment/4494713/+files/lp1505748.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1505748] Re: twisted.web.client._URI.fromBytes does not handle ipv6 addresses

2015-10-14 Thread LaMont Jones
** Patch added: "patch for 13.2.0-1ubuntu1" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/twisted/+bug/1505748/+attachment/4494715/+files/lp1505748.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1505748] Re: twisted.web.client._URI.fromBytes does not handle ipv6 addresses

2015-10-13 Thread LaMont Jones
attaching the correct patch ** Patch added: "Patch for 15.2.1-1ubuntu1" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/twisted/+bug/1505748/+attachment/4493628/+files/twisted.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1505748] [NEW] twisted.web.client._URI.fromBytes does not handle ipv6 addresses

2015-10-13 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: Certainly by 13.2.0-1ubuntu1 (trusty), fromBytes blows up when handed an ipv6 address, because of an assumption that the only valid use of a colon is as part of a port specification. See also bug #1372767. Patch attached which should fix the issue, though it is against

[Bug 1502238] [NEW] bridge does not forward neighbor solicitation packets

2015-10-02 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: 3 hosts involved here: kailan is connected to a cisco switch, which is also connected to kurrat (eth3), which is running a bridge with tigernut connected to eth1. kurrat's controllers are 06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82574L Gigabit Network Connection,

[Bug 1382196] Re: Changing IP address for the region causes the cluster to ignore pserv.conf and endlessly respawn

2015-09-08 Thread LaMont Jones
If you change the IP address of the server, you need to dpkg-reconfigure maas-region-controller. ** Changed in: maas Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1382196] Re: Changing IP address for the region causes the cluster to ignore pserv.conf and endlessly respawn

2015-09-08 Thread LaMont Jones
If you change the IP address of the server, you need to dpkg-reconfigure maas-region-controller. ** Changed in: maas Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1272016] Re: Which interface to bind maas-region-controller to should be a debconf question

2015-09-08 Thread LaMont Jones
In cases where there is no clear "best default", a high-priority debconf question is warranted. If the package is being installed on a machine with multiple configured network interfaces, I don't think we have a clear "best" answer. OTOH, I think that if there is only one interface, then it

[Bug 1272016] Re: Which interface to bind maas-region-controller to should be a debconf question

2015-09-08 Thread LaMont Jones
In cases where there is no clear "best default", a high-priority debconf question is warranted. If the package is being installed on a machine with multiple configured network interfaces, I don't think we have a clear "best" answer. OTOH, I think that if there is only one interface, then it

[Bug 1272016] Re: Which interface to bind maas-region-controller to should be a debconf question

2015-09-08 Thread LaMont Jones
** Changed in: maas Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1272016 Title: Which interface to bind maas-region-controller to should be a debconf question To

[Bug 1272016] Re: Which interface to bind maas-region-controller to should be a debconf question

2015-09-08 Thread LaMont Jones
** Changed in: maas Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1272016 Title: Which interface to bind maas-region-controller to should be a debconf

[Bug 1429857] Re: [MIR] bcache-tools

2015-08-11 Thread LaMont Jones
** Also affects: bcache-tools (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: bcache-tools (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1429857] Re: [MIR] bcache-tools

2015-08-11 Thread LaMont Jones
** Also affects: bcache-tools (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: bcache-tools (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1473231] [NEW] Bad pointer usage in chanserv OnDelCore()

2015-07-09 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: When nickserv drops a user registration and ChanServCore::OnDelCore is called, the pointer handling is wrong and sometimes results in a SIGSEGV. The attached patch fixes it. ** Affects: anope (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added:

[Bug 1473231] Re: Bad pointer usage in chanserv OnDelCore()

2015-07-09 Thread LaMont Jones
The issue only occurs when we have a non-trivial list of channels for which the user is the founder, and there is no specified successor founder. The following reproduces the issue handily: as non-oper nick lj_test: /msg nickserv register foobaz lam...@ubuntu.com /join #chan1 /join #chan2 /msg

[Bug 1472378] Re: upgrading ca-certificates results in broken certificate chains

2015-07-07 Thread LaMont Jones
Looking at the changelog: 20111025: Drop bogus c_rehash on upgrades, ... 20110421: * Depend on openssl 1.0.0 and force a call of c_rehash so that we have both the old and new style of symlinks. (Closes: #611102) I fully suspect that the bug was introduced upstream in oct 2011. If that's the

[Bug 1472378] [NEW] upgrading ca-certificates results in broken certificate chains

2015-07-07 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: Found this (finally) upgrading a web server from lucid to precise (via do-release-upgrade): Preparing to replace ca-certificates 20141019ubuntu0.10.04.1 (using .../ca-certificates_20141019ubuntu0.12.04.1_all.deb) ...^M Unpacking replacement ca-certificates ...^M ... Setting

[Bug 1463147] Re: gnutls_dh_params_generate2 generates short primes

2015-06-08 Thread LaMont Jones
This shows up as weechat failing to connect because the key length is less than 2048 bits (weechat's default behavior). Needless to say, if I ask for 2048 bits of temp key, I should get (at least) 2048 bits of temp key. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1463147] [NEW] gnutls_dh_params_generate2 generates short primes

2015-06-08 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: I have several hosts (running inspircd) that call gnutls_dh_params_generate2 to generate their dh params. The key lengths that openssl s_client reports are not always the correct length. It seems that gnutls is not following the crypto-community standard of forcing the high

[Bug 1459692] [NEW] [MIR] anope

2015-05-28 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: After a careful review of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuMainInclusionRequirements, I believe that anope should be included in main. Our evaluation of IRC daemons led us to anope as the only set of IRC services that is actively maintained and sane. Package: anope

[Bug 1459689] [NEW] [MIR] inspircd

2015-05-28 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: After careful review of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuMainInclusionRequirements, I believe that inspircd should be included in main. Our evaluation of IRC daemons led us to inspircd as the only one that met our needs (open source, ldap integration, without a history of

[Bug 1456783] [NEW] Please add apparmor profile

2015-05-19 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: The following apparmor profile appears to be working for us. Please add it to the package. ** Affects: inspircd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: apparmor profile

[Bug 1454775] Re: incorrect architecture label on i386 images

2015-05-18 Thread LaMont Jones
Trusty-proposed package tested and verified to correctly label images. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1454775 Title: incorrect architecture label on i386 images To manage

[Bug 1454775] [NEW] incorrect architecture label on i386 images

2015-05-13 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: Trusty's python-simplestreams uploads i386 images as architecture: i386, which nova filters out, since it is not 'i686'. See also http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~smoser/simplestreams/trunk/revision/366 Can we please get this into trusty-updates? thanks, lamont ** Affects:

[Bug 1454775] [NEW] incorrect architecture label on i386 images

2015-05-13 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: Trusty's python-simplestreams uploads i386 images as architecture: i386, which nova filters out, since it is not 'i686'. See also http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~smoser/simplestreams/trunk/revision/366 Can we please get this into trusty-updates? thanks, lamont ** Affects:

[Bug 1449242] [NEW] wishlist: in ldapauth, pass the given nick back to client in connection failure message

2015-04-27 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: Affects (at least) 2.0.5 thru 2.0.18 When a client fails to authenticate to inspircd (using ldapauth, or maybe always), it would be useful if the message going back to inform the client of the failure included the nick that the client actually used. This would help the user

[Bug 1437030] [NEW] please add support for logrotate

2015-03-26 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: inspircd has no concept of logrotation. The attached patch (1) adds a reopen of the logfiles to the SIGHUP handler (which also rehashes the config), and (2) fixes a bug in LogManager::CloseLogs where it forgot to clear one list. Relative to 2.0.17-2. ** Affects: inspircd

[Bug 1437044] [NEW] ldapauth logging enhancements

2015-03-26 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: We needed to have more information logged for ldapauth users. The attached patch adds that logging. ** Affects: inspircd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: additional ldapauth logging detail

[Bug 1428209] [NEW] ldapauth module does not handle user:pass format correctly

2015-03-04 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: There are a couple of issues with m_ldapauth's handling of password=$USER:$PASS (2.0.17-2 and still in 2.0.18. I didn't look at 2.0.5) 1) When it does the second ldapsearch, it asks for '$USER' rather than '$ATTRIBUTE=$USER' as in the first search 2) if the first search

[Bug 1428209] Re: ldapauth module does not handle user:pass format correctly

2015-03-04 Thread LaMont Jones
patch to fix the various issues ** Patch added: 10_fix_ldapauth_userpass.diff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/inspircd/+bug/1428209/+attachment/4334473/+files/10_fix_ldapauth_userpass.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1065974] Re: dmesg full of ICMPv6 RA: ndisc_router_discovery() failed to add default route

2015-02-10 Thread LaMont Jones
I believe that this happens because the config (/proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/accept_ra_defrtr) says to accept a default route, and you have one specified in /etc/network/interfaces, and therefore the advertised default route fails to get added to the routing table. It would be a good thing if the

[Bug 583216] Re: inet_protocols can't be preseeded

2015-01-07 Thread LaMont Jones
Looks good to me. I'll get it added into the debian source next time I upload. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583216 Title: inet_protocols can't be preseeded To manage

[Bug 583216] Re: inet_protocols can't be preseeded

2015-01-07 Thread LaMont Jones
Looks good to me. I'll get it added into the debian source next time I upload. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583216 Title: inet_protocols can't be preseeded To

[Bug 1398858] [NEW] nm does not support --keepalive or --ping/--ping-restart

2014-12-03 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: It would be wonderful to be able to override the default values for --keepalive. However, nm-openvpn ignores such settings on import, and has no UI for setting them. ** Affects: network-manager-openvpn (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: New ** Changed in:

[Bug 1379132] [NEW] openvpn has a poor choice of default cipher, and does not negotiate

2014-10-08 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: all versions The default cipher for openvpn is BF-CBC (blowfish), which was likely once a good choice. Virtually all modern hardware has hardware acceleration/support for AES instructions, and can therefore do AES-128-CBC far faster and more efficiently than it can

[Bug 1379132] [NEW] openvpn has a poor choice of default cipher, and does not negotiate

2014-10-08 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: all versions The default cipher for openvpn is BF-CBC (blowfish), which was likely once a good choice. Virtually all modern hardware has hardware acceleration/support for AES instructions, and can therefore do AES-128-CBC far faster and more efficiently than it can

[Bug 1377963] [NEW] sflphone choses the wrong IP for a SIP connection

2014-10-06 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: By default, sflphone chooses the IP address for a connection poorly. It should be trivial to have it query the routing table to get the interface through which our traffic to the SIP server will go, and use that IP, rather than hardcoding all of them to one interface and IP

[Bug 1356012] Re: maas incorrectly overmanages DNS reverse zones

2014-09-17 Thread LaMont Jones
See also https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2317.txt for a very nice (still current best practice 16 years later) writeup on how to handle zones smaller than /24. If you guys have any other DNS questions, feel free to ask me, or one of the other admins. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1356012] Re: maas incorrectly overmanages DNS reverse zones

2014-09-17 Thread LaMont Jones
See also https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2317.txt for a very nice (still current best practice 16 years later) writeup on how to handle zones smaller than /24. If you guys have any other DNS questions, feel free to ask me, or one of the other admins. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1358586] Re: fails to deploy machines when eth0 does not exist

2014-08-19 Thread LaMont Jones
See also https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1335179 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358586 Title: fails to deploy machines when eth0 does not exist To manage

[Bug 1358586] Re: fails to deploy machines when eth0 does not exist

2014-08-19 Thread LaMont Jones
See also https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1335179 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1358586 Title: fails to deploy machines when eth0 does not exist To manage notifications

[Bug 1358306] [NEW] lxc postinst incorrectly chooses network address to use

2014-08-18 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: The lxc postinst assumes that only /24 networks are used in 10.0.0.0/8. If the host has a route for 10.0.0.2/23 (or 10.0.0.0/22, or any other block that includes 10.0.3.0/24 or whatever other block it is checking) then the postinst chooses a chunk of the existing network

[Bug 1358586] [NEW] fails to deploy machines when eth0 does not exist

2014-08-18 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: Trying to use MAAS to deploy a machine, it would go offline early in the deployment. It turns out that the networking was being overwritten to use br0 with eth0 as the underlying interface. The only problem is, there is no eth0 on the machine: 'em1' is the interface that

[Bug 1358586] Re: fails to deploy machines when eth0 does not exist

2014-08-18 Thread LaMont Jones
FWIW, the machine in question has this: cat /proc/net/dev Inter-| Receive| Transmit face |bytespackets errs drop fifo frame compressed multicast|bytes packets errs drop fifo colls carrier compressed lo: 0 0000

[Bug 1358306] [NEW] lxc postinst incorrectly chooses network address to use

2014-08-18 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: The lxc postinst assumes that only /24 networks are used in 10.0.0.0/8. If the host has a route for 10.0.0.2/23 (or 10.0.0.0/22, or any other block that includes 10.0.3.0/24 or whatever other block it is checking) then the postinst chooses a chunk of the existing network

[Bug 1358586] [NEW] fails to deploy machines when eth0 does not exist

2014-08-18 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: Trying to use MAAS to deploy a machine, it would go offline early in the deployment. It turns out that the networking was being overwritten to use br0 with eth0 as the underlying interface. The only problem is, there is no eth0 on the machine: 'em1' is the interface that

[Bug 1358586] Re: fails to deploy machines when eth0 does not exist

2014-08-18 Thread LaMont Jones
FWIW, the machine in question has this: cat /proc/net/dev Inter-| Receive| Transmit face |bytespackets errs drop fifo frame compressed multicast|bytes packets errs drop fifo colls carrier compressed lo: 0 0000

[Bug 1356392] [NEW] lacks sw raid1 install support

2014-08-13 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: There is evidence in both the trusty and utopic versions of curtin that swraid support is on its way, but it appears to only think raid0 is needed/desirable, at least thus far. Installing machines that lack cciss (and therefore hardware raid) under MAAS, we would still like

[Bug 1356392] Re: lacks sw raid1 install support

2014-08-13 Thread LaMont Jones
Following up on a discussion from today with more detail. For metal in the datacenters, everything that can be RAID, is. The driving reason for this is to avoid a disk failure resulting in machine downtime. Given the number of drives in a modern datacenter, it's not a question of if a drive

[Bug 1356392] [NEW] lacks sw raid1 install support

2014-08-13 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: There is evidence in both the trusty and utopic versions of curtin that swraid support is on its way, but it appears to only think raid0 is needed/desirable, at least thus far. Installing machines that lack cciss (and therefore hardware raid) under MAAS, we would still like

[Bug 1356392] Re: lacks sw raid1 install support

2014-08-13 Thread LaMont Jones
Following up on a discussion from today with more detail. For metal in the datacenters, everything that can be RAID, is. The driving reason for this is to avoid a disk failure resulting in machine downtime. Given the number of drives in a modern datacenter, it's not a question of if a drive

[Bug 1356012] [NEW] maas incorrectly overmanages DNS reverse zones

2014-08-12 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: when I configure maas to manage DNS and DHCP for 10.89.64.0/20, it creates a reverse zone for 89.10.in-addr.arpa. If 10.89.0.0/16 is in use for other things, and only 10.89.64.0/20 was delegated to scalingstack, then no reverse DNS can happen, since the parent zone will win

[Bug 1356012] [NEW] maas incorrectly overmanages DNS reverse zones

2014-08-12 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: when I configure maas to manage DNS and DHCP for 10.89.64.0/20, it creates a reverse zone for 89.10.in-addr.arpa. If 10.89.0.0/16 is in use for other things, and only 10.89.64.0/20 was delegated to scalingstack, then no reverse DNS can happen, since the parent zone will win

[Bug 1305232] Re: Postfix fails to start, failure to copy certificates

2014-07-28 Thread LaMont Jones
I will get this added to the package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1305232 Title: Postfix fails to start, failure to copy certificates To manage notifications

[Bug 1305232] Re: Postfix fails to start, failure to copy certificates

2014-07-28 Thread LaMont Jones
I will get this added to the package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1305232 Title: Postfix fails to start, failure to copy certificates To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1324222] [NEW] network manager fails the interface if the vpn fails to come up

2014-05-28 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: If I tell network manager to always bring up a vpn when I connect to a network, and the vpn fails to come up, then NM happily decides that the (wireless in this case) network is unusable and disconnects from it, only to discover it and try again. Once I disabled the

[Bug 1317716] [NEW] net_gateway behaves poorly when used twice

2014-05-08 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: with a precise server (openvpn 2.2.1-8ubuntu1.2) and trusty client (2.3.2-7ubuntu3): In the config, I had: push route xx.xx.xx.xx 255.255.255.255 net_gateway push route yy.yy.yy.yy 255.255.255.255 net_gateway (and another route for the /21 containing both of the hosts

[Bug 1317716] [NEW] net_gateway behaves poorly when used twice

2014-05-08 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: with a precise server (openvpn 2.2.1-8ubuntu1.2) and trusty client (2.3.2-7ubuntu3): In the config, I had: push route xx.xx.xx.xx 255.255.255.255 net_gateway push route yy.yy.yy.yy 255.255.255.255 net_gateway (and another route for the /21 containing both of the hosts

[Bug 1303835] Re: VPN configuration poorly integrated

2014-04-07 Thread LaMont Jones
This is network-manager-openvpn 0.9.8.2-1ubuntu4 on trusty. ** Package changed: network-manager (Ubuntu) = network-manager-openvpn (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1303835

[Bug 1303838] [NEW] nm-openvpn does not allow multiple remote statements

2014-04-07 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: I need to be able to specifiy multiple host/port combinations for the remote end of an openvpn tunnel, and NM won't let me do that. (If I attempt to import a config that has that, I get a SEGV, though that may be something completely unrelated.) ** Affects:

[Bug 1303838] Re: nm-openvpn does not allow multiple remote statements

2014-04-07 Thread LaMont Jones
That is, host and port belong together, not on two separate screens... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1303838 Title: nm-openvpn does not allow multiple remote statements To manage

[Bug 1303835] [NEW] VPN configuration poorly integrated

2014-04-07 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: NM currently believes that a VPN is a subset of a particular SSID on wireless. That is, that I want different VPNs to come up based on what SSID I have connected to. What this means is that if I have a VPN that I always want to bring up, regardless of where I'm connected,

[Bug 1287436] [NEW] grub-probe fails in the presence of snapshot logical volumes

2014-03-03 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: Found in: 2.02~beta2-6 My upgrade from saucy to trusty ran into problems, with grub-probe failing with unknown filesystem, which propogated up to cause the kernel install to fail, resulting in a machine where I cannot install packages. After some debugging: (missing here

[Bug 1287436] Re: grub-probe fails in the presence of snapshot logical volumes

2014-03-03 Thread LaMont Jones
Here is the output of: grub-probe -d -vv --target=fs_uuid --device /dev/mapper/rover3-saucy--save ** Attachment added: grub-probe debug/verbose trace https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1287436/+attachment/4005978/+files/grub-probe-out -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1265877] [NEW] nova fails to launch i386 images

2014-01-03 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: in nova.conf: compute_scheduler_driver=nova.scheduler.filter_scheduler.FilterScheduler scheduler_default_filters=RetryFilter,AvailabilityZoneFilter,DiskFilter,CoreFilter,RamFilter,ComputeFilter,ComputeCapabilitiesFilter,ImagePropertiesFilter The openstack deployment has

[Bug 1265877] Re: nova fails to launch i386 images

2014-01-03 Thread LaMont Jones
We are seeing this in both: nova-scheduler=1:2013.1.4-0ubuntu1~cloud0 and nova-scheduler=1:2013.2-0ubuntu1~cloud0 lamont -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265877 Title:

[Bug 1265877] [NEW] nova fails to launch i386 images

2014-01-03 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: in nova.conf: compute_scheduler_driver=nova.scheduler.filter_scheduler.FilterScheduler scheduler_default_filters=RetryFilter,AvailabilityZoneFilter,DiskFilter,CoreFilter,RamFilter,ComputeFilter,ComputeCapabilitiesFilter,ImagePropertiesFilter The openstack deployment has

[Bug 1265877] Re: nova fails to launch i386 images

2014-01-03 Thread LaMont Jones
We are seeing this in both: nova-scheduler=1:2013.1.4-0ubuntu1~cloud0 and nova-scheduler=1:2013.2-0ubuntu1~cloud0 lamont -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1265877 Title: nova fails to

[Bug 1263765] [NEW] snmpd does not notice when a disk is added

2013-12-23 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: snmpd does not notice when a disk is added to the system after snmpd is started. It should at a minimum arrange to do so. Observed in snmpd 5.4.3~dfsg-2.4ubuntu1.1 ** Affects: net-snmp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug

[Bug 1263765] [NEW] snmpd does not notice when a disk is added

2013-12-23 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: snmpd does not notice when a disk is added to the system after snmpd is started. It should at a minimum arrange to do so. Observed in snmpd 5.4.3~dfsg-2.4ubuntu1.1 ** Affects: net-snmp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug

[Bug 1260431] [NEW] update-grub hangs under 3.11.0-3-generic

2013-12-12 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: I have a saucy/amd64 instance that was booted using the 20130822 image (checksum c19841cd672d6fcb3d4e78f0f918f8e1) and last updated on 2013-08-29, which I finally updated today. During the upgrade, modprobe btrfs hung in init_module(). If I kill modprobe, the upgrade

[Bug 1260431] Re: update-grub hangs under 3.11.0-3-generic

2013-12-12 Thread LaMont Jones
Attaching the apt history.log (files). ** Attachment added: apt history.log (concatenated through all of time) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1260431/+attachment/3928217/+files/history.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1239127] Re: stuck at timezone selection screen, only if within geoip location ~ America/Montreal

2013-10-15 Thread LaMont Jones
** Also affects: geoip (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1239127 Title: stuck at timezone selection screen, only if within geoip

[Bug 1229257] [NEW] assertion failure warnings output

2013-09-23 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: When I run various nova commands, stderr gets assertion failure warnings spewed on it. Unsure if this is a gobject issue, or a nova client issue, so marking it as both. lamot % nova list /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gobject/constants.py:24: Warning:

[Bug 1229257] [NEW] assertion failure warnings output

2013-09-23 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: When I run various nova commands, stderr gets assertion failure warnings spewed on it. Unsure if this is a gobject issue, or a nova client issue, so marking it as both. lamot % nova list /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/gobject/constants.py:24: Warning:

[Bug 1226141] [NEW] evince reports apparmor denials

2013-09-16 Thread LaMont Jones
Public bug reported: % evince foo.pdf ** (evince:26162): WARNING **: Couldn't register with accessibility bus: An AppArmor policy prevents this sender from sending this message to this recipient, 0 matched rules; type=method_call, sender=(null) (inactive) interface=org.freedesktop.DBus

[Bug 1226141] Re: evince reports apparmor denials

2013-09-16 Thread LaMont Jones
In response to ctl-P: ** (evince:26301): WARNING **: Couldn't connect to D-Bus system bus, GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: An AppArmor policy prevents this sender from sending this message to this recipient, 0 matched rules; type=method_call, sender=(null) (inactive)

[Bug 1222179] Re: /usr/bin/mail has no package

2013-09-08 Thread LaMont Jones
Postfix delivers no /usr/bin/mail, nor any mail user agent. ** Package changed: postfix (Ubuntu) = bsd-mailx (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bsd-mailx in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1222179 Title:

[Bug 1222180] Re: postfix package produces errors in ubuntu-bug

2013-09-08 Thread LaMont Jones
Fixed in 2.10.2-1 ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu Saucy) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1222180 Title: postfix package

[Bug 1222180] Re: postfix package produces errors in ubuntu-bug

2013-09-08 Thread LaMont Jones
Fixed in 2.10.2-1 ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu Saucy) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1222180 Title: postfix package produces errors in

[Bug 1222179] Re: /usr/bin/mail has no package

2013-09-08 Thread LaMont Jones
Postfix delivers no /usr/bin/mail, nor any mail user agent. ** Package changed: postfix (Ubuntu) = bsd-mailx (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1222179 Title: /usr/bin/mail has

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >