Yup, seems reasonable
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610820
Title:
Download size discrepancies
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
I think this will be solved more elegantly with multiarch :-)
This bug was wontfixed at a time where a solution didn't seem anywhere
near, but it would be interesting to revisit this once fakeroot is
rebuilt against a multiarch loader
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
it would be nice to find out if it happens with libapt or apt command-
line tools too
perhaps with:
apt-cache show avahi-autoipd=x.y.z | grep Size
where x.y.z is the candidate version of avahi-autoipd returned by apt-
cache policy avahi-autoipd.
** Also affects: python-apt (Ubuntu)
%,$kvers,g' $tmp.boot.script
sed -i'.bak' s,%KERNELVERSION%,$kvers,g $tmp.boot.script
I am rewriting it (flash-kernel as a concept) now, so that won't be too
long. I am bored of waiting for Canonical, Linaro and Debian developers
to fix this.
Noted.
--
Loïc Minier
--
You received
** Changed in: flash-kernel
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671027
Title:
Add Efika MX Smartbook/Smarttop support
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I removed the task on the upstream project as it doesn't track bugs in
Launchpad (but in Debian) and uploaded the original proposal of not
checking subarch (initial version of the code).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
From a quick look, there seems to be trivial indentation mismatches:
+ mount $UBOOT_PART $TMPMOUNT
+tmp=$(tempfile)
in general flash-kernel uses tabs upstream, and pretty much never spaces.
Writing to $tmp.uboot is unsafe as this filename is predictable; would
be nicer to always
Looks much better; some comments:
* the check_subarch tests are a bit weird:
+-case $subarch in.
+imx51)
+---check_subarch imx51
+;;
+*)
+---check_subarch mx51
Uploaded with some tweaks:
* nicer error message
* support imx5 and DON'T support imx51
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723082
Title:
flash-kernel doesn't handle uboot in mx51evk
--
+ ukfile=/boot/uImage-${kvers}
+ uifile=/boot/uInitrd-${kvers}
while this sounds like a good idea, I think this is too wide-ranging:
nothing is going to cleanup the accumulated uImage/uInitrd files, and
ABI changes are fairly frequent. I personally don't think we should add
fancy
actually, I hadn't read the rest carefully enough:
+ eval sed -i'.bak' -e's,%KERNELVERSION%,$kvers,g'
$tmp.boot.script
+ eval sed -i'.bak' -e's,%ROOTPARTITION%,$rootfs,g'
$tmp.boot.script
it's not clear to me which piece of code will write the boot.script, nor
why
It is reproducible for me as follows:
tip of qemu-linaro as of today (c67ccff50fd53723302c47a233f3daec2807cf0d) built
with:
./configure --target-list=arm-softmmu --enable-debug --static
make -j2
This starts:
arm-softmmu/qemu-system-arm -M vexpress-a9 -kernel
vmlinuz-2.6.37-1003-linaro-vexpress
Public bug reported:
Hi
When starting u-boot-linaro for vexpress in qemu-linaro as of today
(c67ccff50fd53723302c47a233f3daec2807cf0d), qemu just hangs:
arm-softmmu/qemu-system-arm -M vexpress-a9 -kernel
Public bug reported:
Hi,
The u-boot binary download from
http://arm.com/community/software-enablement/linux.php crashes qemu-linaro from
today's tip (c67ccff50fd53723302c47a233f3daec2807cf0d):
arm-softmmu/qemu-system-arm -M vexpress-a9 -kernel
~/vexpress/u-boot_realview.axf -serial stdio
VNC
NB: download is on Linux OS Downloads tab
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/729945
Title:
Crashes when running ARM u-boot binary -- Trying to execute code
outside RAM or ROM at
** Changed in: linaro-image-tools (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed
** Changed in: linaro-image-tools (Ubuntu Maverick)
Status: Fix Released = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
/boot/config-$version).
This check would only be possible if a version is passed to
flash-kernel, or would be skipped entirely.
Would that be helpful?
Cheers,
--
Loïc Minier
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
Just a note: I think this is getting off topic for this bug; we should
only exchange on resolving this particular bug in a relatively simple
way; flash-kernel design discussions should be held elsewhere IMO.
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011, Matt Sealey wrote:
I was under the impression that flash-kernel,
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011, Matt Sealey wrote:
For reference this is my untested hook for the Efika..
In general, I find patches easier to review; will you test this new
version?
--
Loïc Minier
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011, Loïc Minier wrote:
Debian #601789 describes related issue around running flash-kernel at
the right time. I think we want to dpkg-trigger flash-kernel from
update-initramfs and perhaps from linux' postinsts.
Sorry, that's Debian #550584
--
Loïc Minier
--
You
mk-build-deps relies on equivs and is very fragile in my experience.
Which pbuilder-satisfydepends are you using? the aptitude version?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728494
Title:
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726428
Title:
Public bug reported:
Hi
Linaro's LAVA software in lp:lava requires a set of tools called
conmux to work; I'd like these tools to be available in natty as to make
it easier for developers to develop lp:lava. It will also serve as a
base version for (PPA-backed) backports to lucid and maverick.
Debian, hmm. I didn't actually plan to use it from Debian installs.
Would you find it useful in Debian?
I don't want to just dump it there for convenience if it's actually only
used on top of Ubuntu installs (it would work in Debian though).
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Loïc Minier (lool)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726428
Title:
Enabling of all possible targets broke ARM cross
Thanks for the report
I think it's inconvenient that objcopy has this behavior, and it does
probably make sense to change it to not list all ARM architectures.
That said, it seems like the above build calls dh_strip on an armel-
cross architecture all package, which is not too common, and also
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #572945
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=572945
** Also affects: device-tree-compiler (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=572945
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug
** Changed in: flash-kernel (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712523
Title:
Add a timestamp to the uboot Image Name
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Removing milestone as this bug currently doesn't have a clear path
forward
** Changed in: linaro-image-tools
Milestone: 0.5.0 = None
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/680650
Title:
Moving the easier path of providing a boot.txt on the boot partition for
now; please shoot/open another bug if it's an issue
** Changed in: linaro-image-tools
Milestone: None = 0.4.4
** Summary changed:
- please install clear text version of boot.scr to /boot/boot.script on rootfs
+ please
I've sent this patch to the upstream u-boot list
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/716540
Title:
IGEP default bootcmd broken and not as useful as beagle's
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I wonder whether I'm a victim of a similar problem: I have to mmc part
0 after mmc rescan on beagle C3, but I don't need to on beagle xM; I
wonder whether there's a different between MMC controllers that might
explain that both u-boot and linux are confused now.
--
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: chromium-browser
Hi
Some source package links from:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/git
are working and others aren't
The Latest upload link:
a href=/ubuntu/+source/git/1:1.7.4.1-11:1.7.4.1-1/a
works, but the Natty Narwhal link to the latest
apport information
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722171/+attachment/1861950/+files/Dependencies.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722171
apport information
** Attachment added: ChromiumPrefs.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722171/+attachment/1861949/+files/ChromiumPrefs.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722171
apport information
** Attachment added: DetectedPlugins.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722171/+attachment/1861951/+files/DetectedPlugins.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: InstalledPlugins.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722171/+attachment/1861952/+files/InstalledPlugins.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: RelatedPackageVersions.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722171/+attachment/1861953/+files/RelatedPackageVersions.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: RelatedPackagesPolicy.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722171/+attachment/1861954/+files/RelatedPackagesPolicy.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: gconf-keys.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722171/+attachment/1861955/+files/gconf-keys.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722171
Nicolas, I assigned this to you because I thought it was only a matter
to merge the patch which Andy attached to the bug; it seems the patches
are all on their way to upstream, but will likely only make it around
2.6.39 as the patchset(s) are blocked for other reasons.
So if you could merge the
Andy, for the other interesting patches, could you send a pull request
to Nicolas over email? Or ask Steve whether he'd mind sending one
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660811
Title:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
Sure. But I want a patch that has been tested, prepared with proper
description in the patch header, SOB, etc. I prefer not to second guess
this if possible.
Ok; Andy, mind git send-email-ing the tested patch to Nicolas? :-)
--
Loïc Minier
computer-janitor-gtk depends on gir1.2-pango-2.0 instead of -1.0
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Loïc Minier (lool)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Also affects: u-boot-linaro
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/716540
Title:
IGEP default bootcmd broken and not as useful as beagle's
--
Public bug reported:
Hi
To allow boot media created by linaro-image-tools to boot on the
EfikaMX, it would be useful if u-boot would set CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND for
efikamx just like it does for e.g. omap3_beagle (looking for a boot.scr
etc.).
Thanks,
** Affects: u-boot-linaro
Importance:
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: computer-janitor
Hey
I get a warning on startup of computer-janitor-gtk that it can't find
the 24x24 icon
Indeed, I can see that ComputerJanitor.ui references computerjanitor-
24x24.png, but that computerjanitor.png gets installed instead.
Changing
** Also affects: linux-linaro-omap (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: linux-linaro-omap (Ubuntu Maverick)
Status: New = Invalid
** Changed in: linux-linaro-omap (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Also affects: linux-linaro
Importance: Undecided
noticed a couple of things:
* #check_subarch would ideally be enabled and consistent with other
platforms, or removed entirely.
* tmpfile is not removed
* $tmpfile.someextension is an insecure construct (used in other places of the
script)
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Ok; the commit you point at is in the current qemu-linaro package
Fix released in Ubuntu is when we upload a fixed source package to the
Ubuntu development release
The usual way to close Ubuntu bugs fixed with an upload is via the
debian/changelog, when Launchpad processes the .changes file with
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Canonical Foundations Team (canonical-foundations) = Loïc
Minier (lool)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719754
Title:
package mount
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 719754 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719754
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 719754
package mount 2.17.2-3.3ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new
pre-installation script returned error exit status 127
* You can subscribe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 719754 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719754
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 719754
package mount 2.17.2-3.3ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new
pre-installation script returned error exit status 127
* You can subscribe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 719754 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719754
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 719754
package mount 2.17.2-3.3ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new
pre-installation script returned error exit status 127
* You can subscribe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 719754 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719754
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 719754
package mount 2.17.2-3.3ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new
pre-installation script returned error exit status 127
* You can subscribe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 719754 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719754
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 719754
package mount 2.17.2-3.3ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new
pre-installation script returned error exit status 127
* You can subscribe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 719754 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719754
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 719754
package mount 2.17.2-3.3ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new
pre-installation script returned error exit status 127
* You can subscribe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 719754 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719754
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 719754
package mount 2.17.2-3.3ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new
pre-installation script returned error exit status 127
* You can subscribe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 719754 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719754
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 719754
package mount 2.17.2-3.3ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new
pre-installation script returned error exit status 127
* You can subscribe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 719754 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719754
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 719754
package mount 2.17.2-3.3ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new
pre-installation script returned error exit status 127
* You can subscribe
Actually marking invalid instead of fix committed since we don't know
where / when the bug was fixed
** Changed in: linux-linaro-mx51 (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 719754 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719754
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 719754
package mount 2.17.2-3.3ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new
pre-installation script returned error exit status 127
* You can subscribe
Ricardo, could you update the package tasks to mention the kernel source
package used in the problematic images?
On my side, I've tested Overo with linux-linaro-omap last week and it
mostly worked (some issues here and there).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: qemu-linaro (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535533
Title:
gdb fails in arm chroot
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Hmm Ubuntu has 2011.02, but I think you had asked me to flip this bug
back to Triaged; I'm confused now, is this fixed in Ubuntu?
I didn't find http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/77888/ applied in qemu-
linaro 0.13.50-2011.02-0-0ubuntu1 which is based of 2011.02.
--
You received this bug
I don't think qemu supports ptrace, and it might or might not be hard to
implement, Peter would be in a better position to comment
However the usual way to gdb with qemu's linux-user emulation is
explained in http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-
dev/2011-January/002022.html and doesn't
Let's close this for now and reopen if someone reproduces
** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Upstream u-boot and hence u-boot-linaro have CONFIG_SYS_HUSH_PARSER set
and CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT_HUSH_PS2 defined to for mx51evk
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510585
Title:
uboot-imx
** Changed in: uboot-imx (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Invalid
** Changed in: uboot-imx (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Terry Lv (r65388) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Robert, yep; I've seen it's only used in the testsuite indeed; problem
is that we actually want to run the testsuite during build, so that the
build-deps need to be there. There is no concept of optional build-
deps because package builds need to be reproducible.
So this build-dep loop needs
From a quick look, this seems much more modern than what we have now;
something like the beagle script is fine, if it was inspired by beagle!
You don't seem to look for boot.ini/setup.ini; it doesn't matter for
Linaro, but maybe it would be nice for people who upgrade their u-boot
to have their
** Changed in: qemu-linaro (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604872
Title:
qemu-system-arm segfaults emulating versatile machine after
What I meant is that it would be a good time to change the default
bootcmd to look for boot.scr (additionally to setup.ini), and perhaps
even boot.txt as well, if the text script patch goes in.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Yes, that's exactly Guilherme's point: /boot is on rootfs, and we have
separate rootfs and bootfs; bootfs is typically the first partition and
a vfat which holds MLO, u-boot.bin, uImage, uInitrd and boot.scr.
rootfs is extN or btrfs and contains /boot/vmlinuz, /boot/initrd. The
bug asks for
Public bug reported:
Hey
#define CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND \
mmc init 0 ; fatload mmc 0 0x8000 setup.ini ; source \0
should be mmc rescan...!!
also, not terribly useful to locate and use a boot.scr...
Cheers,
** Affects: u-boot-linaro (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
I've had various misbehaviors with our current stack, it's a bit hard to
tell whether it's related to any; it seems it's just a warning though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710594
Why can't ccache be an environment variable like CROSS_COMPILE? If
set, we use it.
I think this is because the usual way to use ccache is to have a symlink
to ccache with the name of your compiler under /usr/lib/ccache, and
prepend that dir to PATH, but there is no such link for the cross-
** Package changed: ccache (Ubuntu) = gcc-defaults-armel-cross (Ubuntu)
** Also affects: gcc-4.5-armel-cross (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: gcc-4.4-armel-cross (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
Hi
Booting latest natty overo hwpack (hwpack_linaro-
overo_20110209-1_armel_supported.tar.gz) on a tobi + overo com board, I
got:
[0.971343] SLIP: version 0.8.4-NET3.019-NEWTTY (dynamic channels, max=256) (
6 bit encapsulation enabled).
[0.981689] CSLIP: code
Public bug reported:
Hi
I can't boot a btrfs based Linaro image with either qemu or on a gumstix
tobi + overo board; I get:
FATAL: Error inserting btrfs (/lib/modules/2.6.37-1002-linaro-
omap/kernel/fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko): Unknown symbol in module, or unknown
parameter (see dmesg)
trying to insmod
Seems to be similar to:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org/msg02728.html
./lib/modules/2.6.37-1002-linaro-omap/kernel/crypto/crc32c.ko is in the
linux-image package but is missing from the initramfs, I guess due to
the lack of depends.
--
You received this bug notification
** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715835
Title:
insmod: error inserting
So lots of things here; Debian http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608538 has some information
crc32c doesn't get included in initramfs becasue there is no dep of
libcrc32c on it; this is because there might be multiple providers.
x86 has crc32c and crc32c-intel. Only crc32c will
Fixed initramfs-tools in natty now; 0.98.8ubuntu1
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715835
Title:
insmod:
I've filed bug #715932 for the linaro-image-tools part of this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/715835
Title:
insmod: error inserting '/lib//modules/2.6.37-1002-linaro-
So the remaining part of this bug is that we could build crc32c and
btrfs into all our kernel configs as builtins as for it to be included
by default, as to boot btrfs with the binary kernel.
** Branch linked: lp:~lool/linaro-seeds/add-btrfs-tools
--
You received this bug notification because
** Changed in: linux-linaro-omap (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = John Rigby (jcrigby)
** Changed in: linux-linaro-omap (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I reproduce this with:
sudo qemu-debootstrap --arch armel natty natty-armel
http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports
sudo chroot natty-armel /bin/bash
echo 'deb http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports natty main'
/etc/apt/sources.list
apt-get update
apt-get install --reinstall console-setup
[...]
** Changed in: qt4-x11 (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: Fix Released = In Progress
** Changed in: qt4-x11 (Ubuntu Natty)
Assignee: Michael Casadevall (mcasadevall) = Jani Monoses (jani)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I reproduce this with:
sudo qemu-debootstrap --arch armel natty natty-armel
http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports
sudo chroot natty-armel /bin/bash
echo 'deb http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports natty main'
/etc/apt/sources.list
apt-get update
apt-get install --reinstall console-setup
[...]
On my amd64 system, linux-headers-2.6.38-2-generic is arch: amd64 and
ships a /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.38-2-generic/scripts/kallsyms file
which is for x86-64.
When you're cross-building the kernel, there are two questions:
a) does kallsyms need to be called during the build; if yes, then you
But shouldn't this bug be kept open to fix qt4-x11 with gcc-4.5? We
can't build with gcc-4.4 forever
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705689
Title:
QT applications crash
Added a flash-kernel task as I think the format of the comment should be
similar after a flash-kernel update.
** Also affects: flash-kernel (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Also affects: youtube-dl (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: youtube-dl (Ubuntu Maverick)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: youtube-dl (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification
(I'm keeping the l-i-t task open in case we want to workaround, but
moving back to New until we understand what needs to be done.)
** Changed in: linaro-image-tools
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: linaro-image-tools
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in:
Jamie will amend the documentation to mention that --swap_size should
definitely be passed for some images; I'm keeping a bug task open for
the hardware pack v2 ram_size implementation.
Ideally, we'd also have a better rootfs format to carry meta information
such as required RAM size, but we
Tom, can you confirm that passing --swap_size somethinglarge to
linaro-media-create fixes this?
Also, which specific error from your dmesg was this about? there are
multiple ones
PS: please include all the information in the bug itself, perhaps as a
dmesg attachment, rather than linking to a
It hadn't realized that hwpacks could be shared between boards; this
doesn't seem like a good idea to me as it means we need multiple version
of the metadata: which fdt to use, which board name we mean, which
u-boot to use etc.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Peter gave the example of beagle vs beagle XM as boards supported with
same u-boot etc. but differing amounts of RAM
I can also think that some boards have variable amounts of RAM (e.g.
DDR) so doesn't sound like a good idea to handle this in hwpack v2
indeed.
--
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
Hi
I've checked the 1.58 build log, and I can see dbgsym ddebs being
generated for various packages, but they aren't uploaded.
I think the .ddebs also need to be repacked (currently only .debs are
repacked) and listed in debian/files for dpkg-genchanges to pick them
up.
701 - 800 of 4614 matches
Mail list logo
