[Bug 1933737] Re: Please merge amarok 3.0.1-1 from Debian experimental

2024-06-06 Thread Maia Everett
Debian version 3.0.1-1 (experimental) doesn't build on Ubuntu, so I'm adding a debdiff. I've confirmed that it builds in pbuilder and works when installed. Also added an epoch (since it was present in earlier Ubuntu releases, so we'll probably have to carry it forever). ** Patch added:

[Bug 1933737] Re: Please add Amarok to the new versions of Ubuntu

2024-06-05 Thread Maia Everett
Debian version 3.0.1-1 (experimental) doesn't build on Ubuntu, so I'm adding a debdiff. I've confirmed that it builds in pbuilder and works when installed. ** Patch added: "amarok_3.0.1-1ubuntu1.debdiff"

[Bug 1933737] Re: Please add Amarok to the new versions of Ubuntu

2024-06-05 Thread Maia Everett
Amarok 3.0.1 has been uploaded to Debian experimental: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/amarok Worth syncing into Oracular, maybe? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933737 Title: Please

[Bug 2063031] Re: [noble] Not compatible with Python 3.12

2024-04-21 Thread Maia Everett
To reproduce under Noble: 1. sudo apt install s3cmd 2. s3cmd --configure, input credentials for any S3 bucket you own (a local Minio installation with Docker would do) 3. s3cmd ls s3://bucket-name With the broken version 2.3.0-1: TypeError: sequence item 1: expected str instance, bytes found

[Bug 2063031] [NEW] [noble] Not compatible with Python 3.12

2024-04-21 Thread Maia Everett
Public bug reported: Under Noble, s3cmd 2.3.0 is completely broken because of an incompatibility with Python 3.12, producing the exception: https://github.com/s3tools/s3cmd/issues/1343 All operations fail with the error message: TypeError: sequence item 1: expected str instance, bytes found

[Bug 1992026] Re: Ubuntu Pro APT integration is a bit much

2024-04-07 Thread Maia Everett
I also don't want ubuntu-pro-client to be a hard dependency of ubuntu- minimal. Move it to recommends if you have to, but give the user an option to delete it without touching the rest of the system. I'm running Ubuntu as an open source OS on a production server and don't want to hear about any

[Bug 2056101] Re: [noble] Quod Libet doesn't start: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'senf'

2024-03-18 Thread Maia Everett
Thanks Christoph! debdiff v3, incorporating this fix: ** Patch added: "quodlibet_4.6.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quodlibet/+bug/2056101/+attachment/5756879/+files/quodlibet_4.6.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 2056101] Re: [noble] Quod Libet doesn't start: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'senf'

2024-03-18 Thread Maia Everett
Corrected version of the debdiff, with Origin: upstream, and XSBC- Original-Maintainer in debian/control. ** Patch added: "debdiff v2" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quodlibet/+bug/2056101/+attachment/5756877/+files/quodlibet_4.6.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug

[Bug 2056101] Re: [noble] Quod Libet doesn't start: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'senf'

2024-03-18 Thread Maia Everett
That's the upstream fix, Alexander, you're right! I didn't realize luk1337 committed it upstream and not just to Void Linux. If you wish, you can change "Origin: vendor" in the patch header to "Origin: upstream" with a link to that commit. The fix should make it into the next upstream release.

[Bug 2056101] Re: [noble] Quod Libet doesn't start: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'senf'

2024-03-04 Thread Maia Everett
Subscribed ubuntu-sponsors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056101 Title: [noble] Quod Libet doesn't start: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'senf' To manage notifications

[Bug 2056101] Re: [noble] Quod Libet doesn't start: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'senf'

2024-03-04 Thread Maia Everett
) -- Maia Everett Tue, 05 Mar 2024 01:52:29 +0200 Please review and sponsor the upload! ** Patch added: "quodlibet_4.6.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quodlibet/+bug/2056101/+attachment/5752613/+files/quodlibet_4.6.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You receive

[Bug 2056101] [NEW] [noble] Quod Libet doesn't start: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'senf'

2024-03-04 Thread Maia Everett
Public bug reported: In Noble, with Python 3.12, Quod Libet refuses to start: $ quodlibet Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/quodlibet", line 11, in from quodlibet.main import main File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/quodlibet/__init__.py", line 21, in from

[Bug 1964791] Re: [SRU] Quod Libet fails to start with python 3.10, the default for Jammy

2022-05-11 Thread Maia Everett
** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964791 Title: [SRU] Quod Libet fails to start with python 3.10, the

[Bug 1971613] Re: quodlibet cannot start

2022-05-08 Thread Maia Everett
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1964791 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964791 Duplicate of bug #1964791. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1964791 [SRU] Quod Libet fails to start with python 3.10, the default for Jammy -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1964791] Re: [SRU] Quod Libet fails to start with python 3.10, the default for Jammy

2022-05-07 Thread Maia Everett
** Summary changed: - [SRU] Please sync quodlibet 4.5.0-1 from Debian unstable into jammy (was: Quod Libet fails to start with python 3.10, the default for Jammy) + [SRU] Quod Libet fails to start with python 3.10, the default for Jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1964791] Re: [SRU] Please sync quodlibet 4.5.0-1 from Debian unstable into jammy (was: Quod Libet fails to start with python 3.10, the default for Jammy)

2022-05-07 Thread Maia Everett
Attaching debdiff with a minimal fix. Verified to fix the bug on my machine and to build correctly in pbuilder against current jammy. In kinetic, 4.5.0-1, containing the fix, has been auto-synced from Debian, so nothing needs to be done there. ** Patch added: "quodlibet_4.4.0-2ubuntu0.1.debdiff"

[Bug 1964791] Re: [SRU] Please sync quodlibet 4.5.0-1 from Debian unstable into jammy (was: Quod Libet fails to start with python 3.10, the default for Jammy)

2022-04-22 Thread Maia Everett
[Impact] With Python 3.10 as default, Quod Libet 4.4.0 is completely broken for Ubuntu 22.04 users. It fails to start with the following error: E: 0.321: errorreport.main.errorhook: collection.py:27:: ImportError: cannot import name 'Iterable' from 'collections'

[Bug 1964791] Re: [SRU] Please sync quodlibet 4.5.0-1 from Debian unstable into jammy (was: Quod Libet fails to start with python 3.10, the default for Jammy)

2022-04-22 Thread Maia Everett
** Summary changed: - Quod Libet fails to start with python 3.10, the default for Jammy + [SRU] Please sync quodlibet 4.5.0-1 from Debian unstable into jammy (was: Quod Libet fails to start with python 3.10, the default for Jammy) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1910675] [NEW] Can't connect to ANY networks after update to kernel 5.8

2021-01-07 Thread Maia Everett
Public bug reported: After the 5.8 kernel update, my Ubuntu 20.04.1 installation stopped seeing any networks, either wireless or USB tethering from my phone. The ifconfig command only showed the loopback interface. I rolled back to 5.4.0-59-generic, and it works fine. The offending package is

[Bug 1830096] Re: Firefox 67 in Ubuntu 18.10 thinks it's an older version

2019-05-22 Thread Maia Everett
>From this thread https://www.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/brjj82/firefox_67_thinks_its_an_old_version_and_wont/?ref=readnext "From looking at the compatibility.ini for the old profile vs the new one it looks like the long version number for the newer Ubuntu is slightly smaller. 18.04 profile:

[Bug 1830096] [NEW] Firefox 67 in Ubuntu 18.10 thinks it's an older version

2019-05-22 Thread Maia Everett
Public bug reported: Today I installed the Firefox 67 update on Ubuntu 18.04, then updated to Ubuntu 18.10. After this, launching Firefox gave me a "Using an older version of Firefox" message with only two options: create a new profile or quit. Apparently the Firefox 67 build for 18.10 thinks

[Bug 1636655] Re: [SRU] Ark no longer opens rar files in 16.10

2016-11-15 Thread Maia Everett
Works for me and fixes the problem with rar archives on 16.10, even without unrar installed. I would like it SRU'd as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1636655 Title: [SRU] Ark no

[Bug 1426671] [NEW] [vivid] libkdeinit4_calligrawords.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory (2.8.90-0ubuntu10)

2015-02-28 Thread Maia Everett
Public bug reported: On vivid, calligrawords refuses to start: $ calligrawords calligrawords: error while loading shared libraries: libkdeinit4_calligrawords.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory ** Affects: calligra (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status:

[Bug 1426671] Re: [vivid] libkdeinit4_calligrawords.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory (2.8.90-0ubuntu10)

2015-02-28 Thread Maia Everett
Seems to be fixed by installing 2.9.0-0ubuntu2 from vivid-proposed. ** Summary changed: - [vivid] libkdeinit4_calligrawords.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory + [vivid] libkdeinit4_calligrawords.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

[Bug 1212839] Re: transmission-qt: No icon in the notification area

2015-02-26 Thread Maia Everett
I can confirm this on Kubuntu Vivid with Plasma 5. ** Changed in: transmission (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1212839 Title: transmission-qt:

[Bug 1078446] Re: qtcurve doesn't respect font size in gtk apps

2013-11-05 Thread Maia Everett
Reopening, it occurs for me too. And it *is* a qtcurve bug. It ignores the font set in .gtkrc-2.0 and KDE GTK settings. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to gtk2-engines-qtcurve in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078446

[Bug 1078446] Re: qtcurve doesn't respect font size in gtk apps

2013-11-05 Thread Maia Everett
It also ignores the font set in KDE font settings (not for GTK). The only way I could make it use the KDE system font is by commenting out lines in kdeglobals, as outlined in the first post. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to