[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal

2024-06-08 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
My test PPA passed the CI/CD - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/charm-rabbitmq-server/+/915836 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for

[Bug 2068750] Re: [SRU] webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN

2024-06-07 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
it2gtk (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068750 Title: [SRU] webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN

[Bug 2068750] Re: webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN

2024-06-07 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Also affects: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068750 Title: webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN To

[Bug 2068750] [NEW] webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN

2024-06-07 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported: [ Impact ] webkit2gtk does not ask for the PIN on a PIN protected smartcard. There is an upstream fix at https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/pull/26074 [ Test Plan ] The test plan is manual due to the nature of the bug needing hardware that is difficult to simulate. An E2E

[Bug 2065848] Re: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount.

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks for the update Jacob. I will leave this bug alone and wait to hear back. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065848 Title: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation

[Bug 2068641] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 apache2: misleading comment in default /etc/apache2/apache2.conf

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hello Oliver, Thank you for making this bug report! This documentation is pulled directly from Debian which you can find at [0]. I think it'd be best to have a discussion about this with Debian. Would you be okay making this bug report with Debian as well? [0] - https://salsa.debian.org/apache-

[Bug 2068547] Re: package rabbitmq-server 3.12.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: o subprocesso instalado, do pacote rabbitmq-server, o script post-installation retornou erro do status de saída 1

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hello, thank you for making this bug report! Can you please give the status of `systemctl status rabbitmq- server.service`? ** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
No, Version 0.9.4 is not planned to be backported to Jammy. Big updates like these do not happen often to stable releases. To get this fixed, the specific bug will be narrowed down and just the fix itself will need to be backported. I'd be glad to do some investigation on what other commits may

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I agree. I think we may have a case to do libspf2 inclusion, I'll be happy to start investigating that package and situation a bit deeper next week. For now, the default SPF code in mantic/noble is broken out of the box and I'm not sure which solution (calling bash, removing the quote macro) I

[Bug 2067608] Re: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Actually I think what may be happening here is that clamav- freshclam.service updates the database routinely, so when logwatch attempts to update it, there is nothing to update, so the failure message is actually expected. heynnema, how does your /var/log/clamav/freshclam.log look like now? **

[Bug 2067608] Re: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
reproduction: $ lxc launch ubuntu:noble n $ lxc shell n # apt update -y && apt install -y logwatch clamav # logwatch --service clam-update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067608

[Bug 2067608] Re: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
[0] in my previous comment and still see the failure. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067608 Title: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report To manage notifications

[Bug 2067608] Re: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thank you for making this bug report! I wonder if this can be fixed by the solution in this blog[0], but the blog is pretty old so I'd be surprised such an old solution fixes it. [0] - https://adriano.ws/fixing-updates-detected-log-freshclam-daemon- error/ -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 2068645] Re: Oracular migration issues

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+git/multipath-tools/+merge/467051 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068645 Title:

[Bug 2064380] Re: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Since multipath-tools was merged and is now in -proposed, I am closing this bug and creating a new one to track the migration failures. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2068645 ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed --

[Bug 2068645] [NEW] Oracular migration issues

2024-06-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported: This bug tracks multipath-tools migration failures. ** Affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) Status: In Progress ** Tags: update-excuse ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned

[Bug 2064380] Re: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-06-05 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Setting to in-Progress to track the migration. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064380 Title: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about

[Bug 2064380] Re: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-06-05 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
0.9.7-7 is now in -proposed thanks to Steve Langasek. I see the merge doesn't have a few of the changes I needed when I was in the process of the noble merge[0][1]. Had a quick chat with Steve Langasek on IRC and mentioned I'll keep an eye on the migration and handle any fixes/changes that are

[Bug 2062058] Re: Add a UFW firewall config to support QUIC

2024-06-05 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hello, nginx versions 1.26.0-1ubuntu2 is now available for oracular. This contains the code from [0] and therefore should be available. I am closing this bug now. [0] - https://salsa.debian.org/nginx-team/nginx/-/merge_requests/73 ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix

[Bug 2066999] Re: enable hibernation on ARM

2024-06-04 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
This is the shell script I made to test for amd64 regressions, and the results. mitchdz-hibernate-test-6mantic results: Version: 1.0.0-0ubuntu16.23.10.1~mantic1 22:50:50 up 0 min, 0 user, load average: 1.18, 0.40, 0.14 mitchdz-hibernate-test-6focal results: Version:

[Bug 2067942] Re: autopkgtest failure in oracular

2024-06-04 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: fcgiwrap (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Changed in: fcgiwrap (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: fcgiwrap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 2067942] Re: autopkgtest failure in oracular

2024-06-04 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/fcgiwrap/+git/fcgiwrap/+merge/466889 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067942 Title: autopkgtest

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I'll ask internally again, but the original reasoning why we deviated from debian is explained at https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952738 It is definitely open to discussion, and these woes with the parser can help justify it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2067942] Re: autopkgtest failure in oracular

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Running the autopkgtest commands manually in an LXC container: ``` AUTOPKGTEST_TMP="/tmp/autopkgtest.mitch/autopkgtest_tmp" rm -rf "$AUTOPKGTEST_TMP" mkdir -p "$AUTOPKGTEST_TMP" cd "$AUTOPKGTEST_TMP" export GIT_AUTHOR_NAME=root export GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL=root@localhost export

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I ran `sudo exim4 -bd -d+all` on my server and sent myself an email with the current config in noble to see what the errors look like, and I get a ton of information, it looks like the parsing worked correctly at least (argv[6]). 23:35:50.263 410533 direct command: 23:35:50.263 410533 argv[0] =

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
One extra thing I tried, is to use the condition check logic Jammy is using by default (which I tested a jammy system does have working SPF), except I added preexpand like [0] mentions to use the "old" parsing method. This didn't work, but just putting my attempt here for future reference:

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks for clarifying, I misread what you meant, now I understand. I was looking through https://github.com/Exim/exim/blob/master/doc/doc- txt/ChangeLog to see if there were any other changes between version 4.95 and 4.96 and I don't see much else other than JH/24. Currently I think that [0] and

[Bug 2067942] Re: autopkgtest failure in oracular

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Description changed: fcgiwrap has been failing autopkgtest in proposed - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/fcgiwrap/oracular/amd64 Most likely related to the git upgrade. Can be reproduced in an LXC container easily: $ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:oracular o $ lxc shell o

[Bug 2067942] [NEW] autopkgtest failure in oracular

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported: fcgiwrap has been failing autopkgtest in proposed - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/fcgiwrap/oracular/amd64 Most likely related to the git upgrade. Can be reproduced in an LXC container easily: $ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:oracular o $ lxc shell o # wget

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Also affects: exim4 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: exim4 (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu Man

[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286 Title: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks for doing some testing around the quotes, was that with using /usr/bin/bash? Also the lead I had was the changelog entry from upstream: JH/24 The ${run} expansion item now expands its command string elements after splitting. Previously it was before; the new ordering makes handling

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I have a few leads I want to investigate, will report back once I do some testing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I was also thinking about similar things. FYI - I did find out why ${quote:} is being used - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697057 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #697057 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697057 -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath

2024-06-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Interesting, is there no improvements at all? Did you ensure the correct version is installed? I can take a dive into the git history to see if I can find other potential fixes, but I remember looking a little while back and not finding anything that looked like a smoking gun, especially since

[Bug 2066999] Re: Add ARM support

2024-05-31 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I've tested the agent on amd64 instances to ensure no regression when updating. Further results for ARM enablement coming soon. ** Description changed: - [ Impact ] + [ Impact ] This is a hardware enablement change to support hibernation on ARM. + + Related to

[Bug 2066999] Re: Add ARM support

2024-05-31 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Description changed: - ARM support needed a one line change, found upstream at - https://github.com/aws/amazon-ec2-hibinit- - agent/commit/ab70d14fce4d9f05d54b363a0d849c5169e01ffa + [ Impact ] + This is a hardware enablement change to support hibernation on ARM. + + [ Test Plan ] + The test

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-30 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I'll do a bit of git archaeology tomorrow to try and find out why the quote macros were added. Otherwise, my vote is to go with the bash invocation in the sub-process so that way we can keep the quote macros. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-30 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
With this said, I have reservations about removing a quote macro without research. It does more than just quote wrap a variable, it also escapes quotes and other special characters from the variable To be honest, I'm no expert in this source code, but if the variables $sender_host_address or

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-30 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Nice catch, I like that updated version better. This also leads more credence to an issue with parsing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with

[Bug 2067490] Re: byobu prompt

2024-05-30 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I'm also curious about the screen corruption and I'd like to reproduce it in-case it is a real bug others are experiencing. Djerk, how are you connecting to your system you are running byobu on? Is this a local system or are you connecting to a remote system and then invoking byobu? -- You

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-30 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I think I have found a fix for this issue. My hunch is there is something buggy about the run{} command when invoking programs directly. I wrapped the contents of run with an explicit shell invocation, e.g. condition = ${run{/usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl \

[Bug 2067490] Re: byobu prompt

2024-05-30 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hi Djerk, The default byobu prompt was updated since Ubuntu Noble to show the time elapsed from the previous command. You can see this code in /usr/share/byobu/profiles/bashrc You can see this profile is being applied at the end of your ~/.bashrc file. At the moment I don't think there's a way

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-29 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I have reproduced this issue on a live noble server running exim4. Digging deeper now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't

[Bug 2066914] Re: tmux 3.4 stalls during active pane zoom

2024-05-28 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thank you for making this bug report Dom! I've been unable to reproduce this error that you're showing. I tried on my noble laptop, a noble LXC container, and on an AWS EC2 instance. How are you creating the panes? Maybe there's a weird bug if you zoom in a certain pane configuration, I've just

[Bug 2065848] Re: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount.

2024-05-28 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks for the update Jacob, we will wait to hear back from you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065848 Title: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-28 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Apologies for the delay, I'm picking this back up today. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work To manage notifications

[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath

2024-05-23 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+git/multipath-tools/+merge/466356 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286 Title:

[Bug 2066999] Re: Add ARM support

2024-05-23 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+git/ec2-hibinit-agent/+merge/466349 ** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+git/ec2-hibinit-agent/+merge/466350 ** Merge proposal

[Bug 2066999] [NEW] Add ARM support

2024-05-23 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported: ARM support needed a one line change, found upstream at https://github.com/aws/amazon-ec2-hibinit- agent/commit/ab70d14fce4d9f05d54b363a0d849c5169e01ffa ** Affects: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) Status

[Bug 2065848] Re: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount.

2024-05-22 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks Jacob! Just an FYI If you try to use my PPA right now you may not get the package since the runner is in the process of packaging it. Should be published within an hour or so. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2065848] Re: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount.

2024-05-22 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: resource-agents (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065848 Title: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded

[Bug 2065848] Re: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount.

2024-05-22 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hello Jacob, Thank you for making this bug report and making Ubuntu better! If I prepare a test package in a PPA would you be willing to help test the package? I just kicked off a build with the upstream diff applied here[0]. [0] -

[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath

2024-05-21 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Are you able to see any improvements in CPU usage with the fix? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286 Title: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using

[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath

2024-05-21 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
The version in my PPA I shared is still 0.8.8 with the upstream fix applied and nothing else. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286 Title: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage

[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath

2024-05-21 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thank you for the quick reply! I'll set Focal to Invalid due to the patch not applying cleanly and supposedly not being affected by this issue. Let me know if you think that is wrong. I applied the patch to Jammy in my PPA for testing and it applied with fuzz. I didn't see any major concerns

[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath

2024-05-21 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Also clarifying question - it is mentioned that focal (Ubuntu 20.04) needs this fix, however focal has version 0.8.3-1ubuntu2.3 in our archives (0.8.3-1ubuntu2.4 is in proposed currently). This bug supposedly effects version 0.8.8 through 0.9.3, so therefore nothing is needed on Focal. Have you

[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath

2024-05-21 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hi Ninoy, Thank you for making this bug report and making Ubuntu better! I would say getting multipath-tools version 0.9.4 back into Jammy/Focal is very unlikely due to the amount of changes and the risk of breaking other things in those stable releases. However, if the commit you mentioned[0]

[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath

2024-05-21 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Alternatively I can attempt to apply the upstream patch to our stable releases if you would be willing to help test out the updated package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286

[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal

2024-05-21 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks Paride! Just a heads up - let's please block both jammy/focal in the -proposed pocket until our openstack team can run the CI/CD with these versions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2065757] Re: Merge networkx from Debian Unstable for Oracular

2024-05-15 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
python3-libpysal and python3-pydot are already in the process of syncing for oracular, and the new python3-momepy package is in proposed as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065757

[Bug 2065757] Re: Merge networkx from Debian Unstable for Oracular

2024-05-15 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Tried a quick merge and see: Missing build dependencies: python3-libpysal (>= 4.10), python3-momepy, python3-pydot (>= 2.0) So a few package updates are needed, and an addition of the new package python3-momepy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 2065757] [NEW] Merge networkx from Debian Unstable for Oracular

2024-05-15 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported: Ubuntu: 2.8.8-1ubuntu1 Debian: 3.2.1-4 ** Affects: networkx (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065757

[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal

2024-05-14 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Also affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: rabbitmq-server

[Bug 2049775] Re: add BTRFS support

2024-05-14 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
This is being dropped for SRU reasons due to the feature not being useful for us at the moment, because the root filesystem can not be btrfs. If that changes in the future, then this will be revisited. Closing. ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You

[Bug 2065682] Re: Merge new upstream version v1.0.8 for Oracular

2024-05-14 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2065683 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065683 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2065683 Merge new upstream version v1.0.8 for Oracular -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 2065683] [NEW] Merge new upstream version v1.0.8 for Oracular

2024-05-14 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported: New upstream version v1.0.8 - https://github.com/aws/amazon-ec2-hibinit- agent/releases/tag/v1.0.8 Please merge for Oracular. ** Affects: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) Status: Triaged ** Changed

[Bug 2065682] [NEW] Merge new upstream version v1.0.8 for Oracular

2024-05-14 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported: New upstream version v1.0.8 - https://github.com/aws/amazon-ec2-hibinit- agent/releases/tag/v1.0.8 Please merge for Oracular. ** Affects: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 2062058] Re: Add a UFW firewall config to support QUIC

2024-05-14 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
ged in: nginx (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 2064432] Re: Merge nginx 1.26.0 from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-14 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064432 Title: Merge nginx 1.26.0 from Debian unstable for oracular To manage

[Bug 2064432] Re: Merge nginx 1.26.0 from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-14 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
1.26.0-1 is now available in Debian unstable. ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064432 Ti

[Bug 2064392] Re: Merge checksecurity from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-14 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Set to invalid due to no merge needed (we are up to date with Debian). ** Changed in: checksecurity (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: checksecurity (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) -- You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal

2024-05-13 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+git/rabbitmq-server/+merge/465972 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE

[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal

2024-05-13 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
ured. ++ Federation Plugin: + * Use vhost to delete federated exchange. + * Added new dep8 tests: + - d/t/smoke-test + - d/t/hello-world + - d/t/publish-subscribe + - d/t/rpc + - d/t/work-queue ** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dz

[Bug 2064457] Re: Merge rsync from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-13 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Please sync this. PPA - https://launchpad.net/~mitchdz/+archive/ubuntu/lp2064457-rsync- oracular-merge (The build runs the autopkgtest) tested for the noble bug in an lxc container, which is the only ubuntu delta. Saw the issue is fixed. root@o:~# dpkg -s rsync | grep Version: Version:

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-09 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hi, just want to add a quick comment that I’m on vacation until the end of the week so don’t expect a reply from me until then. Also will be attending the Canonical sprint next week so might not be able to update this next week either. Feel free to take a stab at this if you are triaging this bug

[Bug 2064688] Re: Merge nbd from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-07 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I originally made this to get the fix in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nbd/+bug/2060745 Oracular. Instead, that commit is being cherrypicked into Oracular. Keeping this open in-case nbd getes a new unstable release during Oracular. ** Description changed: Upstream: 3.26.1

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
That could be a possibility. On a side note, I tried to setup a testbed to reproduce this (and start working on a dep8 test) and can't seem to get the setup working correctly. I followed the steps in bug #1998678, see the mail in `/var/mail/ubuntu` but don't see any Received-SPF headers at all,

[Bug 1986739] Re: etckeeper cron spam => please pass --quiet to `bzr commit`

2024-05-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I bumped the debian bug and made a MR for their consideration. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1986739 Title: etckeeper cron spam => please pass --quiet to `bzr commit` To manage

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-05 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I was looking into bug #1998678 as a potential reason, do you see any concerning logs in your /var/log/exim4/mainlog (or wherever your logs are)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

[Bug 2046489] Re: exim4-daemon-heavy: please compile with DMARC support

2024-05-04 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: opendmarc (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046489 Title: exim4-daemon-heavy: please compile with DMARC support To manage

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Dominic, did you upgrade to mantic and start seeing this failure, or did you make a new mantic install and set things up from scratch? I wonder if some logic elsewhere was changed in Debian that we missed, or has this always been broken? This scenario would also be a nice thing to have a dep8

[Bug 2064486] Re: package tftpd-hpa 5.2+20150808-1.2build2 failed to install/upgrade: installed tftpd-hpa package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-05-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thank you for the response Nigel! > Looks like a false alarm Would you like to close this bug then? I'm also curious how often this issue occurs, maybe the maintainer script should be improved to check for port availability before attempting to start the unit. -- You received this bug

[Bug 2064688] Re: Merge nbd from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-02 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Whoops, the fix is in debian experimental, we might need to wait for a new unstable release to happen. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064688 Title: Merge nbd from Debian unstable

[Bug 2060745] Re: nbd-client fails to connect Error: Socket failed: Connection refused

2024-05-02 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I didn't see a bug to track the Oracular merge, so I made it here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nbd/+bug/2064688 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060745 Title: nbd-client

[Bug 2060745] Re: nbd-client fails to connect Error: Socket failed: Connection refused

2024-05-02 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks Andreas! Regarding comment #3 a) debian version has this fix, and quite a few updates to the debian/* directory, so I think we might as well do an early oracular merge to get that fix in. B) I'm curious why the excuses page didn't pick up those autopkgtests during the sync? -- You

[Bug 2064688] [NEW] Merge nbd from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-02 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported: Upstream: 3.26.1 Debian: 1:3.26.1-2~exp2 Ubuntu: 1:3.26.1-1build1 This merge is has the fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nbd/+bug/2060745 that will let noble out of proposed. ** Affects: nbd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New --

[Bug 2064451] Re: Merge rabbitmq-server from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-02 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Right now there is nothing to do since we up to date with Debian. If we want to update it, we will need to either wait to see if Debian updates during OO development, or pull from upstream which does publish deb files. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal

2024-05-01 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Description changed: This bug tracks an update for the rabbitmq-server package in Ubuntu. This bug tracks an update to the following versions: - * Focal (20.04): rabbitmq-server 3.8.12 - * Jammy (22.04): rabbitmq-server 3.9.27 +  * Focal (20.04): rabbitmq-server 3.8.3 +  * Jammy

[Bug 2064457] Re: Merge rsync from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-01 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu) Assignee: Sergio Durigan Junior (sergiodj) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064457 Title: Merge rsync from Deb

[Bug 2064380] Re: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-01 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064380 Title: Merge multipath-tools from Deb

[Bug 2024019] Re: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal

2024-04-30 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Description changed: - Hi, - we recorded more than 30% performance regression on Ubuntu Focal for AWS Graviton instances since Nginx package is not compiled with "-moutline-atomics" cflag for arm64 architecture (337548 rps with default package and 484453 rps using the proposed flag). + [

[Bug 2024019] Re: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal

2024-04-30 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+git/nginx/+merge/465301 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024019 Title: Add GCC atomic support

[Bug 2064139] Re: not building for arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

2024-04-29 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks Lucas, that makes sense. I'll set this to invalid then :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064139 Title: not building for arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x To manage

[Bug 2064139] Re: not building for arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

2024-04-29 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
It may be nice to remove the !amd64 builds since the build failures look like an issue, but maybe that's just me. ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2064139] [NEW] not building for arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

2024-04-29 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported: All architectures except amd64 are not building due to: debian/rules binary-arch dh binary-arch --buildsystem=golang --with=golang --builddirectory=_build dpkg-genbuildinfo --build=any -O../runc_1.1.12+ds1-2ubuntu1_arm64.buildinfo dpkg-genbuildinfo: error: binary build

[Bug 1935709] Re: grpc++-dev doesn't install gRPCConfig.cmake

2024-04-29 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I haven't updated this for a bit, but I tried the aforementioned change in comment #7 in this PPA and it did not build - https://launchpad.net/~mitchdz/+archive/ubuntu/lp1935709-grpc-cmake-dev- files/+packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 2061911] Re: check if new addresses for b.root-servers.net is needed

2024-04-26 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2045297 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045297 Thanks Sergio, looks like that does cover it :) ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2045297 file root.hints needs update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2063400] Re: package unixodbc-common 2.3.9-5 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/etc/odbc.ini', which is also in package odbcinst 2.3.11-1

2024-04-26 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hello Yosua, Thank you for making this bug report! Where did you get the odbcinst 2.3.11-1 package? I do not see that in our archives for Jammy. ** Changed in: unixodbc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 2060745] Re: nbd-client fails to connect Error: Socket failed: Connection refused

2024-04-25 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: nbd (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: nbd (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060745

  1   2   >